Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-05-06
13:53:37 sean-k-mooney if you enable both that is what libvirt will do internally
13:54:06 tafkamax ok, i read that in the docs that post-copy seems to be preferred
13:54:25 sean-k-mooney tafkamax: if you have a new enough nova you can also enabel multile tcp connection for live migration which is you pair that with a high bandwith nic helps alot
13:54:38 sean-k-mooney they are technially for 2 diffent things
13:54:53 sean-k-mooney post-copy is for memory bound vms which is typiclly the main issue
13:55:15 sean-k-mooney auto converge is a diffent aprpoch to the same problem where the vm is paused for longer and longer downtimes
13:55:29 sean-k-mooney basiclly to prevent ti form dirting the memory in the first place
13:55:59 sean-k-mooney but post-copy has much lower guest performance impact
13:56:09 tafkamax ok thanks for the info. will look into the tcp connection thing aswell
13:56:26 sean-k-mooney the tadeoff is that it extend the tiem where if there is a network interuption the guest can crash.
13:56:34 sean-k-mooney that is a very very rare event
13:56:46 sean-k-mooney but that is the reason its not on by default upstream
13:57:00 sean-k-mooney we have had post copy on by defualt in our downstream disto for a few years now
16:01:10 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Drop Python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986881
18:20:27 melwitt elodilles: hey I saw that you had WIP to fix grenade-skip-level-always on stable/2025.1 but I noticed now the failure looks more fundamental i.e. "AttributeError: module 'setuptools.build_meta' has no attribute 'prepare_metadata_for_build_editable'. Did you mean: 'prepare_metadata_for_build_wheel'?"
18:21:12 melwitt not sure if there is a way to fix this or if this is a situation where the job would be better off removed from the branch. FYI for your interest :)
18:22:58 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add unpin-az spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/986539
19:27:15 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Update policy scope enforcement testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986946
19:34:48 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test removal of enforce_scope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986479
19:38:55 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Doc: add short doc section for mdev_class https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986618
19:40:47 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/placement master: Update policy scope enforcement testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/987568
19:41:57 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Update policy scope enforcement testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986946
19:42:03 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test removal of enforce_scope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986479
19:51:45 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: fix: device_by_alias should respect config type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984921
19:51:57 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Add functional reproducer for bug 2102038 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952452
20:32:36 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Return HTTP400 for multi spec pci alias if PCI in Placement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952453
20:32:47 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Multiple spec per PCI alias limitation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952454
20:48:29 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Validated that PCI alias has proper ids https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952455
20:48:41 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Validate [pci]alias at service startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952456
#openstack-nova - 2026-05-07
02:30:45 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Cache [pci]alias parsing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952457
06:03:02 opendevreview ChungWon Lee proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test for bug #2134375 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984900
08:25:37 opendevreview ChungWon Lee proposed openstack/nova master: Fix port remain while error on update port with multi network https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983672
08:59:44 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate eventlet concurrency mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987331
10:03:44 opendevreview ChungWon Lee proposed openstack/nova master: Fix port remain while error on update port with multi network https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983672
11:53:20 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-vif master: Deprecate version module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/987636
14:43:26 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Deprecate version attribute https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/987669
14:45:59 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-traits master: Deprecate version attribute https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/987671
15:15:09 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix resize to unpermitted flavors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987704
15:17:46 dansmith Uggla: this ^ is a public security bug fix.. we decided to do this outside embargo because it's not super impactful.. still would be good to try to prioritize review, merge, and backport I think
15:20:38 Uggla dansmith, yep, I set it in the list, I will warn in the next upstream meeting. Btw, I think we can also ask to have it in a sprint.
15:25:20 dansmith I'd rather not mix our downstream team organization with things like this..
15:25:34 dansmith bauzas: FYI ^ about the flavor fix, maybe you can hit that quicker since you have context
15:29:13 bauzas dansmith: already reviewing it :)
15:29:33 dansmith bauzas: nice thanks :D
15:31:07 bauzas +2
15:31:13 bauzas 'd
15:32:04 dansmith excellent thanks..
15:33:59 dansmith maybe gmaan or melwitt could have a looksee
15:43:43 gibi dansmith: do we want to add a release notes to that bugfix? Other that I'm +2
15:44:51 dansmith gibi: I dunno, I don't really think we need renos for every bug fix, especially when it's not changing important behavior. The bug is referenced and it's very detailed, and while it is a security thing, it's not very impactful.
