| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-19 | |||
| 16:25:55 | dtantsur | exactly ;) | |
| 16:27:27 | mordred | the only use case I could see this making harder is if a user has a cloud that only has an unknown verion of a known service - but even in that case they can set an endpoint_override and a version override and it'll work | |
| 16:27:55 | mordred | dtantsur: after I poke at this image patch I'll see if I can't come up with a unittest | |
| 16:31:16 | gtema | mordred: you should definitely have a look in to the image-reorg. I have managed to resolve some of the issues, but here a knowledge of shade-creator is required to do it properly | |
| 16:37:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: implement set_node_power_state in the proxy https://review.openstack.org/636601 | |
| 16:39:58 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: support for allocation API https://review.openstack.org/636594 | |
| 16:43:14 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image.task resource https://review.openstack.org/637913 | |
| 17:03:07 | gtema | mordred, odyssey4me: with https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/37390 a change of "default" port_security_enabled from True (when not given) to False (explicitly) was introduced. Now all openstacksdk-ansible-devel-functional-devstack are failing | |
| 17:08:10 | gtema | mordred, odyssey4me: I do not really understand why so far, but comparing logs from stable-2.6 and master I see that in 2.6 when no port_security_enabled was given - a net with "True" was created, even when in the SDK we have a default of "False" | |
| 17:13:07 | gtema | mordred, odyssey4me: I got it. Ansible calls cloud.create_network and it bypasses Resource completely, so a "deployed default" plays role. I think we need to create a follow-up in Ansible to make default 'None' | |
| 17:14:14 | Shrews | mordred: 563 lgtm, but will wait for your unittest | |
| 17:14:38 | Shrews | mordred: also, sorry for delay. still quite sick :( | |
| 17:14:41 | mordred | Shrews: coolio | |
| 17:14:49 | mordred | Shrews: no worries! you should stop being sick :( | |
| 17:14:54 | Shrews | ikr? | |
| 17:35:51 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image.task resource https://review.openstack.org/637913 | |
| 18:49:35 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image attributes from v2.7 https://review.openstack.org/637538 | |
| 20:20:26 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image attributes from v2.7 https://review.openstack.org/637538 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-20 | |||
| 09:33:23 | openstackgerrit | David Rabel proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix help message of image add project https://review.openstack.org/638113 | |
| 11:33:03 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684 | |
| 11:38:03 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix minor issues in the baremetal proxy docs https://review.openstack.org/638136 | |
| 11:38:08 | dtantsur | Shrews: ^^^ (also get better soon!) | |
| 13:25:25 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684 | |
| 13:56:16 | Shrews | dtantsur: thanks, feeling much better today | |
| 13:56:30 | dtantsur | great :) | |
| 14:01:38 | Shrews | dtantsur: i guess something in neutron is broken based on the failures in your doc change? | |
| 14:02:12 | dtantsur | dunno, haven't checked yet (crazy day) | |
| 14:02:33 | Shrews | embrace the crazy | |
| 14:03:42 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix minor issues in the baremetal proxy docs https://review.openstack.org/638136 | |
| 14:06:22 | frickler | slaweq: ^^ that looks like a neutron regression, have you seen that yet? http://logs.openstack.org/36/638136/1/check/openstacksdk-functional-devstack/1cdc712/controller/logs/screen-q-svc.txt.gz#_Feb_20_12_04_53_392346 | |
| 14:10:03 | slaweq | frickler: I will check | |
| 14:10:18 | frickler | https://review.openstack.org/635671 looks slightly suspicous in that context | |
| 14:14:26 | slaweq | frickler: TBH I hope it's not that one :) | |
| 14:26:29 | slaweq | frickler: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1816771 | |
| 14:26:30 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1816771 in neutron "Creation of router fails in devstack" [Undecided,New] | |
| 14:26:44 | slaweq | frickler: we now have L3 subteam meeting so I will try to raise this one there | |
| 14:28:36 | frickler | slaweq: thx | |
| 14:38:13 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684 | |
| 14:53:40 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "name" filter in "list" call when retrieving a single register https://review.openstack.org/637238 | |
| 16:01:09 | ralonsoh | dtantsur, hi. About https://review.openstack.org/#/c/637238/2/requirements.txt@11. oslo.utils is already required in nova, neutron and many other projects. I usually prefer not to copy/paste code and use the libraries provided by the OpenStack ecosystem | |
| 16:01:33 | dtantsur | ralonsoh: usually copy-paste is bad, but this is quite an overkill | |
| 16:01:35 | ralonsoh | dtantsur, I'm using both in the code and the tests | |
| 16:01:53 | dtantsur | keep in mind that openstacksdk targets consumers that do not use oslo libraries | |
| 16:02:09 | ralonsoh | dtantsur, ok, I'll implement both functions in sdk repo | |
| 16:02:09 | dtantsur | like this https://github.com/openstack/metalsmith/blob/master/requirements.txt | |
| 16:05:22 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684 | |
