| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-08-17 | |||
| 14:55:27 | sean-k-mooney | i think as wriggen the archive/pruge woudl still be required before doign the online migrations | |
| 14:56:21 | sean-k-mooney | and it might still be worth addign an upgrade release note | |
| 14:56:30 | sean-k-mooney | but i think just rebaseing that commit would be fine | |
| 14:57:05 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: i.e. if you wanted to progress that i would be ok wiht just resolving the merge conflict and proceeding with it | |
| 14:57:46 | sean-k-mooney | with that said this only affect upgrades form unsupproted releases to my knowldage | |
| 14:57:52 | sean-k-mooney | so it has not been a high priorty | |
| 14:58:29 | sean-k-mooney | oh ok the latest comment confirm its an issue for current release | |
| 14:58:35 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: ok cool thank you. yeah ... it caught my eye bc they are upgrading _to_ a supported release though so it set off my alarm bells | |
| 14:58:36 | sean-k-mooney | when upgrading after caracal so ya | |
| 14:59:15 | sean-k-mooney | right it was the other way around its only an issue after caracal but also not sure why we dont see this grenade | |
| 15:01:45 | melwitt | it happens due to the "fake" marker instance for that fill_virtual_interface_list online migration right ... so the grenade test wouldn't have that old of a migration artifact in its database | |
| 15:02:27 | melwitt | it would have to be a long lived deployment that has been upgraded over the years, IIUC | |
| 15:11:46 | sean-k-mooney | i guess i tought that marker was adde by the older migration | |
| 15:11:48 | sean-k-mooney | but ok | |
| 15:14:06 | sean-k-mooney | its still a valid bug so it makes sesne to fix it on master in anycase | |
| 15:15:24 | melwitt | yes I think that is correct that the marker was added by the older migration (rocky => stein). I was trying to say that CI wouldn't show it bc CI would not ever have that old of a migration remnant in it | |
| 15:16:52 | melwitt | maybe i'm misunderstanding it, I guess you are saying the old migration still running today. I have to think about it more | |
| 15:17:45 | sean-k-mooney | i dont recall if alembic/sql aclahme in devstack is instcating the db directly from the model or if it apples the base schema and then runs the migrations | |
| 15:18:09 | sean-k-mooney | i thinink sqlalchemy-migrate may have done the latter | |
| 15:18:19 | sean-k-mooney | as i recall seeign devstack run migraitons locally in teh past | |
| 15:18:33 | sean-k-mooney | but i dont knwo if we skip that step in a normal install with alembic | |
| 15:18:39 | sean-k-mooney | and just create the db directly with the final state | |
| 15:19:04 | melwitt | ah ok I get what you mean | |
| 15:20:21 | sean-k-mooney | so we call migrtion.db_sync and pass the version wihc default to None | |
| 15:21:44 | sean-k-mooney | and that does an alembic upgrade https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/db/migration.py#L54-L94 | |
| 15:22:36 | sean-k-mooney | but we are not going to run the online data migration until the db is already at the latest revision | |
| 15:25:17 | sean-k-mooney | i guess if we have no cells at that point | |
| 15:25:19 | sean-k-mooney | https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/objects/virtual_interface.py#L186-L187 | |
| 15:25:24 | sean-k-mooney | we never enter that for loop | |
| 15:25:36 | sean-k-mooney | and if we never enter that loop we never set the fake marker instnace | |
| 15:25:47 | sean-k-mooney | https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/objects/virtual_interface.py#L284-L287 | |
| 15:26:44 | sean-k-mooney | so in a normal install you wont hit this problem, still not sure why greade wont | |
| 15:27:17 | sean-k-mooney | but proably not worth diging into | |
| 15:28:46 | melwitt | yeah :/ needs more brain power | |
| 15:31:26 | melwitt | unrelated to that, I just saw a new TestComputeGracefulShutdown func test failure in the openstack-tox-cover job https://16fdd6c48f9c26f8b19a-1184c5a69e25bd403bd8a2f61f3cbab7.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/openstack/424ac0a1e84d486eacd5fda46d788ab6/testr_results.html not sure if this is already represented in an open bug cc gmaan | |
| 15:38:08 | Uggla | Reminder: upstream meeting in ~20mn | |
| 15:52:15 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: fix: preserve task_state during evacuation to prevent race https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001186 | |
| 15:52:15 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test for bug 2062523 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001185 | |
