Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2017-04-05
15:45:32 ankur-gupta-f4 yea review the initial. Figure out how to deal with that function that just "pass"es
15:45:59 reedip link ?
15:46:31 sindhu dtroyer: Okay, cool. got it ... thanks :)
15:46:36 ankur-gupta-f4 sindhu: reedip: once the SDK 9.15 is released you will need to follow up with a patchset like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451482/1/global-requirements.txt to bump the global req. then we can merge it
15:46:50 ankur-gupta-f4 reedip:
15:46:51 ankur-gupta-f4 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446223/
15:47:08 reedip ankur-gupta-f4 : Openstack Proposal bot would do that itself, isnt it ?
15:47:10 ankur-gupta-f4 dtroyer: could use your quick input on how its being implemented as well before i get too down the rabbit hole
15:47:21 reedip ankur-gupta-f4 ( for Link ) : thanks :)(
15:47:37 ankur-gupta-f4 reedip: i don't think so, since I've had to do it a couple times already
15:48:05 reedip dtroyer : ^^ shouldnt the proposal bot pick it up ?
15:48:52 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/cliff master: Add 'cliff-commands' Sphinx directive https://review.openstack.org/453383
15:48:52 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/cliff master: Add 'cliff-command' Sphinx directive https://review.openstack.org/450322
15:49:03 ankur-gupta-f4 once merged to global-req, then proposal bot bumps it for all the individual projects as well... i believe
15:49:42 openstackgerrit David Rabel proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add --network and --port to server create https://review.openstack.org/444924
15:50:25 rabel_b1 new proposal for you ::)
15:50:51 reedip ankur-gupta-f4 : yeah it should, and you dont need to do it yourself, in the Ideal scenario
15:50:55 reedip rabel_b1 : thanks :)
15:53:13 rabel_b1 reedip: it has some weeknesses that should be fixed when migrating to MultiKey...andSoOn. but i think for now it should be fine.
15:54:29 reedip rabel_b1 : ok , will put it in the review tab :)
15:55:23 sindhu ankur-gupta-f4: but we don't need SDK now for 383025 to work right?
15:56:53 reedip we dont ... I agree
15:57:10 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add "qos-policy" option to "port create" & "port set" https://review.openstack.org/419236
15:57:51 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: "floating ip set/unset port" for OSC https://review.openstack.org/383025
15:59:29 dtroyer reedip, ankur-gupta-f1: the proposal bot creates reviews for projects based on what gets merged into the requirements repo. We have to propose the reviews to requirements.
15:59:44 dtroyer ankur-gupta-f1: what did you want input on?
16:00:53 openstackgerrit Nakul Dahiwade proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce L7Policy for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/451980
16:01:29 ankur-gupta-f4 dtroyer: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446223/
16:01:38 openstackgerrit Nakul Dahiwade proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce L7Rule for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/452832
16:01:42 ankur-gupta-f4 to see if its in the fashion that looks okay/works for you.
16:02:23 ankur-gupta-f4 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447068/ is piece in OSC to initialize it.
16:02:50 ankur-gupta-f4 Bout to head out to airport so will be on/off for the next couple hours but will log back in on the plane.
16:02:56 mordred cdent: the example iin https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/microversion_specification.html#version-discovery says it was taken from nova, but it does not match what nova emits
16:03:19 cdent a) /me shakes tiny fist
16:03:24 cdent b) predates me
16:03:35 mordred k. I mena- I like what's in the spec better
16:03:36 cdent c) give me a few minutes and I'll look into it more closely and fix it
16:03:47 openstackgerrit David Rabel proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add --network and --port to server create https://review.openstack.org/444924
16:03:50 mordred but I'm wondering if we should align the spec to nova or try to get nova to add an additional key to theirs?
16:03:55 cdent it is quite likely that what's in the spec is desirable
16:04:03 mordred cdent: (the tl;dr is nova uses "version" to mean max_version)
16:04:27 cdent oh yeah, that's an intentional change
16:04:30 mordred ok. cool
16:04:32 cdent the surrounding tesxt is wrong
16:04:42 mordred I'll make the project-navigator stuff align to the api-wg thing
16:05:00 cdent yes please
16:06:19 mordred cdent: also - for major versions without microversions, min_version and max_version can be omitted or contain empty strings? or only be omitted? or do you care?
16:08:24 cdent mordred: as far as I'm aware we haven't yet provided guidance for discovery in a non microversioned world, but my interpretation is that 'id' takes on the meaning of "the actual version you're getting, majorly" and min and max ought to be omitted
16:08:48 reedip sindhu : I updated the latest PS with the changes mentioned by dtroyer
16:09:09 cdent mordred: so, basically, keep id, put the version in there, leave min and max out
16:09:43 sindhu reedip: great! thanks :)
16:10:04 dtroyer is the presence/absense of min_version and max_version how we would detect microversion support?
