Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2017-04-01
09:12:13	RuiChen	reedip: you're updating the patch?
09:12:16	reedip	RuiChen : Can you check this oatch ?
09:12:23	openstackgerrit	Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Structure FindFloatingIP() to work without ip_cache https://review.openstack.org/447938
09:12:35	reedip	If you see anything different then please update it
09:12:41	RuiChen	ah, of course
09:12:58	reedip	sorry for the rework...but your idea struck me :)
09:14:19	reedip	Thanks :)
09:16:41	RuiChen	reedip: thank you work hard for this patch, my English is bad, it might make you confused :(
09:16:45	reedip	RuiChen : I think the Functional Test case needs to be changed
09:17:12	reedip	RuiChen : Python is not dependent on English ! :D
09:17:35	RuiChen	reedip: good point :-)
09:19:27	reedip	Let me know if anything needs to be changed
09:20:51	RuiChen	reedip: the current implement is same with I wish, thank you
09:21:15	reedip	RuiChen : Okay great, awaiting your +1 once Jenkins finishes troubling me :D
09:23:27	RuiChen	seems jenkins is recovered now, can't get log in the morning today
09:24:32	reedip	FUnctional test case may be damaged, checking that :)
09:29:52	RuiChen	reedip: hmmm, still can't get jenkins job log, 404 not found
09:30:30	RuiChen	reedip: there are a pep8 error in patch http://status.openstack.org/zuul/
09:30:49	reedip	Checking and fixing :)
09:36:07	RuiChen	+1 for https://review.openstack.org/447938
09:52:27	openstackgerrit	Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Structure FindFloatingIP() to work without ip_cache https://review.openstack.org/447938
09:53:21	openstackgerrit	Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Structure FindFloatingIP() to work without ip_cache https://review.openstack.org/447938
16:15:19	openstackgerrit	Cedric Brandily proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Enable to specify which fixed-ip to add to a vm. https://review.openstack.org/452235
21:07:29	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: doc: Remove local fork of apidoc https://review.openstack.org/447589
21:08:44	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: doc: Correct Sphinx warnings https://review.openstack.org/447590
21:18:16	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Use Sphinx 1.5 warning-is-error https://review.openstack.org/446629
#openstack-sdks - 2017-04-02
14:33:59	reedip	ankur-gupta-f4 :if u r around, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447938/ :D
14:40:14	openstackgerrit	Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Introduce quota unset command https://review.openstack.org/376311
16:24:48	openstackgerrit	Monty Taylor proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Add ability to pass in user_agent https://review.openstack.org/452550
#openstack-sdks - 2017-04-03
02:04:24	reedip	o/
02:06:49	ankur-gupta-f4	reedip: dont file bug. Only if there was existing. But its just a refactor so its fine
02:07:19	reedip	ankur-gupta-f4 : were u just waiting for me with that response already typed ???? :D
02:07:31	reedip	I am not filing a bug :) , dont worry :P
02:08:53	ankur-gupta-f4	No just rmred u commented on patch
02:08:58	ankur-gupta-f4	N saw u wave
02:09:13	reedip	:D
02:21:53	openstackgerrit	Sean McCully proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: KeystoneAuth should default to system CAFile. https://review.openstack.org/452585
03:10:51	openstackgerrit	Sean McCully proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: KeystoneAuth should default to system CAFile. https://review.openstack.org/452585
05:06:30	openstackgerrit	Sean McCully proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: KeystoneAuth should default to system CAFile. https://review.openstack.org/452585
06:26:58	openstackgerrit	Sean McCully proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: KeystoneAuth should default to system CAFile. https://review.openstack.org/452585
06:31:07	openstackgerrit	Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add extra dhcp option to 'port create/set/unset' https://review.openstack.org/356263
06:48:46	reedip	RuiChen : I updated the Floating IP Patch, awaiting your review :)
09:13:00	openstackgerrit	Samriddhi proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Updated inconsistent value of scope parameter https://review.openstack.org/452652
10:03:54	ZZelle_	ok
10:31:45	reedip	RuiChen : there?
10:57:14	openstackgerrit	Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add extra dhcp option to 'port create/set/unset' https://review.openstack.org/356263
11:06:06	openstackgerrit	Cedric Brandily proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Avoid to authenticate twice https://review.openstack.org/452711
11:26:48	openstackgerrit	Jens Rosenboom proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix block-device-mapping when volume_size is empty https://review.openstack.org/451432
12:29:19	reedip	ankur-gupta-f4 : woke up ?
12:29:55	reedip	sindhu : there ?
