| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-03-22 | |||
| 16:57:15 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-wg master: Create a new set of api stability guidelines https://review.openstack.org/421846 | |
| 16:57:44 | cdent | edleafe, elmiko, anyone else: new version ^. I hope we're nearly done. | |
| 16:58:23 | elmiko | cdent: ack, added to the queue | |
| 17:09:04 | edleafe | cdent: yeah, saw that as I was commenting on the previous version :) | |
| 17:09:25 | cdent | *more tiny fist shaking* | |
| 18:14:30 | openstackgerrit | Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Network L3 Router Commands for OSC https://review.openstack.org/385729 | |
| 18:15:24 | cdent | sdague, elmiko: I agree with you guys that the alternatives secion is a bit sparse, but it is in there to effectively say "yeah, we heard you, but it's not good enough for the needs delineated here" | |
| 18:15:40 | cdent | I'm happy to remove it though, if that's the consensus | |
| 18:24:02 | elmiko | lol | |
| 18:24:28 | elmiko | cdent: can we add a DONT DO THIS! to that section ;) | |
| 18:25:03 | cdent | elmiko: is the last paragraph to circumspect in that regard? | |
| 18:25:05 | cdent | too | |
| 18:58:23 | elmiko | cdent: i think so | |
| 18:58:28 | elmiko | it leaves too much wiggle room | |
| 18:59:18 | cdent | elmiko: have you read the followups from graham and chris? I'm probably gonna let it stew until tomorrow morning as I've lost steam in that direction | |
| 19:06:59 | elmiko | cdent: i'll look again, last reply i saw was from Sean | |
| 19:07:08 | elmiko | +1 to letting it stew | |
| 21:32:33 | openstackgerrit | Ankur proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Network L3 Router Commands for OSC https://review.openstack.org/385729 | |
| 22:58:23 | reedip | ankur-gupta-f4 ; care to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447938/ ? | |
| 23:09:20 | ankur-gupta-f4 | reedip: address dtroyer comments onthere | |
| 23:12:23 | reedip | ankur-gupta-f4 : just saw that... IMHO I think dtroyer has got a point but I am just considering if we would need ip_cache in the future ? | |
| 23:13:15 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Im gonna wait to see what he says. But its simple enough and looks good | |
| 23:15:24 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cliff master: Use Sphinx 1.5 warning-is-error https://review.openstack.org/446630 | |
| 23:16:52 | reedip | ankur-gupta-f4 : Well , dare say I am attempting to tease the dragon , but yes, I am making another workaround so that this function can still be used with the ip_cache ifrequired | |
| 23:17:21 | reedip | I guess it was made for reason, and without knowing that reason, purging the ip_cache doesnt make sense to me | |
| 23:19:25 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Introduce FindFloatingIP() without ip_Cache https://review.openstack.org/447938 | |
| 23:20:58 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Structure FindFloatingIP() to work without ip_cache https://review.openstack.org/447938 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-03-23 | |||
| 01:17:26 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Structure FindFloatingIP() to work without ip_cache https://review.openstack.org/447938 | |
| 03:24:58 | openstackgerrit | Duan Jiong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix some reST field lists in docstrings https://review.openstack.org/448874 | |
| 04:41:38 | openstackgerrit | Duan Jiong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix some reST field lists in docstrings https://review.openstack.org/448874 | |
| 08:17:00 | reedip | RuiChen : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447938/ please | |
| 08:26:03 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add tags filter options to os network list command https://review.openstack.org/380012 | |
| 10:17:21 | openstackgerrit | liyi proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove log translations https://review.openstack.org/449045 | |
| 12:16:06 | reedip | o/ | |
| 13:45:28 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/osc-lib master: The python 3.5 is added https://review.openstack.org/442960 | |
| 13:49:09 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Pass ssl values through to OCC https://review.openstack.org/438277 | |
| 13:50:11 | cdent | edleafe, elmiko: thoughts on how to proceed on http://gnocchi.xyz/install.html with the disagreement between sdague and mugsie ? | |
| 13:50:50 | cdent | oopth, wrong linke | |
| 13:51:01 | cdent | elmiko, edleafe : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421846/ | |
| 13:54:29 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Util methods for column name backward compatibility https://review.openstack.org/436289 | |
| 13:57:05 | edleafe | cdent: I don't like having an Alternatives section in a guideline. I think we should suggest a best practice, and leave it at that. | |
| 13:58:02 | elmiko | cdent: is there any way to work a leg-wrestling match in here? | |
| 13:58:58 | elmiko | i'm a little more lenient i suppose, i could see leaving an even smaller alternatives section that just says we acknowledge alternatives and we recommend against it. | |
| 13:59:29 | elmiko | but for me this goes back to the whole "api police" line | |
| 14:15:51 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Don't duplicate commands https://review.openstack.org/447592 | |
| 14:27:30 | openstackgerrit | Cedric Brandily proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Enable to create legacy router https://review.openstack.org/449176 | |
