Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2019-03-07
08:05:54 openstackgerrit Niraj Singh proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support to get progress details of notification https://review.openstack.org/640673
09:56:01 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: support server-side configdrive building (API 1.56) https://review.openstack.org/641610
14:50:18 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: support server-side configdrive building (API 1.56) https://review.openstack.org/641610
14:50:20 dtantsur keep forgetting release notes ^^ :(
14:59:32 elmiko dtantsur edleafe, i'm a little under the weather, won't make it to the office hours today
14:59:54 edleafe elmiko: ack. Feel better!
15:00:00 elmiko thanks =)
15:18:09 cdent elmiko: I prescribe some sort of spirit + that maple syrup
16:05:34 edleafe Oops - forgot to formally announce: "API-SIG Office Hour has begun!"
16:11:06 edleafe Punishment?? I *love* wet llamas!!
17:55:27 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-client-config master: Update hacking version https://review.openstack.org/641380
18:04:44 mriedem_afk dtroyer: speaking of osc, i've got a couple of easy +2ed changes here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573709/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573830/
19:22:13 dtroyer mriedem: I was >< this close to a release…
19:22:51 mriedem heh, these have been around forever so it's fine to wait
19:22:58 dtroyer lets see if they need a rebase...
19:23:42 dtroyer I am actually waiting on a neutron change or two to clear the gate for one dependent bit in osc
19:39:21 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add network segment range command object https://review.openstack.org/625544
19:41:19 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Mention compute API 2.50 in openstack quota show --class https://review.openstack.org/573834
19:41:27 mriedem dtroyer: if you're feeling randy, ^ is a rebase and was +2ed, also trivial
19:43:01 dtroyer mriedem: got it
19:43:06 mriedem thanks
19:43:28 dtroyer really, my apologies for missing those, I was a little, uh, distracted last year…
19:44:47 mriedem heh np
19:45:20 mordred dtroyer: what's this? distracted?
19:46:36 dtroyer naw, never, you must have heard the wind whistling through the bare trees
20:48:49 mriedem dtroyer: if it makes you feel....something...i did come across a bug that was causing some functional tests i was working on to fail in a very weird way (resource usage reporting was goofed up post resize confirm) - i figured out what it was, and it turns out the code in question was related to something windriver worked on a couple of years ago, and had actually already patched up the issue in starlingx
20:49:24 mriedem so lo these many years later, i'm fixing it upstream
20:52:59 dtroyer We still have a number of those patches with a subset of them being worked into stein/train development.
20:53:23 dtroyer Did I ever point you to https://github.com/starlingx-staging/stx-nova/tree/master/stx-patches? I so wish those could have been available last summer when you did your analysis...
20:59:45 mriedem i heard they showed up at some point but haven't looked through those
21:00:08 dtroyer I put up the last batch in Jan
21:00:21 mriedem heh https://github.com/starlingx-staging/stx-nova/blob/master/stx-patches/0013-Drop-support-for-forced-hosts-for-live-migrate.patch
21:00:29 mriedem we did that in 2.68 this release
21:00:32 mriedem coincidentally
21:01:16 mriedem well, we removed the force option in that microversion, but you can still screw yourself over on an older microversion i guess
21:03:02 mriedem yup this is the one i'm currently fixing (part of it anyway) https://github.com/starlingx-staging/stx-nova/blob/master/stx-patches/0041-primary-resource-tracking-fixes.patch
21:03:53 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Mention 2.51 in help for openstack server event show https://review.openstack.org/573830
21:05:01 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add note about version 2.5 when listing servers using --ip6 https://review.openstack.org/573709
21:08:49 dtroyer mriedem: oh, that's one of the nasty rebase commits they did to update OpenStack releases. I had to break up some of those for $REASONS and still shake my head at the time spent carrying all of them
21:14:56 mriedem now they can glory in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641806/
21:15:12 mriedem seems they are still going to have a ton of forward porting of patches when migrating to stein
21:15:22 mriedem that will be a ton of work for...someone
21:15:49 mordred mriedem: I guess it's good for people to have work?
21:15:50 dtroyer actually, that's what I meant my much of that is now idle… we cut over starlingx master to containerized stein last week
21:16:08 dtroyer the list of things to do upstream is small, large enough that it isn't going to get done but much smaller than before
21:16:49 mriedem a large part of https://github.com/starlingx-staging/stx-nova/blob/master/stx-patches/0041-primary-resource-tracking-fixes.patch is tied to numa live migration support that didn't land in stein though,
21:16:54 mriedem so something will have to give there
21:17:24 mriedem mordred: heh, i guess. does that mean if huawei cans me i can get hired by windriver to be their forward port patch maintainer?
