| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-08-26 | |||
| 05:02:06 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Reconcile stale Manila share access rules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001916 | |
| 05:48:33 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Reconcile stale Manila share access rules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001916 | |
| 06:22:48 | opendevreview | Daniel Schulz proposed openstack/nova master: Prevent orphaned attachments when shelve is preempted by a delete https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002439 | |
| 06:24:05 | opendevreview | Daniel Schulz proposed openstack/nova master: Prevent orphaned attachments when shelve is preempted by a delete https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002439 | |
| 06:25:16 | opendevreview | Daniel Schulz proposed openstack/nova master: Prevent orphaned attachments by preemptive delete https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002439 | |
| 07:03:47 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Use service shutdown related config options in nova-graceful-shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001017 | |
| 08:21:26 | antia | gibi: Is there anything to resolve, other than the gate errors, for the TDX series? | |
| 08:24:48 | gibi | antia: I'm not tracking anything else just the gate | |
| 08:25:01 | gibi | antia: if you have time contributing whitebox test for TDX would be nice | |
| 08:25:47 | gibi | also if you want you can write a blogpost somewhere about how to configured you HW and tested the series (or even about your overall contribution experience) and we will probably link to it in our doc :) | |
| 08:27:05 | antia | I already started on the whitebox testing, so I'll try to finish that :) | |
| 11:02:32 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: melwitt: Because we're doing some deeper diving on KSA at the moment... I've proposed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002359. That is a small initial step that would allow us to move away from cinderclient in a future release. efried started the effort years ago but never closed it out. I'd appreciate your reviews if possible | |
| 11:03:11 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: i saw that in my notifications but didnt look so closely | |
| 11:03:30 | sean-k-mooney | i think some of the changes that melwitt has in the cybrog patch are still not required | |
| 11:03:45 | sean-k-mooney | i think it will now work | |
| 11:03:56 | sean-k-mooney | but im not sure why we need to pass in ksa_auth | |
| 11:04:15 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: do you know why https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002007/11/nova/utils.py is required | |
| 11:04:35 | sean-k-mooney | am i missing somthing in the admin false path? | |
| 11:05:26 | sean-k-mooney | its creating a service token and then usign the user token form the context to create the connections? | |
| 11:05:31 | sean-k-mooney | or is that wrong | |
| 11:06:38 | sean-k-mooney | was the previous admin=false path not passing a service token as well as the user token | |
| 11:06:45 | stephenfin | looking | |
| 11:15:22 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: ya thats the chnage | |
| 11:15:47 | sean-k-mooney | well | |
| 11:15:54 | stephenfin | sorry, wanted to double check stuff | |
| 11:16:01 | stephenfin | my understanding of those changes was that we needed to pre-build the auth plugin becuse one of the other services currently using SDK appear to be using service tokens | |
| 11:16:22 | stephenfin | (i.e. ironic and and manila) | |
| 11:16:58 | sean-k-mooney | so manila i think needed the service toke already | |
| 11:17:22 | sean-k-mooney | but in any case i can see that the new flow does build it correctly | |
| 11:17:37 | sean-k-mooney | the old flow might of or may have needed us to add it after the connection was created | |
| 11:17:59 | sean-k-mooney | so this is a bit cleaner in that when we get the adapter back we know it has it | |
| 11:18:12 | sean-k-mooney | but also less clean as it requires use to manually build it and pass it in | |
| 11:18:28 | stephenfin | we don't seem to be using service tokens for manila currently? https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/share/manila.py#L32-L48 | |
| 11:19:11 | stephenfin | unless I'm missing something (that's what I was looking for) | |
| 11:19:11 | sean-k-mooney | we are ment ot use service tokesn for ever call ot other services if tis defiend in the config | |
| 11:19:20 | sean-k-mooney | and you cant talk to cinder or cyrbog without them | |
| 11:19:28 | sean-k-mooney | so the service user section is effectivly alwasy required now | |
| 11:19:55 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: i rememebr there was a lot of issues tryign to figurfe out how to make serivce user tokens work before with the sdk | |
| 11:20:08 | sean-k-mooney | so my guess is this nerver got wiered in and we hav ejust and a bug the hwole time | |
| 11:20:59 | stephenfin | I suspect so, though again I might be missing something | |
| 11:21:44 | stephenfin | You're likely right about this not being as simple as it could be. we probably should have get_sdk_adapter handle the whole service token logic for us (and I assume it should default to doing just that) | |
| 11:21:48 | sean-k-mooney | well i think in either case if tis not obviouysly using it its a opertunity to impvoe it | |
| 11:22:04 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: that is waht i was expecting | |
| 11:22:29 | sean-k-mooney | for the get_sdk_adapter to uncondtionally add the service token when its in the config | |
| 11:23:07 | sean-k-mooney | i think we can likely proceed with mels patch for now, and then we can do that cleanup with or after your cidner one | |
| 11:23:53 | sean-k-mooney | alsthough we can see what mel things ill leave a suggestion in the review | |
