| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-25 | |||
| 17:03:58 | holser_ | Hi | |
| 17:04:01 | holser_ | mordred here? | |
| 17:04:03 | openstackgerrit | Sergii Golovatiuk proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Log OpenStackCloudResourceNotFound exceptions https://review.openstack.org/637169 | |
| 17:08:19 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "name" filter in "list" call when retrieving a single register https://review.openstack.org/637238 | |
| 18:12:19 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add missing py37 and corrected default envlist. https://review.openstack.org/639095 | |
| 18:43:20 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: API microversion 2.69: Handles Down Cells https://review.openstack.org/633579 | |
| 19:58:16 | elmiko | mordred++ | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-26 | |||
| 05:46:08 | openstackgerrit | Kailun Qin proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add network segment range command object https://review.openstack.org/625544 | |
| 08:42:40 | openstackgerrit | Sergii Golovatiuk proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Log OpenStackCloudResourceNotFound exceptions https://review.openstack.org/637169 | |
| 08:45:49 | openstackgerrit | Sergii Golovatiuk proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Log OpenStackCloudResourceNotFound exceptions https://review.openstack.org/637169 | |
| 09:36:39 | openstackgerrit | Kailun Qin proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add network segment range command object https://review.openstack.org/625544 | |
| 10:14:34 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add possibility to filter images using member_status https://review.openstack.org/637508 | |
| 10:15:08 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: support network_data when building configdrive https://review.openstack.org/639149 | |
| 10:33:17 | openstackgerrit | Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: API microversion 2.69: Handles Down Cells https://review.openstack.org/633579 | |
| 10:39:02 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: support network_data when building configdrive https://review.openstack.org/639149 | |
| 10:51:30 | gtema | dtantsur: a chocolate is definitely well deserved:D | |
| 10:51:39 | dtantsur | nice :) | |
| 10:52:07 | gtema | I will pass it you when we meet in person ;-) | |
| 10:52:21 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "name" filter in "list" call when retrieving a single register https://review.openstack.org/637238 | |
| 10:52:33 | dtantsur | if I get a US visa (the interview is tomorrow, wish me luck), I may see you in Denver | |
| 10:52:43 | dtantsur | gtema: are you going to Denver? | |
| 10:53:12 | gtema | unfortunately not - company is a platin sponsor, but since no talks accepted only top management goes there | |
| 10:53:33 | dtantsur | even to the PTG? | |
| 10:53:35 | gtema | but good luck with the interview | |
| 10:53:37 | gtema | nope | |
| 10:53:44 | dtantsur | wow | |
| 10:54:01 | dtantsur | well, depending on your location, it will spare you a long or not so long flight | |
| 10:54:09 | gtema | gernamy | |
| 10:54:12 | gtema | Germany | |
| 10:54:23 | gtema | so not that short | |
| 10:54:23 | dtantsur | which part of it? | |
| 10:54:30 | gtema | central (NRW) | |
| 10:54:56 | dtantsur | nice part :) I'm in Berlin nowadays. | |
| 10:55:13 | gtema | cool, but to crowded for me | |
| 10:55:17 | dtantsur | are you coming for the ops meetup in March? | |
| 10:55:30 | dtantsur | heh, yeah. but I was born in Moscow, so not too crowded for me :) | |
| 10:55:41 | gtema | ha-ha-ha. Even being in T-systems - no. | |
| 10:56:21 | dtantsur | I see.. | |
| 10:56:22 | gtema | I'm born in UA, lived in Kiev, so not too crowded for sure, but compared with Paderborn (150t) is already | |
| 10:56:48 | dtantsur | oh, so you also travelled to the West :) | |
| 10:56:54 | gtema | yupp | |
| 10:56:59 | dtantsur | cool | |
| 10:57:04 | gtema | "Go West"!!! | |
| 11:06:41 | gtema | mordred: do you want to cover comments from dtantsur for a choco, or should I do that? | |
| 11:07:39 | mordred | gtema: I'd like a choco ... lemme take a quick pass | |
| 11:08:06 | gtema | mordred: come to Germany and you will get one too | |
| 11:08:45 | dtantsur | ++ | |
| 11:09:13 | mordred | I feel like february isn't the MOST fun time to come to germany | |
| 11:09:32 | dtantsur | depending on your definition of fun :D | |
| 11:09:33 | gtema | it's around 20°C now | |
| 11:09:47 | dtantsur | yeah, this spring came much earlier | |
| 11:09:47 | gtema | it's nearly spring here | |
| 11:10:17 | mordred | oh nice! | |
| 11:10:41 | mordred | well then maybe I should come to germany to get some nice weather | |
| 11:11:04 | gtema | yeah, heard already of weather in US :D | |
| 11:16:35 | mordred | dtantsur: oh goodie. your second comment opens up a whole giant can of worms | |
| 11:16:55 | dtantsur | which one was the second? :) | |
| 11:17:03 | mordred | dtantsur: the one after the first ;) | |
| 11:17:08 | dtantsur | ah, got it | |
| 11:17:10 | dtantsur | :D | |
| 11:17:16 | mordred | the one about avoiding the race by returning image_id | |
