Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2018-08-10
17:13:59 mordred ++
17:14:03 samueldmq you okay if that reflects on really splitting tests into separate files/directories? or should I add a decorator or somehting on the top of the tests?
17:14:23 samueldmq like @operator to indicate that's an operator test
17:14:49 samueldmq s/test/testcase
17:17:37 mordred samueldmq: either thing works for me - I don't have a strong opinion - so whichever seems to work best as you work on it
17:18:00 mordred directories is probably easier
17:18:16 samueldmq nice, I like that. let's just get the thing done
17:18:34 mordred samueldmq: in fact, we could get a little fancy ...
17:19:17 samueldmq also, I found we allow tests to run against other clouds... but we call it so many different things: OS_CLOUD, OS_TEST_CLOUD, OS_DEMO_CLOUD, OS_OPERATOR_CLOUD. so having that consolidated into a single envvar is a must.
17:19:19 mordred we have self.demo_cloud and self.operator_cloud
17:19:25 mordred samueldmq: ++
17:19:47 mordred samueldmq: if we make an OperatorFunctionalTest base class that is where self.operator_cloud comes from
17:20:10 mordred it could help us make sure we're testing features even in devstack with the correct user vs. operator context
17:20:14 mordred or something
17:20:37 samueldmq base.py for each one of enduser/ operator/ dirs then?
17:20:40 mordred probably still need self.operator_cloud in setUp/tearDown methods though ...
17:21:03 mordred samueldmq: but yeah - start with the directories - and we can figure out if we can do fancier things later :)
17:21:53 samueldmq mordred: nice. I will follow what we had as operator cloud in shade previously
17:22:01 samueldmq to define what's operator and what's not
17:24:58 mordred sounds great to me
17:25:59 Shrews mordred: my wrist is quite sore today so i'm going to stop keyboarding for a while. i'll check in on things later
17:30:11 mordred Shrews: ++
17:30:23 mordred Shrews: don't push through - gotta let that wrist heal
17:35:17 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix the heat template resource more cleaner https://review.openstack.org/590786
17:37:05 abishop dtroyer: I need to ask you re-review https://review.openstack.org/575804 (I had to rebase to resolve merge conflict)
17:59:20 openstackgerrit Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Make require_service use conn.has_service in tests https://review.openstack.org/591029
18:09:38 openstackgerrit Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Consolidate cloud/base.py into functional/base.py https://review.openstack.org/591031
18:20:16 samueldmq mordred: what is the difference between tests in functional/ vs functional/cloud ?
18:20:48 samueldmq all those in /cloud came from shade? are there known intersections?
19:50:57 mordred samueldmq: yes - that's the only difference
#openstack-sdks - 2018-08-11
12:25:29 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add more options to enable ansible testing feature https://review.openstack.org/590078
22:03:21 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix wait for futures append 'result' error https://review.openstack.org/559523
#openstack-sdks - 2018-08-13
07:27:15 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: add pool member operating status https://review.openstack.org/591281
07:38:37 usr2033 hi, how can i get services available resource amount that can be allocated to projects
09:07:24 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Correct update operations for baremetal https://review.openstack.org/590770
09:12:27 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Use the base Resource's JSON patch support in Image https://review.openstack.org/591314
09:51:31 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] VIF API for baremetal https://review.openstack.org/591324
10:01:39 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Add VIF API for baremetal https://review.openstack.org/591324
10:26:53 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Add VIF API for baremetal https://review.openstack.org/591324
11:40:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Replaced a few references to LP bugs with storyboard https://review.openstack.org/586453
12:27:59 dtantsur TheJulia: early comments welcome: https://review.openstack.org/591324
12:48:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add simple create/show/delete functional tests for all baremetal resources https://review.openstack.org/590806
12:55:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: fix 2 typos in documentation https://review.openstack.org/587624
13:26:56 TheJulia dtantsur: thanks! Added to my review queue :)
14:03:18 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix inconsistency (nit) https://review.openstack.org/572771
14:29:37 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: add support for VIF attach/detach API https://review.openstack.org/591324
14:33:46 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: add support for VIF attach/detach API https://review.openstack.org/591324
16:05:24 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: DNM: implement block-storage backup resource https://review.openstack.org/591445
17:13:56 amotoki dtroyer: is there any chance to land https://review.openstack.org/#/c/590425/ in stable/rocky?
17:14:51 amotoki dtroyer: this breaks neutronclient OSC plugin gate for a while. I would like to have this in Rocky and release it as osc-lib 1.11.1.
