Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2017-01-19
15:13:40 reedip_ braincurtin : dont thank me yet if there is work to be done :)
15:26:07 stevemar briancurtin: just tag 1.0, problem solved (reading scroll up)
15:26:25 stevemar err scroll back
15:30:55 briancurtin reedip_: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstacksdk/+bugs?field.tag=resource2-port is a list of them. i’ve already done work locally on database and object_store so i assigned those and will push them soon. the rest are open!
15:31:22 reedip_ briancurtin : okay
15:31:29 reedip_ briancurtin : looking
15:31:50 reedip_ stevemar : I knew you would have an innovative answer :D
15:32:03 briancurtin stevemar: i’ll do that and then go on vacation for a month
15:32:08 stevemar briancurtin: hehe
15:32:09 reedip_ hahahahaha
15:32:39 stevemar briancurtin: you've got to be getting close to a 1.0 by now? i think?
15:33:03 stevemar in terms of breadth anyway, lots of resources and APIs are covered
15:33:40 reedip_ briancurtin : you mentioned a document in the Bug report
15:33:57 reedip_ When porting, do a walkthrough of the documentation to see if anything has changed so that we can keep the service updated."
15:33:57 reedip_ "
15:34:05 reedip_ Link to the document ???
15:34:09 briancurtin stevemar: yeah pretty close. just need to get 8 services moved over to the newer base classes so everything is on the same API, and most of those are pretty small services
15:34:36 stevemar briancurtin: then we can deprecate all the python-*clients, yesss
15:34:55 briancurtin reedip_: oh i meant the REST API docs, like on docs.openstack.org. meaning when you’re porting over a particular resource, just check that it still offers the same fields or if it has more, perhaps add them
15:35:10 reedip_ briancurtin : oohhhh !
15:35:11 reedip_ ok
15:35:59 briancurtin stevemar: some of those smaller services are pretty light in terms of depth, but now that we’ll be locked down on the API, just expanding things to keep up with what a REST API provides borders on trivial
15:36:10 briancurtin and adding new ones is pretty easy
16:07:57 dtroyer waj334: There is quite a bit that needs attention in that review, not the least of which is the resource name 'message', that's _very_ generic and we even have a project with a very sinilar type tag 'messaging'
16:08:26 dtroyer Right now we are in a pre-Ocata release freeze prep and new things like this simply are not getting much (if any) attention
16:08:58 dtroyer None of the volume v3 is merging before the stable/ocata branch is cut either way, we talked about this in the meetings the last couple of weeks
16:10:06 waj334 dtroyer: I'm aware of the freeze. I'm just completing the tasks I was given so I pay my bills every month lol
16:11:33 waj334 dtroyer: Shall I change that resource name to something or just put it under another resource?
16:11:56 dtroyer sure, and I am aware of how the supplier if said pay tends to operate
16:13:00 dtroyer I need to digest that new thing, this is the first I've even heard of it, and we have a nice history of pissing off Cider folk by changing their names for things, which sometimes are unfortunate choices in the bigger scheme of things
16:14:15 waj334 dtroyer: As long as I can say it's been implemented, I'm cool with however it gets done
16:18:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-client-config: Fix typo for baremetal_service_type https://review.openstack.org/422381
16:49:29 openstackgerrit Justin A Wilson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Refactor volume service tests https://review.openstack.org/422757
16:52:06 edleafe elmiko: If you could review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-wg-newsletter and make any changes you think are needed, that would be awesome
16:52:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/api-wg: Removes unnecessary utf-8 encoding https://review.openstack.org/414782
17:04:19 elmiko edleafe: ack, looking now
17:05:01 elmiko edleafe: lgtm +1
17:05:09 elmiko thanks =)
18:02:44 stevemar waj334: dtroyer pay dem bills
19:24:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk: Network L3 Router Commands https://review.openstack.org/385728
19:58:18 openstackgerrit Nikita Gerasimov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Switch server create to block_device_mapping_v2 https://review.openstack.org/407111
20:24:26 ankur-gupta-f1 did I miss the IRC meeting again :|
20:56:59 openstackgerrit Justin A Wilson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Refactor volume service v2 tests https://review.openstack.org/422757
20:58:22 stevemar oh no, i think i did too
20:58:42 stevemar dtroyer: looks like we all missed the meetign
20:58:44 stevemar :)
22:14:04 stevemar dtroyer: heads down work is fun
#openstack-sdks - 2017-01-20
00:38:07 openstackgerrit Corentin Ardeois proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib: Update supported keystone version https://review.openstack.org/422936
01:36:08 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/js-openstack-lib: Update supported keystone version https://review.openstack.org/422936
04:28:05 huanxuan dtroyer, stevemar: Sorry for missing the meeting, a bit busy at the end of the school term :(
04:28:33 huanxuan dtroyer, stevemar: I have some questions about the freeze...
