Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-27
14:32:07 dtantsur ++
14:33:02 frickler sshnaidm: for the job failure, I think ansible-collections-openstack-functional-devstack is missing openstack/ansible-collections-openstack as required-project, making it fail when not running against itself
14:33:47 sshnaidm frickler, I don't think you need it in required project, since it's defined in this project
14:33:56 sshnaidm the job actually pass on collections repo
14:34:21 sshnaidm seems like it's something weird in devstack post playbook, let's see the last run..
14:34:23 frickler sshnaidm: yes, when running against the project itself, it is there, when running against other project, like openstacksdk, it is missing
14:34:44 frickler FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack'
14:36:32 dtantsur sshnaidm: the project where a job is defined in is not necessary added to required-projects
14:36:48 dtantsur (e.g. for ironic we explicitly add ironic to all its jobs to make them reusable)
14:38:49 sshnaidm hmm.. was sure it's smart enough, will check again
14:41:15 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add colleciton repo to required projects https://review.opendev.org/704332
14:42:04 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fail a job for ansible modules with message https://review.opendev.org/703342
14:42:11 sshnaidm let's try ^
16:15:38 sshnaidm ok, the job pass, you're welcome to vote: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703342/
20:49:31 openstackgerrit Keith Berger proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/rocky: Fix openstack server list --deleted --marker option https://review.opendev.org/704422
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-28
01:22:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add colleciton repo to required projects https://review.opendev.org/704332
01:22:41 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: fix os_user_role for groups in multidomain context https://review.opendev.org/703930
01:22:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix argument spec for os_subnet and os_zone https://review.opendev.org/703554
05:53:39 openstackgerrit Kendall Nelson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove mention of Meetings from docs https://review.opendev.org/704494
05:54:24 openstackgerrit Kendall Nelson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove mention of meetings from docs https://review.opendev.org/704494
06:03:15 mordred diablo_rojo: ++
06:55:33 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Stop testing python2 https://review.opendev.org/686590
07:19:45 openstackgerrit Bram Verschueren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add os_routers_info module https://review.opendev.org/703927
07:28:42 bverschueren @sshnaidm: regarding https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703927/; shall I clear tests/unit/requirements.txt from unnecessary packages ?
07:30:36 bverschueren those were copied during the migration from the ansible repo but I guess they're not used for openstack testing
07:34:04 sshnaidm bverschueren, of course, if you see something unnecessary you can clean it, but in different patch please so we can manage this easily
07:35:40 sshnaidm bverschueren, would be great if you make some functional test here for new role: https://github.com/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/blob/master/ci/roles/router/tasks/main.yml
07:36:57 bverschueren yes, I will have a look at it
07:37:29 bverschueren need to figure out how to run locally as I hadn't worked with collections before
12:30:33 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fail a job for ansible modules with message https://review.opendev.org/703342
12:43:10 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/stein: Revert "Add fake support for global_request_id" https://review.opendev.org/704305
12:48:37 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: porting Openstack guidelines spec from Ansible https://review.opendev.org/704558
13:54:05 openstackgerrit Bram Verschueren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add os_routers_info module https://review.opendev.org/703927
14:25:49 openstackgerrit Will Tome proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: fix constructed compose https://review.opendev.org/704582
14:58:01 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: porting Openstack guidelines spec from Ansible https://review.opendev.org/704558
15:23:09 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add rstcheck for ansible-test to lint RST files https://review.opendev.org/704590
15:46:27 openstackgerrit Will Tome proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: fix constructed compose https://review.opendev.org/704582
17:05:15 pabelanger hello
17:05:48 pabelanger it was pointed out to me in #ansible, that with the migration of ansible 'openstack' content to openstack project, a CLA is now required: https://opendev.org/openstack/project-config/src/branch/master/gerrit/acls/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack.config#L23
17:05:55 pabelanger Is this correct
17:06:24 pabelanger mordred: sshnaidm ^
17:20:57 sshnaidm pabelanger, yep, see discussion on #openstack-ansible-sig
17:21:19 sshnaidm pabelanger, oh, you're not there, just asked mnaser about that
17:22:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add rstcheck for ansible-test to lint RST files https://review.opendev.org/704590
17:38:03 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: porting Openstack guidelines spec from Ansible https://review.opendev.org/704558
17:38:08 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: porting Openstack guidelines spec from Ansible https://review.opendev.org/704558
22:52:23 openstackgerrit Keith Berger proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/rocky: Fix functional tests for py3 https://review.opendev.org/703683
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-29
06:27:56 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/stein: Keep connection backrefs with weakref.proxy https://review.opendev.org/696220
08:50:31 openstackgerrit Bram Verschueren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add os_routers_info module https://review.opendev.org/703927
13:45:43 openstackgerrit Bram Verschueren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add os_routers_info module https://review.opendev.org/703927
14:19:30 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Added new filter `host_name` to segment list https://review.opendev.org/704814
15:32:21 KeithMnemonic I would really like to get a few rocky patches merged before EM but need some reviews to get things moving. is there anyone who can help? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701299/ and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/702260/ have to get merged before i can get my rocky cherry pick
20:30:37 openstackgerrit Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132
20:30:37 openstackgerrit Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132
22:54:30 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Make an OpenStackModule base class https://review.opendev.org/698044
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-30
01:43:52 openstackgerrit Shogo Saito proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adding basic implementation for Accelerator(Cyborg) https://review.opendev.org/679914
11:58:54 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Added new filter `host_name` to segment list https://review.opendev.org/704814
12:37:32 openstack Launchpad bug 1860810 in tripleo "os_ansible_tempest fails w/ create_network() got an unexpected keyword argument 'dns_domain'" [High,Triaged]
12:37:32 odyssey4me hey folks - what do we think is the best way to resolve https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/64495 / https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/64841 / https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1860810
12:40:06 odyssey4me sshnaidm: ^ any thoughts?
