| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-11-25 | |||
| 23:45:35 | eandersson | sounds good - will take me a few hours anyway to run the tests and verify the results | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-11-26 | |||
| 00:42:17 | openstackgerrit | Yongli He proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Microversion 2.78 - server show topology https://review.opendev.org/680928 | |
| 03:01:19 | tonyb | So I have a newbie question | |
| 03:01:34 | tonyb | I'm writing my first app using the opensatcksdk | |
| 03:01:59 | tonyb | I need to know how to get to the 'fualt' on a server object | |
| 03:02:44 | tonyb | It doesn't seem to be exposed by default, but I can see it the shell via openstack | |
| 03:02:55 | tonyb | Hmm I guess I could just go see what it does | |
| 04:58:29 | openstackgerrit | Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Create an OpenDev docker image https://review.opendev.org/696015 | |
| 05:11:54 | openstackgerrit | Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Create an OpenDev docker image https://review.opendev.org/696015 | |
| 05:40:42 | openstackgerrit | Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Create an OpenDev docker image https://review.opendev.org/696015 | |
| 05:49:16 | openstackgerrit | Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Create an OpenDev docker image https://review.opendev.org/696015 | |
| 15:08:07 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Keep connection backrefs with weakref.proxy https://review.opendev.org/695795 | |
| 17:28:35 | eandersson | mordred, efried: Is it possible to cross link a bug from sdk to senlin? or do they require separate bug reports? | |
| 17:32:31 | efried | eandersson: sdk is storyboard, right? What's senlin? | |
| 17:33:24 | eandersson | launchpad | |
| 17:33:34 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1851646 in senlin "senlin-health-manager process consume many memory" [Undecided,Confirmed] | |
| 17:33:34 | eandersson | https://bugs.launchpad.net/senlin/+bug/1851646 | |
| 17:33:52 | efried | then I think the best you can do is stuff each link in the other's bug repo | |
| 17:34:04 | efried | but diablo_rojo et al might have a better answer | |
| 19:08:41 | umbSublime | Hi, I got a bit more time to work on my "fix_allocations" script again, and just noticed this behaviour change between microversions of the nova-api. http://paste.openstack.org/show/786747/ moving forward will UUID's be used to reference hypervisors ? | |
| 19:11:16 | efried | umbSublime: Yes, UUIDs. Were you expecting sdk to be negotiating the latest microversion? | |
| 19:11:18 | efried | by default | |
| 19:11:31 | efried | there was a bug recently about that... | |
| 19:12:19 | umbSublime | yes I was assuming it would | |
| 19:12:29 | umbSublime | my API support microversion up to 2.60 | |
| 19:12:43 | umbSublime | t.conn.compute.get_endpoint_data().max_microversion -> (2, 60) | |
| 19:13:05 | efried | umbSublime: have a look at this https://review.opendev.org/#/c/686600/2/releasenotes/notes/fix-for-microversion-70cd686b6d6e3fd0.yaml | |
| 19:13:06 | umbSublime | I'm alsov curious why the openstackcli doesn't also use the latest microversion | |
| 19:13:12 | efried | that's a different question. | |
| 19:14:24 | umbSublime | efried: curiously ebough though it looks like the SDK doe figure out mi max_microversion accuretely. Meaning version discovery would be working correctly right ? | |
| 19:14:36 | umbSublime | I can't type today sorry :/ | |
| 19:14:56 | efried | umbSublime: It's *supposed* to be, but read that reno ^ -- it was broken prior to a fix in ksa. | |
| 19:15:15 | efried | so you want to make sure you have that ksa -- and once you do, you'll want the sdk fix from that patch or other things will break. | |
| 19:16:14 | umbSublime | but isn't ksa doing the right thing in my case: http://paste.openstack.org/show/786748/ (maybe I just don't understand the bug) | |
| 19:16:47 | efried | umbSublime: what ksa version do you have? | |
| 19:16:56 | efried | and what sdk version? | |
| 19:17:22 | umbSublime | Much older than the one mentioned in the bug: keystoneauth1==3.4.0 | |
| 19:17:49 | efried | but also, ksa has about fifty different code paths for discovery, depending how it's used. Just because that particular query responds "correctly" doesn't mean whatever sdk is using for hypervisors is doing same. | |
| 19:18:19 | umbSublime | errr nvm, I was outisde my env when running. Im on 3.18.0 | |
| 19:18:36 | umbSublime | efried: gotcha, thanks for explanation ! | |
| 19:18:58 | efried | np | |
| 19:20:22 | umbSublime | so I guess I need to wait for sdk 0.38.0 ? or is there a 0.37.1 version ? I'd prefer not having to manage backporting a patch | |
| 19:21:08 | efried | oh, yeah, that fix ought to have been released, sec... | |
| 19:21:50 | efried | hmph, it's in stable/train, which *should* have meant it got a default release at some point... | |
| 19:22:43 | efried | yeah, looks like it ought to be in 0.37.0, let me confirm quick.. | |
| 19:23:55 | efried | umbSublime: yeah, it should be in 0.37.0. Not sure why gerrit doesn't show that. | |
| 19:24:57 | umbSublime | huh, well I technically am running 0.37.0 | |
| 19:25:35 | efried | and ksa 3.18.0? | |
| 19:25:37 | umbSublime | Here is my dependency graph for openstacksdk: http://paste.openstack.org/show/786749/ | |
| 19:26:13 | efried | okay, then this might be.... a *bug* | |
| 19:36:50 | umbSublime | I guess so, here's a condensed version http://paste.openstack.org/show/786752/ | |
