Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2018-10-17
00:18:02 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Convert inspect_machine to use the baremetal proxy https://review.openstack.org/610941
10:37:36 ShilpaSD mordred: HI
10:42:30 ShilpaSD dtruong: Hi
10:44:26 ml samueldmq: I made some changes and answered commets after your review a few days ago, would be nice if you could have a look at it again https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604811/
12:02:41 Luzi hey, it would be nice to get some ideas from osc and sdk side on the library search for image encryption: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/library-for-image-encryption-and-decryption
13:47:46 mordred Luzi: I added a note to it - my vote is definitely for putting it in openstacksdk
13:53:59 Luzi thank you mordred :)
13:54:57 mordred Luzi: didn't you already write a patch for sdk for it?
13:55:28 Luzi that was for the signing of an image, now its about the encryption and decryption of images
13:55:37 mordred AH - gotcha
13:56:14 mordred yeah- I _definitely_ think it should go in sdk :)
13:57:53 Luzi mordred, we think that too, but there might be objections from nova or cinder - that's why there's an etherpad for a discussion :)
14:00:07 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Add release note about decoupling https://review.openstack.org/611320
14:48:43 ShilpaSD dtruong: Hi
16:11:35 openstackgerrit Merged openstack-infra/shade master: Add release note about decoupling https://review.openstack.org/611320
16:11:35 openstackgerrit Merged openstack-infra/shade master: Decouple OpenStackCloud from Connection https://review.openstack.org/610981
16:11:42 dtruong hi ShilpaSD
16:12:55 ShilpaSD dtruong: Hi, its related to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607061/
16:12:56 ShilpaSD , mordered helped me to resolve the query
16:13:23 ShilpaSD dtruong: query was, we have cluster related functional test cases under cloud package as well
16:13:53 ShilpaSD So can we move them here undr clustering package, that you have added
16:14:14 ShilpaSD Mordered replied that one day they should be merged
16:15:30 dtruong ShilpaSD: you are talking about the cluster tests in here: https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/openstack/cloud/openstackcloud.py
16:17:23 dtruong sorry, wrong link. are you referring to the tests in here: https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/openstack/tests/functional/cloud/test_clustering.py
16:17:25 ShilpaSD under cloud package
16:17:25 ShilpaSD Functional tests 'test_cluster_templates.py' and 'test_clustering.py'
16:17:31 ShilpaSD yes
16:20:46 dtruong ok, i guess i didn't realize that those tests existed
16:21:21 dtruong those tests are more comprehensive so i guess we can drop my functional tests in favor of those
16:24:11 dtruong ok, i see now. the functional tests in cloud package came from shade integration
16:24:32 ShilpaSD please elaborate this point for me
16:24:32 dtruong so they test a different code path than my functional tests
16:25:19 mordred dtruong: yah - that's right. we really should go through and make one set of tests - but also the plan (that we've just started on) is to get the openstackcloud.py layer things to be built on top of the things in the Proxy layer
16:26:01 mordred but we're still figuring out exactly what that should look like
16:27:10 dtruong so i think until that is done, it is useful to keep the two sets of tests
16:27:27 mordred dtruong: I agree
16:27:40 mordred dtruong: while I've got you there -- this just happened: http://logs.openstack.org/84/609984/1/gate/openstacksdk-functional-devstack-senlin/a6a39d7/testr_results.html.gz
16:27:47 mordred does that mean anythig to you?
16:28:28 mordred oh - that's stable/rocky
16:29:09 mordred I think it needs https://review.openstack.org/#/c/610753/ - but that is failing test
16:29:26 mordred *phew* I was worried something extra bad had happened
16:31:43 dtruong i have to look into why https://review.openstack.org/#/c/610753/ is failing
16:32:02 dtruong i don't see anything obvious but i'll check it out
16:35:21 mordred me either - and thanks!