17:23:00 guilhermesp hello everyone! Could some one clarify some questions about openstacksdk? I have two different use cases that I'd like to discuss
17:24:32 guilhermesp In advance: a user can create a router with an external network via python clients and horizon, but if a regular user wants to create this resource via api, I can't be done because is not allowed by the network policy
17:24:33 guilhermesp https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/1dda2bca862b1268c0f5ae39b7508f1b1cab6f15/etc/policy.json#L105
17:24:58 guilhermesp One of the user cases is using an ansible module to configure routers https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/modules/os_router_module.html#os-router-module
17:25:23 guilhermesp and another is a role that attempts to configure a router without success http://logs.openstack.org/94/588594/10/check/ansible-role-cloud-launcher-functional/9507169/ara-report/result/7ead3794-7594-4b91-aef1-4a761cbe3eca/
17:25:50 guilhermesp so my question is: is the network policy consistent?
17:26:07 guilhermesp mordred mnaser ^
17:27:28 mnaser i'll dig in a bit but i wonder if a bug report already exists for this somewhere
17:28:50 openstackgerrit Tim Rozet proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Cinder: Add version checking https://review.openstack.org/590807
17:39:43 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: DNM: implement block-storage backup resource https://review.openstack.org/591445
18:11:12 mordred guilhermesp: the situation with what 'regular' users can or can't do on a given neutron related to routers and external networks is about as far away from being consistent behavior as is possible
18:11:43 mordred just about every possible combination of being able to do or not do exists in the wild - and that's just looking at public clouds
18:12:05 mordred there isn't really a way for sdk to know whether a given user can perform a task based on policy settings on the server side
18:12:16 mordred unfortunately
18:22:34 mnaser mordred: this seems to be failing against our public cloud (and both devstack).. openstack cli seem to work
19:30:09 mordred mnaser: awesome
19:30:25 mordred mnaser: well - openstack cli uses sdk for these - so something somewhere is unhappy :)
19:30:38 mnaser mordred: so sounds very much like a module thing
19:32:05 mnaser guilhermesp: maybe you can have a look over https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/lib/ansible/modules/cloud/openstack/os_router.py if you have sometime
19:32:18 guilhermesp yeah, I'm going to take a look at this
19:32:18 mnaser and see what difference is it being called with compared to osc
20:28:27 dtroyer amotoki: yes, I had meant to do that earlier, apologies for the delay...
#openstack-sdks - 2018-08-14
07:23:24 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: DNM: implement block-storage backup resource https://review.openstack.org/591445
08:19:33 usr2033 hi, are there any way to check connection scope[domain/project]?
08:50:33 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: add pool member operating status https://review.openstack.org/591281
11:22:35 dtantsur no microversion talks for us in Berlin :(
11:28:09 cdent dtantsur: :(
11:28:27 cdent it really does seem like we need an actual openstack conference
11:28:49 cdent maybe it is time for an alterstack
11:28:57 dtantsur ++
11:41:54 dtantsur cdent: but careful, this can lead you to asking for an openstack foundation to govern it :D
11:42:20 cdent /o\
12:08:27 dtantsur mordred: hey, is it intentional that functional tests are not running on stable branches? e.g. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591617/
12:50:40 openstackgerrit Matthias Lisin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fwaas: Add support for FWaaS v2.0 API https://review.openstack.org/591650
12:53:07 mordred dtantsur: nope! that seems like a thing we should fix
12:53:16 dtantsur indeed
12:53:19 mordred dtantsur: and BOO for our microversion talk not getting accepted
12:53:26 dtantsur very much BOOOO
12:53:34 dtantsur you were right, we should have included "Edge" in the title :(
12:54:06 mordred edge solves everyone's problems
12:56:12 cdent Microversions are very edgy
12:56:35 cdent Microversions: We'll sell you the whole API but you'll only get the edge
12:56:39 cdent etc
14:18:17 openstackgerrit Matthias Lisin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fwaas: Add support for FWaaS v2.0 API https://review.openstack.org/591650
15:13:36 mordred cdent: Microversions: Edge edge containers edge nfv micro-services golang edge?
15:14:15 cdent I think you need an innovation in there
15:24:03 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: import zuul job settings from project-config https://review.openstack.org/591750
15:24:04 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: switch documentation job to new PTI https://review.openstack.org/591751
17:11:36 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Fix sphinx-build invocation https://review.openstack.org/591790
17:44:19 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Detailed help message for QoS max-burst-kbps value https://review.openstack.org/588168

Earlier   Later