| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-11-28 | |||
| 16:02:45 | gtema | yupp, sure | |
| 16:47:29 | dtantsur | We're close to wrapping up this extremely productive office hour :D anyone has anything to say? | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-11-30 | |||
| 01:56:57 | eandersson | why would server_get not include a flavor_id ? | |
| 13:59:52 | mordred | eandersson: nova no longer stores the flavor id with a server - because a flavor can be deleted while servers booted from it still exists. instead it stores the information about the flavor that was used to create the server | |
| 19:37:25 | eandersson | I see mordred - I wonder how long this has been broken in Senlin | |
| 19:38:06 | eandersson | https://github.com/openstack/senlin/blob/master/senlin/profiles/os/nova/server.py#L1329 | |
| 19:38:34 | eandersson | Is this a good "solution"? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696767/4/senlin/profiles/os/nova/server.py | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-12-01 | |||
| 11:39:39 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add server migrate list CLI https://review.opendev.org/675304 | |
| 15:08:08 | mordred | eandersson: it's *a* solution - but the issue is that there might not be a flavor any more (this is why we're not doing a similar search workaround in sdk) | |
| 15:10:33 | mordred | eandersson: what do you need the flavor id in that server profile for? is it so that you can create new servers with the same flavor? if that's the case, I think the you may want different logic anyway, which is to look at the flavor details and then find a flavor on creation that (best) matches them. or if it's for reporting purposes, just switching to report name - or the flavor details - would | |
| 15:10:35 | mordred | likely also be more resilient | |
| 18:37:19 | eandersson | mordred most likely don't need it, but also don't want to break any unknown use for it | |
| 18:38:08 | eandersson | So a solution might be a work around (that could be backported) and then a smarter implementation for U. | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-12-02 | |||
| 14:42:26 | mordred | eandersson: yeah | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-12-03 | |||
| 14:08:16 | dtantsur | mordred: hey! have you seen http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-December/011295.html ? | |
| 14:08:22 | dtantsur | this is re ironic ansible modules | |
| 15:16:13 | mordred | dtantsur: been out with US Thanksgiving. sshnaidm pinged me on IRC the other day wanting to talk about modules, but I haven't circled back on it yet | |
| 15:16:34 | dtantsur | mordred: don't worry, we're assigning all the work to you. enjoy the holiday! | |
| 15:17:01 | mordred | sweet! | |
| 16:11:16 | dtantsur | elmiko: JFYI there will be ansible SIG people jumping on our API SIG hours. more details http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ansible_sig/2019/ansible_sig.2019-12-03-15.01.log.html | |
| 16:18:47 | mordred | dtantsur, elmiko: simul-sig | |
| 16:27:57 | elmiko | dtantsur: ack, will we be able to share? (ie do they need to use meeting commmands or something?) | |
| 16:32:07 | dtantsur | elmiko: likely | |
| 16:37:50 | elmiko | cool | |
| 16:38:06 | elmiko | i don't have an issue with that, it's been pretty quiet the last few months anways | |
| 19:36:35 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix .. note:: rendering in doc https://review.opendev.org/697168 | |
| 20:11:08 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Update deps for tox venv target https://review.opendev.org/697178 | |
| 20:11:09 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Expose baremetal Node.owner https://review.opendev.org/697179 | |
| 20:12:53 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Expose baremetal Node.owner https://review.opendev.org/697179 | |
| 20:49:23 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix .. note:: rendering in doc https://review.opendev.org/697168 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-12-04 | |||
| 02:17:29 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Update deps for tox venv target https://review.opendev.org/697178 | |
| 07:24:24 | openstackgerrit | Édouard Thuleau proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix router create/show if extraroute not supported https://review.opendev.org/697240 | |
| 09:23:02 | odyssey4me | hey folks, I see the ansible SIG meeting isn't in http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/ - does anyone know how to get it there? | |
| 09:45:26 | frickler | odyssey4me: that should be driven by https://opendev.org/opendev/irc-meetings/src/branch/master/meetings | |
| 09:46:10 | odyssey4me | frickler: tyvm, I'll push up a patch for it in a bit | |
| 13:57:52 | openstackgerrit | Édouard Thuleau proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix router create/show if extraroute not supported https://review.opendev.org/697240 | |
| 16:51:35 | mriedem | is it just me or are the sdk tests pretty flaky in the gate? | |
| 17:03:03 | mordred | mriedem: they used to be pretty solid - but that object one seems to have gotten unhappy recently :( | |
| 19:18:54 | openstackgerrit | Pedro Henrique Pereira Martins proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Add OTP to v3OIDCpassword plugin https://review.opendev.org/697348 | |
