| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-12-30 | |||
| 15:06:27 | mordred | mnaser: your patch failed on an unrelated issue - which I'm guessing is us learning that support for block storage v2 was removed | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-01-02 | |||
| 06:50:22 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1810260 in python-openstackclient "modify project's subnet quota, value<used is successfull from CLI" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to NAVYA (navyas1) | |
| 06:50:22 | openstackgerrit | NAVYA proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Its in relation to the bug, https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/1810260 https://review.openstack.org/627631 | |
| 09:58:41 | openstackgerrit | Kailun Qin proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add network segment range command object https://review.openstack.org/625544 | |
| 10:04:42 | dtantsur | mrhillsman: re "incentivize the SDKs", from my SDK perspective I would love to have a list of features to implement first, especially for services I'm not closely familiar with. So at least it's not a problem from young SDK perspective IMO. | |
| 11:29:52 | openstackgerrit | Kailun Qin proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add network segment range command object https://review.openstack.org/625544 | |
| 16:38:52 | openstackgerrit | weizj proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update hacking version https://review.openstack.org/627705 | |
| 17:06:39 | mordred | morning dtantsur ! if you get bored, gtema has a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/621153/ that could use eyes | |
| 17:07:18 | dtantsur | morning and HNY mordred! ah, yeah, I promised to review that some time ago :) | |
| 17:09:17 | mordred | dtantsur: HNY to you as well - looks like you had some nice travels over the holidays | |
| 17:14:27 | dtantsur | mordred: indeed! not very far, but still :) | |
| 17:14:30 | dtantsur | and you? | |
| 17:23:25 | mordred | dtantsur: not too much interesting - took a road trip to visit wife's family ... ready for holidays to be over :) | |
| 17:25:05 | dtantsur | next year we would like to go somewhere with actual snow :) | |
| 17:35:17 | mordred | dtantsur: there's still time for actual snow to come find you this year isn't there? :) | |
| 17:39:22 | dtantsur | yeah, it may happen closer to March :) but Berlin is not famous for having a lot of snow | |
| 17:42:01 | mordred | indeed | |
| 20:49:17 | dmsimard | The last release of osc-lib was 1.11.1 back in August 2018, I'm interested in https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/osc-lib/commit/?id=72fbf45ed15a1b4c8111cac9f4446289ca187b0d which unbreaks py37 | |
| 20:49:27 | dmsimard | Did we plan on doing a release anytime soon ? | |
| 20:51:05 | dmsimard | For example, the openstack client package is broken on fedora 29: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663043 | |
| 20:51:06 | openstack | bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1663043 in python-osc-lib "python-3 openstack command doesn' t work for server" [High,New] - Assigned to amoralej | |
| 22:02:16 | mordred | dtroyer: ^^ re: dmsimard | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-01-03 | |||
| 08:59:29 | dtantsur|afk | morning API ppl | |
| 09:00:10 | dtantsur | anyone has anything for the API SIG office hour? | |
| 13:13:23 | radeks_ | hey folks, I wonder if someone could have a look on this review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/617139/ please | |
| 13:31:44 | openstackgerrit | Radoslaw Smigielski proposed openstack/openstackclient master: Replace deprecated PBR option 'warnerrors' by 'warning-is-error' https://review.openstack.org/628177 | |
| 15:13:27 | openstackgerrit | Radoslaw Smigielski proposed openstack/openstackclient master: Remove deprecated PBR option 'warnerrors' https://review.openstack.org/628177 | |
| 15:51:57 | openstackgerrit | Radoslaw Smigielski proposed openstack/openstackclient master: Remove deprecated PBR option 'warnerrors' https://review.openstack.org/628177 | |
| 16:01:01 | elmiko | API SIG office hour is now open | |
| 16:01:12 | dtantsur | \o/ | |
| 16:01:39 | dtantsur | hi elmiko, how were your holidays? | |
| 16:01:50 | elmiko | dtantsur: quiet and relaxing =) | |
| 16:02:11 | elmiko | how about for you? | |
| 16:02:27 | dtantsur | yeah, ditto :) a bit of travelling around, a bit of calm drinking at home :) | |
| 16:02:41 | elmiko | nice, i'm all for calm drinking ;) | |
| 16:02:47 | dtantsur | major version bump to /dtantsur/v3.0 :) | |
| 16:02:57 | elmiko | \o/ congrats! | |
| 16:03:10 | dtantsur | thnx :) I hope it's a good thing :D | |
| 16:03:18 | elmiko | haha, ++ | |
| 16:05:02 | dtantsur | so, wanna have a discussion or we better just relax (and wait for someone)? :) | |
| 16:05:49 | elmiko | depends on the conversation | |
| 16:06:05 | elmiko | looks like maybe edleafe is not here | |
| 16:07:36 | elmiko | dtantsur: did you want to have a discussion about sig stuff? | |
| 16:08:11 | dtantsur | well, I have some API related thoughts.. or we can talk some SIG business (API vs SDK) | |
| 16:08:46 | elmiko | i'm game for either, might have any conclusive answers but we can talk it through | |