04:28:54 huanxuan I don't quite sure about that, what cann't we do during the freeze? we cann't merge new features, or bug fixed, right?
04:48:51 stevemar huanxuan: o/
04:49:14 huanxuan stevemar: :)
04:49:29 stevemar huanxuan: you are in school! let me know when you graduate and are looking for a job :P
04:50:32 stevemar huanxuan: so, for feature freeze... we try to minimize the major changes doing into OSC this week and next
04:50:42 huanxuan stevemar: Yes... One year left, Will graduate in next year
04:51:03 stevemar huanxuan: if there is a major bug that needs fixing, we should fix it. But we shouldn't be introducing anything big, like a new feature
04:51:14 stevemar huanxuan: so a new command probably shouldn't merge
04:51:39 stevemar huanxuan: i am very impressed that you are doing this while in school, thats amazing
04:52:30 huanxuan stevemar: hehe! half time for study, half time for job :)
04:52:42 stevemar huanxuan: still very impressive!
04:53:13 stevemar huanxuan: the reason we have the freeze is because once we do our next release, it'll be the final release for the Ocata cycle
04:54:00 stevemar and we don't want to merge something that can be 1) incomplete or 2) possibly introduce bugs
04:54:43 stevemar huanxuan: other projects like tripleo and rally use OSC, so we can't have a broken CLI at the end of the release :)
04:54:57 huanxuan stevemar: OK! Get it, Thank you for your explanation
04:55:27 huanxuan stevemar: I need to learn more from you, dtroyer and others
04:56:23 stevemar huanxuan: ask away :)
04:56:50 huanxuan stevemar: Thanks :)
05:03:58 reedip stevemar : Do you wish to be back in school ??? :P
05:04:11 stevemar reedip: tempting offer :P
05:04:35 reedip o really ?? I think you will go back to school soon, for someone else though :)
05:07:24 stevemar reedip: few more years til that happens :D
05:07:33 reedip stevemar :D
05:18:50 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Fix Setting Quotas in Neutron https://review.openstack.org/419911
05:22:46 reedip stevemar : ^^ ??
05:24:15 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Add project ID in QuotaDefault requests https://review.openstack.org/420301
05:26:12 stevemar lgtm, but i don't know the sdk very well :(
05:43:54 reedip stevemar : hmm, okay
05:43:56 reedip no issues
05:44:10 reedip would wait for braincurtin's viewpoint
05:46:57 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Fix Setting Quotas in Neutron https://review.openstack.org/419911
06:28:48 openstackgerrit jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Functional test for volume qos https://review.openstack.org/421066
06:44:46 openstackgerrit Rui Chen proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Replace "Display Name" by "Name" in volume list https://review.openstack.org/423081
07:48:11 reedip RuiChen : Is there tabination support for OpenstackClients ??
07:48:17 reedip Just a query
07:58:30 RuiChen reedip: you means tagging support ?
08:00:03 reedip No , If I press a tab, then would the command be auto-complete ?
08:08:59 RuiChen reedip: openstack complete?
08:09:25 reedip ?
08:10:39 reedip oh ok let me try
08:11:15 RuiChen I saw the command "openstack complete" in help message, but i'm not sure which you want
08:13:15 reedip Okay, there is a bug in it :)
08:13:16 reedip openstack complete
08:13:17 reedip __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'project_name'
08:14:25 openstackgerrit Rui Chen proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Replace "Display Name" by "Name" in volume list https://review.openstack.org/423081
08:15:33 RuiChen looks like that help message error https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418221/
08:36:59 RuiChen reedip: openstack complete issue you faced, it have the same root reason with help message error, please apply the patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418221/
08:41:40 RuiChen and i think "complete" command is bash auto complete http://docs.openstack.org/developer/cliff/complete.html , that you need?
08:50:12 reedip RuiChen : yup

Earlier   Later