Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2017-01-16
12:09:55 Dinesh_Bhor Hi, anyone knows if any bugs status is 'Fix released' then can I submit patch against that bug? or do I need to report a separate bug?
12:23:43 openstackgerrit Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix OSC networking commands help errors https://review.openstack.org/418221
12:25:16 stevemar Dinesh_Bhor: you can submit a patch for it still, just use "Related-Bug" instead of "Closes-Bug" in the commit message
12:25:29 stevemar Dinesh_Bhor: or if the bug was not properly fixed, simply re-open the bug
12:25:47 stevemar Dinesh_Bhor: or if the bug is similar, but new, open a new one
12:25:51 stevemar lots of options :)
12:39:12 Dinesh_Bhor stevemar: Actually the bug was fixed but for some reasons the fix was reverted later
12:52:44 Dinesh_Bhor stevemar: I think I should re-open the bug but I don't see any option enabled there to change its status. Will it get change when I submit a patch against it with closes-bug?
12:53:40 stevemar Dinesh_Bhor: whats the bug?
12:53:59 openstack Launchpad bug 1633361 in OpenStack SDK "neutron fails with BadRequest" [Undecided,Fix released] - Assigned to Choe, Cheng-Dae (whitekid)
12:53:59 Dinesh_Bhor stevemar: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstacksdk/+bug/1633361
12:55:07 stevemar Dinesh_Bhor: you can re-open i suppose
12:55:29 stevemar Dinesh_Bhor: may have to bug briancurtin to re-open it
12:55:34 stevemar Dinesh_Bhor: or just file a new bug :)
12:55:49 stevemar (I don't have the permissions to re-open it)
12:56:43 Dinesh_Bhor stevemar: ok, thanks for your time. I will contact briancurtin
13:43:06 openstackgerrit Dinesh Bhor proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Fix error messages are not displayed correctly https://review.openstack.org/420722
14:08:52 openstackgerrit Nikita Gerasimov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Switch server create to block_device_mapping_v2 https://review.openstack.org/407111
14:52:36 stevemar dtroyer: morning boss
14:53:56 dtroyer stevemar: heyo
14:55:19 stevemar dtroyer: uno mas for stable/mitaka that RuiChen asked for: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354271/
14:56:04 dtroyer that needs the tox fix to pass, right?
15:00:19 stevemar dtroyer: yeah, but they are cascading
15:00:54 stevemar dtroyer: http://imgur.com/a/YWzWs
15:02:15 dtroyer I can never remember the ordering in the UI
15:03:59 stevemar dtroyer: you're not alone, i seem to be always reminding folks
15:10:33 stevemar dtroyer: is the plan to release 3.7.0, and fix the quota set (once sdk 0.9.13 is out), then release 3.8.0?
15:15:01 dtroyer I don' tknow if we can wait for 0.9.13 so that bit is timing-depenant
15:16:01 dtroyer I'd like to hold off merging new bits for a day maybe in case the 3.7.0 release has unforseen problems, but then go ahead with (safer) new stuff and do 3.8.0 next Monday
15:16:11 openstackgerrit Nikita Gerasimov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Switch server create to block_device_mapping_v2 https://review.openstack.org/407111
15:17:08 stevemar dtroyer: okay, the network help one should be ready to go and is arguably necessary for the next release
15:17:38 stevemar aside from that, *only* new fucntionality should land (like the volume type encryption stuff)
15:18:15 dtroyer right
15:18:44 stevemar dtroyer: kk, just wanted to make sure we're on the same page :)
15:18:46 dtroyer I'm not sure if we can have manage/unmanage settled in time, I still _really_ do not like those actions
15:19:10 stevemar yeah, debatable stuff can wait
15:19:14 stevemar tests are always welcomed :)
15:27:17 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/keystoneauth: Replace yaml.load() with yaml.safe_load() https://review.openstack.org/420572
16:34:57 openstackgerrit zhiyong.dai proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Update functional test for aggregate. https://review.openstack.org/418685
17:26:26 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/420846
17:28:10 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/420862
17:28:13 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/420863
19:24:59 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-lib: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/420846
20:04:23 stevemar dtroyer: did you want me to abandon the revert of the SDK bump?
20:04:42 stevemar actually, i think we want that merged now that i think about it
20:07:42 dtroyer stevemar: which is that?
20:08:06 stevemar dtroyer: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418663/
20:08:52 dtroyer yeah, we do want that merged.