| 16:08:54 | elmiko | *might not | |
| 16:12:05 | dtantsur | so, we have /v1/nodes. Now I'm introducing a resource that has 1-1 mapping with nodes. Do we have any opinion on it being /v1/nodes/<node>/something, /v1/something (with a node_uuid), both, neither? | |
| 16:12:52 | elmiko | cdent: you around? i feel like you might have some good thoughts about ^^ | |
| 16:13:00 | cdent | oh hi | |
| 16:13:29 | elmiko | i don't think we have an official opinion, i think my personal preference would be to create the route hierarchy if it makes sense to decompose the components like that | |
| 16:14:01 | elmiko | i would think something like /v1/nodes/<node id>/something | |
| 16:14:28 | cdent | it depends on the meaning of something. If <something> is a part of a (a sub thing) node, then yeah, hierarchy | |
| 16:14:55 | cdent | but if something is simply something that just happens to have a node id in it, maybe not | |
| 16:15:32 | cdent | I tend to like sub resources, where there is a notiion of containership | |
| 16:15:47 | elmiko | good point about the something containing the node id within it | |
| 16:16:26 | elmiko | dtantsur: will these "somethings" only ever be accessed in relation to the node they are associated with or can they be operated on independently? | |
| 16:17:24 | dtantsur | so, we're talking about a semi-virtual "deployment" resource for a node. it may not be even completely independent on the database level. | |
| 16:17:56 | dtantsur | I'm not sure how much sense it makes to talk about a deployment without the node | |
| 16:18:39 | elmiko | i guess would /v1/deployments/<id> make any sense? | |
| 16:24:23 | cdent | /v1/nodes/<node id>/deployments/<deployment id> sounds vaguely correct, or maybe deployment$ if there's only ever one | |
| 16:24:53 | cdent | presumably this thing only exists when something is in a state of deployed? | |
| 16:37:47 | mordred | I agree with everything all of you have said | |
| 16:40:07 | elmiko | ++ more cookies for mordred XD | |
| 16:40:49 | cdent | elmiko: on things, I went back to healy's a bit before xmas and got the cider that was aged in bourbon casks. double plus good | |
| 16:41:12 | mordred | mmm. cookie | |
| 16:41:13 | elmiko | yay! | |
| 16:41:21 | elmiko | cdent: that place is too much fun | |
| 16:41:50 | cdent | met a nice cat | |
| 16:42:24 | elmiko | some friends spent the holidays in cornwall, they knew i had went to healy's and sent me a photo of them all drinking pints of the rattler. it was awesome | |
| 16:42:51 | cdent | excellent | |
| 16:43:06 | elmiko | hmm, so pints of cider + meeting a nice cat, sounds like a win! | |
| 16:43:20 | cdent | we did not have the most inspiring weather for "holidays in cornwall" | |
| 16:43:24 | cdent | was damp and mild | |
| 16:43:31 | elmiko | bummer =( | |
| 16:43:32 | cdent | which is just no fun in either direction | |
| 16:43:47 | elmiko | right, plus i imagine it kills the beach trips | |
| 16:46:26 | cdent | been in the sea three times in the last week or so | |
| 16:47:23 | elmiko | sounds chilly! | |
| 17:01:13 | elmiko | i'm stepping out for some lunch, dtantsur i know it's late over there but if you want to talk more i should be around | |
| 17:01:29 | dtantsur | sure, I forgot to say thanks all :) | |
| 17:01:36 | elmiko | np =) | |
| 17:01:37 | dtantsur | I think I'm good for now | |
| 17:01:46 | elmiko | awesome, good luck! | |
| 17:08:56 | dtantsur | \o | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-01-04 | |||
| 03:38:13 | openstackgerrit | Martin Chlumsky proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Allow "server migrate" (not live) to take "--host" option https://review.openstack.org/628334 | |
| 14:18:39 | mordred | cdent: it occurs to me that you should have chosen "placemat" as the codename for placement - because it wouldn't have made typing terrible at all | |
| 14:19:03 | cdent | i know how that can be | |
| 14:25:56 | mordred | cdent: it's all his fault isn't it? | |
| 14:26:20 | cdent | meh, he had a good idea and then we all ran with it and ruined it | |
| 16:01:11 | elmiko | mordred: LOL ++ for placemat | |
| 16:21:45 | dtantsur | ++ | |
| 16:42:57 | openstackgerrit | weizj proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Update hacking version to latest https://review.openstack.org/628593 | |
| 16:43:00 | openstackgerrit | weizj proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Update hacking version to latest https://review.openstack.org/628597 | |
| 16:43:03 | openstackgerrit | weizj proposed openstack/os-service-types master: Update hacking version to latest https://review.openstack.org/628602 | |
| 16:57:02 | elmiko | placements have sufficient resources this year. | |
| 16:57:12 | elmiko | cdent: i loved that line! | |
| 16:57:32 | cdent | i figured something was required | |
| 16:57:40 | elmiko | ++ | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-01-06 | |||
| 10:12:55 | openstackgerrit | weizj proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Update hacking version https://review.openstack.org/628593 | |
| 10:51:27 | openstackgerrit | weizj proposed openstack/os-service-types master: Update hacking version https://review.openstack.org/628602 | |