| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-05-11 | |||
| 16:39:03 | Uggla | yep I mentioned it before | |
| 16:40:50 | cardoe | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/985785 & https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955685 for the optimization ones | |
| 16:41:03 | cardoe | Which are roughly doing the same thing but tested differently. | |
| 16:41:59 | dansmith | ...why does Uggla have a competing implementation there? | |
| 16:43:10 | Uggla | dansmith I did not know about the previous implementation and it was not linked to the bug. As it looked no too difficult I did a patch. | |
| 16:43:42 | dansmith | okay I think it'd be better to not have the duplication, and you help the other patch by improving the tests | |
| 16:45:41 | Uggla | I agree, but that's assuming I knew about it. | |
| 16:45:55 | dansmith | I'm saying.. now that you know... | |
| 16:47:47 | gibi | I can review whatever patch remains :) | |
| 16:48:11 | Uggla | Sean’s comment is a bit ambiguous. I get the impression he prefers my version, but regardless, I’m going to try to move things forward. | |
| 16:48:57 | dansmith | so they are actually competing? | |
| 16:49:27 | dansmith | I mean if that's the case, then fine, but let's figure out which one we want and close the other.. having two proposed without active management towards a decision is just asking for them to be ignored, IMHO | |
| 16:50:32 | Uggla | yes sure. | |
| 16:51:05 | Uggla | #topic Bug scrubbing | |
| 16:51:12 | Uggla | #info up to 193 (+2) | |
| 16:51:19 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:51:24 | Uggla | #link https://truc.uggla.fr/ to follow the trend. | |
| 16:51:29 | Uggla | #info New bugs assigned. | |
| 16:51:35 | Uggla | Next meeting (this week): [public] Upstream bug triage. Wednesday, May 13 · 15:30 – 16:00 UTC. Video call link: meet.google.com/qdd-fwzs-tje | |
| 16:52:11 | gibi | I'm affraid I have to skip it again. I promise I'm not intentionally avoiding it | |
| 16:53:05 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: if its the one im thinking of you had better testing but i prefer there version | |
| 16:53:30 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: in either case it woudl be nice to converge them | |
| 16:54:24 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, ok thanks for the clarification. | |
| 16:54:28 | Uggla | Are you abandoning me? | |
| 16:54:34 | Uggla | gibi ^ | |
| 16:54:36 | Uggla | ;) | |
| 16:55:05 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: agree I prefer the original patch (in terms of the runtime code) | |
| 16:55:14 | gibi | Uggla: It is complicated ;) | |
| 16:55:31 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: more reuse and uses len() | |
| 16:55:41 | dansmith | also, the original patch has unanswered questions/comments from gibi AFAICT | |
| 16:55:43 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: exactly | |
| 16:56:11 | sean-k-mooney | its been a while since i looked at either so i have not seen them | |
| 16:56:18 | dansmith | basically precisely what I said in a review a few minutes ago | |
| 16:56:24 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:57:10 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: maybe you coudl take over both patchs and adress gibi's comments | |
| 16:57:31 | sean-k-mooney | or even just add your extra tests into ther patch for them | |
| 16:58:03 | Uggla | yes I thought about the latest option. | |
| 16:58:20 | Uggla | which looks simpler. | |
| 16:58:48 | Uggla | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:59:19 | Uggla | nothing on the agenda. So I think we can close. Unless someone has a 2mn things to say | |
| 17:00:15 | Uggla | TBH I wanted to discuss a bug, but I'll do it outside of the meeting. | |
| 17:00:33 | Uggla | So I think we are done for today | |
| 17:00:59 | Uggla | Time to close, thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening. | |
| 17:01:07 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-05-11-16.00.log.html | |
| 17:01:07 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-05-11-16.00.txt | |
| 17:01:07 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-05-11-16.00.html | |
| 17:01:07 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Mon May 11 17:01:07 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 17:01:07 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 17:01:16 | gibi | thanks Uggla | |
| 17:01:57 | dansmith | Uggla: just some feedback from me.. it feels like the pace of the meetings has really slowed to a crawl lately and it's feeling like there's a lot of dead space.. I wonder if we could pick up the pace a bit and try to make it a quicker in-and-out sort of thing? | |
| 17:02:12 | dansmith | maybe it's just me, in which case ignore me, but.. might be worth considering | |
| 17:03:04 | sean-k-mooney | the last few meeting i have either been double booked or not able to focus much on ti so cant commet if tis just dan but ya it proably coudl be a littel snappier | |
| 17:03:44 | dansmith | right, it's easy to get distracted because the pace is so slow and I tend to do other things to try to fill the minutes | |
| 17:06:44 | Uggla | Oh, I didn't realize! I'll definitely try to make it snappier next time. | |
| 17:11:10 | dansmith | thanks :) | |
| 17:11:31 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Fix resize to unpermitted flavors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988148 | |
| 17:21:19 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Fix resize to unpermitted flavors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988153 | |
| 17:21:20 | womax | of how much I should go in details | |
| 17:21:20 | womax | sean-k-mooney: hi I updated the spec for tempurl usage (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/975883), last time you said it was a bit lacking in details, and apart for explicity adding the use of download_handlers, I did not feel I have added much. If you had some part in mind that were lacking details, and if it was more an overall impressions I'm curious if you could point to me to a spec I could refer to have an idea | |
