| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2017-01-11 | |||
| 02:23:31 | jiahui | Qiming: YES:). | |
| 02:23:39 | Qiming | cool. | |
| 02:23:49 | Qiming | good to know there are hands working on this | |
| 02:24:22 | stevemar | jiahui: hmm, can you check what version of the SDK you are using in your local box? | |
| 02:24:39 | stevemar | jiahui: i think in the gate, we now block SDK v0.9.12 | |
| 02:26:30 | jiahui | stevemar: SDK v0.9.10 in my box | |
| 02:27:32 | stevemar | jiahui: i think the gate will test with that too | |
| 02:27:38 | stevemar | jiahui: which patch are you referring to? | |
| 02:29:22 | jiahui | stevemar: I have look the skip you have done in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/417576/ | |
| 02:35:03 | openstackgerrit | Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Revert "Updated from global requirements" https://review.openstack.org/418650 | |
| 02:49:09 | stevemar | jiahui: ah let me see -- the gate is currently testing with sdk 0.9.10 i believe, let's see what happens with ^ | |
| 02:53:29 | jiahui | stevemar: thank you steve :) | |
| 03:08:49 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/osc-lib: Calls to federated service providers using Keystone-to-Keystone https://review.openstack.org/371709 | |
| 03:23:42 | jiahui | stevermar:I run the command "tox -e functional openstackclient.tests.functional.network.v2" to test all network functional tests, it fails 3 tests. I reinstall devstack ,the same three tests fail. | |
| 03:41:09 | openstackgerrit | Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Revert "Updated from global requirements" https://review.openstack.org/418650 | |
| 03:49:27 | openstackgerrit | Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Revert "Updated from global requirements" https://review.openstack.org/418650 | |
| 05:20:34 | stevemar | jiahui: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/418650/ should have functional test results with SDK v0.9.12 | |
| 05:20:46 | stevemar | in about 30 minutes :) | |
| 05:22:08 | openstackgerrit | zhiyong.dai proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Update functional test for aggregate. https://review.openstack.org/418685 | |
| 05:40:18 | openstackgerrit | jiahui.qiang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix filter error in os volume list https://review.openstack.org/416852 | |
| 06:18:07 | jiahui | stevemar: Yes, i am thinking about how to upgrade my local SDK to SDK v0.9.12. It should be late in your place and good night! Thank you steve :) | |
| 06:40:09 | openstackgerrit | Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Fix quota show output https://review.openstack.org/418729 | |
| 07:40:40 | RuiChen | hi jiahui if you want to update your local sdk to 0.9.12, you should modify your local /opt/stack/requirements/upper-constraints.txt, then change python-openstackclient/tox.ini, like this {env:UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE:/opt/stack/requirements/upper-constraints.txt} | |
| 07:55:23 | jiahui | RuiChen: hi ,thank you for your advice. Is the gate testing with sdk 0.9.10? I find 'functional installed: ...openstacksdk==0.9.10...', when i read this http://logs.openstack.org/50/418650/3/check/gate-osc-dsvm-functional-ubuntu-xenial/7c4daa7/console.html | |
| 08:01:34 | RuiChen | jiahui: yes, current gate run on 0.9.10 https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/upper-constraints.txt#L214 | |
| 08:12:02 | RuiChen | jiahui: I found export UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE=/opt/stack/requirements/upper-constraints.txt is better way :-) | |
| 08:13:02 | jiahui | RuiChen: Thank you, it is so helpful to me! | |
| 09:31:13 | reedip | anyone here ?? | |
| 09:31:41 | reedip | RuiChen, dtroyer, stevemar ?? | |
| 09:32:23 | RuiChen | yeah reedip | |
| 09:32:34 | reedip | RuiChen : question | |
| 09:33:15 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1655445 in python-openstackclient "Cannot update subnetpool quota" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Reedip (reedip-banerjee) | |
| 09:33:15 | reedip | RuiChen, dtroyer, stevemar : while working on Neutron's quota update API, I found that this bug exists : https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/1655445 | |
| 09:34:20 | RuiChen | so your question is ? | |
| 09:35:06 | reedip | RuiChen, dtroyer, stevemar : I found that the issue is because of this line: https://github.com/openstack/python-openstacksdk/blob/master/openstack/proxy2.py#L64 | |
| 09:36:08 | reedip | RuiChen, dtroyer, stevemar : now not all End Points accept id=PROJECT_ID for each type of resource. | |
| 09:36:26 | reedip | for example, Neutron doesnt accept Project ID while updating the quotas | |
| 09:36:54 | reedip | Now, changing Neutron API would take some time and as we are near Ocata-3 , I am not sure if it would be accepted. | |
| 09:40:05 | RuiChen | i'm not clear your means, let me check the bug details | |
| 09:41:48 | reedip | RuiChen: Sure, I will wait | |
| 09:45:12 | RuiChen | I try the command in my env, no error exist, something I miss? (openstack) quota set --subnetpools 1234 ${proejct_id} | |
| 09:46:02 | RuiChen | my openstack sdk is openstacksdk-0.9.10 | |
| 09:49:38 | reedip | How do I check my openstacksdk ? | |
| 09:50:01 | reedip | I mean RuiChen how do I check my version of openstacksdk | |