20:09:28 stevemar dtroyer: tweaked it a bit, made the minimum .12
20:09:44 dtroyer it leaves the 0.9.11 block in place, any particular reason? I know it'll probably never be used in practice
20:10:20 dtroyer ok, refreshed
20:12:01 stevemar dtroyer: yah, refreshed and added relevant people
20:12:33 dtroyer have you seen any tests yet since u-c merged? I just now heading off to look for some
20:13:03 stevemar dtroyer: not yet
20:58:35 openstackgerrit Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Update functional test for aggregate. https://review.openstack.org/418685
21:06:42 stevemar dtroyer: i think mitaka is when folks really started to use OSC
21:06:50 stevemar judging by the backports
21:06:57 stevemar interested
21:06:59 stevemar interesting*
21:08:24 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/420862
21:50:11 openstackgerrit John Dennis proposed openstack/keystoneauth: Use comma as separator in ECP Accept HTTP header https://review.openstack.org/420970
#openstack-sdks - 2017-01-17
01:22:10 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient: Update functional test for aggregate. https://review.openstack.org/418685
02:18:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstacksdk: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/420863
04:29:10 openstackgerrit jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Error in the return of command 'volume qos create' https://review.openstack.org/421065
04:38:05 openstackgerrit jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Functional test for volume qos https://review.openstack.org/421066
06:02:16 openstackgerrit jichenjc proposed openstack/api-wg: fix no sample file in browser https://review.openstack.org/421084
06:03:18 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient: functional test for volume https://review.openstack.org/417349
06:43:39 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/keystoneauth: Use comma as separator in ECP Accept HTTP header https://review.openstack.org/420970
09:17:56 openstackgerrit Rui Chen proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Update devref about "--no-property" https://review.openstack.org/421160
10:10:55 openstackgerrit zhiyong.dai proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Add "volume host failover" command https://review.openstack.org/411259
10:13:49 openstackgerrit jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Functional test for volume snapshot https://review.openstack.org/421194
11:43:33 openstackgerrit jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Error in the return of command 'volume qos create' https://review.openstack.org/421065
12:58:00 amotoki hi, could someone from OSC team advise the command naming in neutronclient OSC plugin review? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416321/6/setup.cfg
12:58:41 amotoki what I'd like to ask are 'net-assoc' and 'router-assoc'.
12:59:29 amotoki (1) In OSC we don't use '-' as a delimiter. we use a space as a delimiter. Should we use 'bgpvpn net assoc create' for example?
12:59:51 amotoki (2) Should we use 'network associate' instead of 'net-assoc'?
13:00:49 amotoki (OSC has commands like 'network xxxx' rather than 'net xxxx', so I think we should not abbreviate command names as possible as we can)
13:06:55 stevemar amotoki: definitely 'network' over 'net'
13:07:18 stevemar amotoki: what's 'assoc' ?
13:07:36 amotoki stevemar: thanks. 'assoc' is abbrev of association.
13:07:51 stevemar amotoki: an bgvpn?
13:07:57 amotoki yes
13:07:59 stevemar bgp*
13:08:17 stevemar amotoki: sorry, i meant, what is bgpvpn?
13:08:48 amotoki neutron stadium has bgpvpn project (though not yet approved)
13:09:24 amotoki it is related to BGP VPN (not BGP (which is part of dynamic-routing)
13:10:01 stevemar ohh bgp == bagpipe
13:10:59 amotoki let me check
13:11:19 stevemar amotoki: associations are tricky
13:11:21 amotoki there are networking-bgpvpn and networking-bagpipe...
13:12:03 amotoki what we are looking at is networking-bgpvpn (not bagpipe)
13:12:08 amotoki See http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/networking-bgpvpn/tree/setup.cfg
13:13:38 amotoki honestly I am not sure 'association' is the right word.
13:17:07 amotoki stevemar: at least, I think 'assoc' is confusing (even though 'association' is the right word)
13:18:10 openstackgerrit Rodrigo Duarte proposed openstack/keystoneauth: Add test for header in Saml2 plugin https://review.openstack.org/421265
13:19:33 openstackgerrit Rodrigo Duarte proposed openstack/keystoneauth: Add test for header in Saml2 plugin https://review.openstack.org/421265
13:21:00 stevemar amotoki: commented
13:21:10 amotoki stevemar: thanks!
13:21:18 openstackgerrit Nikita Gerasimov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Switch server create to block_device_mapping_v2 https://review.openstack.org/407111
13:21:44 stevemar amotoki: its mostly what we already do for the volume type qos resource

Earlier   Later