12:42:33 sshnaidm odyssey4me, seems like need to bump openstacksdk version?
12:43:11 odyssey4me sshnaidm: sure, I'm pushing up a patch to do that, but changing upper-constraints in openstack for a break in ansible/openstacksdk seems a bit odd
12:43:45 openstackgerrit Michał Dulko proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix error handling on add/remove router iface calls https://review.opendev.org/704998
12:44:29 sshnaidm odyssey4me, yeah, need to look how we can protect..
12:44:33 odyssey4me It looks to me like the module code just takes the lead from openstacksdk, unless I'm misreading it or missing something... so it seems odd that suddenly the module behaviour changes with the same version of openstacksdk being used.
12:47:44 sshnaidm odyssey4me, from my brief look seems like openstacksdk version is not compatible with openstack api, and os_network just pass everything as is
12:48:31 odyssey4me sshnaidm: so you're thinking that the sdk is passing something to the API and the API is the one returning the fail?
12:50:42 sshnaidm odyssey4me, hmm.. or not: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/lib/ansible/modules/cloud/openstack/os_network.py#L229-L237
12:50:59 sshnaidm odyssey4me, so that sdk doesn't have this option
12:51:08 odyssey4me sshnaidm: yes, that makes more sense
12:51:51 sshnaidm https://github.com/ansible/ansible/commit/6c74e29618a6872bc0da66e4992cfcd9cebf6acc
12:52:08 sshnaidm it was something new ^
12:52:22 odyssey4me yeah, and with that the sdk minimum version should have been updated
12:52:42 odyssey4me odd, though is that we're getting this error from ansible2.8
12:52:52 odyssey4me lemme see if I can find abackport
12:53:38 odyssey4me no, this has not been ported back
12:54:06 odyssey4me ok - so that means that whatever we're getting that back from is actually running ansible 2.9 - not 2.8
12:54:23 odyssey4me I'll push a patch up to ansible to update the minimum SDK version... thanks for the help!
12:54:35 sshnaidm all version: devel (#56453) v2.9.4 v2.9.3 v2.9.2 v2.9.1 v2.9.0 v2.9.0rc5 v2.9.0rc4 v2.9.0rc3 v2.9.0rc2 v2.9.0rc1 v2.9.0b1 stable-2.9-branchpoint
12:55:23 sshnaidm it's good point to think how can we avoid such failures, maybe all new sdk features should come with version check
12:55:37 sshnaidm when they're used in ansible module
13:29:03 odyssey4me sshnaidm: ok, fixes to upstream modules are frozen, right? so I should submit this fix to the collection and directly to stable-2.9?
13:32:46 sshnaidm odyssey4me, well, it could be a problem.. I think we set ci job for modules to fail, so not sure we can merge even to 2.9..
13:33:17 sshnaidm odyssey4me, maybe we need to enabled it for 2.9
13:33:53 sshnaidm odyssey4me, what could be a fix? The revert?
13:36:50 odyssey4me sshnaidm: let me push up patches to ansible and into tyhe collection, then we figure out how to get the fix merged in all the places :)
13:37:06 sshnaidm odyssey4me, ack, thanks
13:47:27 odyssey4me sshnaidm: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/66944 pushed upstream, let me know if you find any other places where the openstacksdk is set
13:47:57 odyssey4me I'm hoping that all the docs key off that, but I couldn't find a doc ref.
13:50:29 sshnaidm odyssey4me, that will fail module if using lower openstacksdk version, right?
13:51:23 odyssey4me sshnaidm: yep
13:52:14 odyssey4me sshnaidm: I suppose an alternative approach would be, in the os_network module, to warn that a newer openstacksdk is required if the current version does not meet the minimum to support that parameter
13:52:27 sshnaidm odyssey4me, I wonder if we can check sdk version and use or not to use dns_* parameter
13:52:28 odyssey4me that's probably nicer than an outright fail
13:54:15 sshnaidm I mean to fail only if this parameter set explicitly
13:54:44 odyssey4me yeah, that'd be a much nicer approach
13:55:23 odyssey4me ok, let me see if I can work that out
13:58:26 odyssey4me hmm, another option is to only fail it for os_network
14:04:12 odyssey4me sshnaidm: do you know where the openstack documentation fragment comes from - I see references to it, but can't find 'it'
14:05:35 odyssey4me sshnaidm: never mind: https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/dev_guide/developing_modules_documenting.html#documentation-fragments

Earlier   Later