| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-10-24 | |||
| 20:07:43 | mordred | cmurphy, vishakha: lgtm | |
| 20:34:18 | cmurphy | thanks mordred | |
| 20:44:05 | mordred | dtantsur|afk: the sdk ironic and ironic-inspector jobs are failing ... | |
| 20:44:40 | mordred | dtantsur|afk: for ironic: "The /opt/stack/ironic-python-agent-builder project was not found;" | |
| 20:46:09 | mordred | dtantsur|afk: for ironic-inspector, it's a post failure - something about --subunit not being a valid argument to last | |
| 20:46:25 | mordred | I'm going to dig in a little - but if you already know answers, awesome :) | |
| 22:17:28 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Re-add functional tests on flavor content https://review.opendev.org/686765 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-10-25 | |||
| 02:24:37 | openstackgerrit | Xuan Yandong proposed openstack/cliff master: Switch to Ussuri jobs https://review.opendev.org/691148 | |
| 02:48:50 | openstackgerrit | Xuan Yandong proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch to Ussuri jobs https://review.opendev.org/691158 | |
| 02:59:10 | openstackgerrit | Xuan Yandong proposed openstack/shade master: Switch to Ussuri jobs https://review.opendev.org/691162 | |
| 04:04:25 | vishakha | mordred: thanks | |
| 07:08:21 | openstackgerrit | zhangboye proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Switch to Ussuri jobs https://review.opendev.org/691233 | |
| 08:29:38 | yonglihe | zuul failed while in merging. add version check by the way, so, need another round review: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/680928/ | |
| 11:35:58 | ttx | elmiko, dtantsur: SIG chair update proposed at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691269/ | |
| 14:11:44 | efried | mordred, cmurphy, vishakha: I left some comments in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/669331/ -- if you can assuage my concerns about those two main things, I'll +A. | |
| 15:06:18 | mriedem | can i get a review on this simple osc change to use the sdk to list compute api extensions rather than novaclient? it's holding up using novaclient 16.0.0 in upper-constraints: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691039/ | |
| 15:27:43 | openstackgerrit | Marc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [DOC]Fix opesntack command for removing router https://review.opendev.org/691375 | |
| 16:08:28 | openstackgerrit | James E. Blair proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP: test extract_name https://review.opendev.org/691386 | |
| 16:11:22 | corvus | Shrews: ^ clarkb and i have been looking into that in -infra | |
| 16:12:37 | corvus | that's a failing unit test, with real data | |
| 16:12:53 | corvus | b"actual = ['dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c', 'a82af292-bb2e-44a4-bf31-fb8145b66e6b']" | |
| 16:12:53 | corvus | b"reference = ['servers']" | |
| 16:12:53 | corvus | it produces: b'testtools.matchers._impl.MismatchError: !=:' | |
| 16:13:10 | corvus | and indeed, that matches output we're actually seeing on disk on the graphite server | |
| 16:46:01 | Shrews | corvus: is this a new failure? | |
| 16:46:16 | corvus | Shrews: we're starting to suspect current code may be okay | |
| 16:54:58 | corvus | yeah, it looks like this was probably fixed in 0.36.0 | |
| 17:05:33 | cmurphy | efried: responded | |
| 18:55:20 | mriedem | dtroyer: is it possible to write an osc command which extends command.Lister but doesn't provide output? | |
| 18:55:24 | mriedem | i know that's weird | |
| 18:56:04 | mriedem | trying to figure out how to solve this https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006779 - maybe the answer is "add --no-provider to openstack resource provider allocation set" or create a new "openstack resource provider allocation unset --provider" command | |
| 19:22:34 | mriedem | nvm, looks like i'm going with the set --no-provider option | |
| 20:40:28 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add application credential CRUD support https://review.opendev.org/669331 | |
| 20:44:35 | efried | cmurphy: that happened ^ | |
| 20:45:28 | cmurphy | \o/ | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-10-26 | |||
| 00:27:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Bump the openstackdocstheme extension to 1.20 https://review.opendev.org/689393 | |
| 10:36:23 | openstackgerrit | Xuan Yandong proposed openstack/shade master: Stop testing python2.7 https://review.opendev.org/691476 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-10-28 | |||
| 08:42:59 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: CI: add ironic-python-agent-builder to the ironic job https://review.opendev.org/691630 | |
| 08:43:17 | dtantsur | mordred: ^^ | |
| 10:16:32 | openstackgerrit | Shogo Saito proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adding basic implementation for Accelerator(Cyborg) https://review.opendev.org/679914 | |
| 10:58:17 | openstackgerrit | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add reset_interfaces argument to patch_node https://review.opendev.org/689414 | |
| 14:15:26 | openstackgerrit | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add reset_interfaces argument to patch_node https://review.opendev.org/689414 | |
| 14:18:34 | openstackgerrit | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Increase dogpile version for Py3.7 compatibility https://review.opendev.org/691680 | |
| 14:58:51 | openstackgerrit | Marc Gariépy (mgariepy) proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [DOC]Fix openstack command for removing router https://review.opendev.org/691375 | |
| 16:18:06 | efried | dtroyer: So as I'm working through these plugin docs issues, it has been in the back of my head: | |
| 16:18:34 | efried | Should the plugin projects build osc in a gate job, so they don't break it? | |
| 16:18:57 | efried | or maybe they already do, /me looks... | |
| 16:20:12 | efried | ah, I guess that's what openstackclient-plugin-jobs would be for? ... | |