15:45:00 dansmith if you think this needs one for some reason I can surely add it
15:47:17 gibi dansmith: I have no specific reason for a reno so I approved the patch as is
15:47:27 gibi I left a follow up request to consider
16:02:52 elodilles melwitt: unfortunately i haven't found any fix for the grenade-skip-level-always job (unmaintained/2024.1 -> stable/2025.1) yet :/ it's on my TODO (but with lower priority). in nova, it was set non-voting some time ago already. in placement i also added the same workaround to unblock the gate (i'd appreciate a review on the patch o:)): https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/980761
16:31:02 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor get_flavor_by_flavor_id() to require context https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987723
16:31:23 dansmith gibi: ^ straight from the devil's mouth to your eyeballs. Minimal checking so far, but I'll go over it in more detail in gerrit
16:54:00 gibi dansmith: looks OK to me
16:56:04 dansmith gibi: ack, thanks for catching my typo, I'll rev both quickly
16:59:46 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor get_flavor_by_flavor_id() to require context https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987723
17:05:09 gibi dansmith: thanks. +2
17:05:43 dansmith o7
17:47:32 sean-k-mooney dansmith: i +1'd no need to pull it form the gate or anythin but it woudl be good to add a release note for this i think
17:48:13 sean-k-mooney the fix looks good overall so no objection to merging it as is
17:57:33 sean-k-mooney gibi: dansmith by the way i have seen the updates on the pci spec. i have not had time to review them and likely wont till next week but
17:57:53 sean-k-mooney i do see the pain point in the configuration options
18:38:22 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add unpin-az spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/986539
20:32:42 sean-k-mooney dansmith: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/986818 does not fix the image pull failure in the ceph jobs but it shoudl help some fo the other transiant failure. if you keep seeing podman failure perhaps we shoudl condier retrying that step as well
20:33:06 sean-k-mooney dansmith: im assuming the 503 was just a tempry failure so hopefully yoru recheck goes through
20:36:44 sean-k-mooney it failed on https://github.com/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/blob/master/devstack/lib/cephadm#L373-L374
20:40:16 sean-k-mooney and we are only usign that to determin which verion of cephadm to install https://github.com/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/blob/master/devstack/lib/cephadm#L166-L185
20:40:34 sean-k-mooney so i feel like we could improve that although it may just fail later
#openstack-nova - 2026-05-08
00:39:05 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Fix resize to unpermitted flavors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987704
02:09:00 opendevreview ChungWon Lee proposed openstack/nova master: Fix port remain while error on update port with multi network https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983672
08:32:33 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987815
08:38:32 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987815
08:39:21 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987815
09:00:32 kklimaszewski Hello, I've recently proposed a new nova spec for SPDK-based nova-provisioned storage backend: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/985676. Would anyone here be willing to review it/be its liaison?
09:01:19 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Deprecate eventlet concurrency mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987331
09:42:51 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: [dnm] testing python 3.14 with restored fork https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987821
12:30:01 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: [dnm] testing python 3.14 with restored fork https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/987821
12:30:01 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Change nova-alt-configurations job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983179
14:13:47 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add unpin-az spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/986539
14:32:20 dansmith gibi: ^
14:32:38 dansmith also, gibi are you waiting on me for anything on the pci grouping spec?
14:33:00 dansmith I had gotten distracted with things and realized I never hit submit on my comments from a couple days ago
14:33:08 dansmith but I assume we're looking for another revision soon?
14:46:12 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova-specs master: add pci passthrough groups spec for 2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/975635
14:46:50 gibi dansmith: very soon indeed :) ^^
14:47:06 dansmith ack
14:47:27 dansmith gibi: no +2 on the unpin-AZ because you're not going to review the implementation I guess?
14:49:18 dansmith I had asked bauzas because it seems like he has a lot of context in the area, but never heard that he actually would... so I need to confirm or find someone I guess
14:49:35 gibi dansmith: no +2 as I don't yet know if it gets enough priority that I will have the time to review the impl
14:50:19 gibi but if my time allocation is resolved then I can be one who reviews the impl
14:51:42 dansmith ack.. I guess I was expecting I need to review the pci grouping thing even though I don't want to.. were you expecting/counting on me for that or..
14:51:47 dansmith ?
14:55:27 gibi obviously reviews are welcome but if you don't have the time then feel free to ignore it
14:57:27 dansmith I'm just trying to make sure we've got people signed up to review it if it's important and non-trivial and that you don't get left with "best effort"
14:58:04 gibi right now I'm good with best-effort. I will let the team know if this changes (internal priorities are in flux at the moment
14:58:07 gibi )
14:58:26 dansmith okay

Earlier   Later