| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-06-12 | |||
| 18:02:16 | sean-k-mooney | and its not any more broken then it was before | |
| 18:02:33 | sean-k-mooney | ill leave a comment explaining now | |
| 18:02:49 | melwitt | yeah. I didn't know nowadays what's the easiest way to pull a patch. I had thought in the past -W didn't work but that was probably ages ago | |
| 18:04:48 | sean-k-mooney | so -w wont pull it | |
| 18:04:58 | sean-k-mooney | but it will prevent zuul form submitting it | |
| 18:05:09 | sean-k-mooney | the easisly way to pull it as in stop the job | |
| 18:05:11 | sean-k-mooney | is to rebase | |
| 18:05:28 | melwitt | ah gotcha | |
| 18:06:21 | sean-k-mooney | oh looks like they impoved it in zuul | |
| 18:06:37 | sean-k-mooney | it -2'd with "This change is unable to merge due to a missing merge requirement." | |
| 18:06:48 | sean-k-mooney | the same as if a depend on failes or goes into merge conflict | |
| 18:09:05 | gmaan | melwitt: yeah, i need to fix those first. thanks | |
| 18:09:13 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: very cool | |
| 18:10:47 | sean-k-mooney | gmaan: fyi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/992998/comment/1c2bae72_2cb0d3e5/ the whitebox jobs need nested virt and multinode nodeset | |
| 18:10:55 | sean-k-mooney | so that why that is failing | |
| 18:13:41 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: thanks, did not get chance to check if those are passing, fixed. | |
| 18:17:00 | sean-k-mooney | actully | |
| 18:17:14 | sean-k-mooney | gmaan: so to melwitt's point | |
| 18:17:25 | sean-k-mooney | for thos to pass we need the fixes that gibi is making in nova | |
| 18:17:31 | sean-k-mooney | so instead fo doing that | |
| 18:17:44 | sean-k-mooney | why dont we fix those in whitebox in the new jobs | |
| 18:17:56 | sean-k-mooney | and then change the job we are running on stable | |
| 18:18:29 | gmaan | you mean separate jobs to run on stable | |
| 18:18:30 | sean-k-mooney | since they are perodic we dont care about the overried checkout | |
| 18:19:04 | sean-k-mooney | ya so the master jobs your addign on master | |
| 18:19:07 | gmaan | we can, I think that will be easy to maintain things on one side (whitebox plugin) | |
| 18:19:17 | gmaan | let me do it | |
| 18:19:22 | sean-k-mooney | right we can update the exclude as we add things | |
| 18:19:33 | gmaan | neutron plugin does the same and it is helpful | |
| 18:19:49 | sean-k-mooney | ack ya so i think that the better patten then | |
| 18:20:02 | sean-k-mooney | nova will still need a stabel patch per branch but only to use the relevent job | |
| 18:20:53 | sean-k-mooney | ok im really going to call it a day as i feel myself stuggaleing to thing that ture o/ | |
| 18:22:08 | gmaan | o/ no worry, I will propose those. | |
| 18:22:51 | melwitt | sean-k-mooney: have a nice weekend o/ | |
| 18:23:02 | sean-k-mooney | you too o/ | |
| 19:37:08 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: DNM: testing whitebox stable branch jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/993173 | |
| 19:37:27 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: DNM: testing whitebox stable branch jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/993174 | |
| 19:37:38 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: DNM: testing whitebox stable branch jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/993175 | |
| 20:08:32 | melwitt | gmaan: this release notes static page change is ready for your re-review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989211 you were previously +2 but your vote got dropped by a new PS | |
| 20:10:14 | gmaan | melwitt: thanks, done | |
| 20:10:51 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Use static pages for eol release release notes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989210 | |
| 20:27:35 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Use static pages for eom release release notes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989211 | |
| 20:34:34 | opendevreview | Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991948 | |
| 20:53:17 | opendevreview | Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991948 | |
| 22:02:25 | opendevreview | Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991948 | |
| 22:33:57 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Speed up release notes builds https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989212 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-06-13 | |||
| 02:06:16 | opendevreview | Brian Haley proposed openstack/nova master: Change neutron API calls to use project_id https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991948 | |
| 02:48:32 | gmaan | melwitt: sean-k-mooney[m] gibi I separated the whitebox-devstack-multinode job definition for stable branches in whitebox plugin itself via 'branches' variant, and it is working fine https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/992998 | |
| 02:49:21 | gmaan | and we do not need any modification on nova or any other user of that job. it is tested in https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22whitebox-stable-branch-jobs%22 | |
| 02:49:35 | gmaan | stable/2025.1 is broken for more tests but that is separate things to fix | |
| 08:20:25 | opendevreview | huangjs3 proposed openstack/nova master: cpu monitor: avoid ZeroDivisionError on non-positive cputime delta https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/993205 | |
| 16:05:46 | opendevreview | huangjs3 proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: avoid IndexError when no nova-scheduler is live https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/993246 | |