| 16:22:01 | efried | ugh, that guy doesn't require novaclient or osc-placement. | |
| 16:22:22 | efried | also, it doesn't appear to build docs, which would be a useful add. | |
| 16:22:52 | efried | ...and it's marked as non-voting by default. | |
| 16:27:22 | efried | ...and the only thing it does right now is check for duplicate entry points. | |
| 16:27:38 | efried | okay, so tldr some of the infrastructure is there, but it hasn't really been fleshed out. | |
| 16:28:12 | dtroyer | efried: exactly. that was all supposed to come together in the openstackclient repo and never did | |
| 16:28:46 | dtroyer | IIRC stevemar was organizing all of that when IBM lured him to the dark side… | |
| 16:29:02 | efried | dtroyer: those IBM guys... | |
| 16:29:17 | efried | dtroyer: so what's next here? | |
| 16:30:24 | efried | like, if I want to do a thing (like make sure python-xclient doesn't break python-openstackclient's doc build with a bogus option help) it would be nice if I didn't have to drag that entire openstackclient infra effort into daylight first. | |
| 16:30:39 | dtroyer | efried: I think the cross-project plugin stuff still belongs in openstackclient, its purpose is to provide that integration for users, makes sense for the knowledge of plugins to all be there. | |
| 16:30:50 | efried | put another way: I'd like to be able to contribute without signing up for fixing the world. | |
| 16:30:55 | dtroyer | exactly, which is why I'm not insisting that it be moved before improving what we do have | |
| 16:31:17 | dtroyer | just keep that in mind so we don't break that possibility somehow | |
| 16:31:43 | efried | okay, so... | |
| 16:32:05 | efried | I'm not actually going to be able to use that openstackclient job, since that project isn't building plugin docs yet | |
| 16:32:25 | efried | so I would need to need to create a new job in python-openstackclient | |
| 16:32:55 | efried | ...that installs all the plugins and builds its docs. | |
| 16:33:08 | efried | well | |
| 16:33:21 | efried | I guess I'll ask you: of those two alternatives, which seems like the path of least resistance? | |
| 16:33:38 | dtroyer | I don't really like that either… and this is all one reason I wasn't involved in it in the first place, I didn't want osc to be an integration bottleneck | |
| 16:34:47 | efried | mm, especially if the goal is to add $job to each of the 20+ plugin client projects, it would be better for it to be the real, long-term-plan job. | |
| 16:35:49 | efried | dtroyer: so was the eventual goal to somehow have the osc doc build moved from python-openstackclient to openstackclient? | |
| 16:36:07 | dtroyer | if there is a lot to build, let's just do it in the final place. | |
| 16:36:37 | dtroyer | There was never a final goal to have a single doc, maybe a single index pointing to the individual ones, but the OSc dosc themselves should only cover what is in the repo | |
| 16:37:02 | efried | well... | |
| 16:37:08 | dtroyer | the whole point of plugins was supposed to be freedom (for OSC) from having to gatekeep any of this | |
| 16:37:13 | efried | not sure I agree with that from a UX standpoint. | |
| 16:37:24 | efried | I mean, I understand from a project management perspective. | |
| 16:38:05 | efried | but as a consumer of the docs, I would like to be able to navigate around the plugin docs without having to use the browser's Back button liberally. | |
| 16:38:14 | efried | Guess that's not the end of the world. | |
| 16:38:27 | dtroyer | when there is less than a single half-time person maintaining something, this is what you get. If someone has the time to build an integrated all plugins-and-everything doc, go for it. I don't have that luxury any more. | |
| 16:38:43 | efried | well, that's what I've done. | |
| 16:39:52 | efried | https://docs.openstack.org/python-openstackclient/latest/cli/plugin-commands/index.html <== all of these links point to in-repo (python-openstackclient) docs built via autoprogram-cliff of the registered entrypoints of the plugins. | |
| 16:40:02 | dtroyer | ok, cool. I'll suggest that openstacklcient is the right repo for osc+plugins stuff, | |
| 16:40:15 | dtroyer | yup, that was intended to be moved | |
| 16:40:29 | efried | (all but the last five, which just need https://review.opendev.org/#/c/690387/ which is waiting for three final u-c bumps) | |
| 16:40:54 | efried | And should the rest of the python-openstackclient documentation also be moved? | |
| 16:41:07 | dtroyer | no, unless you would do that for all of the plugins too. | |
| 16:41:19 | efried | sorry, "do that" what? | |
| 16:41:24 | dtroyer | move all of their docs | |
| 16:41:37 | dtroyer | python-openstackclient as functioanlity and docs for that in one place | |
| 16:41:39 | efried | well, the docs at $plugin are a separate thing. | |
| 16:41:54 | dtroyer | and openstackclient is the integration point, not python-openstackclient | |
| 16:42:40 | dtroyer | this is such a mess because that transition was not completed and isn't a high enough priority (until now) for anyone to spend time on it | |
| 16:44:10 | dtroyer | this is life in a project that nobody really wants to pay for… "clients are not important" — a (former) OSF Platinum Board Member | |
| 16:44:49 | efried | okay, it's not a super high priority, I just came across it because I was trying to get at some plugin docs and couldn't find them in the first few obvious places I looked. What exists now is a dramatic improvement, but it's brittle. | |
| 16:45:06 | efried | Before, $plugin could merge a broken option help and nobody would be the wiser | |
| 16:45:18 | efried | like, literally nobody, because those weren't being used *anywhere* afaict. | |
| 16:45:27 | efried | Not even sure if they were being used to build the CLI helps. Maybe they were... | |
| 16:45:41 | efried | but those obv don't have the same rules as the sphinx-built docs. | |
| 16:46:15 | efried | anyway, now if $plugin merges and releases a bogus option help, python-openstackclient will start to fail its doc build. | |