| 14:29:49 | reedip | dtroyer: there? | |
| 14:30:10 | reedip | ankur-gupta-f4 , sindhu, stevemar ??? | |
| 14:30:37 | openstackgerrit | Cedric Brandily proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Enable to create legacy router https://review.openstack.org/449176 | |
| 14:58:29 | sindhu | reedip: hey, wass up | |
| 14:58:47 | reedip | review requested for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447938/ | |
| 14:59:23 | reedip | its stuck for reviews .... | |
| 16:08:02 | sindhu | dtroyer: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/382023/ is ready for your review :) | |
| 16:19:41 | openstackgerrit | Shashank Kumar Shankar proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Introduce neutron flavor associate, disassociate to OSC https://review.openstack.org/403907 | |
| 16:33:31 | rabel_b1 | can someone tell me what a quota class is? as in "openstack quota set --class ..." ? | |
| 16:51:29 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: docs: Don't include ChangeLog https://review.openstack.org/447588 | |
| 17:34:38 | cdent | elmiko, edleafe (anyone else): proof please: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-wg-newsletter | |
| 17:45:00 | cdent | elmiko, edleafe shipped it | |
| 17:52:44 | elmiko | cdent: sorry, was at lunch | |
| 17:53:00 | cdent | no worries, but any flubs are YOUR FAULT | |
| 17:53:02 | cdent | :) | |
| 17:54:51 | elmiko | LOL | |
| 18:04:46 | openstackgerrit | Cedric Brandily proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Enable to create legacy router https://review.openstack.org/449176 | |
| 18:06:53 | edleafe | cdent: yeah, stepped out. LGTM in any case, so it's all elmiko's fault | |
| 18:07:24 | cdent | I can live with that | |
| 18:24:35 | elmiko | haha | |
| 18:24:42 | elmiko | guess i'm out voted? | |
| 18:29:16 | ankur-gupta-f4 | dtroyer: ping | |
| 18:33:42 | openstackgerrit | Shashank Kumar Shankar proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: [WIP] Introduce Pool resource in Octavia Load Balancer Base https://review.openstack.org/449264 | |
| 18:34:17 | dtroyer | ankur-gupta-f1: yo | |
| 18:35:45 | ankur-gupta-f4 | hey its about the osc plugin | |
| 18:36:02 | ankur-gupta-f4 | if set up as a pure plugin, how does the interaction with the API happen | |
| 18:36:28 | ankur-gupta-f4 | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446223/ is the initial patches for the plugin | |
| 18:36:46 | ankur-gupta-f4 | but i also did a skeleton patch for the repo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448331/ | |
| 18:37:10 | openstackgerrit | Shashank Kumar Shankar proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: [WIP] Introduce Pool resource in Octavia Load Balancer Base https://review.openstack.org/449264 | |
| 18:37:11 | ankur-gupta-f4 | but not sure if the skeleton is needed if the API interaction happens through OSC/SDK. | |
| 18:37:20 | dtroyer | it happens like any other, there is nothing restricting a plugin to only what is in its package | |
| 18:37:49 | dtroyer | remember, everything in the OSC repo itself is built as a plugin, it's just all in the same repo | |
| 18:38:06 | ankur-gupta-f4 | like any other meaning through the SDK. or should the API binding happen within python-octaviaclient | |
| 18:38:19 | dtroyer | so the adidtional things to think about with a plugin in a package with no lib is to make sure you install it's dependencies properly | |
| 18:38:54 | dtroyer | python-octaviaclient implies that it is a python API lib for the Octavia REST API | |
| 18:39:04 | dtroyer | that's what that naming convention is used for | |
| 18:39:31 | dtroyer | the presence of OSC plugins within those is a convenience, just as the presence of the CLi binaries that some have | |
| 18:40:09 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Okay that makes sense. Will continue down the patch I am on then. | |
| 18:40:16 | dtroyer | kk | |
| 18:40:23 | dtroyer | are you using SDK for that? | |
| 18:41:02 | ankur-gupta-f4 | wasn't planning on it. what would be easier | |
| 18:41:11 | ankur-gupta-f4 | our guys will also be introducing Octavia to the SDK as well | |
| 18:41:46 | dtroyer | SDK isn't 1.0 yet, so OSC itself isn't going to use it for anything else for a while. | |
| 18:42:20 | ankur-gupta-f4 | so then I should continue down the skeleton path where all the client bindings happen in the native python-octaviaclient lib | |
| 18:42:25 | dtroyer | eventually it should, but I'm revisiting the openstackclient.api stuff to be able to dump some of the existing lib dependencies sooner | |
| 18:42:55 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Could you comment on this then: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448331/ to clarify | |
| 18:43:03 | dtroyer | think through the transition plan if you ever want to change that | |
| 18:43:44 | ankur-gupta-f4 | i think its mostly about getting it done at this point since we are trying to get it all done by Pike. Poor planning, but Neutron has put us on the clock | |
| 18:44:14 | ankur-gupta-f4 | also in team meeting there was a discussion about whether the namespace should be "loadbalancer" or "load balancer" | |
| 18:45:03 | dtroyer | is python-octaviaclient a thing already? | |
| 18:45:08 | ankur-gupta-f4 | indeed | |
| 18:45:19 | ankur-gupta-f4 | https://github.com/openstack/python-octaviaclient | |
| 18:45:36 | ankur-gupta-f4 | there is nothing in it yet except the stuff im trying to push up | |
| 18:46:26 | ankur-gupta-f4 | there isn't a release of it yet | |