| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-06-08 | |||
| 16:03:22 | Uggla | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:03:28 | gibi | o// | |
| 16:03:29 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:03:36 | Uggla | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:03:42 | Uggla | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:03:49 | Uggla | #info Please try to provide a meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:03:59 | Uggla | I have noticed these 2 bugs: | |
| 16:04:06 | Uggla | #info https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2155773 entered by Gibi. Is it still the case. | |
| 16:04:21 | Uggla | and | |
| 16:04:26 | Uggla | #info https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2155462 entered by Helen. TBC it is a solid one. | |
| 16:05:02 | Uggla | gibi any thoughts about the first one ? | |
| 16:05:43 | gibi | no thoughts somebody needs to debug it :) | |
| 16:06:15 | gibi | it is not super frequent so I did not take time to look into it yet | |
| 16:06:26 | Uggla | ok I may have missed something because I though the recent runs were ok. | |
| 16:08:12 | gibi | I did not fixed it for sure :) | |
| 16:08:32 | Uggla | ok | |
| 16:08:55 | Uggla | let's move on | |
| 16:08:58 | Uggla | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:06 | Uggla | #link https://releases.openstack.org/hibiscus/schedule.html | |
| 16:09:11 | Uggla | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:09:15 | Uggla | #info PTG etherpad for 2026.2 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg | |
| 16:09:22 | Uggla | #info Thursday (11st June) is spec freeze. | |
| 16:09:36 | Uggla | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:09:45 | Uggla | #link New file for Hibiscus https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-status | |
| 16:09:50 | Uggla | #info I have updated Launchpad and the above doc. Please ping me if you spot something missing. | |
| 16:09:58 | Uggla | info I have flagged the priorities in bold. | |
| 16:10:04 | Uggla | #info 471815: Expose vlan trunking in metadata/configdrive | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/471815 --> Sean +2, Gibi +1 thanks. | |
| 16:10:09 | Uggla | #info Please review 984384: Add spec for bidirectional RPC liveness handshake | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/984384 --> Gibi -1, Sylvain -1 | |
| 16:10:16 | Uggla | #info 939929: Reduce node build fail value by time | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939929 --> Sean +1 , Gibi -1 with a question. | |
| 16:10:42 | Uggla | I have warned all the owners of the 3 specs above that it is their turn to comment. | |
| 16:11:04 | sean-k-mooney | spec freeze is cob wednesday this week right? or thusday? | |
| 16:11:26 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney I set it Thu in the release doc | |
| 16:11:31 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:11:45 | sean-k-mooney | there is also another spec relatied to teh disk roation_speed | |
| 16:11:55 | sean-k-mooney | basiclly a way to tell qemu that the storage is an ssd or hdd | |
| 16:12:26 | Uggla | do you have the link | |
| 16:12:34 | sean-k-mooney | that might be a nice one ot have but im not going to hold my breath on it being ready in time | |
| 16:12:45 | sean-k-mooney | sure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/979696 | |
| 16:12:55 | Uggla | thx | |
| 16:14:31 | sean-k-mooney | we can likely move on | |
| 16:14:33 | Uggla | Regarding Expose vlan trunking in metadata/configdrive, cardoe has partialy answered. He is on PTO/ | |
| 16:15:13 | sean-k-mooney | ya i htink we can proceed with that i just need a second reviewr that has time to review the exsitng implemation | |
| 16:15:30 | Uggla | so as it looks not in a bad shape, maybe I'll have a short exception for that one. | |
| 16:15:49 | Uggla | unless people are really against that. | |
| 16:16:03 | Uggla | otherwise | |
| 16:16:08 | Uggla | #info Starting: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-status#L16 interesting bugs to review. | |
