Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2017-10-04
07:32:51 slaweq briancurtin: hello, can You take a look once again at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/504111/?
07:33:17 slaweq briancurtin: Your W+1 disappeared probably because of zuul v2 <--> v3 migrations
08:47:32 slaweq hi, when will be some new version of openstacksdk released?
08:48:26 slaweq I need one feature from it to make properly patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/501868/
08:48:45 slaweq and I will also need one more patch from SDK for OSC later
08:49:01 slaweq is there any schedule of releases for openstack sdk?
09:01:27 flanders_ slaweq: you'll want to chat with the API-SIG over on #openstack-api
09:01:40 slaweq flanders_: ok, thx
09:01:44 slaweq I will talk there
09:02:17 flanders_ slaweq: ask for edleafe
09:31:43 slaweq ok, thx for tip flanders_
11:18:44 briancurtin slaweq: not sure what he’s talking about, this is the right place. i’ll take a look at what else has been merged and i can put together a release
11:20:15 briancurtin slaweq: i just w+1’ed it so it should be merged soon
11:23:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Add support for network quota details command https://review.openstack.org/504111
11:28:38 slaweq briancurtin: thx a lot
11:29:08 slaweq briancurtin: in fact I will need for OSC patches also this patch which You just w+1'ed :)
13:08:31 mordred briancurtin: sorry for the delay, yesterday was a bit hectic ...
13:10:49 mordred briancurtin: I'm not anticipating much moving or shaking this week what with all the zuul v3 stuff flying around this week.
13:12:05 mordred briancurtin: that said, there was never any intention of removing any existing cores, so I don't think there shouldn't be any time-related issues for getting that in
18:47:03 openstackgerrit Hongbin Lu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Added AddNetwork command to server https://review.openstack.org/509209
20:52:29 mriedem hello!
20:52:37 mriedem so apparently the openstack python sdk doesn't have any support for flavor extra specs
20:52:40 mriedem which is pretty basic if you're using nova
20:52:46 mriedem does anyone know if someone is already working on this?
20:53:22 briancurtin no.
20:54:23 mriedem no you don't know, or no no one is working on it?
20:56:45 briancurtin no, i didn’t get around to implementing that in my free time and i am not working on it nor will i be.
20:56:53 briancurtin it’s pretty basic though
20:57:12 mriedem ok, yeah, should be - i've just never done any sdk coding, so wanted to ask before spending any time on it
20:57:19 mriedem for now i sent someone to novaclient
20:57:24 briancurtin great
20:59:54 flanders_ Have you looked at python shade SDK mriedem ?
21:00:11 mriedem nope
21:00:19 mriedem i really don't venture outside of novaclient
21:00:31 flanders_ No worries.
21:00:46 flanders_ Good luck.
21:00:56 mriedem flanders_: so i've heard you have some gap analysis charts
21:01:08 mriedem would that be so detailed to the point of knowing some of these major gaps in the compute api in the openstacksdk?
21:01:54 flanders_ Analysis was usability study on getting started quickly with each of the sdks
21:02:05 flanders_ Shade is the easiest, in short.
21:02:46 flanders_ Worth talking with chairs of API-SIG for feedback via #openstack-api
21:02:47 briancurtin mriedem: i doubt anyone knows such a thing, but yeah, someone could look at the docs, look at the code, and implement what’s not there. same for just about everything ever.
21:02:49 mriedem to get started, but not the most feature complete
21:03:01 briancurtin API-SIG and openstack-api has nothing to do with this project.
21:03:10 mriedem flanders_: ^
21:03:36 briancurtin yeah it’s not the most feature complete because people building it weren’t on the server-side projects and no one on the server-side projects cared about SDK, so we built what we knew and what we were using
21:03:56 flanders_ My bad briancurtin - mea culpa
21:04:09 mriedem briancurtin: tbc, i was replying to flanders_ about shade
21:04:13 edleafe flanders_: FWIW, we hang out here, not #openstack-api
21:05:05 flanders_ Duly noted edleafe
21:05:19 mriedem hells bells it's edleafe
21:09:51 mordred mriedem: we've got flavor extra specs in shade - I expect we'll add support for it to sdk as we work on getting the shade layer and the sdk layer integrated with each other
21:10:11 mriedem mordred: so if i worked on extra specs in the sdk, that would ultimately benefit shade?