| 11:17:34 | mordred | I don't think we can do that - because the method should also work well for people calling it directly on the Proxy - which means we need to return an Image | |
| 11:17:36 | mordred | BUT | |
| 11:18:23 | dtantsur | well, for example, baremetal.list_node_vifs return port IDs without trying to convert them to ports (largely because somewhere on the Earth there may be a downstream ironic plugin where VIF IDs are not port IDs) | |
| 11:18:29 | mordred | we can't just return Image(image_id) - because we don't know what version of the image service we need | |
| 11:19:17 | mordred | so we'd need, I guess, to use the image proxy class to get an Image resource only populated with the image_id | |
| 11:19:37 | mordred | and then the shade layer - and other callers - can call wait_for_image on that Image if they want to | |
| 11:20:20 | gtema | image_id and probably name (it shouldn't be changed anyway) | |
| 11:21:18 | mordred | yeah | |
| 11:59:36 | dtantsur | lazy loading of other attributes anyone? :) | |
| 11:59:50 | dtantsur | I think having a half-populated Resource is even more confusing than returning image_id tbh | |
| 12:18:55 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: add multiple attributes to image from APIv2.7 https://review.openstack.org/637528 | |
| 13:37:29 | holser__ | dtantsur I reworked https://review.openstack.org/637169 | |
| 13:37:46 | dtantsur | cool. I'm leaving now, can review on Thu | |
| 13:37:56 | holser__ | ok, thanks | |
| 15:52:00 | tssurya | I have a client side chane here which is sort of the last piece of a blueprint: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/633579/ , reviews would be really appreciated, thanks in advance! | |
| 15:52:10 | tssurya | s/chane/change | |
| 16:59:13 | gtema | dtroyer, amotoki osc question: what is the best way to make utils.find_resource find resource, if `list` should be called with a special flag. When image.os_hidden flag is set to true image can be found by name only with `list(os_hidden=True)` - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/637528/ | |
| 17:24:32 | cdent | elmiko, dtantsur|afk, edleafe : I'm looking at my old api-design doc at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592003/ and wondering where in my head I should prioritize revisiting it on a scale of never to asap. Thoughts? | |
| 17:31:46 | edleafe | cdent: While I think it's a worthwhile effort, it seems to me that the shared storage discussion could be applied here | |
| 17:33:06 | cdent | In my head it's sort of a "thing to do when I need to think about something else". But I'm not certain I will ever think about it well or enough to be useful beyond some very anodyne cliches. | |
| 17:33:40 | cdent | but yeah | |
| 17:33:50 | cdent | I think I'll set it aside | |
| 17:35:00 | cdent | done | |
| 17:45:57 | edleafe | That seems more like a topic for a book than a guideline of a few paragraphs | |
| 17:47:35 | cdent | you send me the huge advance, i'll write the book | |
| 17:59:17 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "name" filter in "list" call when retrieving a single register https://review.openstack.org/637238 | |
| 18:07:39 | elmiko | cdent: i generally agree with edleafe. while i think it would be a lovely doc to have, it could also become a never-ending windmill to tilt at. | |
| 18:08:08 | elmiko | so, i guess unless o'reilly shows up with a check and a bw picture of a cute animal... | |
| 18:08:35 | elmiko | although, i would _love_ to see an o'reilly book with a line art bagpus on it XD | |
| 18:09:27 | elmiko | *bagpuss | |
| 18:09:34 | fungi | so... for you sdk wonks, some of whom may also be storyboard users/fans, there is a feature in progress to store attachments in swift. the bulk of the backend interface implementation is proposed in https://review.openstack.org/633365 and i'm wondering if anyone would like to weigh in on unified python sdk vs swiftclient there | |
| 18:10:10 | fungi | mordred: ^ not sure if you're around but you often have strong opinions on things | |
| 18:12:43 | fungi | this initial version just authenticates directly to swift, so ought to work well with standalone/dedicated swift deployments. i don't know enough about the unified sdk to know whether it complicates standalone swift use cases | |
| 18:23:11 | openstackgerrit | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Disabling c-backup service for osc-functional-devstack-tips job https://review.openstack.org/639410 | |
| 18:26:03 | openstackgerrit | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix: Restore output 'VolumeBackupsRestore' object is not iterable https://review.openstack.org/624860 | |
| 19:04:47 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "name" filter in "list" call when retrieving a single register https://review.openstack.org/637238 | |
| 19:10:41 | mordred | fungi: I recommend using sdk - I feel that nobody should ever use the python-*client libraries for any purpose | |
| 19:11:11 | mordred | fungi: that said - I have never used it with standalone swift | |
| 19:34:45 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Use mock context in test_fwaas https://review.openstack.org/639421 | |