| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-05-25 | |||
| 13:58:03 | sean-k-mooney | ok its checked in the bug config | |
| 13:58:15 | sean-k-mooney | let me uncheck it quickly until we have time to dicuss it | |
| 13:58:43 | sean-k-mooney | oh os its actully confire to only expire incomplete bugs currently | |
| 13:58:48 | sean-k-mooney | not any open bug | |
| 13:59:24 | sean-k-mooney | fungi: not sure if you can see https://launchpad.net/nova/+configure-bugtracker | |
| 13:59:38 | sean-k-mooney | i just uncheck the Expire "Incomplete" bug reports when they become inactive | |
| 13:59:39 | fungi | advanced search for nova bugs in expired state sorted by number turns up one that got expired on the 13th too | |
| 13:59:40 | sean-k-mooney | box | |
| 14:00:15 | sean-k-mooney | the nova irc meeting is in a few hours let just add this to opendicuss | |
| 14:00:22 | sean-k-mooney | and we can fiture out if we want it on or off | |
| 14:00:44 | sean-k-mooney | there doesnet seam to be any indication fo what "becomes inactive" actully means | |
| 14:00:50 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. is it weeks or years | |
| 14:00:53 | fungi | i don't have access to that by default (though i could get to it by adding myself to the right group) so will take your word for it | |
| 14:02:21 | sean-k-mooney | its set for cybrog and watcher as well | |
| 14:02:24 | fungi | looks like it's 60 days with no activity while in "incomplete" state, at least (not sure about what other states also trigger it, sll the examples i found so far are for previously-incomplete) | |
| 14:02:27 | sean-k-mooney | this might be on by default | |
| 14:03:21 | fungi | okay, so it might be that it's on for a bunch of projects and i've just somehow not noticed it before today | |
| 14:03:24 | sean-k-mooney | if its resticted to the incompelte state i might be ok with this on. i dont like exiring bugs in general but we only use incomplete when we are missing info | |
| 14:04:02 | fungi | yeah, i mean the example i linked above was perfectly fine to expire, consensus seemed to be that it was likely invalid anyway | |
| 14:05:24 | fungi | anyway, not an emergency, i just wanted to make sure behavior hadn't changed somewhere, but looke like it may have been doing this all along | |
| 14:08:29 | sean-k-mooney | it might have | |
| 14:08:44 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. i dont recall seeing this in a very very long time | |
| 14:08:53 | sean-k-mooney | in anycase added to opendicuss https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 14:09:32 | sean-k-mooney | fungi: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2142042 was invlide by the way and not a secuirty bug | |
| 14:09:51 | sean-k-mooney | we only supprot pci passhtough vai the pci_alias | |
| 14:10:17 | sean-k-mooney | we have never allowed attaching pci devices via the resouce: syntax | |
| 14:10:41 | sean-k-mooney | the only thing that ever allwoe dthat was generic mdevs and i have alwasy held that was a mistake | |
| 14:11:20 | fungi | yeah, that's why i say it was fine that it expired | |
| 14:11:49 | sean-k-mooney | im going to leave a comment and mark it invlaid | |
| 15:15:42 | opendevreview | Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Object changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978209 | |
| 15:40:15 | opendevreview | Thibaut Démaret proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: add disk rotation_rate support for local disks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979693 | |
| 16:07:20 | opendevreview | Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/nova master: Set correct link for configuration file format https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989981 | |
| 17:18:56 | jayaanand | hi All, i created blueprint as per PTG discussion https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/raw-image-flexclone-optimization. Please review | |
| 17:20:06 | sean-k-mooney | so you have create a bluepitn with the conte of a spec as its decription | |
| 17:20:17 | sean-k-mooney | but you actully need to submit that spec as a review to the nova-specs repo | |
| 17:20:29 | sean-k-mooney | the describe in the plurpint shoudl jsut be the intorduction fo the spec | |
| 17:21:08 | sean-k-mooney | so you need to clone https://github.com/openstack/nova-specs | |
| 17:21:25 | sean-k-mooney | and then add your spec in teh approved folder for this cycle 2026.2 | |
| 17:21:35 | sean-k-mooney | and then submit it for review via gerrit | |
| 17:22:11 | sean-k-mooney | you can use the contet you currently have in teh blueprint. by convention the file name shoudl mattch the blurpint name with .rst | |
| 17:22:22 | sean-k-mooney | so raw-image-flexclone-optimization.rst | |
| 17:22:35 | sean-k-mooney | we have some tooling that use that to forralate the spec file and the blueprint | |
| 17:24:00 | sean-k-mooney | jayaanand: just siming it im not sure that the current direction is correct. i.e. wrapping flat with now new config value for NetAppFlexClone | |
| 17:24:13 | sean-k-mooney | well hte netap variant | |
| 17:26:26 | sean-k-mooney | i think images_type=netapp_flexcloen give you are propsoing addign a [netapp_flexclone] config section woudl be a much more natural fit | |
| 17:27:35 | sean-k-mooney | with all that said i dont think there was an general agreement that we shoudl add a vendor sepcifc image_type backend to nova | |
| 17:28:02 | sean-k-mooney | so you will have to build a concentio that that shoudl be doen before we go into the details of how | |
| 17:29:13 | sean-k-mooney | jayaanand: the vendor specific point we raised cant be sidespte by adding a spereat vendor specific cofnig option like netapp_flexclone_enabled = false | |
| 17:32:13 | sean-k-mooney | anyeya i can take a looks once its actully submited for review as a spec but i likely cant commit to reviewign this this cycle so you will need to find concnsoue to build this functionalty in general. | |
| 18:45:59 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Set correct link for configuration file format https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989981 | |
