Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-07-07
19:12:36 sean-k-mooney hum https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/tox.ini#L142-L151 does not configure eventlet so i assume it is not disabeled by default
19:14:04 sean-k-mooney so not quite
19:14:06 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/monkey_patch.py#L134-L144
19:14:44 sean-k-mooney we will patch if the env var is not set because the behvior fo the new config option is to return auto
19:15:01 sean-k-mooney which means we take the else brnach
19:15:42 sean-k-mooney so until we change the default here https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/monkey_patch.py#L120 we still have not actully change the default in all code paths
19:16:25 sean-k-mooney so the unit and functional test and any tox env that does not set the evn var is currently using eventlet still
19:18:07 gmaan i think that was left because console proxy in this cycle still in eventlet mode as default
19:18:36 sean-k-mooney if that is the case then the unit test shoudl proably not be updated until next cycle
19:20:10 sean-k-mooney gmaan: we stil have a few test that dont pass in threaded mode as well https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/threading_unit_test_excludes.txt
19:20:17 gmaan or we can do it for all other services
19:20:53 sean-k-mooney we cant have monkey patched and not in the same tox invocation
19:20:53 gmaan oh, i thought this list was cleared but yeah then we should wait probably
19:21:12 sean-k-mooney almost
19:21:35 sean-k-mooney if we get that to 0 it valid to swap the behvior up to RC1
19:21:39 sean-k-mooney so we are not in a rush
19:22:48 gmaan yeah
21:14:23 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Correct release name in concurrency_backend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996219
21:50:36 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Task tracking mechanism for graceful shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996299
22:27:15 opendevreview Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994321
#openstack-nova - 2026-07-08
00:51:42 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Fix intermittent 409 in TestGracefulShutdown tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996381
00:53:21 gmaan melwitt: sean-k-mooney ^^ i think this will fix the test_cold_migration_dest_compute_graceful_shutdown (i think revert resize test also have same issue ) failure
02:59:03 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Use domain capabilities to detect SEV-SNP support by libvirt/QEMU https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996316
05:22:23 opendevreview minwoo seo proposed openstack/nova master: Add availability_zone support for migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/976085
05:25:23 opendevreview minwoo seo proposed openstack/nova master: Add availability_zone support for migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/976085
05:31:01 opendevreview minwoo seo proposed openstack/nova master: Add availability_zone support for migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/976085
05:31:36 opendevreview minwoo seo proposed openstack/nova master: Add availability_zone support for migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/976085
05:32:29 opendevreview minwoo seo proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for cross-AZ migration support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/976202
06:27:03 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Use domain capabilities to detect SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996316
06:29:03 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Use domain capabilities to detect SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996316
06:33:54 ralonsoh hello folks, if you have a few minutes, please check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/995933
06:33:57 ralonsoh thanks in advance!
06:34:36 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Fix SEV-SNP feature detection in start up https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/996394
06:39:22 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Use domain capability to detect SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/996395
08:13:18 gibi gmaan: sean-k-mooney: re threading as default in our unit test jobs. I'm OK in general to switch. The remaining disable unit tests needed DB fixture changes currently being developed in the functional test series.
08:37:34 opendevreview minwoo seo proposed openstack/nova master: Add availability_zone support for migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/976085
09:08:50 rubasov hi nova folks: may I ask for a review on this bugfix (with a functional reproducer)? https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug/2051685
09:40:29 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Use domain capabilities to detect SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996316
10:33:01 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928022
10:58:53 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928022
11:27:29 tkajinam mhen, can you share the full content of the firmware descriptor file in Ubuntu ?
11:27:59 tkajinam mhen, it's probably best to report a bug for ubuntu then add the link to it, just in case they fix that invalid descriptor
11:28:06 tkajinam instead of describing the whole details in the local doc
11:47:38 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Remove [libvirt] num_memory_encrypted_guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995120
11:47:38 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Update documentations for AMD SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995090
11:47:39 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Use domain capabilities to detect SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996316
11:51:44 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Update documentations for AMD SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995090
11:51:45 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Use domain capabilities to detect SEV-SNP support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996316
11:51:45 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Remove [libvirt] num_memory_encrypted_guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995120
12:06:26 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/placement master: tests: Support file-backed SQLite URL in placement fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/993106
12:21:04 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: use file-backed Placement SQLite in functional threading https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992581
14:50:52 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Use per-database write locks instead of global lock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992862
15:00:50 Uggla Reminder: Upstream bug triage in ~30mn.