| 19:41:14 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Expose baremetal Node.owner https://review.opendev.org/697179 | |
| 19:54:32 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix reno index list indent https://review.opendev.org/697356 | |
| 21:09:38 | rm_work | re: ospurge/sdk, I am thinking January I might have time to actually look at it :D | |
| 21:09:51 | rm_work | just an FYI (and a reminder that I haven't forgotten) | |
| 21:21:36 | openstackgerrit | Colleen Murphy proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for app cred access rules https://review.opendev.org/677857 | |
| 21:22:24 | cmurphy | seeking feedback from the osc team on ^ | |
| 21:24:56 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix reno index list indent https://review.opendev.org/697356 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-12-05 | |||
| 11:24:55 | openstackgerrit | Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444 | |
| 13:59:21 | mordred | rm_work: ossum | |
| 13:59:54 | rm_work | :) | |
| 15:31:23 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/shade master: Add source and contributing link in readme https://review.opendev.org/686871 | |
| 15:55:53 | elmiko | dtantsur: is the ironic thing happening today? | |
| 15:56:37 | dtantsur | elmiko: ironic things happen every day | |
| 15:57:02 | dtantsur | it's not ironic-specific, more of adopting all openstack ansible modules (and re-shaping their API for consistency - hence API SIG involvement) | |
| 15:57:59 | elmiko | ahh, gotcha | |
| 15:58:06 | cloudnull | o/ | |
| 15:58:12 | elmiko | is ironic things happening everyday also ironic? | |
| 15:58:43 | dtantsur | ironic things are ironically also ironic | |
| 15:58:49 | elmiko | nice | |
| 15:59:10 | cloudnull | isn't it ironic, don't you think? | |
| 15:59:25 | dtantsur | ++ | |
| 15:59:47 | ekultails | o/ | |
| 15:59:57 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, can you run the mtg bot here? | |
| 16:00:09 | dtantsur | we haven't done it for a while, I guess I can | |
| 16:00:10 | elmiko | API SIG office hour now open | |
| 16:00:15 | dtantsur | w00t | |
| 16:00:26 | elmiko | i'll let you do your bot thingie | |
| 16:00:31 | dtantsur | #startmeeting API-SIG | |
| 16:00:32 | openstack | Meeting started Thu Dec 5 16:00:31 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dtantsur. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:33 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:35 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'api_sig' | |
| 16:00:41 | dtantsur | heya! | |
| 16:00:49 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, cool, if you can chair me too please :) | |
| 16:01:00 | dtantsur | today we're a bit hijacked by Ansible SIG and the ongoing effort of bringing OpenStack ansible modules under our wing | |
| 16:01:03 | dtantsur | #chair sshnaidm elmiko | |
| 16:01:04 | openstack | Current chairs: dtantsur elmiko sshnaidm | |
| 16:01:28 | sshnaidm | ok, so thanks to SDK folks for the channel time :) | |
| 16:01:32 | dtantsur | a big part of it will be re-designing the modules for consistency, hence our (API SIG) involvement | |
| 16:01:54 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: take it from here :) | |
| 16:02:03 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, right | |
| 16:02:05 | sshnaidm | please use the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-modules | |
| 16:02:18 | sshnaidm | we have update from gundalow from Ansible team | |
| 16:02:18 | dtantsur | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-modules | |
| 16:02:32 | sshnaidm | it's written in the bottom of etherpad | |
| 16:02:43 | sshnaidm | and I think we have a few decisions to make | |
| 16:03:00 | sshnaidm | 1. what is namespace name of openstack collections | |
| 16:03:11 | sshnaidm | gundalow, great | |
| 16:03:17 | elmiko | i just want to state for the record, that it is currently not within the goals of the api-sig to define guidance for these type of apis. /but/ with that said, it is within our goals to facilitate and promote these types of discussions. | |
| 16:03:58 | sshnaidm | elmiko, thanks | |
| 16:04:09 | dtantsur | well, our *actual* goals is to spend some time joking on each other | |
| 16:04:19 | elmiko | haha, too true | |
| 16:04:19 | dtantsur | soooo... :D | |
| 16:05:10 | sshnaidm | so, can we use "openstack." namespace? | |
| 16:05:15 | gundalow | So goal wise, all (will nearly all) modules/plugins will be removed from ansible/ansible before Ansible 2.10 ships. Getting a head of the curve and thinking about this now is good think | |
| 16:05:46 | gtema | is it official target of Ansible to remove modules from core? | |
| 16:05:49 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: my only concern is the fact that the collection won't be strictly "official" | |
| 16:05:50 | sshnaidm | gundalow, so no more community modules in 2.10? | |
| 16:06:23 | ekultails | What about modules that won't be able to find a new home? | |
| 16:06:26 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, yeah, these licenses differences, that's why raised this | |
| 16:06:27 | gundalow | ansible/ansible:stable-2.10 will only contain https://github.com/ansible-community/collection_migration/tree/master/scenarios/minimal | |
| 16:07:04 | gundalow | ekultails: for "homeless modules" that are currently in ansible/ansible they may go in the "catch-all" (aka dumping ground) repo & Collection | |