12:53:19	openstackgerrit	Dirk Mueller proposed openstack/cliff master: .gitignore: Ignore eggs https://review.openstack.org/449740
13:02:42	openstackgerrit	Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add extra dhcp option to 'port create/set/unset' https://review.openstack.org/356263
14:37:57	sindhu	reedip: hey wass up
14:38:38	reedip	hey hi , small issue with unicode in the functional test of https://review.openstack.org/356263
14:40:41	reedip	sindhu : the unset command fails to find the dict in the list of dicts in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356263/23/openstackclient/network/v2/port.py L#987
14:41:28	reedip	cant think straight as of now, if you have some time to day, would be great if you can tell me how to ignore the unicodes
14:41:46	reedip	unicode mismatch is the only issue, the items are in the correct value
14:42:01	sindhu	reedip: cool, will look into it today :)
14:42:17	reedip	gr8 thanks :)
14:58:12	ankur-gupta-f4	reedip: good evening
15:05:36	reedip	ankur-gupta-f4 : hello
15:23:21	openstackgerrit	Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add extra dhcp option to 'port create/set/unset' https://review.openstack.org/356263
15:23:43	reedip	sindhu : also need to get this merged so that the floating IP merges https://review.openstack.org/447938
15:25:05	sindhu	reedip: yes, the change in SDK won't help us now like u mentioned
15:25:29	reedip	yeah , so thats why want this to be merged so that the floating ip change merges soon
15:27:09	sindhu	yeah, I agree :)
15:44:35	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/cliff master: WIP: Add 'cliff' Sphinx directive https://review.openstack.org/450322
16:02:26	openstackgerrit	Ed Leafe proposed openstack/api-wg master: Recommend the correct HTTP method for tags https://review.openstack.org/451536
16:17:35	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/cliff master: .gitignore: Ignore eggs https://review.openstack.org/449740
16:23:30	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/cliff master: Add 'cliff-command' Sphinx directive https://review.openstack.org/450322
16:31:57	openstackgerrit	Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add help commands withouth auth in functional https://review.openstack.org/452407
16:46:52	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/os-client-config master: Docs: add a note about rackspace API keys https://review.openstack.org/451563
16:47:19	openstackgerrit	Nakul Dahiwade proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce L7Rule for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/452832
16:53:00	openstackgerrit	Nakul Dahiwade proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce L7Rule for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/452832
17:02:07	openstackgerrit	Shashank Kumar Shankar proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Introduce neutron flavor associate, disassociate to OSC https://review.openstack.org/403907
17:06:11	openstackgerrit	Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Introduce Base for Octavia (load balancing) https://review.openstack.org/428414
17:06:28	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/cliff master: Add 'cliff-command' Sphinx directive https://review.openstack.org/450322
17:12:02	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP! Start using 'cliff.sphinxext' https://review.openstack.org/452861
17:25:18	cdent	edleafe, elmiko : I'm cogitating on how to provide a final revision on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421846/ (compatibility guidelines). I think I may do what I say in my last comment about "one tactic". Any thoughts?
17:25:35	openstackgerrit	Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Network L3 Router Commands for OSC https://review.openstack.org/385729
17:29:13	edleafe	cdent: I thought the motivation for this *was* the TC tag
17:29:56	cdent	the motivation was that they wanted to use the guidelines and they seemed bad
17:30:09	cdent	but now that they are revised we should revise them so they are not about tags, but about the bigger thing, the mission
17:30:23	cdent	thus my statement: interoperability right there in the mission
17:31:38	cdent	if we guide to the mission, the relevancy for tags (or new tags) falls out of that, but the tags will be mission oriented, not "make some tags to deal with whatever situation is lying around"
17:34:01	edleafe	I get that, but it seems like looking at it as a single concern will make it essentially useless for the vast majority of OpenStack developers
17:34:38	edleafe	Really, I joke and call it the "Monty case", but I don't know anyone else who has such stringent requirements
17:35:29	cdent	that's kind of the point: are we trying to describe interop or not? I felt that the outcome from a) the ptg, b) the discussion on the document and c) look at TheMission is that we are. If we are, then the implications are _severe_
17:35:56	cdent	and thus the document needs to be pretty explicit about just how difficult things are, and the things to look out for
17:37:02	elmiko	i'm having a difficult time following the action item here, are we still trying to figure how to mention alternatives without blessing them?>
17:37:59	cdent	elmiko: no, more general than that: get something published that is actionable
17:38:16	elmiko	cdent: ok, cool. i thought we were in the weeds about that.
17:38:27	cdent	ed pointed out a few more contradictions and issues in his comments shortly before my last one
17:38:29	edleafe	I felt that the PTG was really a non-outcome, because we didn't have the two factions talking with each other
17:38:51	elmiko	i agree with the sentiment that using these guidelines as the bar for a tag is problematic at best
17:39:23	edleafe	elmiko: so how would the TC determine if a project has earned that tag?
17:39:49	elmiko	edleafe: i guess it depends a little on the conversation here
17:39:51	elmiko	like for example
17:40:11	cdent	edleafe: I don't quite agree (about PTG). I think we established that there were some people who did not want to prioritize service wide interoperability and stability and that's okay, but that if you do, there are consequences
17:40:16	elmiko	if the guidelines are about the mission and interop, then maybe we need a document that clearly defines what you need for the tag (ugh, more docs)

Earlier   Later