Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2018-06-29
14:58:29 dtantsur mordred: any suggestions on a title for https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/microversions-better-than-beer ? or any other comments?
15:03:27 dhellmann dtroyer , mordred : putting the image signing stuff into the sdk layer seems reasonable to me
15:08:04 mordred 745787
15:08:08 mordred gah
16:21:05 ssbarnea anyone here that can help reviewing/merging stuff into cliff?
16:26:31 ssbarnea https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579025/
16:26:43 ssbarnea https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574846/
16:32:23 dtroyer ssbarnea: looking…
16:32:53 ssbarnea thanks!
16:33:29 dtroyer +2 on the first, I already did the second one…
17:59:39 ssbarnea dtroyer: now the question it would be how long it will take to get the +Workflow on these.
18:00:27 dtroyer dhellmann: got a sec for some cliff? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574846/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579025/
18:00:53 dtroyer ssbarnea: we're getting close to freeze in a few weeks, best get some time on it all
18:01:47 dhellmann dtroyer : looking
18:02:51 dhellmann dtroyer : LGTM, +2a for both
18:03:00 dtroyer thanks!
18:03:02 dhellmann dtroyer : how do you feel about turning of the pypy jobs? those are non-voting anyway
18:03:05 dhellmann I can do it if you agree
18:03:12 dhellmann I think infra will want your +1
18:03:29 dtroyer sounds good
18:03:35 dhellmann ok, I'll add you to the review
18:03:54 dtroyer there are two backports in the queue also for cmd2
18:08:29 dhellmann ok, I starred those so I will see the email when zuul finishes the tests
18:09:35 dtroyer I'm not aware of anything else coming up, I can prepare releases for Monday
18:09:42 dhellmann sounds good
18:17:49 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding api_version to FakeApp https://review.openstack.org/576833
19:34:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cliff master: Build universal wheels https://review.openstack.org/574846
19:40:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cliff master: Assure executable name is kept when app is called as module https://review.openstack.org/579025
20:15:28 openstackgerrit Hongbin Lu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support filtering port with IP address substring https://review.openstack.org/532324
#openstack-sdks - 2018-06-30
13:26:17 openstackgerrit Fan Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add --key-name and --key-unset option for server rebuild API. https://review.openstack.org/576422
13:30:18 openstackgerrit Fan Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add --key-name and --key-unset option for server rebuild API. https://review.openstack.org/576422
15:54:22 openstackgerrit Fan Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add --key-name and --key-unset option for server rebuild API. https://review.openstack.org/576422
16:02:51 wacuuu hi. I've got a problem with testing. I changed one thing in code, it resulted in change in uri. Now request contains some extra fields. I'm trying to make proper tests for last few days and i have no idea where to look in code. It would be a simple change to let know tox that request contains extra field. Where to start?
16:05:05 openstackgerrit Fan Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add --key-name and --key-unset option for server rebuild API. https://review.openstack.org/576422
16:13:59 openstackgerrit Fan Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add --key-name and --key-unset option for server rebuild API. https://review.openstack.org/576422
19:05:45 frickler wacuuu: usually the structure of the tests follows the structure of the code. for further clues, maybe you can show us your change?
19:24:12 wacuuu https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2002563
19:24:56 wacuuu frickler:the efect it gives is that it expands uri for additional filter with domain_id
#openstack-sdks - 2018-07-01
00:55:57 openstackgerrit Fan Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add --key-name and --key-unset option for server rebuild API. https://review.openstack.org/576422
07:01:25 frickler wacuuu: so IIUC the solution would be to amend all the affected URI mocks with the new parameter, like this http://paste.openstack.org/show/724684/ (modulo pep8)
07:02:43 frickler wacuuu: of course this will need expanding for all the other tests, but it does get one test to pass for me again
07:04:14 frickler wacuuu: looking at these tests, it may also be useful to untangle the mess of repetitions a bit, but that would be a different issue I think. also not sure what mordred and others would think of that
07:04:29 wacuuu frickler: Thanks a lot! I will do this as soon as possible.
07:05:13 wacuuu about the second i will try to ask them when i understand the issue and become more fluent in this code
07:06:16 frickler wacuuu: also, in regard to your earlier question, don't be afraid to submit patches with failing tests, we can then help to iterate on them and get things fixed
07:06:58 wacuuu ok, will do in future
17:29:00 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-wg master: Expand error code document to expect clarity https://review.openstack.org/577118
17:37:01 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-wg master: Add links to errors-example.json https://review.openstack.org/578369
#openstack-sdks - 2018-07-02
01:38:57 openstackgerrit tianhui proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Compute: Add tags support for server https://review.openstack.org/569386
09:35:27 nobuto Hello, regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/565152/ I submitted it a while ago, but don't know how to get a review from core reviewers for +2. Can somebody review it?
