Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2017-03-14
02:16:56 reedip ankur-gupta-f4 : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/376311/ ????
02:20:29 openstackgerrit jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Functional test for subnet_pool https://review.openstack.org/440150
02:44:38 stevemar ankur-gupta-f4: probably just skip the tests IMO
02:45:03 stevemar ankur-gupta-f4: it would be nice to check for that exception and skip the test
02:47:39 reedip stevemar : hello :)
02:47:50 stevemar reedip: mr reedip
02:47:58 reedip ??
02:50:01 openstackgerrit luqitao proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Replace six.iteritems() with .items() https://review.openstack.org/445273
02:51:31 reedip ankur-gupta-f4, stevemar : How does OpenstackClient search for new Commands
02:51:45 reedip ankur-gupta-f4, stevemar : even if they are registered in tox.ini
02:57:34 stevemar reedip: you mean setup.cfg :)
02:57:44 reedip sorry , yeah stevemar
02:57:48 reedip except setup.cfg
02:57:59 stevemar reedip: you have to add it to setup.cfg and 'install' it
02:58:14 stevemar i normally create a new virtualenv by doing $ virtualenv testcmd
02:58:26 stevemar source it, $ source testcmd/bin/activate
02:58:34 stevemar go to my OSC directory
02:58:41 stevemar edit setup.cfg for the new command
02:58:52 stevemar and 'install' osc locally in my virtualenv
02:59:02 stevemar $ pip install -e .
02:59:10 stevemar ^ from OSC root directory
02:59:30 stevemar when you run $ openstack --version you'll see a .dev version installed
02:59:40 stevemar that should have the new command
02:59:50 stevemar you can run $ which openstack and see where it points also
03:00:04 stevemar when you're done with the virtualenv just run, $ deactivate
03:00:15 stevemar you can then rm -rf the virtualenv directory
03:01:42 reedip stevemar : the command is not in OSC , its in a separate repo , which extends OSC plugins
03:02:16 stevemar reedip: same principals i believe, install OSC in the virtualenv then the other repo
03:03:28 reedip lemme try
03:06:29 reedip stevemar : what if requirements are not met :)
03:09:37 reedip stevemar : getting an error
03:09:42 reedip in requirements
04:13:23 ankur-gupta-f4 reedip: it should work in the same way
04:13:37 ankur-gupta-f4 R u talking about the TaaS commands?
04:23:47 rabel__b1 can someone help me with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444924/ ? two functional tests in the gate job are failing, but it seems to have nothing to do with the change. one of the test i also saw failing for other changes that seem to be unrelated.
04:24:31 ankur-gupta-f4 rabel__b1: the image tests are temporarily broken.
04:25:00 ankur-gupta-f4 Till its resolved avoid rechecking
04:36:49 rabel__b1 ankur-gupta-f4: ok, thank you.
04:52:14 reedip ankur-gupta-f4 : all working :) dont worry .. I worked around stevemar's solution :D
04:52:53 ankur-gupta-f4 K
05:04:59 openstackgerrit Lv Jiawei proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add extra filtering options to qos policy list https://review.openstack.org/401131
08:23:29 openstackgerrit Colleen Murphy proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Narrow expected responses for CheckUserInGroup https://review.openstack.org/445257
08:29:25 openstackgerrit Lv Jiawei proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add status filtering options to port list https://review.openstack.org/444810
11:11:17 openstackgerrit Lv Jiawei proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add status filtering options to port list https://review.openstack.org/444810
11:53:17 rabel does anyone know about the status of the broken image functional tests for osc?
13:07:59 elmiko cdent: saw your ping way too late yesterday, isn't that email basically sending us back down the openapi rabbit hole?
13:08:29 cdent elmiko: I think so, but wasn't sure, so wanted to check in.
13:08:49 cdent Thanks for pinging me about it though, as I completely forgot to follow up like I promised I would
13:09:00 elmiko hehe =)
13:49:22 openstackgerrit Bence Romsics proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Add port property: trunk_details https://review.openstack.org/445501
14:50:31 openstackgerrit Pepijn Oomen proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Expose ha_state property from HA enabled L3 Agents. https://review.openstack.org/445520
14:53:34 reedip o/
15:14:19 ynirk I faced a problem with the command `openstack user show 12345 --domain Default` returning the error "get() got an unexpected keyword argument 'domain_id'"
15:14:19 ynirk I am working on an openstack infrastructure where some usernames are only numeric (12345 for example) in a specific domain
15:14:19 ynirk Hi, I hope I am in the right place
15:14:20 ynirk I am more of an ops so I prefer asking for your advice before submitting a bug and a patch.