| 11:24:05 | stephenfin | Yes, we dont want to block the other cyborg work you've got going on. I'll pull that down and see if I can tidy it up somewhat. We've still got another day or two before freeze for SDK so if there are feature gaps there, we could close them out | |
| 11:25:28 | sean-k-mooney | i think in the long term it might be nice to have a more native way to do this in the sdk, ie and interface that allwo use to pass 2 config section and optionally an exisitng token when we want to use that as the user token | |
| 11:25:45 | sean-k-mooney | and jsut let the sdk deal with it but not right now | |
| 11:42:41 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: ok left my comments and +2'd ill hold +w unitil mel is aroudn and she can catchup | |
| 11:42:51 | sean-k-mooney | ill go look at your cidner patch next | |
| 11:43:38 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: oh that `'[cinder] catalog_info` ya that annorying and we shoudl fix that | |
| 11:44:17 | sean-k-mooney | it was "special" when we were creating the now redhat installer and i rememebr havign to confirue it differencly | |
| 11:45:11 | sean-k-mooney | that shoudl allwo use to clean up some fo this in devstack also | |
| 11:45:36 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: I agree RE: SDK support here. I forgot that I wrote docs on this back when Uggla was working on the Manila stuff, but I think he never got it work (?) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/893505 | |
| 11:45:37 | sean-k-mooney | we have some common fucntion for configruign the ksa sections which dont quite work with cidner if i recall | |
| 11:46:09 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: I looked at devstack and it doesn't set those weird Cinder options, thankfully | |
| 11:46:13 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: that or the patch is siting on review somewhere | |
| 11:46:32 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: oh good to know | |
| 11:47:13 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/nova-operator/blob/main/templates/nova/nova.conf#L362-L377 | |
| 11:47:17 | stephenfin | well good and not good. not good because the manila integration currently doesn't use service tokens so it suffers from the token expiry issues service tokens are supposed to work around | |
| 11:47:27 | stephenfin | good because Mel's changes should let us fix that? | |
| 11:47:27 | sean-k-mooney | we needed to use the internal endpoint in our installer so i had to set them | |
| 11:48:12 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 11:48:18 | sean-k-mooney | if we passk in the ksa_auth | |
| 11:48:25 | sean-k-mooney | or if we do my suggetion and inline it | |
| 11:48:29 | sean-k-mooney | then it woudl "just work" | |
| 11:48:39 | stephenfin | why not just set interface instead of catalog_info? | |
| 11:48:42 | sean-k-mooney | because we woudl start sendign it when ever it was enabled in the config | |
| 11:48:58 | stephenfin | in https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/nova-operator/blob/main/templates/nova/nova.conf#L362-L377 | |
| 11:49:00 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Stabilize TestSerialConsoleLiveMigrate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002477 | |
| 11:49:01 | sean-k-mooney | so the standard field is valid_interfaces = internal | |
| 11:49:07 | sean-k-mooney | which is a list ans we coudl not use that | |
| 11:49:19 | stephenfin | interface also works though, I believe? | |
| 11:49:24 | sean-k-mooney | interface may have worksed but i just used what was in kolla or tripleo | |
| 11:49:36 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002477 is yet another gate stabilization patch if you have a bit of spare cycles | |
| 11:50:12 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#cinder its not one of the document options | |
| 11:50:18 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: so i didnt use it | |
| 11:50:35 | stephenfin | fair. interface is disabled tbf, but we nothing ever gets removed in ksa 😅 | |
| 11:50:51 | stephenfin | okay that's an oversight. devstack sets `interface`, fwiw | |
| 11:50:53 | stephenfin | gibi: looking | |
| 11:51:02 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: by the way it loks like barbica is also slightly special | |
| 11:51:10 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/nova-operator/blob/main/templates/nova/nova.conf#L394 | |
| 11:51:21 | sean-k-mooney | but that is coming form castalean | |
| 11:51:39 | stephenfin | gibi: done. dead simple | |
| 11:53:05 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: dont we alrady have a wait_for_migration_status in the integrate helpers | |
| 11:54:02 | stephenfin | sean-k-mooney: read the commit message :) | |
| 11:54:03 | sean-k-mooney | we copy that function in some of the regression tets and we reuse it in others | |
| 11:54:04 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: as I noted in the commit message this regression does not use our helper mixing | |
| 11:54:09 | gibi | s/g// | |
| 11:54:21 | gibi | hence I vendored the helper | |
| 11:54:39 | gibi | I didn't wanted the bigger change to pull in a new base class | |
| 11:55:09 | sean-k-mooney | ya i was just debating the value of that vs the copy | |
| 11:55:11 | sean-k-mooney | +2w | |
| 11:55:34 | gibi | thanks | |
| 11:58:09 | sean-k-mooney | im alway 50:50 on that, i perfer when our regression tests follow our docs and inherit form our base test case with minimal depency on those deper classes, on the other hand the integrate heleprs mixin is very useful and keeps them small | |
| 11:58:47 | sean-k-mooney | so i prefer reading them when it uses it :) and writeing them i guess but it creats more depencnece on the internals | |
| 11:59:39 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: so just to confirm with the cinder change i should now be able to use valid_interface internal,public for cidner right | |
| 11:59:49 | sean-k-mooney | we get that for free form ksa | |
| 12:00:38 | sean-k-mooney | i think in our installer we woudl still jut have it defautl to only internal | |