16:10:31 cdent dtroyer: that seems to be the implication
16:10:38 cdent but I'm not sure if that's intentional or not
16:10:40 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: "floating ip set/unset port" for OSC https://review.openstack.org/383025
16:10:51 dtroyer I'm generalizing the client-side negotiation code to put into ksa…
16:12:52 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: "floating ip set/unset port" for OSC https://review.openstack.org/383025
16:13:21 mordred cdent: https://review.openstack.org/453361
16:13:49 mordred dtroyer: that is my hunch, yes
16:14:27 cdent mordred: cool, will look properly soon
16:14:29 mordred dtroyer: and ooh - you adding version discovery and microversion-per-call suport? or just one or just theother?
16:14:50 dtroyer I've started with the negotiation, will be doing per-call since OSC needs it
16:15:04 mordred woot
16:15:08 dtroyer mordred: https://review.openstack.org/451618
16:15:15 mordred I've been avoiding bothering with that so far
16:15:18 dtroyer it's all in OSC for development ATM
16:19:21 mordred dtroyer: ah - so cool - I _also_ want major version discovery and have a minor portion of that somewhere - but can add that in when you're happy with what you've got there for microversions
16:19:25 mordred (and I like what you've got there)
16:29:28 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-wg master: Remove reference to nova on version discovery https://review.openstack.org/453744
16:35:11 openstackgerrit Nakul Dahiwade proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce L7Policy for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/451980
16:38:09 mordred dtroyer: also, I finally got around to writing a patch to horizon to add suport for downloading clouds.yaml files
16:38:20 mordred (fixing tests right now)
16:38:49 openstackgerrit Nakul Dahiwade proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce L7Policy for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/451980
16:39:04 dtroyer mordred: \o/
16:44:04 mordred dtroyer: remote: https://review.openstack.org/453669 Add support for downloading clouds.yaml files
16:50:49 dtroyer mordred: Nice. Maybe OSC should grow this too, and maybe both need to have a way to pull the update for the vendors file?
16:52:03 mordred dtroyer: yah - I have some patches I'll push up later today about vendors files too
16:52:28 dtroyer coolio
16:52:29 mordred dtroyer: and I've been thinking of making a few osc commands like "add cloud" that could injest a clouds.yaml from a vendor into an existing one
16:53:20 dtroyer yeah, thats a natural place to manage that file...
16:53:34 mordred ++
16:57:17 reedip stevemar: there ?
17:00:49 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Enable to create legacy router https://review.openstack.org/449176
18:10:40 openstackgerrit Nakul Dahiwade proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce L7Policy for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/451980
18:46:19 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Develop api.versions for microversion discovery https://review.openstack.org/451618
18:51:39 openstackgerrit Nakul Dahiwade proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce L7Rule for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/452832
18:54:46 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Clean up password prompt work-arounds https://review.openstack.org/453832
19:06:04 malloc83 hi there :-) just a tad curious why this isnt covered or just not documented.. i just started using the openstack proposed sdk.. and realised after authenticating and using authorize to get a token.. it pretty much doesnt mean much,, because after the user browses around on my gui, i have zero way of using the token to authenticate again on the sdk ;-)
19:06:52 briancurtin You can auth again with that token
19:06:57 malloc83 is this just not possible at this time? I noticed there is a plugin ? password? but nothing stating i could use plugin token if it even exists..
19:07:16 malloc83 bradjones: yup i can,, but not using the sdk.. i cant find any intercace or something via the connection class that allows that.
19:07:25 briancurtin huh?
19:07:54 malloc83 so openstack has a connection class that i am using to connect in python, i use authorise() method to get a token...
19:08:00 malloc83 after that i can use the token again against the api...
19:08:09 malloc83 but how do i use it again with the connection handler?
19:08:41 malloc83 since the connection handler has been re-initilized, i cant afford to store a username and password in memory to auth again :) it must have some way for me to provide the token to continue the session
19:09:03 briancurtin as in, you want to create another connection instance elsewhere, perhaps in another instance of your application, using the token that was already received?
19:09:20 malloc83 bradjones: spot on.. this is for wsgi app..
19:09:46 malloc83 briancurtin: i am sorry spot on yes.. :) getting used to this new mac keyboard.
19:10:08 briancurtin malloc83: that has definitely worked in the past. let me write something up and send it to you in a min

Earlier   Later