| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-09-10 | |||
| 16:34:41 | sean-k-mooney | well once we cut RC1 master will be 2027.1 and it shoudl be voting there anyway in the next week or 2 as our default shoudl be chaning | |
| 16:35:03 | sean-k-mooney | but ya lets focus on getting RC1 out for nova and placement and come back to this next week | |
| 16:36:01 | gmaan | yeah, we can backport that based on hoiw it run on stable/2026.2 | |
| 16:36:18 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:36:38 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: but from testing runtime, i think we will keep 24.04 and 26.04 noth voting on 2027.1 | |
| 16:36:55 | sean-k-mooney | no | |
| 16:37:11 | gmaan | https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/2027.1.html#additional-testing-for-a-smooth-upgrade | |
| 16:37:13 | gmaan | yes | |
| 16:37:26 | sean-k-mooney | we will keep 24.04 for upgrades | |
| 16:37:36 | sean-k-mooney | but 26.04 shoudl be voting and our new default | |
| 16:37:37 | gmaan | because its 2027.1 where we are bumping the distro testing | |
| 16:37:46 | gmaan | yes and at least one job for 24.04 | |
| 16:37:48 | gmaan | and voting | |
| 16:38:04 | sean-k-mooney | ya so proably the skiplevel greande job | |
| 16:38:21 | sean-k-mooney | with the normal greade job using 26.04 | |
| 16:38:27 | sean-k-mooney | but we can select one fo the others | |
| 16:38:28 | gmaan | yeah, that only. so upgrade path from 2026.2 (on ubuntu 24.04) -> 2027.1 (ubuntu 26.04 ) is covered | |
| 16:38:59 | gmaan | ski level job is always there for SLURP and NON-SLURP by default unless project opt-out on non-SLURP release | |
| 16:39:01 | sean-k-mooney | yep i think the skip level job is often the best for that smoth upgrade path | |
| 16:39:08 | gmaan | yeah | |
| 16:40:14 | sean-k-mooney | ok i need to check that all the rc/stable branches for the cybrog and watcher repos that should exsit have been created so ping if anything comes up else ill be doing that for the next while | |
| 16:42:52 | sean-k-mooney | gmaan: actully for the tempest plugins those will happen as a group correct? | |
| 16:43:20 | sean-k-mooney | i guess they are not typiclly branched | |
| 16:43:35 | sean-k-mooney | so that probaly fine but they will be tagged | |
| 16:43:41 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: yeah, there will be only final release for tempest plugin and no stable branch | |
| 16:43:51 | sean-k-mooney | ack perfect | |
| 16:44:00 | gmaan | and jobs/ new master twick will happen usually at same time | |
| 16:44:03 | gibi | Uggla: sean-k-mooney: zigo: the placement RC1 release patch is not up to date with the tip of master | |
| 16:44:24 | gmaan | for devstack/greande branches, yes it wait for all projects stable exist and when i get release go ahead | |
| 16:44:34 | gmaan | *release team go ahead | |
| 16:45:21 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: ah is it missing the packagign fix form earlier in the week | |
| 16:45:31 | gmaan | s/i/QA PTL, hoping it will not be me all the time :) | |
| 16:45:47 | gibi | the placement unreleased release notes looks OK to me I don't think we need a prelude there as it is sort | |
| 16:46:19 | gibi | Uggla: are you still around or should I go ahead and update the placement release patch? | |
| 16:47:00 | sean-k-mooney | oh that is there it just missing the tox changes | |
| 16:47:35 | sean-k-mooney | those are nice ot hvae if can bump them quickly | |
| 16:47:53 | gibi | I can | |
| 16:48:00 | gibi | so I start doing it | |
| 16:48:20 | sean-k-mooney | i think its low risk and we might as well inculde them | |
| 16:52:19 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1004525/1..2 | |
| 16:52:21 | gibi | updated | |
| 16:52:40 | gibi | but we need Uggla's or bauzas' approval a release liasons | |
| 16:53:44 | sean-k-mooney | well the current version is not approved | |
| 16:54:00 | sean-k-mooney | adn the release team only merge them tomorow if late | |
| 16:54:16 | sean-k-mooney | so updatign now wont really impact there appoval | |
| 16:54:42 | sean-k-mooney | i commented on the patch that the current sha is ok since the tox chagne are nice to have | |
| 16:54:52 | sean-k-mooney | we can alwasy backport them if needed | |
| 16:55:55 | gibi | I pushed the change :) | |
| 16:56:48 | sean-k-mooney | i guess the irc bot is not flexibel enough to tell use when nova related release patches are pushed | |
| 16:56:59 | gibi | yeah that would be too much :) | |
| 16:58:11 | sean-k-mooney | that looks good to me | |
| 17:09:50 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Update release notes with known bug of live migration task leak https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005093 | |
| 17:10:29 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Update release notes with known bug of live migration task leak https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003386 | |
| 17:11:49 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Update release notes with known bug of live migration task leak https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003386 | |
| 17:12:43 | gmaan | dansmith: gibi bauzas updated release notes to list that task tracking bug as known bug https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003386 | |
