Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-20
16:47:17 mrhillsman just something to think about
16:47:22 elmiko mrhillsman: might make the list much easier to consume when we have a bar that says "above this line pass all tests, below not so much" XD
16:47:26 gtema one might want to use libcloud, which means 2 python
16:47:52 mrhillsman sorry, i meant jclouds
16:48:02 mrhillsman java v java
16:48:34 edleafe gtema: you bring up another point. There are OpenStack-specific SDKs in python, and then cross-cloud SDKs like libcloud
16:49:06 edleafe Obviously the cross-cloud won't do everything that an OpenStack-specific SDK would
16:49:28 edleafe Some people don't care about those things - they just want to spin up a VM, or store a blob
16:50:00 edleafe Having these validation tests would show what each SDK could do
16:50:53 mordred yeah. if you're writing a multi-cloud thing, libcloud might make your life much easier
16:51:22 mordred if I had more time, I'd start sending libcloud patches to use openstacksdk for their underlying layer and let them just be the mutli-cloud-abstraction layer - but I do not have such time
16:51:39 gtema :D
16:51:41 mordred same thing with jclouds vs openstack4j
16:52:04 elmiko what is this "more time" thing you speak of, it is an alien concept to me XD
16:52:29 mordred it seems like people are leaning more towards use of cloud-specific libraries with app plugins - sort of like how terraform uses gophercloud and doesnt' try to use a cloud abstraction layer
16:52:37 mordred elmiko: ikr?
16:53:04 mordred becausr the cloud specific libraries can do a better job of taking advantage of features of the cloud to provide features of the app
16:53:42 mordred the multi-cloud-libraries seemed to be much more popular several years ago - but that's a totally unsupported by science
16:54:25 mrhillsman hehe
16:54:45 elmiko lol
16:54:50 mrhillsman have we identified any next steps?
16:54:59 mrhillsman i know i have the project nav update
16:55:10 mrhillsman no meeting next thursday?
16:55:16 mrhillsman or office hours rather
16:55:19 edleafe Not for the next 2 weeks for me
16:55:43 edleafe Next one for me is Jan 10th
16:56:08 elmiko edleafe: ++
16:56:25 mrhillsman gtema i will follow your lead, next thursday is probably ok for me but not the 3rd
16:56:34 mrhillsman too close to the 1st :)
16:57:41 gtema mrhillsman: I would also like to skip next week, since I am moving to another house
16:57:44 mrhillsman sorry flip that
16:58:01 mrhillsman ok great
16:58:32 mrhillsman so just wait until the 10th gtema?
16:58:44 gtema yupp, that would be better
16:58:46 mrhillsman or sig leads?
16:59:13 mrhillsman ++
16:59:23 mrhillsman thx for the time it was great; ttyl
16:59:30 edleafe Thanks for coming!
16:59:34 elmiko mrhillsman: glad to help =)
16:59:41 mrhillsman really appreciate it
16:59:49 elmiko and in the new year we should add gtema to the official roster of the sig
17:01:57 elmiko later edleafe mordred gtema mrhillsman , have a nice holiday and new year =)
17:02:11 edleafe As the hour is up for the Office Hour, and I have to be somewhere soon, I'll see everyone in API and SDK land next year!
17:02:11 mrhillsman same to you!
