| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-02-15 | |||
| 22:52:51 | dtroyer | it's usually lightly attended :) | |
| 22:52:58 | dtroyer | wait | |
| 22:53:19 | ankur-gupta-f4 | although reedip would attend and we could get his networking background input | |
| 22:54:30 | dtroyer | tomorrow is 19:00 UTC (late) | |
| 22:54:51 | dtroyer | I skipped last week early because I was out there :) | |
| 22:55:07 | dtroyer | and now, time to walk the dogs before it gets dark | |
| 22:55:27 | ankur-gupta-f4 | kk catch u tmw | |
| 22:55:32 | ankur-gupta-f4 | in case i forget just ping me | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-02-16 | |||
| 00:27:13 | openstackgerrit | Sindhu Devale proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: OSC Quota List https://review.openstack.org/379813 | |
| 00:58:02 | sindhu | dtroyer: ping? | |
| 01:43:09 | RuiChen | ping ankur-gupta-f4 | |
| 01:43:51 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Hey Rui | |
| 01:44:19 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Good morning | |
| 01:44:47 | RuiChen | morning : ) | |
| 01:45:04 | RuiChen | you know our patches fix the same bug | |
| 01:45:22 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Yea i posted comment | |
| 01:45:39 | RuiChen | I would like to add Co-Authored-by and abandon one of them | |
| 01:45:59 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Okay. Abandon yours and add co-authored to mine | |
| 01:46:01 | RuiChen | save the core review time | |
| 01:46:14 | ankur-gupta-f4 | But gate issues | |
| 01:46:14 | ankur-gupta-f4 | I think dean put +2 on it | |
| 01:47:08 | RuiChen | ok, I prefer to rebase your patch ob my functional port test patch | |
| 01:47:21 | RuiChen | sorry, s/ob/on/ | |
| 01:49:01 | RuiChen | >> this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/423970/ | |
| 01:50:05 | ankur-gupta-f4 | It should be the other way. Because the updated functional tests will fail without bug fix | |
| 01:50:30 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Or it should if functional hits bug, which if its a complete functional test it should hit | |
| 01:53:11 | RuiChen | the current functional test don't cover the port set/unset --secuerty-group logic, so it don't catch the bug | |
| 01:54:04 | RuiChen | the related cases should be added in your patch, it's good, I just want to avoid the merge conflict | |
| 01:54:30 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Okay. Fair enough | |
| 01:54:42 | ankur-gupta-f4 | Im good with whichever decision you make | |
| 01:54:55 | ankur-gupta-f4 | As long as it gets done im happy :) | |
| 01:56:50 | RuiChen | thank you :) | |
| 02:55:01 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize image docs https://review.openstack.org/434539 | |
| 02:56:27 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize compute docs https://review.openstack.org/434475 | |
| 02:56:32 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize database docs https://review.openstack.org/434500 | |
| 02:58:07 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize bare_metal docs https://review.openstack.org/434460 | |
| 02:58:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Privatize session instance on Proxy subclasses https://review.openstack.org/434457 | |
| 03:05:10 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Remove unnecessary coding format in the head of files https://review.openstack.org/416500 | |
| 03:15:22 | openstackgerrit | jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix can not set is_default in network https://review.openstack.org/434602 | |
| 04:07:25 | RuiChen | anyone face the issue ? I have no idea about it | |
| 04:07:33 | RuiChen | name + opts) | |
| 04:07:33 | RuiChen | File "openstackclient/tests/functional/compute/v2/test_server.py", line 68, in server_create | |
| 04:07:33 | RuiChen | self.server_create(self.NAME) | |
| 04:07:33 | RuiChen | File "openstackclient/tests/functional/compute/v2/test_server.py", line 94, in setUp | |
| 04:07:33 | RuiChen | ft1.1: openstackclient.tests.functional.compute.v2.test_server.ServerTests.test_server_attach_detach_floating_ip_StringException: Traceback (most recent call last): | |
| 04:07:34 | RuiChen | TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found | |
| 04:08:23 | RuiChen | in functional tests, block current jenkin jobs gate-osc-dsvm-functional-ubuntu-xenial | |
| 04:21:51 | sindhu | RuiChen: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383025/ | |
| 04:22:15 | sindhu | RuiChen: yes, even I m getting the same error | |
| 04:50:25 | reedip | o/ | |
| 05:42:18 | openstackgerrit | zhiyong.dai proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix the output of quota show https://review.openstack.org/431366 | |
| 05:43:56 | openstackgerrit | zhiyong.dai proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support --no-property in "volume set" command https://review.openstack.org/434094 | |
| 05:52:49 | openstackgerrit | jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix can not set is_default in network https://review.openstack.org/434602 | |
| 06:00:30 | openstackgerrit | jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix can not set is_default in network https://review.openstack.org/434602 | |
| 06:13:37 | RuiChen | sindhu, reedip looks like all patch are blocked by the issue, so we have some workaround tips? | |
| 06:25:47 | reedip | which issue ? | |
| 06:26:17 | reedip | RuiChen : nm | |