16:37:43 dtruong ok, i need to backport one of my changes to rocky: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597225/
16:37:52 dtruong then it should work
16:48:44 mordred dtruong: awesome. I rebased my senlin patch on top of your backport, then added a depends-on to that patch for the sdk patch
16:48:50 mordred maybe it'll all work this time :)
17:08:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Rearrange shade image code https://review.openstack.org/609683
21:50:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add some warnings and clarifications for discovery https://review.openstack.org/606113
23:27:41 openstack Launchpad bug 1798489 in Shade "v4-fixed-ip / v6-fixed-ip no longer supported in shade for new vms" [Undecided,New]
23:27:41 eandersson mordred, I created a bug for the issue I mentioned yesterday https://bugs.launchpad.net/shade/+bug/1798489
23:46:04 mordred eandersson: thanks! I'll take a peek at that when I wake up. are you using shade directly still or are you on sdk? (the bug will be in both - mostly just curious)
23:48:21 eandersson This is for ansible
23:59:01 eandersson (so ansible -> shade)
#openstack-sdks - 2018-10-18
00:42:31 openstackgerrit Robin Cernin proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Improve document 'openstack complete' https://review.openstack.org/611469
00:49:06 openstackgerrit Robin Cernin proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Improve document 'openstack complete' https://review.openstack.org/611469
06:50:49 openstackgerrit wangxiyuan proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add registered limit CRUD support https://review.openstack.org/609572
06:50:50 openstackgerrit wangxiyuan proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add limit CRUD support https://review.openstack.org/609604
06:51:30 openstackgerrit wangxiyuan proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add limit CRUD support https://review.openstack.org/609604
09:51:21 openstackgerrit Mike Chen proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Compute: Add description support for server https://review.openstack.org/568549
09:52:12 jayashri_bidwe hi team, I have one query that is it possible to move magnum test which is inside openstacksdk/openstack/tests/functional/cloud package? please help.
13:22:11 mordred jayashri_bidwe: sure - where do you want to move it?
14:26:30 openstackgerrit Mike Chen proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Compute: Add description support for server https://review.openstack.org/568549
15:15:46 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Update sphinx extension logging https://review.openstack.org/611157
15:30:22 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Support v4-fixed-ip and v6-fixed-ip in create_server https://review.openstack.org/611651
15:30:31 mordred eandersson: ^^ that should take care of your issue
15:31:01 mordred Shrews: if you get a sec, mind looking at that?
15:33:23 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support v4-fixed-ip and v6-fixed-ip in create_server https://review.openstack.org/611652
15:34:52 Shrews mordred: alrighty
15:38:13 Shrews mordred: found a problem
15:40:58 mordred Shrews: oh no!
15:41:12 Shrews oh yeah!
15:41:12 mordred Shrews: you mean I'm not infallible?
15:41:34 Shrews mordred: i was disheartened to discover this too
15:41:58 Shrews i mean... what's real? what do i believe?
15:42:31 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Support v4-fixed-ip and v6-fixed-ip in create_server https://review.openstack.org/611651
15:43:06 Shrews mordred: uh... that fix is actually worse?
15:43:12 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support v4-fixed-ip and v6-fixed-ip in create_server https://review.openstack.org/611652
15:43:18 mordred Shrews: it is?
15:43:42 mordred Shrews: both port and port-id apparently go to 'port'
15:44:00 Shrews mordred: oh
15:44:32 mordred Shrews: what if I just makeall the parameters go to a one called "parameter"
15:44:56 Shrews i like that
15:45:00 Shrews easy to code to
15:45:10 mordred RIGHT? much easier than all of these different names
15:46:11 mordred and you can tell it things by putting markers into the parameter content - so like value['parameter'] = '<key>network</key>value:{network-name}EOL'
15:46:46 mordred but to save memory we sohuld really gzip the value first
15:47:11 dtantsur base64, then gzip
15:47:25 dtantsur hmm, the other way around
15:47:31 dtantsur oh both?
15:47:35 Shrews def both
15:48:21 mordred both for sure
15:48:42 mordred actually - for extra security, I thin you want to base64, then gzip, then base64 - then rot13 for good measure
15:50:01 dtantsur and pack it all into SOAP for enterprise friendliness
15:50:12 Shrews and yubikey 2FA so the user has to continually interact with the dongle
15:50:14 mordred maybe take the base64, turn it into an array of uint64, then swap the endianness of each uint64
15:50:31 mordred we should start a security consulting company
15:51:34 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add stackviz processing to functional tests https://review.openstack.org/610167
16:00:17 edleafe The API-SIG Office Hour has officially started

Earlier   Later