21:17:37 mordred mriedem: totally
21:17:57 dtroyer yup, that was at the top of the list, we're not sure exactly how that will play out. I am pushing an approach that is very similar to stable branch management, where we pull in those features as they merge upstream rather than waiting for the train release
21:18:31 mriedem dtroyer: makes sense - we had a similar process at ibm years ago where it was upstream first, but if we really had to we would backport from master to internal stable
21:18:33 dtroyer so getting numa live migration in early in train is still a thing
21:19:48 dtroyer mriedem: is CD it still a thing in nova? I recall that defining the way things have to be operational when they merge, and talk about relaxing that a year or two ago
21:20:27 mriedem depends on who you ask, but yes
21:21:03 mriedem otherwise it's too easy to say, "let's just land this broken thing with the plan to fix it in 3 weeks before anyone knows"
21:21:23 dtroyer ok, goos. even if it isn't as rigorous as it once was that makes it easier to stay close to master for us
21:21:46 mriedem i'd say it's still as rigorous as always
21:21:50 mriedem maybe more so
21:22:02 dtroyer good deal, thanks
23:19:17 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Mention compute API 2.50 in openstack quota show --class https://review.openstack.org/573834
#openstack-sdks - 2019-03-08
02:27:38 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add network segment range command object https://review.openstack.org/625544
08:53:18 openstackgerrit Niraj Singh proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support to get progress details of notification https://review.openstack.org/640673
09:09:00 openstackgerrit Niraj Singh proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support to get recovery workflow details https://review.openstack.org/640673
12:54:27 n-singh_ Reveiw request https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640673/
12:56:06 n-singh_ dtantsur: Hi, Please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640673/ as masakariclient library is going to release soon https://review.openstack.org/#/c/641988
12:56:25 dtantsur hi, I'll try to get to it, but no promises
13:04:04 n-singh_ dtantsur: Thank you
13:10:12 shilpasd gtema: Kindly further review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640673/8/
13:14:11 openstackgerrit Niraj Singh proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support to get recovery workflow details https://review.openstack.org/640673
13:15:32 shilpasd gtema: wait, we removed depends on tag, so wait till zuul pass
14:51:26 shilpasd mordred: thank you for review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640673/9
14:51:43 mordred shilpasd: sure thing!
14:56:19 shilpasd dtantsur: kindly review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/640673/9
14:56:51 dtantsur shilpasd: folks, you ping me so often that I'm on the border of ignoring this patch :-/
14:58:30 dtantsur don't get me wrong, I have nothing personal against you and the patch, but I don't want to encourage such approach to prioritization
15:09:21 shilpasd dtantsur: sorry if you feel so
15:10:37 shilpasd dtantsur: i have overlooked that n-singh also requesting
15:10:59 dtantsur no problem, but please be considerate
15:12:33 dtantsur shilpasd, approved
15:13:17 shilpasd dtantsur: sure, thanks a ton
16:41:04 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support to get recovery workflow details https://review.openstack.org/640673
16:49:38 openstackgerrit Glenn Van de Water proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix service discovery in functional tests https://review.openstack.org/642074
16:59:02 openstackgerrit Glenn Van de Water proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix service discovery in functional tests https://review.openstack.org/642074
17:01:03 openstackgerrit Glenn Van de Water proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix service discovery in functional tests https://review.openstack.org/642074
17:32:48 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Move object methods to object_store proxy https://review.openstack.org/638731
17:53:09 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove ServerDetails class https://review.openstack.org/642094
18:28:22 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deprecate VolumeDetail and BackupDetail classes https://review.openstack.org/642107
18:32:58 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deprecate ServerDetails class https://review.openstack.org/642094
#openstack-sdks - 2019-03-09
10:11:19 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deprecate ServerDetails class https://review.openstack.org/642094
10:13:21 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deprecate VolumeDetail and BackupDetail classes https://review.openstack.org/642107
10:44:24 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Split OpenStackCloud into reasonable pieces https://review.openstack.org/642218
11:00:35 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deprecate ServerDetails class https://review.openstack.org/642094
13:33:07 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove outdated devstack section from docs https://review.openstack.org/642228
13:33:07 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Swap human-facing links to use opendev.org https://review.openstack.org/642227
14:01:42 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Collapse OpenStackSDKAdapter into Proxy https://review.openstack.org/642231
14:01:42 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Collect request stats https://review.openstack.org/614834
14:49:34 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Get rid of setUpClass and block it for forever https://review.openstack.org/640379
15:51:11 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deprecate ServerDetails class https://review.openstack.org/642094
16:14:01 gtema mordred: would there be git clone links in opendev.org? I thought I would give it a try to swap local remote, but can find only https link
16:25:31 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix some typos https://review.openstack.org/642239

Earlier   Later