15:14:20 ynirk Wouldn't it be more coherent with the other try/except to have a 'pass' at https://github.com/openstack/osc-lib/blob/master/osc_lib/utils.py#L124 instead of a 'raise' and let the function raise a NotFound at the end if no resource was found ?
15:14:20 openstack Launchpad bug 1671179 in python-keystoneclient "Unable to retrieve a numeric only username within a domain" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Julien Lavesque (ynirk)
15:14:20 ynirk All get requests (in all openstack components) made with a numeric name and kwargs might return a TypeError if the method's prototype doesn't handle kwargs.
15:14:20 ynirk I first thought of a keystoneclient problem (with the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+bug/1671179) but after deeper analysis I think the problem is in find_resource from osc-lib/utils.py
15:14:21 ynirk What do you think ?
15:16:45 breton ynirk: > All get requests (in all openstack components) made with a numeric name and kwargs might return a TypeError if the method's prototype doesn't handle kwargs.
15:16:51 breton ynirk: why is that?
15:21:50 dtroyer ynirk: I think you may be right there
15:22:22 dtroyer I am trying to recall what exceptions I thought should be raised at that point
15:23:49 dtroyer this function is a combination of 3 or 4 of these from individual libs, so working back to that may be fun. Changing it now may also change things in unexpected ways
15:24:33 dtroyer the choices are to add a type(ex) check for TypeError or to remove them altogether
15:25:31 ynirk dtroyer yes exactly but I was not sure of the impact
15:25:33 dtroyer I'm going to have to think on that a bit. if you have time, you may want to try proposing temoving the if in lines 120-124 and just doing a pass there and see what tests/jobs fail.
15:26:20 dtroyer it would be safer to add the TypeError check though
15:28:15 ynirk Ok I also think it is safer and shouldn't break anything
15:28:28 ynirk I was wondering of the reason for the raise (compared to the other try/except)
15:31:57 ynirk I will try to add the TypeError check and see if some tests fail
15:32:09 ynirk Thanks for the feedback
15:51:11 josecastroleon hi
15:51:35 josecastroleon the gate in openstackclient is failing since devstack removed glance v1
15:51:58 ankur-gupta-f4 yes
15:53:05 josecastroleon shall we remove the glance v1 test?
15:53:47 ankur-gupta-f4 https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/p3o3Cgo2/
15:54:05 dtroyer no, we need to continue to support v1 for some time, for now I'd prefer to re-enable Glance v1 in DevStack
15:54:20 dtroyer at least for a time
15:54:36 ankur-gupta-f4 stevemar suggested doing a check first. If exception raised then skip tests
15:54:45 josecastroleon fine, but then we may need to enable glance v1 in the gate
15:54:48 josecastroleon right?
15:55:14 dtroyer yes, that's on my list, I'm fixing cliff's gate ATM
15:55:23 josecastroleon ok thx
16:04:59 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/cliff master: Update cmd2 fix to still work with 0.6.7 https://review.openstack.org/445552
16:06:10 dtroyer josecastroleon, ankur-gupta-f1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445553/ re-enables Image v1 for OSC functional jobs
16:18:55 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/golang-client master: Update for CTI ps4 https://review.openstack.org/444499
16:27:55 openstackgerrit Bence Romsics proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Add port property: trunk_details https://review.openstack.org/445501
16:30:59 ynirk dtroyer tests pass with the two modifications. To be sure I will add the TypeError check
16:43:36 reedip sindhu : hi
16:44:45 sindhu reedip: hey wass up
16:45:12 reedip nothin much sindhu : just wanted to know about the floating ip patch
16:45:30 sindhu reedip: it's all ready right?
16:45:53 reedip no comments from anyone else, I guess
16:45:56 reedip :|
16:46:53 sindhu reedip: yeah! waiting for reviews/getting merged :)
16:47:47 reedip stevemar , can you come to our rescue ???? :D
18:52:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Add port property: trunk_details https://review.openstack.org/445501

Earlier   Later