| 18:46:14 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/2024.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965491 | |
| 20:04:22 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-05-26 | |||
| 04:34:46 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633 | |
| 06:29:01 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633 | |
| 10:21:09 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use static pages for eol release release notes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989210 | |
| 10:21:10 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Speed up release notes builds https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989212 | |
| 10:21:10 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Use static pages for eom release release notes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989211 | |
| 12:21:42 | cw0306-lee[m] | My question is, is nova's policy still same? Or is it able to suggest this subject again? | |
| 12:21:42 | cw0306-lee[m] | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/selecting-subnet-when-creating-vm | |
| 12:21:42 | cw0306-lee[m] | Hi, nova team! I want to create blueprint about support subnet selection during vm create. However, it rejected in 2015. | |
| 12:43:22 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix live migration with pinned VM and iothreads https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988774 | |
| 12:51:11 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Reproduce bug/2152697 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/990096 | |
| 12:51:12 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Fix live migration with pinned VM and iothreads https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/990097 | |
| 13:24:40 | sean-k-mooney | cw0306-lee[m]: so nova does not want to add new networkign proxy apis in general | |
| 13:24:46 | sean-k-mooney | but the feature your askign for i think already exists | |
| 13:25:24 | sean-k-mooney | https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#id11 | |
| 13:26:24 | sean-k-mooney | i think we can pass the subnet when we do --nic in osc | |
| 13:27:49 | sean-k-mooney | ok not quite | |
| 13:27:51 | sean-k-mooney | https://docs.openstack.org/python-openstackclient/latest/cli/command-objects/server.html#cmdoption-openstack-server-create-nic | |
| 13:28:02 | sean-k-mooney | you can pass teh ip to use but not the subnet | |
| 13:28:31 | sean-k-mooney | cw0306-lee[m]: so you cant have neutron allcoate it form a subnot | |
| 13:29:07 | sean-k-mooney | basucly our current stance is if you need anything behod a basic prot on a netork you shoudl create the port in neutron first and pass in the port uuid when creating the vm | |
| 13:31:10 | sean-k-mooney | cw0306-lee[m]: basiclly this falls under https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/project-scope.html#no-more-api-proxies | |
| 13:40:36 | cw0306-lee[m] | sean-k-mooney @_oftc_sean-k-mooney:matrix.org: Thank you for your kind reply. I asked this question because blueprint closed long time ago, so if there is a possibility of adding the option again. Thank you! | |
| 13:42:11 | sean-k-mooney | it was closed because it was nto in line with the future direction of the project. that has not really changed. we have dicussed this on an off a few times but i think the sentiment still remains that we would prefer not to | |
| 13:50:08 | cw0306-lee[m] | Is this blueprint need spec? And when can i talk this with? | |
| 13:50:08 | cw0306-lee[m] | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/reduce-build-fail-time-base | |
| 13:50:08 | cw0306-lee[m] | Thank you! I have one more question that i made blueprint in 2025-1. | |
| 13:53:54 | sean-k-mooney | cw0306-lee[m]: that could be dicsused in a nova irc meeting as perhaps a specless blueprint | |
| 13:54:17 | sean-k-mooney | the build failure count is jsut use by the weigher to avoid the host | |
| 13:54:42 | sean-k-mooney | having it decay over time is proably a reasonabel optimisation | |
| 13:56:07 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure about doing it in the update_available_resouce perodic but perhaps. | |
| 13:56:30 | sean-k-mooney | i woudl be more incliend to have it be its own persodic and opt into ti by setting the time interval in the config | |
| 13:58:33 | cw0306-lee[m] | Then, can we talk about this on next irc meeting(6/1)? Then I'll add this in agenda. | |
| 13:59:29 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 13:59:48 | cw0306-lee[m] | Thank you very much! | |
| 15:13:49 | melwitt | I haven't looked in more detail yet but fyi looks like we have nova-grenade-multinode failing on stable/2025.1 due to a conflict trying install sphinx https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/b433e624b0304542a7acd99c735a051c cc elodilles | |
| 15:18:31 | elodilles | melwitt: sorry for not advertising it earlier here on IRC, but stable/2025.2 and stable/2025.1 gates are blocked :( some details: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 15:19:00 | melwitt | elodilles: thanks, sorry I missed it! | |
| 15:19:26 | elodilles | melwitt: grenade on stable/2025.1 could be fixed with this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/989580 | |
| 15:20:18 | elodilles | at least, it worked for grenade last week o:) (unfortunately, the skip-level grenade needs another workaround for the patch to merge) | |
| 15:21:12 | elodilles | stable/2025.2 was blocked by the skip-level grenade as well. i hope the fix could work there too | |
| 15:21:17 | elodilles | but :( | |
| 15:21:32 | elodilles | a tempest patch has merged recently :/ | |
| 15:21:37 | elodilles | that causes another error | |
| 15:22:00 | elodilles | (move from setup.cfg to pyproject.toml) | |
| 15:22:27 | elodilles | and the above mentioned grenade jobs uses ubuntu-jammy nodeset | |
| 15:23:20 | elodilles | on which tox drops error due to old pbr/setuptools because of the new pyproject.toml setup :/ | |
| 15:23:33 | melwitt | @_@ ok | |
| 15:24:31 | elodilles | so now i'm testing a couple of workarounds with this patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/989786 | |