| 22:24:45 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Keep connection backrefs with weakref.proxy https://review.opendev.org/695795 | |
| 22:33:36 | efried | mordred, eandersson: Guess we want a release for that ^ pdq? | |
| 22:37:03 | melwitt | dtroyer: how do you feel about this patch and the one above it going to osc stable/queens? https://review.opendev.org/691459 | |
| 22:40:03 | eandersson | Yea - gotta back port it as well. Ideally to all releases over the last two years. | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-11-27 | |||
| 02:07:29 | eandersson | efried mordred opened back ports as well for queens to train | |
| 05:34:12 | openstackgerrit | Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Create an OpenDev docker image https://review.opendev.org/696015 | |
| 14:41:03 | efried | eandersson: hm, why didn't they show up in channel? | |
| 15:17:30 | frickler | efried: because the config tells gerritbot to only show patches on master (+ the likely now obsolete osc4 feature branch) https://opendev.org/openstack/project-config/src/branch/master/gerritbot/channels.yaml#L1813-L1815 | |
| 15:17:45 | frickler | mordred: dtroyer: ^^ want to amend that? | |
| 15:17:48 | efried | ack | |
| 15:18:09 | efried | I... guess I could have figured that out :P | |
| 15:29:23 | elmiko | dtantsur: i was registered, just stuck in wrong channel lol | |
| 15:29:28 | dtantsur | heh | |
| 15:29:30 | dtantsur | happens sometimes | |
| 15:29:49 | elmiko | anyway, yeah, would you be ok with watching the office hour tomorrow? | |
| 15:34:13 | dtantsur | elmiko: likely yes | |
| 15:34:26 | dtantsur | now that I have a kitchen, my schedule is a bit more predictable :D | |
| 15:41:40 | elmiko | dtantsur: thanks! i will hold off on sending an email about cancelling | |
| 16:42:07 | rm_work | is someone making a release of the SDK soon to include https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/commit/0e8e36163716a53b4c1c2931408ced72951513be ? | |
| 16:42:24 | rm_work | would be nice :D i would like to be able to do a build of horizon dashboards that include this | |
| 16:47:35 | efried | rm_work: we were just talking about that earlier. Yes, we should do that. | |
| 16:48:20 | rm_work | cool | |
| 16:48:22 | efried | rm_work, eandersson, mordred: I'll throw that out real quick. | |
| 16:48:31 | rm_work | thanks | |
| 16:54:48 | efried | rm_work, eandersson, mordred, gtema: https://review.opendev.org/696359 | |
| 17:45:30 | melwitt | dtroyer: how do you feel about this patch and the one above it going to osc stable/queens? https://review.opendev.org/691459 | |
| 22:43:28 | openstackgerrit | Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Create an OpenDev docker image https://review.opendev.org/696015 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-11-28 | |||
| 12:27:14 | openstackgerrit | Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Stop testing python 2 in tox and zuul. https://review.opendev.org/695427 | |
| 16:00:13 | dtantsur | hey folks! The API SIG office hour is starting! | |
| 16:00:33 | gtema | yupi | |
| 16:00:38 | dtantsur | we can even have some elmiko jokes since he's out ;) | |
| 16:01:09 | gtema | we are not brute | |
| 16:01:17 | dtantsur | oh | |
| 16:01:21 | dtantsur | I haven't noticed that :) | |
| 16:01:34 | dtantsur | so, does anyone have any API related questions or discussion topics? | |
| 16:01:50 | gtema | not me | |
| 16:02:21 | dtantsur | gtema: then I have a question for you: is there anything touristic in your city? I suspect it's got quite a history. | |
| 16:02:45 | gtema | yupp, sure | |
| 16:47:29 | dtantsur | We're close to wrapping up this extremely productive office hour :D anyone has anything to say? | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-11-30 | |||
| 01:56:57 | eandersson | why would server_get not include a flavor_id ? | |
| 13:59:52 | mordred | eandersson: nova no longer stores the flavor id with a server - because a flavor can be deleted while servers booted from it still exists. instead it stores the information about the flavor that was used to create the server | |
| 19:37:25 | eandersson | I see mordred - I wonder how long this has been broken in Senlin | |
| 19:38:06 | eandersson | https://github.com/openstack/senlin/blob/master/senlin/profiles/os/nova/server.py#L1329 | |
| 19:38:34 | eandersson | Is this a good "solution"? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696767/4/senlin/profiles/os/nova/server.py | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-12-01 | |||
| 11:39:39 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add server migrate list CLI https://review.opendev.org/675304 | |
| 15:08:08 | mordred | eandersson: it's *a* solution - but the issue is that there might not be a flavor any more (this is why we're not doing a similar search workaround in sdk) | |
| 15:10:33 | mordred | eandersson: what do you need the flavor id in that server profile for? is it so that you can create new servers with the same flavor? if that's the case, I think the you may want different logic anyway, which is to look at the flavor details and then find a flavor on creation that (best) matches them. or if it's for reporting purposes, just switching to report name - or the flavor details - would | |
| 15:10:35 | mordred | likely also be more resilient | |
| 18:37:19 | eandersson | mordred most likely don't need it, but also don't want to break any unknown use for it | |