| 17:21:48 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Fix resize to unpermitted flavors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988154 | |
| 17:22:17 | dansmith | womax: I think I'm a but unsure about this one after PTG | |
| 17:22:33 | dansmith | womax: it sounded to me like you were saying that ironic and glance wanted/needed this and nova could benefit, | |
| 17:22:46 | dansmith | but then talking to the glance people it sounded like that wasn't really the case | |
| 17:23:01 | dansmith | so I'm left wondering.. is this something ironic wants nova to do specifically? | |
| 17:27:08 | womax | dansmith: ok I wasn't trying to say that, my point was I (and overall OVH) would like to have a tempurl management feature in glance. glance people were not really interested, especially if it will not be used anywhere. So my point was to see if such a feature would exist in glance, could a use be implemented in nova. And if so I would go back to glance to discuss more about if is something that can go further | |
| 17:28:01 | womax | And for the ironic, it was where I did find tempurl at first that was done only for swift, but I don't think it should interact much with nova | |
| 17:28:16 | dansmith | okay, I think that's what I took from it after getting the full picture.. that nova's implementation here would just help to justify the glance feature | |
| 17:29:18 | womax | yes that's it | |
| 17:29:23 | dansmith | gotcha | |
| 17:37:03 | womax | and linked to that, I tried to experiement a bit with the download handler code path, to see what the implmemention could look like. And I was under the impression that it cannot works if glance show_multiple_locations config is false (which is the default (https://docs.openstack.org/glance/latest/configuration/glance_api.html#DEFAULT.show_multiple_locations), as nova never seems to call the dedicated route to get locations | |
| 17:37:04 | womax | (/v2/images/{image_id}/locations), (https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/image/glance.py#L253). I don't know if it normal/bug, or if I missed something else, but I could never make it even try to see if download_handlers existed without a bit of modification in the nova code | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-05-12 | |||
| 07:42:34 | gibi | Hi folks it seems nova-alt-configuration job is started to fail since yesterday | |
| 07:42:38 | gibi | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-alt-configurations&branch=master&skip=0 | |
| 07:43:10 | gibi | May 11 20:41:52.111833 npfa8fa206b4014 nova-compute[32688]: ERROR nova.compute.manager [instance: 0de2d300-db70-420c-a502-c6015ad70e94] libvirt.libvirtError: unsupported configuration: spice graphics are not supported with this QEMU | |
| 07:43:14 | gibi | May 11 20:41:52.111833 npfa8fa206b4014 nova-compute[32688]: ERROR nova.compute.manager [instance: 0de2d300-db70-420c-a502-c6015ad70e94] libvirt.libvirtError: unsupported configuration: spice graphics are not supported with this QEMU | |
| 07:43:19 | gibi | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7f08461295e24d3b8f1673f29dd9f711/log/compute1/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt?severity=4 | |
| 07:45:43 | gibi | this can be relevant https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/968354 | |
| 07:49:57 | frickler | gibi: iiuc you need to install an extra pkg for that, see also https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/972441/4/docker/nova/nova-libvirt/Dockerfile.j2 | |
| 07:52:26 | gibi | frickler: thanks for the pointer | |
| 07:56:03 | gibi | I will push a fix in devstack then | |
| 07:57:42 | frickler | looks like the failure was already present in the testing patch, but wasn't noticed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968892 | |
| 08:06:15 | gibi | indeed | |
| 08:06:39 | gibi | it is partially me who approved the devstack patch yesterday who missed that failure. | |
| 08:07:09 | gibi | I pushed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/988214 to fix it | |
| 08:09:06 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: test nova-alt-configuration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/988215 | |
| 08:09:15 | gibi | testing it in ^^ | |
| 08:15:43 | mikal | gibi: yeah, the Debian Trixie qemu requires an additional package for SPICE. Same deal with Ubuntu FWIW. | |
| 08:34:24 | gibi | mikal: TIL :) | |
| 08:34:32 | gibi | elodilles: for your eyes https://review.opendev.org/q/I469688be203c319dd048d6a99057b8d98369de0e | |
| 08:42:20 | elodilles | gibi: ACK, i'll keep an eye on them | |
| 09:16:50 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: am i belive speice is an optional package on debian 13 and 12 + backport likely has the same pattern | |
| 09:17:08 | sean-k-mooney | ah yep | |
| 09:17:25 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: mikal so i have been meaning to move that job to debian 13 for a while now | |
| 09:21:22 | mikal | sean-k-mooney: yeah fair enough. I am working on a job for Kolla-Ansible at the moment, but that's likely heavier weight than what you'd want in Nova. | |
| 09:22:05 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966479 | |
| 09:22:44 | sean-k-mooney | was the change i worked on 6 months ago i just didnt get around to the followup for addign the spice module expelcitly | |
| 09:22:52 | sean-k-mooney | at least not that isee upstream | |
| 09:23:45 | mikal | I'd like to do stronger assertions that SPICE is actually working, not just getting the server "banner" back, but that's a thing I've wanted for a while and am only just getting to now. | |
| 09:24:08 | sean-k-mooney | mikal: i mena we could do that | |
| 09:24:28 | sean-k-mooney | it really just depends on what that looks liek and how much time it addes to the job | |