| 09:50:26 | RuiChen | in your python install dir site-package | |
| 09:51:01 | RuiChen | pip freeze | |
| 09:51:36 | reedip | I have openstacksdk==0.9.12 | |
| 09:53:03 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1652317 in Manila "OpenStackSDK refactoring caused various OSC networking commands to fail" [Critical,New] | |
| 09:53:03 | RuiChen | seems it cause by the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/1652317 | |
| 09:54:51 | reedip | RuiChen : Okay | |
| 09:55:51 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1652317 in Manila "OpenStackSDK refactoring caused various OSC networking commands to fail" [Critical,New] | |
| 09:55:51 | reedip | RuiChen : my bug may not be caused due to returning dicts , but yes it doesnt accept ID in it as mentioned in https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/1652317/comments/13 | |
| 10:03:58 | RuiChen | reedip: yeah, I decide to install sdk 0.9.12, try to find out something wrong about it :) | |
| 10:15:17 | reedip | :D | |
| 10:34:55 | reedip | RuiChen: I resolved it in a PS | |
| 10:35:05 | reedip | can you try the patch and lemme know of the result ? | |
| 10:35:27 | reedip | Basically I modified the refactoring of Openstack SDK for this fix. | |
| 10:43:58 | reedip | RuiChen : Never mind, anyways I am looking into this bug, will post the PS today | |
| 10:46:04 | RuiChen | I will go to dinner in a moment, sorry, please show me the patch link, I will check it when I have time | |
| 12:31:32 | openstackgerrit | yuval shalev proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk: Added project role assignment https://review.openstack.org/416598 | |
| 13:47:00 | openstackgerrit | Huanxuan Ao proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Add "encryption-*" options in volume type commands https://review.openstack.org/414197 | |
| 14:37:16 | openstackgerrit | Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Run functional tests with SDK 0.9.12 https://review.openstack.org/418650 | |
| 14:38:22 | stevemar | dtroyer: so i pushed ^ -- we probably want that to be successful before releasing | |
| 14:38:32 | stevemar | it ensure we will work with the latest SDK release | |
| 14:39:07 | stevemar | cause right now our CI is passing, not because of skipped tests, but because the latest SDK versions are blacklisted | |
| 15:01:16 | dtroyer | stevemar: right… thanks | |
| 15:02:14 | dtroyer | I want to release osc-lib Real Soon Now | |
| 15:02:44 | dtroyer | I'm still not sure I want to force-include keyring, we've already been down that road… | |
| 15:04:23 | dtroyer | stevemar: I'm thinking we need to add OSC functional tests to osc-lib and the sdk jobs... | |
| 15:15:51 | stevemar | dtroyer: definitely need to do that | |
| 15:16:19 | dtroyer | so osc-lib auth cache… include or not? I'll release now if we leave it out | |
| 15:16:29 | stevemar | i am negative on that | |
| 15:16:37 | stevemar | untested (mostly) | |
| 15:17:15 | dtroyer | roger that… agreed | |
| 15:17:20 | stevemar | dtroyer: want to add a functional test job to osc-lib before releasing? | |
| 15:17:29 | stevemar | or are you comfortable enough to release? | |
| 15:17:37 | stevemar | i think the changes were mostly additive | |
| 15:17:44 | dtroyer | depends on how long it takes to get it added :) | |
| 15:18:25 | dtroyer | I made those compat-changes, the case I am concerned about we get in the dsvm jobs (using env vars for auth) | |
| 15:18:42 | dtroyer | rather, using having the comat bits in osc-lib and also in osc | |
| 15:19:08 | dtroyer | in one case it's doing double work and is not (should not be) harmful | |
| 15:19:27 | stevemar | dtroyer: looks like only one thing is failing with sdk 0.9.12 -- http://logs.openstack.org/50/418650/4/check/gate-osc-dsvm-functional-ubuntu-xenial/abbb8d4/testr_results.html.gz ? | |
| 15:20:03 | dtroyer | woo! | |
| 15:20:15 | dtroyer | qos rule type... | |
| 15:20:37 | dtroyer | is anyone workign on that (I just skimmed the overnight scrollback) | |
| 15:20:52 | dtroyer | I'll jump on it after adding the func tests and releasing osc-lib | |
| 15:20:53 | stevemar | dtroyer: for the functional job in osc-lib... it should test with master osc-lib and master osc? | |
| 15:21:24 | dtroyer | we need that combination somewhere, but I was thinking master osc-lib with released osc | |
| 15:21:42 | dtroyer | we've found that dsvm jobs are insufficient for validating we don't break anything | |
| 15:21:47 | stevemar | right | |
| 15:22:28 | stevemar | dtroyer: i did the combination before but i don't recall how to do it, may take a few hours | |
| 15:22:55 | dtroyer | release osc + master osc-lib would be the default, right? | |
| 15:23:05 | dtroyer | ie, no extra work | |
| 15:29:08 | stevemar | i think so, but we'll need to run the functional tests *in* the osc repo, so i'm not sure how that works :\ | |
| 15:29:34 | dtroyer | ugh, right | |
| 15:31:04 | stevemar | dtroyer: and we'll need to probably run the master version of those tests? | |
| 15:31:26 | stevemar | dtroyer: you know, we could have another job in the OSC gate that tests osc-lib master and osc master | |
| 15:31:39 | stevemar | instead of osc-lib release and osc master | |
| 15:31:49 | stevemar | that'll be *really* easy | |
| 15:31:53 | stevemar | i think | |