| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-09-19 | |||
| 16:10:06 | mordred | since the user gave us the endpoint | |
| 16:10:11 | dtantsur | aha, and this is something that I think I changed in the API SIG patch ;) | |
| 16:10:18 | mordred | heh | |
| 16:10:25 | dtantsur | because that means we're still stuck with versioned endpoints everywhere | |
| 16:10:39 | dtantsur | aaaand microversion discovery also? | |
| 16:10:51 | mordred | yeah- we need to figure out when it is the correct thing to do to do the discovery logic even with an endpoint override | |
| 16:11:01 | dtantsur | man we need to dedicate a whole day in Berlin in November just to sit down and go through this mess | |
| 16:11:06 | mordred | for microversion discovery it will do the fetch on the endpoint override | |
| 16:11:12 | mordred | dtantsur: ++ | |
| 16:11:13 | mordred | seriouslyu | |
| 16:11:27 | mordred | because therea re like 12 competing use cases | |
| 16:11:32 | dtantsur | yep | |
| 16:12:22 | dtantsur | ideally, I'd prefer to endpoint-override to be unversioned (but support versioned ones too) | |
| 16:12:32 | dtantsur | my head hurts just from thinking about it.. | |
| 16:16:20 | mordred | dtantsur: yeah. such awesomeness | |
| 16:16:56 | dtantsur | the next two functions are also awesome: they handle the fact that some API use empty string instead of null :) | |
| 16:17:08 | dtantsur | which is not an issue for Python but a big issue for a statically typed language :D | |
| 16:32:18 | mordred | dtantsur|afk: ok. I think I have the versioned/unversioned thing handled | |
| 16:35:13 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Use discovery instead of config to create proxies https://review.openstack.org/600292 | |
| 19:33:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Explicitly set logging levels for external libs https://review.openstack.org/602085 | |
| 21:33:39 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Run all tasks through the threadpool https://review.openstack.org/603739 | |
| 23:47:10 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Update baremetal objects with fields added up to Rocky https://review.openstack.org/599420 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-09-20 | |||
| 06:34:48 | AJaeger | Shrews, mordred, can you approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594393/ , please? | |
| 06:35:27 | AJaeger | please also review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603563/ - that finishes python3-first goal | |
| 12:45:23 | Shrews | AJaeger: mordred: why does that shade job need to be in stable/queens branch when the job itself requires shade master? | |
| 12:46:09 | AJaeger | Shrews: that job is *today* configured this way in project-config. If it's wrong, good that we figure that one finally out ;) | |
| 12:46:47 | Shrews | i don't see that job in project config, only a reference to it for ansible/ansible | |
| 12:47:13 | AJaeger | Shrews: let's double check - which job exactly do you mean? | |
| 12:47:22 | mordred | Shrews: oh, good point - I don't think it needs to be there | |
| 12:47:23 | Shrews | shade-ansible-stable-2.5-functional-devstack | |
| 12:47:53 | AJaeger | Shrews: ah, we can remove it as well completely. | |
| 12:47:58 | mordred | AJaeger, Shrews: lemme fix real quick | |
| 12:49:06 | AJaeger | mordred, Shrews - indeed, why was it added there? | |
| 12:50:19 | AJaeger | Shrews: ah see, it - mordred changed shade-ansible-functional-devstack which was in-repo... We could remove that one as well... | |
| 12:50:37 | mordred | AJaeger, Shrews: remote: https://review.openstack.org/594393 import zuul job settings from project-config | |
| 12:51:36 | AJaeger | LGTM, want to +2A directly? | |
| 12:53:11 | mordred | wfm - look good to you Shrews ? | |
| 12:53:24 | Shrews | looking | |
| 12:55:19 | AJaeger | mordred: want to +2A https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597579 as well? I expect dhellmann to remove his WIP from it once 594393 merged... | |
| 12:55:53 | Shrews | where is openstack-cover-jobs template? | |
| 12:56:45 | AJaeger | Shrews: in openstack-zuul-jobs - as announed in openstack-dev mailing list | |
| 12:56:53 | AJaeger | bbl | |
| 12:57:16 | Shrews | oh, my repo wasn't up-to-date | |
| 12:57:17 | Shrews | :) | |
| 12:57:34 | Shrews | +3 | |
| 13:30:48 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Use discovery instead of config to create proxies https://review.openstack.org/600292 | |
| 13:55:28 | AJaeger | mordred: do you know why https://review.openstack.org/600941 fails? | |
| 13:56:25 | mordred | AJaeger: I'm going to blame elves | |