| 16:15:07 | opendevreview | huangjs3 proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: skip tick when no scheduler is live https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/993246 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-06-15 | |||
| 06:51:37 | opendevreview | wanghongtao proposed openstack/nova master: Fix operator precedence in limit_check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/993297 | |
| 07:26:21 | opendevreview | Shalini Srivastava proposed openstack/nova master: Filter invalid kwargs in volume_api.create to prevent TypeError https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/993306 | |
| 07:39:36 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987815 | |
| 07:57:59 | opendevreview | Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/placement master: tests: Add connection parameter to Database and PlacementFixture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/993106 | |
| 09:17:42 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Speed up release notes builds https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989212 | |
| 09:21:24 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Speed up release notes builds https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989212 | |
| 09:35:46 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Add mtty/mdpy support for testing fake mdevs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/898100 | |
| 09:35:47 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Rename vtpm job and add mtty support for vpgu test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922140 | |
| 10:32:58 | opendevreview | Shalini Srivastava proposed openstack/nova master: Filter invalid kwargs in volume_api.create to prevent TypeError https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/993306 | |
| 11:17:43 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron Ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969298 | |
| 11:19:54 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron security-groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/981141 | |
| 11:33:26 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Rename vtpm job and add mtty support for vpgu test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922140 | |
| 12:25:02 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney[m]: gibi; could either of you look at https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2153425%22 ? I'm all good | |
| 12:28:48 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Rename vtpm job and add mtty support for vpgu test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922140 | |
| 12:45:51 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: sorry was on a call but i can take a look quickly | |
| 12:46:20 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: so i have been watching the updates on this passivly | |
| 12:46:35 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: this is not quite enough to fix numa vswitch correct? | |
| 12:47:01 | sean-k-mooney | its related but this is only for the live migration path | |
| 12:47:06 | bauzas | it should be good | |
| 12:47:14 | sean-k-mooney | we still have the issue with the compute not havig it on spwawn | |
| 12:47:21 | bauzas | at least we have a customer asking for it | |
| 12:47:25 | sean-k-mooney | or cold migrate | |
| 12:48:00 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: what i mean is this will help with live migration but there is more work needed to make sure that all code path include the limits | |
| 12:49:18 | bauzas | we can ask that for a follow-up | |
| 12:49:23 | sean-k-mooney | bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2145135 we alos have a gap for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1855332 | |
| 12:49:40 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: sure im not saying its inscope fo those change | |
| 12:49:55 | sean-k-mooney | but you were previsoly working on bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2145135 a month or two ago | |
| 12:50:02 | sean-k-mooney | that why im bringing the topic up | |
| 12:50:28 | sean-k-mooney | anyway ill review it now i just want to clear on the scope | |
| 12:52:14 | bauzas | ack thanks | |
| 12:53:16 | sean-k-mooney | just an fyi the expecation in the bug are also incorrect https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2153425 | |
| 12:53:21 | sean-k-mooney | setting only `{‘hw:numa_nodes’: ‘1’}` | |
| 12:53:42 | sean-k-mooney | does not claim any cpu or memroy in the host numa tracker but it does end up with the vm being pinned | |
| 12:53:50 | sean-k-mooney | to a host numa cell | |
| 12:54:22 | sean-k-mooney | we do not expect any numa blancing to happen with that config unless you also request hw:mem_page_size in teh falvor or image | |
| 12:58:12 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: so im sorry to say but thet bug is technially inviald and its a psudo feature request. | |
| 13:00:00 | bauzas | but the issue still remains | |
| 13:00:10 | sean-k-mooney | the flavor is not valid | |
| 13:00:39 | sean-k-mooney | we can add supprot for numa blancin on shared cpus only but that was never supproted by nova | |
| 13:00:47 | sean-k-mooney | we supprot it for pinned cpus | |
| 13:00:50 | sean-k-mooney | and for guest memory | |
| 13:01:01 | sean-k-mooney | but not for shared cpus | |
| 13:01:08 | sean-k-mooney | so im not agains supproting that | |
| 13:01:33 | sean-k-mooney | but the expecation today is that we wont consider the cpu allcation ration at the numa node level today | |
| 13:09:51 | bauzas | honestly, I don't know what to say :( | |
| 13:10:31 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: im not agaisnt building thei fucntionlatiy into nova but its really a new feature | |
| 13:11:07 | sean-k-mooney | and if we are to do it we need to do it for spawn and cold migrate and unshleve ectra | |