| 16:16:28 | Uggla | Moving on | |
| 16:16:29 | Uggla | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:16:45 | elodilles | thanks | |
| 16:16:50 | elodilles | #info nova stable gates are working again | |
| 16:16:57 | elodilles | thanks gmaan o:) | |
| 16:17:05 | elodilles | #info placement stable/2025.1 is blocked - workaround: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/992299 | |
| 16:17:25 | elodilles | the rest of the stable gates should be OK | |
| 16:17:31 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:17:45 | elodilles | and that's all from me about stable | |
| 16:17:53 | elodilles | Uggla: back to you | |
| 16:17:59 | Uggla | thx elodilles | |
| 16:18:32 | Uggla | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:18:39 | Uggla | fwiesel anything to report ? | |
| 16:18:39 | fwiesel | Hi, no updates from my side. | |
| 16:18:45 | Uggla | ok thx | |
| 16:18:51 | Uggla | #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal | |
| 16:19:41 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:19:52 | gibi | I'm not sure if sambork are around or not | |
| 16:21:17 | Uggla | seems not | |
| 16:21:25 | gibi | yeah | |
| 16:21:30 | gibi | I have not much to say | |
| 16:22:01 | Uggla | we can skip if there's nothing new | |
| 16:22:02 | gibi | Ashish is working on the functional env, sambork on a forking issue in 3.14 | |
| 16:22:19 | gibi | that is it | |
| 16:22:46 | Uggla | thx | |
| 16:23:05 | Uggla | skipping next 2 topics, because layos and cardoe are not available. | |
| 16:23:16 | Uggla | #topic Bug scrubbing | |
| 16:23:24 | Uggla | #info up to 140 (-45) | |
| 16:23:30 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:23:35 | Uggla | #link https://truc.uggla.fr/ to follow the trend. | |
| 16:23:52 | Uggla | #info everybody should have bugs assigned. | |
| 16:23:59 | Uggla | Next meeting (this week): [public] Upstream bug triage. Wednesday, June 10 · 15:30 – 16:00 UTC. Video call link: meet.google.com/zjr-rxus-hzj | |
| 16:24:08 | Uggla | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:24:35 | Uggla | Last time we did not discuss sean topic, so sean-k-mooney please go ahead. | |
| 16:25:18 | Uggla | first is bug janitor, second is pre populated cirros rootfs experiment | |
| 16:25:35 | sean-k-mooney | the first one i belive is the tick box to auto expire incompelte bugs after 30-90 days | |
| 16:26:00 | sean-k-mooney | fungi notice that take affect and we were not sure if that was intentinoal or not | |
| 16:26:11 | sean-k-mooney | so i disabled it quickly and wanted to know are we ok with it | |
| 16:26:29 | sean-k-mooney | basiclly if a bug is incompelte and has no comment after 90? days | |
| 16:26:34 | sean-k-mooney | itw ill go to the expired state | |
| 16:26:44 | sean-k-mooney | i think that is fine but just wanted to make sure we were ok with that | |
| 16:26:50 | sean-k-mooney | it wont affect bugs in any other state | |
| 16:27:28 | sean-k-mooney | if we are i can go make sure that is set the same for all the nova repos | |
| 16:27:33 | gibi | I'm fine to close bugs that sitting in incomplete for 90 days | |
| 16:27:41 | Uggla | same for me | |
| 16:27:57 | sean-k-mooney | since it puts them in the exired state we can also find them again | |
| 16:28:03 | sean-k-mooney | because we dont use that for anythign else | |
| 16:28:38 | sean-k-mooney | if there is no objection then ill go re enable it in nova/placment and check if tis enabeld in the other nova repos | |
| 16:28:56 | Uggla | ok | |
| 16:29:27 | sean-k-mooney | the second topic is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/990728 | |
| 16:29:52 | sean-k-mooney | so that didnt merge after like 5 or more recheck because it hit many other unrleated gate bugs | |
| 16:30:04 | sean-k-mooney | we have fixed at least 2 if not 3 of them since then | |
| 16:30:21 | sean-k-mooney | none of the rechecks failed on the kernel painc it was intended to test | |
| 16:30:34 | sean-k-mooney | so it looks like using prepoulated images does infact prevent the kernel panic | |