| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-06-08 | |||
| 16:26:44 | sean-k-mooney | i think that is fine but just wanted to make sure we were ok with that | |
| 16:26:50 | sean-k-mooney | it wont affect bugs in any other state | |
| 16:27:28 | sean-k-mooney | if we are i can go make sure that is set the same for all the nova repos | |
| 16:27:33 | gibi | I'm fine to close bugs that sitting in incomplete for 90 days | |
| 16:27:41 | Uggla | same for me | |
| 16:27:57 | sean-k-mooney | since it puts them in the exired state we can also find them again | |
| 16:28:03 | sean-k-mooney | because we dont use that for anythign else | |
| 16:28:38 | sean-k-mooney | if there is no objection then ill go re enable it in nova/placment and check if tis enabeld in the other nova repos | |
| 16:28:56 | Uggla | ok | |
| 16:29:27 | sean-k-mooney | the second topic is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/990728 | |
| 16:29:52 | sean-k-mooney | so that didnt merge after like 5 or more recheck because it hit many other unrleated gate bugs | |
| 16:30:04 | sean-k-mooney | we have fixed at least 2 if not 3 of them since then | |
| 16:30:21 | sean-k-mooney | none of the rechecks failed on the kernel painc it was intended to test | |
| 16:30:34 | sean-k-mooney | so it looks like using prepoulated images does infact prevent the kernel panic | |
| 16:31:12 | sean-k-mooney | so we coudl recheck this and get more data or we could abandon it as i think we have confirmed at this point that that is the underlying issue | |
| 16:31:38 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. if teh vm boot is interupted because we resize or reboot the vm while the rootfs is beign copied from the initram | |
| 16:31:58 | sean-k-mooney | then we get teh "trying to kill init" panic we have been seeign for the last few years | |
| 16:32:39 | sean-k-mooney | im goign to followup with the cirros folks to prepare a 0.6.4 release with a new pre-poulated image | |
| 16:32:42 | sean-k-mooney | and some other fixes | |
| 16:33:05 | sean-k-mooney | so i guess the only quesiton i have is do we want to continue trying to do the experiment | |
| 16:33:29 | sean-k-mooney | or will i abandon those patche or atleast drop +w and just recheck to do more testing if needed | |
| 16:33:53 | Uggla | any idea of the frequency of the crashes ? | |
| 16:34:01 | gibi | will this be fixed by cirros folks, or we need something home made cirros imagae? | |
| 16:34:05 | sean-k-mooney | about 20 times a day in novas gate | |
| 16:34:19 | sean-k-mooney | there are other workarounds | |
| 16:34:31 | sean-k-mooney | which is we can make it less likely by waithing for sshable | |
| 16:34:42 | sean-k-mooney | before we do reboots or resizes | |
| 16:34:59 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: i have propesed prs to cirros | |
| 16:35:02 | sean-k-mooney | to fix it | |
| 16:35:28 | sean-k-mooney | but we need ot undersnad the currnet maintaince sate of the cirros project in general | |
| 16:35:47 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: worst case we will fork it again but im hoping we can fix it upstream | |
| 16:36:04 | Uggla | ++ checking for sshable | |
| 16:36:23 | sean-k-mooney | checking for sshable is really just a workaround | |
| 16:36:42 | sean-k-mooney | but we coudl do it in the couple fo tests that are impacted | |
| 16:36:55 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: OK, lets see what the cirros folks say | |
| 16:37:16 | sean-k-mooney | waitign for sshable mostly means we shoudl have compelted the rootfs copy | |
| 16:37:17 | gibi | I'm OK to add sshable checks to the impacted test | |
| 16:37:34 | Uggla | maybe not ideal but better loosing a bit of time to be ready than crashing. IMHO | |
| 16:37:37 | sean-k-mooney | ack i can see if we can come up with a list | |
| 16:37:56 | sean-k-mooney | basiclly its any test that rebots a vm or does a resize | |
| 16:38:02 | sean-k-mooney | it happen mroe on the bfv tests | |
| 16:38:12 | sean-k-mooney | just because of the extra overhead | |
| 16:38:37 | sean-k-mooney | the 2 ways it manifest is the panic | |
| 16:38:39 | sean-k-mooney | or ssh failing | |
| 16:38:55 | sean-k-mooney | the latter is because if we coppy the root fs but have not writeen the athrised key | |
| 16:39:10 | sean-k-mooney | there was a race in cirros that ment it woudl not do that on the next boot | |
| 16:39:22 | sean-k-mooney | waiting for sshable shoudl cover both cases | |
| 16:39:42 | sean-k-mooney | to wrap this up wil i abandon my test patches for now? | |
| 16:40:27 | gibi | sure | |
| 16:40:45 | Uggla | unless you want to contnue | |
| 16:40:45 | sean-k-mooney | ok i can revive them later anway | |
| 16:41:13 | sean-k-mooney | for now i think i got the data i wanted to confrim the thory | |
| 16:41:27 | sean-k-mooney | so we can move on with a target tempest patch for sshable | |
| 16:41:39 | sean-k-mooney | and then check in again ocne that is merged | |
| 16:42:29 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:43:58 | Uggla | fine by me | |
| 16:44:14 | Uggla | Anything else you want to discuss ? | |
