Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-17
16:05:14 Uggla #topic Release Planning
16:05:22 Uggla #link https://releases.openstack.org/hibiscus/schedule.html
16:05:28 Uggla #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule
16:05:33 Uggla #info PTG etherpad for 2026.2 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg
16:05:39 Uggla #info Feature freeze is next week.
16:05:46 Uggla #info Thursday is 2nd Nova Implementation Review Day
16:06:07 sean-k-mooney i think the non clinet lib freeze would be thrusday
16:06:07 Uggla #topic Review priorities
16:06:19 Uggla sean-k-mooney yes you are right.
16:06:27 sean-k-mooney meaning we need anything for os-triats/os-vif ectra in this week
16:06:55 sean-k-mooney not sure we have anything we need for those just calling it out
16:07:06 Uggla sure no worries
16:07:07 gibi we had a change landed in futurist
16:07:23 gibi I guess we get a release of it this week
16:07:34 gibi I assume futurist is also non client lib
16:07:37 sean-k-mooney that should get done with the rest of the oslo lib yes
16:07:42 gibi cool
16:08:08 dansmith if I could,
16:08:22 dansmith I've been going back and forth on the share migration stuff
16:08:48 dansmith it's progressing but still lacking some robustness around the error handling
16:09:16 dansmith I'm going to be out part of next week around the deadline and I'm the only one what has reviewed it AFAICT
16:09:30 dansmith so just highlighting that it's a bit of a risk for FF
16:09:36 Uggla dansmith ok, can I help on that side ?
16:10:33 dansmith for sure, any reviews can help, of course
16:11:04 gibi on the same note we will need a second set of eyes on the TDX series. I'm +2 but bauzas is on PTO
16:11:35 dansmith I'm also on the hook for the graceful shutdown stuff, which has made progress for sure, but the next patch is pretty big
16:11:54 dansmith I don't want to jeopardize the share stuff, but the shutdown stuff is progressed a bit farther
16:12:00 sean-k-mooney gibi: i can maybe take a look at the tdx work
16:12:02 gibi dansmith: I replied on your comment there but I'm not sure that helps:)
16:12:17 sean-k-mooney but im alos trying to prgoress some cybrog work so we will see
16:12:19 gibi e
16:12:19 gibi sean-k-mooney: that would be awesom
16:12:34 Uggla ok so I'll have a look tomorrow. I'll try to look the share cold migration and if possible tdx.
16:12:37 sean-k-mooney i have most of the context still loaded form the sev work
16:12:51 gibi I'm also off Thur / Fri (public holiay)
16:13:02 Uggla sean-k-mooney 👍
16:13:30 Uggla anything else for review prio ?
16:13:42 dansmith gibi: yeah I saw, will circle back
16:13:59 sean-k-mooney im hoping https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994579 can land before FF
16:14:15 sean-k-mooney but we will see
16:15:44 Uggla skipping couple of next topics because of Elod and fwiesel ptos.
16:16:00 Uggla #topic Kamil's news about eventlet removal
16:16:22 gibi o/ Kamil is off today
16:16:22 Uggla Kamil is on bank holiday, gibi something to report on that topic ?
16:16:27 gibi I substitute
16:16:35 Uggla gibi 👍
16:17:13 gibi when futurist is released we can progress on removing code form nova by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997410
16:17:44 gibi this will conflict (trivially) with gmann's refactor patch dansmith mentioned above
16:17:49 gibi just to complicate things :)
16:18:25 dansmith oh wonderful
16:18:37 gibi I think the graceful shutdown series is more important that this futurist code move so I'm fine delaying https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997410
16:18:52 sean-k-mooney right
16:19:01 sean-k-mooney so that is just adopting the futureist port
16:19:04 gibi yepp
16:19:06 sean-k-mooney so we can merge that later
16:19:21 gibi yepp
16:19:45 gibi we have one more thing for eventlet, the functional test job
16:19:54 sean-k-mooney provided the futurist release happens i think it woudl be fine to merge kamils change after FF as long as it happens before rc1
16:19:59 gibi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997216 this and its ancestors are ready to land
16:20:32 sean-k-mooney those look small so i can take a look after the meeting
16:20:39 sean-k-mooney looks lik gmaan is +2 on them alrady
16:20:49 gibi yepp
16:20:51 gibi thanks sean-k-mooney
16:21:06 gibi this give use an extra safety net
16:21:16 gibi for any later refactors
16:21:30 gibi that is it from me about eventlet <EOM>
16:21:44 Uggla thx gibi
16:21:59 Uggla #topic Nova using openstack sdk for neutron
16:22:06 Uggla lajoskatona, something to share ?
16:22:46 lajoskatona not really the sdk patch is ready to merge and after to be released: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/995724
16:23:12 lajoskatona so seems like the whole series is skipping again for the next cycle
16:23:52 lajoskatona that's it for the Neutron and SDK work
16:24:20 Uggla thx lajoskatona.
16:24:58 Uggla I think this is bug fixes and not impacted by FF.
16:25:35 Uggla we will see
16:25:41 Uggla moving on
16:25:44 Uggla #topic Confidential computing, status of SNP and TDX features
16:26:00 Uggla antia, tkajinam, gibi, something you would like to share ?
16:27:36 gibi as I mentioned above I'm +2 on TDX and it needs a second core
16:27:50 gibi I'm not trackin anything for SNP any more for H
16:28:04 gibi but tkajinam correct me if there are open things to land
16:28:09 gibi for SNP
16:28:55 antia I was trying to wrap my head around some Zuul logs earlier today, but didn't get too far
16:29:03 tkajinam nothing is left for SNP, as far as I'm aware of
16:29:03 sean-k-mooney i think the only SNP thing is the test cleanup
16:29:16 tkajinam (nothing critical, I mean
16:29:35 sean-k-mooney tkajinam: did the mock path fix merge yet
16:29:52 tkajinam sean-k-mooney, not yet
16:29:57 sean-k-mooney ack
16:30:12 gmaan gibi: sean-k-mooney on threading jobs series, I was in between of this one on friday but will check today, rest all were good https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999121/3
16:30:55 tkajinam there is one small simplification change related to SNP, waiting for 2nd +2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998285
16:31:19 tkajinam so it would be nice if we can merge that too
16:31:31 tkajinam https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999780 is the mock path fix which sean-k-mooney mentioned, just for record
16:31:44 sean-k-mooney tkajinam: ill review that shortly but ya only checkign x86 makes sense
16:32:00 tkajinam yup
16:32:05 tkajinam a similar change is proposed for tdx as well (found in the series)
16:32:07 sean-k-mooney tkajinam: im ok with merging that as is and defering the rest till later
16:32:24 sean-k-mooney but just want to make sure gibi and dansmith are ok with that before +2ing
16:32:35 sean-k-mooney that for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999780
16:32:39 tkajinam sean-k-mooney, you are talking about 999780, right ?

Earlier   Later