| 16:00:10 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:00:18 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:18 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:18 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Mon Aug 17 16:00:18 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Uggla. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:18 | Uggla | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:27 | Uggla | Hello everyone | |
| 16:00:42 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:00:44 | antia | o/ | |
| 16:01:04 | bryanfraschetti | o/ | |
| 16:01:14 | lajoskatona | o/ | |
| 16:02:38 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:02:44 | Uggla | Let's start | |
| 16:02:51 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:02:55 | Uggla | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:03 | Uggla | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:03:27 | Uggla | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:03:35 | Uggla | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:03:43 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:03:50 | Uggla | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:04:05 | Uggla | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:04:11 | Uggla | #info Please try to provide a meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:04:30 | Uggla | I have not seen something bad. Please tell me if I'm wrong. | |
| 16:05:14 | Uggla | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:05:22 | Uggla | #link https://releases.openstack.org/hibiscus/schedule.html | |
| 16:05:28 | Uggla | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:05:33 | Uggla | #info PTG etherpad for 2026.2 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg | |
| 16:05:39 | Uggla | #info Feature freeze is next week. | |
| 16:05:46 | Uggla | #info Thursday is 2nd Nova Implementation Review Day | |
| 16:06:07 | sean-k-mooney | i think the non clinet lib freeze would be thrusday | |
| 16:06:07 | Uggla | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:06:19 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney yes you are right. | |
| 16:06:27 | sean-k-mooney | meaning we need anything for os-triats/os-vif ectra in this week | |
| 16:06:55 | sean-k-mooney | not sure we have anything we need for those just calling it out | |
| 16:07:06 | Uggla | sure no worries | |
| 16:07:07 | gibi | we had a change landed in futurist | |
| 16:07:23 | gibi | I guess we get a release of it this week | |
| 16:07:34 | gibi | I assume futurist is also non client lib | |
| 16:07:37 | sean-k-mooney | that should get done with the rest of the oslo lib yes | |
| 16:07:42 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:08:08 | dansmith | if I could, | |
| 16:08:22 | dansmith | I've been going back and forth on the share migration stuff | |
| 16:08:48 | dansmith | it's progressing but still lacking some robustness around the error handling | |
| 16:09:16 | dansmith | I'm going to be out part of next week around the deadline and I'm the only one what has reviewed it AFAICT | |
| 16:09:30 | dansmith | so just highlighting that it's a bit of a risk for FF | |
| 16:09:36 | Uggla | dansmith ok, can I help on that side ? | |
| 16:10:33 | dansmith | for sure, any reviews can help, of course | |
| 16:11:04 | gibi | on the same note we will need a second set of eyes on the TDX series. I'm +2 but bauzas is on PTO | |
| 16:11:35 | dansmith | I'm also on the hook for the graceful shutdown stuff, which has made progress for sure, but the next patch is pretty big | |
| 16:11:54 | dansmith | I don't want to jeopardize the share stuff, but the shutdown stuff is progressed a bit farther | |
| 16:12:00 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: i can maybe take a look at the tdx work | |
| 16:12:02 | gibi | dansmith: I replied on your comment there but I'm not sure that helps:) | |
| 16:12:17 | sean-k-mooney | but im alos trying to prgoress some cybrog work so we will see | |
| 16:12:19 | gibi | e | |
| 16:12:19 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: that would be awesom | |
| 16:12:34 | Uggla | ok so I'll have a look tomorrow. I'll try to look the share cold migration and if possible tdx. | |
| 16:12:37 | sean-k-mooney | i have most of the context still loaded form the sev work | |
| 16:12:51 | gibi | I'm also off Thur / Fri (public holiay) | |
| 16:13:02 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney 👍 | |
| 16:13:30 | Uggla | anything else for review prio ? | |
| 16:13:42 | dansmith | gibi: yeah I saw, will circle back | |
| 16:13:59 | sean-k-mooney | im hoping https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994579 can land before FF | |
| 16:14:15 | sean-k-mooney | but we will see | |