| 16:44:30 | Uggla | If not I think we are done. | |
| 16:45:13 | Uggla | So time to close, thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening. | |
| 16:45:21 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-06-08-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:45:21 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-06-08-16.00.txt | |
| 16:45:21 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-06-08-16.00.html | |
| 16:45:21 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Mon Jun 8 16:45:21 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:45:21 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 16:45:45 | gibi | thanks Uggla | |
| 16:46:07 | Uggla | gibi you'r welcome | |
| 16:46:24 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 17:34:04 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Use common utility to parse Host header https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966280 | |
| 18:03:31 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Use oslo.utils to parse cell URL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971810 | |
| 19:29:28 | opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Increase wait retries for resize reschedule functional test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992343 | |
| 19:54:32 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Update python versions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/991969 | |
| 23:55:03 | opendevreview | Masanori Ueno proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test for bug #2153425 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988777 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-06-09 | |||
| 07:21:26 | opendevreview | Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: tests: file-backed SQLite with WAL in threading mode for Database and CellDatabases Fixtures https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988583 | |
| 08:00:36 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Fix port remain while error on update port with multi network https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/991819 | |
| 09:45:11 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Add mtty support to nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922140 | |
| 10:51:51 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Add mtty support to nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922140 | |
| 12:15:25 | DominikDanelski[m] | If I see correctly, there are still many spec reviews that haven't been addressed. With the upcoming spec freeze, is there any chance each would be accepted or rejected in these 2 days? | |
| 12:35:30 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Fix error when multiple security group in a project with same name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989530 | |
| 13:51:50 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Add mtty support to nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922140 | |
| 14:15:46 | gibi | could another core approve the intel TDX trait addition to os-traits? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/992301 | |
| 14:25:00 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-traits master: Add a new trait for Intel TDX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/992301 | |
| 14:29:01 | gibi | thanks dansmith | |
| 14:29:28 | dansmith | o7 | |
| 14:43:25 | gibi | Uggla: elodilles: new os-trait release propose to get the Intel TDX trait out https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/992468 | |
| 14:48:33 | Uggla | gibi +1 👍 | |
| 14:48:43 | gibi | thanks | |
| 14:49:44 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Doc changes for unpin-az https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992469 | |
| 16:32:24 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Add mtty support to nova-next https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922140 | |
| 16:40:40 | Mike-- | nice dansmith, that would open up an path to actually migrate a instance between az's given x,y,z are also available (example cinder replicated storage) | |
| 16:41:08 | dansmith | Mike--: that's the idea :) | |
| 16:41:10 | sean-k-mooney | Mike--: you can do that today provide the vm is not pinned to an az | |
| 16:41:24 | sean-k-mooney | but dansmith's patch allows you to do it for even pinned instnaces | |
| 16:41:51 | Mike-- | I was thinking in the pinned AZ mode yes, but you are right sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:42:26 | sean-k-mooney | pinning is not the default :) even if it ofen is what happens in reality | |
| 16:43:00 | sean-k-mooney | horizon used to require you to selct an az in the past | |
| 16:43:02 | Mike-- | it might be inheritely pinned due to some other factor (like cinder) | |
| 16:43:17 | sean-k-mooney | yes althoguh that is also off by defualt | |
| 16:43:24 | Mike-- | ye | |
| 16:43:30 | sean-k-mooney | cross az attach is allowed by default and what we normally recomemnd | |
| 16:43:50 | Mike-- | for clarity, I've been deep diving on Openstack since ~4 months now and the more I peel off the more features I find :) | |