17:02:13 gtema thanks elmiko, you too
17:02:37 gtema edleafe, bye
18:39:39 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add osc repo to the base job definition https://review.openstack.org/626590
19:51:20 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/cliff master: Use template for lower-constraints https://review.openstack.org/626673
20:03:20 frickler mordred: if I read the failure correctly, we need to revert the pin in sdk first, and reqs after that? so the other way round than what the deps say now. http://logs.openstack.org/93/624993/6/check/requirements-tox-py27-check-uc/c854690/
20:03:59 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Use template for lower-constraints https://review.openstack.org/626691
20:09:02 mordred frickler: oh - you're probably right about that
20:12:24 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Use template for lower-constraints https://review.openstack.org/626702
20:13:12 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Use template for lower-constraints https://review.openstack.org/626703
22:52:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cliff master: Use template for lower-constraints https://review.openstack.org/626673
23:16:38 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Use template for lower-constraints https://review.openstack.org/626702
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-21
00:26:47 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update the URL in doc https://review.openstack.org/604632
01:36:49 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove testr.conf as it's been replaced by stestr https://review.openstack.org/626492
03:14:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Use template for lower-constraints https://review.openstack.org/626691
08:53:03 openstackgerrit Jens Harbott (frickler) proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Unpin dogpile.cache https://review.openstack.org/625759
14:36:50 tobiash mordred: I just tried to install the openstackclient into a fresh venv (mac os, py37) and 'openstack server list' fails with this: http://paste.openstack.org/show/737821/
14:37:02 tobiash it pulled in openstacksdk 0.22.0
14:38:11 tobiash image list works however
14:44:00 frickler tobiash: oh, I think that that is a known py37 issue. let me see if we have a patch for that somewhere
14:46:52 frickler tobiash: https://review.openstack.org/618137 , not sure whether this has been released yet
14:47:55 tobiash frickler: ah thanks :)
14:49:34 tobiash frickler: the last release is 5 months ago so probably not
14:51:59 tobiash frickler: thanks, I can confirm that latest master fixes my issue :)
14:55:57 frickler tobiash: thanks for confirming, we should get a release for that early next year, then.
14:56:22 tobiash thanks
15:12:23 mordred frickler, tobiash: oh good. I was worried it was another sdk fail
16:01:51 slaweq dtroyer: hi, can You take a look at backport of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/624191/1/ if You will have time?
16:01:54 slaweq thx in advance
16:32:27 finucannot Given the sheer amount of bugs in argparse, I'm really starting to think we should just vendor it for cliff
16:33:17 finucannot The latest beauty: not being able to combine optionals with varying amounts of arguments and positionals https://bugs.python.org/issue9338
16:50:22 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Make 'destination' optional for live migration https://review.openstack.org/626949
23:59:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: More volume functional test fixes https://review.openstack.org/626020
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-24
12:00:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support enable/disable uplink status propagation https://review.openstack.org/586684
14:27:49 openstackgerrit Kailun Qin proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add network segment range command object https://review.openstack.org/625544
16:42:24 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-client-config master: Use template for lower-constraints https://review.openstack.org/626703
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-25
07:47:47 openstackgerrit wangqiang-bj proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fix typos https://review.openstack.org/627258
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-26
17:30:06 mchlumsky -m
17:30:51 mchlumsky git remote add mtl-ai144 ssh://mtl-ai144.ubisoft.org:git/kolla-ansible
17:31:02 mchlumsky git push mtldo
17:31:46 mchlumsky mchlumsky@
17:33:23 mchlumsky home/mchlumsky/
17:39:09 mchlumsky sorry about that
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-27
07:44:47 openstackgerrit lijunjie proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix the misspelling of "configuration" https://review.openstack.org/627477
08:35:45 openstackgerrit Noam Angel proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: fix multiple server delete produce multiple new lines https://review.openstack.org/627493
08:40:46 openstackgerrit Noam Angel proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: fix multiple server delete produce multiple new lines https://review.openstack.org/627493
08:40:55 openstackgerrit Noam Angel proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: fix multiple server delete produce multiple new lines https://review.openstack.org/627493
13:39:15 mchlumsky Hello. I created a blueprint and I was wondering if it needed to be approved before I can start working on it. The blueprint is here: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+spec/server-migrate-better-target-host-support
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-28
12:18:08 openstackgerrit NAVYA proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: commiting changes https://review.openstack.org/627631
20:57:45 openstack Launchpad bug 1674213 in python-openstackclient "openstack output as json end with shell line" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Yossi Ovadia (jabadia)
20:57:45 openstackgerrit Yossi Ovadia proposed openstack/cliff master: Fix for bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/1674213 https://review.openstack.org/627734
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-29
18:25:30 mnaser mordred: am i doing something seriously wrong here? http://paste.openstack.org/show/739409/
18:25:57 mnaser http://paste.openstack.org/show/739410/
18:26:09 mnaser i dont think there's any magic, envvars work with openstack client right now
18:35:01 openstackgerrit Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: docs: Add simplified CLI parser docs https://review.openstack.org/627781
18:35:07 mnaser mordred: ^ well that is much simpler.
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-30
02:53:44 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Remove support for py34 https://review.openstack.org/626300

Earlier   Later