15:15:03 sean-k-mooney gibi oh actlly https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/zuul-providers/+/996449 merged an hour ag
15:15:09 sean-k-mooney *ago
15:15:40 gibi ack
15:15:41 sean-k-mooney so we shoudl not see failure in new jobs
15:34:09 sean-k-mooney Uggla: url?
15:34:26 Uggla https://meet.google.com/zjr-rxus-hzj
15:41:19 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove redundant version check for virtio-fs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996496
15:41:35 tkajinam ^^^ wondering if we should check the virt type instead
15:42:14 sean-k-mooney we woudl need to check for both qemu and kvm
15:42:15 tkajinam (this also makes me wonder if we should require kvm for sev support. it may not work for the other virt type really.
15:42:55 sean-k-mooney i.e virtio fs shoudl wor for qemu and kvm
15:43:10 sean-k-mooney sev maybe
15:43:25 tkajinam sean-k-mooney, yeah and I don't think it may work for lxc for example
15:43:35 sean-k-mooney i dont know if that works for qemu or just with kvm
15:44:19 sean-k-mooney well for lxc we are not actully using a vm so i dont think sev works for contianer in general
15:44:37 sean-k-mooney you can enabeld sev for all memoy at the host level but if you do that it used to break sriov
15:45:10 tkajinam sev definitely requires kvm because it relies on the implementations in kvm_amd module. I'm not too sure about virtiofs on the other hand
15:45:48 sean-k-mooney i dont think that requires kvm
15:46:05 sean-k-mooney but ya for sev you could add checkign teh vrit type to the supprot crtiria
15:46:10 sean-k-mooney if its not already there
15:46:20 tkajinam it's not, yet
15:46:40 tkajinam that's has never been added since sev support was first introduced.
15:47:02 tkajinam because that's an existing problem and may be trivial I'll look into that later, separately from sev-snp work
15:47:03 sean-k-mooney well if it does not work it would just fail to boot the vm
15:47:08 tkajinam yeah
15:47:26 sean-k-mooney so its not really a regression to not report sev supprot when virt type is qemu
15:47:57 sean-k-mooney tkajinam: if you can confim it i would just file a bug for it
15:48:48 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996496 looks ok ot me although im serpised we dont have any unit test coverage of the functions your removing
15:49:25 tkajinam sean-k-mooney, I'll file one by my end
15:49:43 tkajinam we might want to change that check to virtio-fs to account virt_type, instead of just removing it.
15:49:53 tkajinam (I'll record that as a separate bug, too
16:07:42 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Do not report SEV capability for non kvm virt_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996498
16:16:43 gibi sean-k-mooney: I think futurist is just slow to shut down an exector https://bugs.launchpad.net/futurist/+bug/2160159
16:17:19 sean-k-mooney ah ok
16:17:50 sean-k-mooney i mean we could actully swap to concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=100) if needed
16:18:15 sean-k-mooney we have centralised the executor interaction in nova.utils
16:19:04 sean-k-mooney but cool that sound like a real bug
16:19:32 gibi yeah I will check if I can spot why
16:21:22 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/futurist/blob/master/futurist/_thread.py#L110-L147
16:22:24 sean-k-mooney so its polling ever second https://github.com/openstack/futurist/blob/master/futurist/_thread.py#L98-L108
16:22:29 sean-k-mooney when its waitign for the work to complete
16:23:35 sean-k-mooney but its also joining the work thread https://github.com/openstack/futurist/blob/master/futurist/_thread.py#L142
16:24:01 sean-k-mooney but in your lamda case that should not be costly
16:24:16 gibi is it due to https://github.com/openstack/futurist/blob/master/futurist/_thread.py#L103
16:24:19 gibi ?
16:24:27 gibi there is a clear 1 sec timeout passed there
16:25:00 sean-k-mooney that what i was wondering too

Earlier   Later