| 17:13:30 | gmaan | gablan: ^^ as you are backporting the graceful shutdown in downstream, this is known bug. | |
| 17:15:12 | gmaan | gablan: btw, good to see interest in graceful shutdown feature, let us know how it works and especially any feedback on default value of graceful shutdown timeout configuration https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/graceful-shutdown.html#configuration | |
| 17:28:08 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add Hibiscus prelude section https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004927 | |
| 17:33:19 | dansmith | gmaan: see my comment on the reno | |
| 17:33:33 | dansmith | if you agree I can ninja the updated version, and if not, I'll +W | |
| 17:35:42 | gmaan | dansmith: checked, yes that is correct. let me update it | |
| 17:37:54 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Update release notes with known bug of live migration task leak https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003386 | |
| 17:38:22 | gmaan | dansmith: ^^ done | |
| 17:38:38 | dansmith | got it | |
| 18:54:02 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Update release notes with known bug of live migration task leak https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003386 | |
| 19:45:47 | opendevreview | Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005115 | |
| 19:49:02 | clif | man I'm going to have to rework that backport patch again for 2025.2 since it seems like at that point in time futurist.GreenThreadPoolExecutor was used instead of nova.utils.create_executor | |
| 19:53:00 | JayF | No guardrail on the eventlet migration cliff :( don't fall (I know this is maybe unbelivable but pun not intended) | |
| 20:11:11 | clif | I guess it wasn't as bad as I expected | |
| 20:21:42 | opendevreview | Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005118 | |
| 20:23:22 | opendevreview | Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005119 | |
| 20:29:07 | sean-k-mooney | clif: we have been slowly cenrtalisaing all the executor stuff release to release and putting it in a corner | |
| 20:29:31 | sean-k-mooney | so ya i woudl expect some rework to be needed there | |
| 20:30:09 | clif | yeah I understand, the main hurdle was initially adapting to the change that happened recently with thread_pool_executor | |
| 20:30:22 | clif | going backward has been relatively easy | |
| 20:31:10 | clif | and the initial adaptation wasn't that bad in hindsight either, just unexpected | |
| 20:35:47 | sean-k-mooney | at least your doing it the "right way" release by release, its much much harder to skip im my expirnce | |
| 20:36:29 | sean-k-mooney | anyway im calling it a day o/ | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-09-11 | |||
| 08:31:06 | gibi | JayF: lol | |
| 08:35:10 | Uggla | gibi I think we are happy with d837768baea29358752452ee625d9c7183bc2e7e on the master branch and it can go be released. Right ? | |
| 08:38:23 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004430 is not landed | |
| 08:38:34 | gibi | neither https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004424 | |
| 08:39:09 | gibi | I think we need those on master then we need to add the resulting hash to the RC1 patch | |
| 08:41:32 | Uggla | gibi, oh yes you are right. I saw the +w on them yesterday and thought there were already merged. | |
| 08:45:22 | gibi | OK, both rechecked now | |
| 08:46:09 | gibi | now we wait, and pray for the CI to be gentle with our souls | |
| 09:18:16 | Uggla | gibi, I'am looking at zuul for the 2 patches. "There is no Dana, only Zuuuul!" | |
| 09:20:29 | gibi | :) | |
| 10:02:20 | bauzas | hopefully the streams are not crossing | |
| 10:44:31 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004430 has a timed out tox cover. :( I need to find a goat... | |
| 10:47:00 | gibi | bauzas: Uggla: could one of you as release liasons approve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999977 the placement RC1? | |
| 10:53:02 | opendevreview | Grzegorz Grasza proposed openstack/nova master: Mask personality file contents in debug request logging https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1005208 | |
| 12:07:03 | gibi | the gate is still not in its best shape. there are random timeouts both in eventlet and threading based functional runs and in openstack-tox-cover as well | |
| 12:11:44 | gibi | I filed a tracker for the tox cover one https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2167088 | |
| 12:18:20 | gibi | it seems we have one or more randomly hanging test case that blocks the cover run forever | |
| 12:45:02 | eduardomorais[m] | i everyone, I'm a new contributor looking for a bug to start working on. I came across this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1703488. Is it still valid? | |
| 12:48:18 | Uggla | gibi, I think you copy paste the wrong fix above. | |
| 12:49:31 | Uggla | 999977 is regression test for bug 2162835 not placement. | |
| 12:51:14 | Uggla | eduardomorais[m], cool. That's an old bug, I suggest you try first to reproduce on master. It could have been fixed. | |
| 13:05:00 | Uggla | eduardomorais[m], also I played with pci stuff with the introduction of variant driver and I did not notice this behavior. Anyway, even if you can't reproduce that means you will be able to close your first bug, and this is cool. | |