| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-10-29 | |||
| 21:41:07 | efried | is it possible that certain CI nodes are running py3 by default, so if this job doesn't say anything, it gets whatever it happens to land on?? | |
| 21:41:24 | efried | and all four of the runs previously noted just happened to get lucky? | |
| 21:41:30 | mordred | it really shouldn't be - we use the same images across all clouds | |
| 21:42:03 | efried | mm. So maybe I just don't know what I'm looking at. But I saw lots of "pyXX doesn't match your env" messages fly by. | |
| 21:42:30 | mordred | well - this is complicated - because there's the devstack install - and then there's the tox venv inside of which the functional tests run | |
| 21:42:56 | efried | o | |
| 21:43:25 | efried | okay, I'll stfu until it gets a bit further. | |
| 21:44:05 | mordred | looks like the tox file should have been running functional tests themselves in py3 for a while now | |
| 21:44:14 | mordred | so - this will be fun to understand :) | |
| 21:45:53 | mriedem | without basepython set in tox.ini i'm guessing you get whatever node you land on | |
| 21:46:20 | mriedem | so it's probably good to be explicit and switch those functional jobs over to py3 | |
| 21:46:27 | mriedem | and set USE_PYTHON3=True in the zuul job def | |
| 21:46:32 | mordred | well - basepython is set in tox ... | |
| 21:46:42 | mordred | but yeah - we should set USE_PYTHON3=True anyway | |
| 21:46:47 | mordred | just because | |
| 21:47:04 | mriedem | i mean basepython isn't set in https://github.com/openstack/python-openstackclient/blob/master/tox.ini#L6 | |
| 21:47:12 | mriedem | or https://github.com/openstack/python-openstackclient/blob/master/tox.ini#L70 | |
| 21:47:59 | mordred | it's totally set in my local copy - what's up with that? | |
| 21:48:19 | mordred | ah. BWAHAHAHA | |
| 21:49:04 | mordred | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/686590/ <-- that was on the tip of my local checkout :) | |
| 22:00:22 | mordred | efried: am I in the right channel? my irc client somehow split this channel into two different buffers and I'm confused ... | |
| 22:00:53 | efried | mordred: I see you, but was switched out and haven't read anything in the last 18 mins or so. Catching up... | |
| 22:02:08 | efried | mordred: beaut. and as you can see, it failed the same jobs the same way | |
| 22:03:16 | efried | mordred: so basically, you discovered this problem three weeks ago and didn't say anything. | |
| 22:03:24 | efried | :P | |
| 22:03:31 | mordred | efried: neat! | |
| 22:04:18 | efried | my patch got past the previous point okay. It's failing some tests tho, so being able to iterate on the node will be useful. However, I likely will have to bail before then. Is it legit to hold the node until tomorrow? | |
| 22:22:41 | mordred | yah. point me at your key though | |
| 22:22:58 | mordred | efried: I believe the default node hold timeout is 24h | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-10-30 | |||
| 08:11:00 | yonglihe | I'm sorry to lost 2 +2, but happy to make it better, thanks for review again: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680928/ | |
| 08:12:08 | openstackgerrit | Shogo Saito proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adding basic implementation for Accelerator(Cyborg) https://review.opendev.org/679914 | |
| 13:33:08 | openstackgerrit | Pedro Henrique Pereira Martins proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Fixes OIDC authentication with multiple IdPs https://review.opendev.org/692140 | |
| 21:05:52 | efried | Does the sdk image proxy do anything with multiple glance endpoints? | |
| 22:22:14 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix functional tests for py3 https://review.opendev.org/691980 | |
| 22:22:38 | efried | mordred, dtroyer: ^ Fingers crossed, that should unwedge the build | |
| 23:52:25 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix 'versions show' helps & docs https://review.opendev.org/691989 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-10-31 | |||
| 00:17:53 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix functional tests for py3 https://review.opendev.org/691980 | |
| 00:47:08 | openstackgerrit | wangfaxin proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: Fix review link. https://review.opendev.org/692249 | |
| 01:59:14 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix 'versions show' helps & docs https://review.opendev.org/691989 | |
| 10:21:38 | openstackgerrit | Thomas Bechtold proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Increase test timeout for 2 tests in TestImageProxy class https://review.opendev.org/692323 | |
| 13:43:54 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Stop testing python2 https://review.opendev.org/686590 | |
| 13:44:34 | mriedem | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691980/ unblock osc in the gate so would be nice to prioritize that | |
| 14:18:34 | efried | mordred, dtroyer: ^ is green in zuul now, please merge soonest :* | |
| 15:51:38 | efried | amotoki: ^ | |
| 16:00:02 | elmiko | API SIG office hour has begun! | |
| 16:09:57 | efried | o/ | |
| 16:10:12 | efried | (I got nothing, just happened to be in the room) | |
| 16:10:22 | elmiko | hey efried =) | |
| 16:10:57 | elmiko | it's mostly quiet these days, but we are here if folks need us | |
| 16:18:52 | dtroyer | mriedem, efried, etc: +W on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691980/, thank you for chasing that down. | |
| 16:19:01 | efried | thanks dtroyer | |
| 16:48:29 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Use SDK to get compute API extensions https://review.opendev.org/691039 | |
| 16:48:39 | efried | dtroyer: if you're still about, would you also please send this one, which is holding up the python-novaclient release? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691039/ | |