| 16:06:07 | mordred | yeah. we don't use oslo libraries in sdk because our users are end-users and not just openstack services | |
| 16:09:57 | gtema | mordred: I'm passing image-reorg to you. 'properties' need to be fixed, but I do not know how you wanted to do this | |
| 16:10:16 | mordred | gtema: oh - hah. I've got a huge update to that patch locally | |
| 16:10:43 | gtema | mordred: ups. Fun merging | |
| 16:10:54 | mordred | although i'm also at "properties needs to be fixed" | |
| 16:11:06 | gtema | but you can then simply throw away my changes then | |
| 16:16:51 | mordred | :) | |
| 16:17:02 | mordred | gtema: just think how much fun we both got to have | |
| 16:17:13 | gtema | yeah | |
| 16:17:27 | gtema | and this all is just a beginning of aligning things | |
| 16:18:14 | gtema | mordred: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/637913/ - have you wanted it for ImageTask this way? | |
| 16:19:56 | mordred | gtema: yeah - I think that's a great idea (although I haven't read the whole patch yet) | |
| 16:20:20 | gtema | no hurry. Just a brief idea, especially with respect to wait_for_task | |
| 16:22:48 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684 | |
| 16:23:01 | mordred | gtema: ok. I think that should work now | |
| 16:23:12 | gtema | mordred: great | |
| 16:23:17 | mordred | gtema: unless it doesn't | |
| 16:23:48 | gtema | :D let's see | |
| 16:30:30 | ralonsoh | dtantsur, mordred: thanks! I'll implement those functions in the repo | |
| 17:37:56 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image.service_info resources https://review.openstack.org/638227 | |
| 19:17:19 | mordred | dtroyer: does this: http://logs.openstack.org/84/609684/9/check/openstacksdk-functional-devstack-tips/0c1b740/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-02-20_16_51_39_497256 mean anything to you? | |
| 19:19:33 | Shrews | mordred: slaweq opened a bug for that this morning https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1816771 | |
| 19:19:34 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1816771 in neutron "Creation of router fails in devstack" [Undecided,New] | |
| 19:19:46 | mordred | Shrews: oh awesome | |
| 19:22:04 | johnsom | mordred Who should I poke to get the rest of this chain merged? We want to start using some of this in the dashboard. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/openstacksdk+owner:self+status:open | |
| 19:43:02 | dtroyer | mordred: no, that's new to me | |
| 19:43:21 | mordred | dtroyer: seems there is a neutron bug open - so yay | |
| 19:48:34 | mordred | johnsom: I pushed them in (responded to dtantsur|afk on the first one) - although it's possible we'll hit that neutron bug | |
| 19:49:03 | johnsom | mordred Thank you! | |
| 19:49:47 | mordred | Shrews: got a sec to look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/634558 ? | |
| 20:28:45 | Shrews | mordred: sure | |
| 22:46:23 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Bail earlier on a version mismatch for a supported service https://review.openstack.org/637563 | |
| 22:46:36 | mordred | Shrews, dtantsur|afk : ^^ I made tests | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-21 | |||
| 00:48:02 | mordred | slaweq: let me know if I can be helpful investigating that devstack/neutron thing - it's hitting all of our patches now | |
| 00:48:11 | mordred | slaweq: I'm pretty open tomorrow and can debug or whatnot if it's helpful | |
| 08:03:17 | slaweq | mordred: frickler: I found the culprit of Your issue :) | |
| 08:03:31 | slaweq | mordred: frickler: it is this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/q/e8b7e768a2545621ee98511b8dd271c5117f76bd | |
| 08:03:48 | slaweq | I proposed revert (just in case): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/638359/1 | |
| 08:03:59 | slaweq | but I will try to fix it in better way than only reverting | |
| 08:04:05 | slaweq | maybe it will not be very hard :) | |
| 09:13:55 | frickler | slaweq: oh, great, so this is only triggered by port-forwarding being enabled? and that scenario is missing in neutron gate? | |
| 09:15:24 | slaweq | frickler: to be strict it is problem with multiple loading L3 service plugin | |
| 09:15:49 | slaweq | because now it is added as "requirement" for port forwarding service plugin and is loaded from config too in Your scenario | |
| 09:15:52 | slaweq | and that cause this issue | |
| 09:16:24 | slaweq | I'm know what is wrong and now I'm trying to change the logic in such way that it will not init service plugin class twice | |
| 09:19:32 | frickler | slaweq: o.k., that sounds plausible, I'm still worried that the patch did pass neutron gate | |
| 09:19:54 | slaweq | frickler: yes, that is something else what I will have to check | |
| 09:20:03 | slaweq | frickler: but first I would like to fix the issue :) | |
| 09:53:07 | frickler | slaweq: sure. fyi I confirmed that your revert fixes the issue in my local devstack, but I'm assuming you are much further in your analysis anyway by now ;) | |
| 09:54:44 | slaweq | frickler: yes, I have locally patch which should fix this issue without reverting | |
| 09:54:56 | slaweq | frickler: I hope I will finish it in 1-2 hours and will send to review | |
| 10:37:03 | openstackgerrit | Jens Harbott (frickler) proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: DNM: Dummy patch to verify neutron fix https://review.openstack.org/638385 | |
| 10:37:20 | frickler | slaweq: ^^ testing your patch here | |
| 10:38:19 | slaweq | frickler: ok, thx | |