21:10:28 mriedem and the sdk
21:12:51 mordred mriedem: sure nuff
21:18:17 xarses to echo the conversation that was going on in #openstack-dev " Given the openstack python sdk, how is one expected to CRUD flavor properties? https://developer.openstack.org/sdks/python/openstacksdk/users/proxies/compute.html Seems to have no clue, and flavor_create took kwargs from me that it did nothing with (I initially figured that sending properties would have done it, but its ignored) "
21:18:38 xarses API is: https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#flavors-extra-specs-flavors-os-flavor-extra-specs
21:19:51 briancurtin xarses: create_flavor would take any of the names on https://developer.openstack.org/sdks/python/openstacksdk/users/resources/compute/v2/flavor.html#openstack.compute.v2.flavor.Flavor, so create_flavor(disk=blah, ram=blah, ephemeral=False, …) and calling that does what?
21:20:24 mordred adding extra specs to a flavor is an additional call - it's not part of the create_flavor flow
21:20:43 briancurtin sure, but create_flavor shouldn’t be doing nothing
21:20:53 mordred once you have a flavor, you POST to /flavors/{id}/os-extra_specs
21:21:04 mordred briancurtin: agreed
21:22:08 xarses f = {'property': {'hw:cpu_policy': 'dedicated', 'hw:cpu_sockets': 1, 'hw:cpu_threads': 2, 'cost': 148.5, 'hw:cpu_cores': 8, 'hw:cpu_thread_policy': 'prefer'}, 'vcpus': 16, 'ram': 32256, 'name': 'm32-c16-d320-as', 'disk': 320, 'id': 'e2193116-f4f6-4db1-9191-33ef7d958895'}
21:22:17 xarses create_flavor(**f)
21:22:23 xarses returns the flavor object
21:22:42 xarses no info about that keys where ignored
21:23:22 briancurtin yeah, should probably output that and/or fail. i believe there was a ticket to output a warning with the ignored keys
21:23:29 xarses I see two problems, it took extra keys
21:23:34 briancurtin everything you pass has to match up with something on the associated resource
21:23:51 xarses and that there is no interface in sdk.compute to set os-extra_specs
21:24:03 briancurtin yeah well someone has the add the later
21:24:43 briancurtin im also not sure how you figured you could just send an arbitrary list of keys
21:25:10 briancurtin (that’s horribly worded…it’s not a list. arbitrary keyword arguments)
21:25:37 xarses by sending them and it just returning the result that I sort-of expected and moving on
21:25:57 xarses then accidentally reviewing the output of `openstack flavor list --long` and seeing they where missing
21:26:49 xarses I get the most frustrated when the sdk objects don't resemble what you get back on the CLI (like keys are wholly renamed)
21:27:48 briancurtin that’s a feature of the SDK, as there are several naming formats across openstack REST responses, including keys which cannot be python names
21:28:10 briancurtin for example, most of what you tried to send
21:31:58 briancurtin people want (wanted?) one place to do all of this, one format, one thing to install, consistency all around. a bunch of things get renamed in the process to make it usable for the masses, but yeah, if you’re looking at what are probably database column names or something, they don’t always match up 1-1 with the names in openstacksdk. on purpose.
21:37:29 mordred ++
22:16:23 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/osc-lib master: --os-profile option suddenly causes trouble in unit tests https://review.openstack.org/509662
#openstack-sdks - 2017-10-05
01:09:50 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509448
01:12:02 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509460
02:25:48 openstackgerrit Hongbin Lu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Added AddNetwork command to server https://review.openstack.org/509209
02:41:57 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509448
02:43:59 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509460
02:44:35 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support creating unaddress neutron port https://review.openstack.org/504817
02:57:57 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509448
02:59:51 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509460
03:13:45 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509448
03:15:40 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509460
03:34:02 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509448
03:35:57 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509460
04:03:41 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509448
04:05:37 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509460
04:19:53 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509448
04:21:49 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509460
05:30:33 openstackgerrit shogoadachi proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Accept 0 for --min-disk and --min-ram https://review.openstack.org/507345
06:11:34 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509448
06:13:38 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/509460

Earlier   Later