| 16:48:53 | efried | mriedem: fyi rebased that on the gate fix to smooth its path | |
| 16:50:52 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 16:51:09 | mriedem | i'm gonna go smooth some food into my gullet | |
| 16:53:30 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove redundant OpenStackShell.prepare_to_run_command https://review.opendev.org/691865 | |
| 17:00:54 | elmiko | later all o/ | |
| 17:47:40 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix functional tests for py3 https://review.opendev.org/691980 | |
| 18:01:37 | mgariepy | can i have a quick push for this patch please ? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691375/ | |
| 18:56:27 | efried | mgariepy: FYI I'm working on making all of those pages autogenerated from the command classes | |
| 18:57:52 | efried | mgariepy: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691767/ -- for this specific case, here's how it renders, which I think is the same as what you've done https://21fbb9beee6499333383-b4831d08abece0047714b6befcdb357a.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/691767/1/check/openstack-tox-docs/8df38ae/docs/cli/command-objects/network-agent.html#network-agent-remove-router | |
| 21:49:57 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: neutron: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/691767 | |
| 23:41:59 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/cliff master: WIP: Add autoprogram_cliff_app_dist_name config opt https://review.opendev.org/692464 | |
| 23:42:52 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Let autoprogram-cliff know who's running https://review.opendev.org/692465 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-11-01 | |||
| 07:07:43 | openstackgerrit | gugug proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: tox: Keeping going with docs https://review.opendev.org/692503 | |
| 07:08:47 | openstackgerrit | gugug proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: tox: Keeping going with docs https://review.opendev.org/692503 | |
| 10:26:24 | openstackgerrit | Pierre Prinetti proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: versions: Fix 'versions show' help message https://review.opendev.org/686408 | |
| 14:28:18 | umbSublime | Is there any way to query the placement API with the SDK ? I can't seem to figure it out | |
| 14:28:38 | frickler | umbSublime: iirc there's a plugin for that | |
| 14:28:47 | umbSublime | osc-placement ? | |
| 14:29:07 | frickler | umbSublime: exactly | |
| 14:29:21 | umbSublime | Ok, that works ! thanks | |
| 14:32:28 | umbSublime | frickler: I don't think I've ever user anything but the sdk or requests to query the API, is there a way I can just register a proxy on my connection object from this ? | |
| 14:35:20 | frickler | umbSublime: oh, you said sdk and not osc, not sure about that. maybe cdent or others can help, but likely many are on their way to the summit currently | |
| 14:35:46 | umbSublime | hehe no worries I have workarounds currently but it feels hacky :) | |
| 14:41:53 | efried | umbSublime: In the sdk you can create a raw placement proxy (connection.placement) and use the REST primitives (.get(), .put(), etc.) | |
| 14:42:10 | efried | Extensive examples in nova's report client... | |
| 14:42:41 | efried | https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/scheduler/client/report.py#L170 | |
| 14:43:31 | efried | https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/utils.py#L1012 | |
| 14:43:31 | efried | https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/scheduler/client/report.py#L229 is where we create the proxy. That calls into... | |
| 14:44:02 | efried | which in nova's case uses oslo.config opts to create the connection; but you should use your regular clouds.yaml thing. | |
| 14:44:38 | umbSublime | efried: awesome thanks ! | |
| 14:45:01 | efried | for your purposes | |
| 14:45:02 | efried | placement_proxy.get(...) etc. | |
| 14:45:02 | efried | placement_proxy = conn.placement | |
| 14:45:02 | efried | conn = openstack.connection.Connection(...) | |
| 14:48:01 | frickler | efried: hmm, I'm assuming that that code is in nova for historical reasons, wouldn't it make sense to move it into a library? not sure whether osc-placement would be the right target or something like python-placementclient | |
| 14:48:40 | efried | frickler: not sure how much history you're signing up for. Grab a cup of coffee and scoot closer to the fire... | |
| 14:49:21 | umbSublime | efried: I've tried what you suggest but I get this message "Skipping over invalid version data. No stability status in version." | |
| 14:49:41 | efried | umbSublime: what release are you on? | |
| 14:50:15 | umbSublime | for this specific cloud 'queens' | |
| 14:50:43 | efried | frickler: The SchedulerReportClient previously talked to placement through a generic ksa Adapter. We cut over to the SDK in Train, after putting a bit of framework in the SDK to accept oslo.config opts. Having done that, the change was a one-liner (plus test): https://review.opendev.org/#/c/656023/ | |
| 14:51:15 | efried | umbSublime: in queens placement was still part of nova, and sdk wasn't ready to create a generic placement proxy. | |
| 14:51:50 | umbSublime | Ahh I see, no worries then, I'll move along with my work around and make a bit more generic | |
| 14:51:55 | efried | umbSublime: you *might* be able to get away with it if you upgrade your openstacksdk to train-level code. But it's also possible you'll encounter some incompatible changes. | |
| 14:52:07 | cdent | presumably the new sdk release will still work with old | |
| 14:52:07 | umbSublime | my sdk is at 0.36 | |
| 14:52:17 | efried | yeah, I'm not so sure about that ^ | |
| 14:53:07 | umbSublime | in fact I was wondering which version to use. i couldn't find any documentatyion saying "Queens should use sdk version XX" | |