11:04:38 openstackgerrit yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [WIP]Add error message when using "set" command without all optional arguments https://review.openstack.org/579515
11:30:05 openstackgerrit Telles Mota Vidal Nóbrega proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Adding api_version to FakeAPP https://review.openstack.org/579523
12:24:04 tellesnobrega hi folks, I sent out a patch that we need on saharaclient to implement a new feature. The patch is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579523
12:24:20 tellesnobrega my question is, when is the next released planned?
12:56:46 Luzi mordred: I have been looking through openstacksdk, but i don't think the openstackcloud class is a suitable place for the signature generator. Where do you think we can add the signature generator class?
13:45:05 openstackgerrit Nobuto Murata proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support --community in openstack image list https://review.openstack.org/565152
13:48:06 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Only send force parameter to live migration if supported https://review.openstack.org/578960
14:27:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add release note link in README https://review.openstack.org/578672
14:27:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Magnum cluster support https://review.openstack.org/578097
16:40:01 mriedem mordred: one question inline https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578960/
17:55:28 tellesnobrega dhellmann, do you know when the next release of osc-lib will be?
18:36:03 dtroyer tellesnobrega: soon? I want to get that and cliff out this week yet in advance of the upcoming freeze by at least a week. OSC will follow with at least one more release
18:47:24 tellesnobrega we need for a sahara patch
18:47:24 tellesnobrega I have a patch for osc-lib that I would love to see in before the release
18:47:24 tellesnobrega dtroyer, awesome. Thanks
19:06:12 dtroyer ok, good to know. I'll be able to look at these later this afternoon
19:17:42 wacuuu hi, i tried to push my change to gerrit by git remote add gerrit https://git.openstack.org/openstack/openstacksdk && git review. it exited with 104. Have i done something wrong? Forgive me if i'm doing something wrong, but i did not find any clear instructions how to, so that is why i experimented a bit
19:19:10 Shrews wacuuu: hrm, i don't think it's necessary to manually add the remote anymore with recent git-review. A 'git review -s' would also do it
19:19:56 Shrews i think the automatic setting of it uses ssh (at least it does for me)
19:24:36 mordred wacuuu, Shrews: if git review finds a gerrit remote, it won't update anything...
19:24:54 mordred my gerrit remote uses ssh://mordred@review.openstack.org:29418/openstack/openstacksdk.git as the url
19:25:31 mordred BUT - you should be able to 'git remote remove gerrit && git review -s' in the openstacksdk repo and it should set it up properly for you
19:25:41 mordred have you added your ssh key to your account in gerrit?
19:26:10 mordred https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/ssh-keys
19:26:10 wacuuu yes i did
19:26:21 mordred cool
19:26:35 Shrews mordred: i do not understand your words. there must be a gerrit remote
19:26:47 Shrews you just pasted yours
19:27:02 mordred Shrews: yes - there must be- but if one has been added by hand first, git review will not modify it
19:27:08 Shrews oh
19:27:19 mordred Shrews: I frequently make bad words
19:28:36 mordred mmm. crunchy
19:29:43 wacuuu could you take a look http://paste.openstack.org/show/724795/ ?
19:31:20 mordred hrm. that's not fun
19:31:35 mordred wacuuu: does this command work for you? ssh -p 29418 review.openstack.org gerrit ls-projects | wc -l
19:31:51 mordred wacuuu: (make sure to do the wc -l - otherwise the command will print 1958 lines)
19:32:07 wacuuu nop. got hit by permision denied
19:32:08 Shrews that's head scratching for multiple raisins
19:32:43 wacuuu key is bad i assume
19:32:53 mordred kk. so that means either somehting doesn't like your ssh key, that somethign is blocking your access to 29418 or something is weird with username
19:33:35 Shrews fwiw, that seems like an older git-review
19:33:48 mordred you can doublecheck that gerrit agrees your username is wacuuu at https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/
19:34:52 mordred yes - it does seem like an older git-review- although I would expect it to still work
19:36:24 Shrews me too, it just failed at failing properly in that paste
19:36:40 mordred ++
19:36:49 wacuuu yyyy i think username is ok, i will try to regenerate pub from priavate
19:51:11 wacuuu i will try one more thing: push this from other machine. because i don't have to many ideas what could be wrong. btw: does username change happens immediatly or it needs time to propagate?
19:55:38 mordred it should happen immediately
20:00:48 wacuuu different server, permision denied :/
20:13:06 wacuuu gerrit at it's full might. mordred, your test passed. review still doesn't work :)

Earlier   Later