| 13:57:09 | mordred | AJaeger: lots of timeout exceptions - maybe just got a super slow node? | |
| 13:57:12 | AJaeger | so, recheck again? | |
| 13:57:29 | mordred | yeah. :( | |
| 13:57:40 | AJaeger | ok, thanks | |
| 14:05:37 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Update .zuul.yaml https://review.openstack.org/603563 | |
| 14:29:49 | openstackgerrit | LIU Yulong proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support firewall service for SDK https://review.openstack.org/592303 | |
| 15:08:19 | mnaser | mordred: i remember you mentioning there was a way to get an 'http client' for the placement service using openstacksdk :( | |
| 15:08:23 | mnaser | but i cant remember where or how | |
| 15:09:03 | mnaser | it was something that even if there is no placement support, doing something got you an http client | |
| 15:18:11 | mordred | mnaser: conn.placement should be an http client for placement | |
| 15:18:44 | mordred | mnaser: so conn.placement.get('/some/url') should return you a Response object | |
| 15:18:55 | mnaser | mordred: wonderful, i'll give that a shot. writing tooling to do an audit of placement/nova | |
| 15:19:33 | mordred | cool! we should probably add real placement support | |
| 15:19:46 | mordred | maybe one day I'll sucker cdent into doing that | |
| 15:19:51 | mnaser | mordred: mriedem made osc-placement so it cant be that much work | |
| 15:20:14 | cdent | andrey and a few others did a lot of that work | |
| 15:20:24 | cdent | mordred: curl and/or gabbi 4evah | |
| 15:23:42 | mnaser | mordred: http://paste.openstack.org/show/730447/ shucks | |
| 15:23:45 | mnaser | i remember us talking about this | |
| 15:23:53 | mnaser | maybe the fix wasn't released | |
| 15:24:04 | mnaser | cdent pushed up something about this too | |
| 15:25:51 | mriedem | yeah i only reviewed osc-placement... | |
| 15:26:11 | cdent | mnaser: you thinking of this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575117/ ? | |
| 15:26:32 | mriedem | cdent: no, | |
| 15:26:34 | mriedem | more about, | |
| 15:26:34 | mnaser | cdent: ah yes | |
| 15:26:47 | mnaser | this is a queens deployment | |
| 15:26:47 | mriedem | oh - i think what mnaser is looking for is a tool to look for orphans in placement | |
| 15:27:02 | mriedem | e.g. orphaned providers or allocations for things that don't actually exist in nova anymore | |
| 15:27:05 | mriedem | like compute nodes and instances | |
| 15:27:09 | mnaser | well that's what im trying to write if i get a working client :p | |
| 15:27:29 | cdent | it's fun to "yes" and "no" to the same thing | |
| 15:27:31 | mriedem | personally i think that should live in nova-manage placement * | |
| 15:27:51 | mordred | mnaser: ah - that hasn't landed yet :( | |
| 15:27:53 | mnaser | i dont mind adding that in | |
| 15:28:02 | mriedem | but as i said yesterday, we can't know if the providers/allocations in placement are for nova things really without consumer types | |
| 15:28:16 | mriedem | although we can probably glean that from knowing if the provider has VCPU inventory | |
| 15:28:35 | mordred | oh - wait - I can't read - it did land | |
| 15:28:39 | mriedem | (1) is it root (2) does it have vcpu inventory, then it's likely a compute node | |
| 15:28:54 | mnaser | mordred: landed on the API side in rocky, i dont think sdk works around this somehow locally | |
| 15:29:35 | mordred | mnaser: yah - I do not believe it has any local workarounds. we could maybe make one? I think the best workaround would be to put in a placement_endpoint_override | |
| 15:29:39 | mnaser | mriedem: i was going to assume it was a compute node all the time (because in my use case it always is) but i guess adding those stuff can be trivial | |
| 15:29:56 | mordred | in your clouds.yaml or whatever - so that we don't try to run discovery and fail due to lack of status | |
| 15:30:16 | mnaser | im totally using env variables out of lazyness | |
| 15:30:22 | mnaser | so i assume OS_PLACEMENT_ENDPOINT_OVERRIDE ? | |
| 15:30:46 | mordred | yah | |
| 15:32:24 | cdent | mriedem: speaking of "does it have vcpu inventory" I made https://review.openstack.org/#/c/600016/ in response to digging in some of the placement-db using nova-manage and nova-status stuff | |
| 15:33:23 | mnaser | mordred: yay that worked, i'll workaround with that and then maybe i'll ask for help from mriedem to bring that into nova-manage | |
| 15:33:36 | mordred | coolio | |
| 15:33:40 | mnaser | merci beaucoup | |
| 15:33:44 | mordred | \o/ | |
| 17:04:28 | edleafe | cdent: elmiko: dtantsur: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-sig-newsletter is ready for your review | |