| 06:27:32 | reedip | RuiChen, restacking devstack, will look into it as soon as it is up. | |
| 06:29:52 | reedip | RuiChen : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432993/ ?? | |
| 06:32:04 | RuiChen | reedip: yes, I found the current osc patches face the same issue in job gate-osc-dsvm-functional-ubuntu-xenial | |
| 06:32:17 | RuiChen | TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found | |
| 06:32:40 | RuiChen | raise TypeError in setup() of functional tests | |
| 06:33:35 | RuiChen | the same cases pass in my local devstack env | |
| 09:28:26 | openstackgerrit | Huanxuan Ao proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Avoid 'NoneType' error when format conversion https://review.openstack.org/434768 | |
| 10:33:39 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add new parameter "is_default" to Network QoS policy. https://review.openstack.org/432260 | |
| 11:18:49 | openstackgerrit | Huanxuan Ao proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Gate broken test https://review.openstack.org/434818 | |
| 13:06:14 | openstackgerrit | Brian Curtin proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Reorganize identity docs https://review.openstack.org/434534 | |
| 14:35:36 | cdent | mordred: thanks for adding your words to the api stability guideline thing. I think we'll get there in the end, but if nothing else it has done a good job of showing what I thought: that there isn't yet a solid consensus. So all in all a good exercise I guess. | |
| 14:35:49 | mordred | cdent: ++ | |
| 14:36:38 | cdent | I was hoping to write a new version today, but I don't think we're there yet | |
| 14:36:56 | mordred | cdent: if I had a billion dollars, I'd buy a large billboard in the bay area and put on it "using semver is not an excuse to break your users" | |
| 14:37:34 | mordred | of course, if I actually had a billion dollars, Id likely stop caring about semver really quickly | |
| 14:37:40 | cdent | I would hope so | |
| 14:38:07 | cdent | I tried to address that concept at the top a bit where I say that if you do use versioning it shouldn't mean that you're removing the old version. | |
| 14:38:10 | dtroyer | mordred: you might be able to pay me to care as your proxy though... | |
| 14:38:14 | cdent | But that's in the "should" side. | |
| 14:39:30 | cdent | yup. dtroyer you're input is eagerly awaited here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421846/ | |
| 14:39:42 | cdent | oh for heaven's sake | |
| 14:39:43 | cdent | your | |
| 14:50:23 | sdague | cdent: that's looking quite good, it would be nice to move that into merge state | |
| 14:51:36 | sdague | so even mordred's issues don't seem very far from concensus | |
| 14:51:53 | cdent | sdague: Yes, but I'm not willing to do so while there's still some pretty hefty disagreement in the comments. I'm trying to be really agnostic about my own points of view and get the disagreements to a point of at least compromise if not aggreement, without imposing my own view. | |
| 14:52:14 | sdague | ok, what do you see as the major disagreements? | |
| 14:52:14 | cdent | I think steve isn't fully on board with everything yet, for example | |
| 14:53:23 | cdent | a) not a disagreement but something that needs to be cleared up is the unresolved questions section | |
| 14:54:15 | cdent | b) monty's comments about never changing even with a version is an important thing to resolve. it is the heart of the discussion and the main reason why the document now opens with "if you're gonna do this you must version" | |
| 14:54:49 | cdent | c) the role or meaning of discoverability with regard to capability needs to be clarified | |
| 14:55:24 | cdent | d) 5xx to 4xx == okay needs to change to 500 to anything == okay | |
| 14:55:56 | cdent | e) at least one person wants the examples back | |
| 14:56:24 | sdague | so I don't think c) needs to be resolved before this is updated, because that's an active and ongoing discussion | |
| 14:56:45 | sdague | and other things are held up by the asserting that the currently written api guidelines aren't valid any more | |
| 14:56:55 | cdent | sure, but that conversation is happening because we are doing this process | |
| 14:57:15 | cdent | so it would be good to have it play out on a field where it's already happening? | |
| 14:58:50 | sdague | only if there is a belief that all relevant inputs have the stamina for that, and won't give up and go other places. I'm much more a fan of "ok, we're all agreed on X, get that committed, so it's clear where we are still having discussion" | |
| 14:59:16 | sdague | because while the whole thing remains uncommitted people assume, correctly, that everything is up for reinterpretation | |
| 15:03:00 | cdent | I guess I'm pretty invested in allowing people to explore that reinterpretation because it is exactly that which leads to real, instead of artifical, agreement | |
| 15:04:11 | cdent | sdague: I'm not intending to draw this out forever or anything, and if I had a clear understanding of everything that was in the comments right now, I'd try to close it up pronto. but right now I don't. | |
| 15:06:08 | cdent | sdague: I'm especially hesitant to commit the pending conversation down when people who I know to have a lot of interest and opinion on this topic (like mordred) have only commented today | |
| 15:06:25 | cdent | he's provided some good input which will help the next version | |
| 15:07:42 | sdague | sure, there is just a lot of cognitive weight on the fact that the diff is the entire document. | |