Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-04-29
01:25:14 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.2: [pci]Keep used dev in Placement regardless of dev_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960246
04:02:45 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Standardize the service-to-service communication https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986590
04:05:49 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Standardize the service-to-service communication https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986590
06:24:58 opendevreview Nilesh Thathagar proposed openstack/nova master: Dell PowerFlex: Pass requested_size to os-brick on extend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986604
07:12:25 opendevreview Philipp Dreesens proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for bidirectional RPC liveness handshake https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/984384
07:59:18 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Doc: add short doc section for mdev_class https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986618
08:30:03 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Disable greenlet-based notifier sender check under native threading temporarily https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/985621
11:18:47 elodilles Uggla: hi, this is just a heads up, that i might not be able to join to today's bug roster meeting, i've added comments/question to my bugs to those i had time to look at.
11:36:55 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Change nova-alt-configurations job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983179
11:52:05 gibi Uggla: have to say the same unfortunately
11:55:52 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Test nova CLI commands with native threading https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984036
13:36:52 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Doc: fix misleading PCI address in multi-VF example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986650
13:57:22 sambork @Uggla: Hey, Same here (in case of bug triage) i have updated the etherpad; two ofthe bugs are duplicates, and i'm currently trying to create a reproducer for the third one
13:57:46 Uggla sambork ok no problem.
14:12:01 opendevreview Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix invalid jsonschema for keypair list response https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986660
14:17:06 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova-specs master: WIP: Support different resource classes for VFs on the same PF https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/986661
14:36:39 opendevreview Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix invalid jsonschema for keypair list response https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986660
14:37:54 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Drop redundant N371 check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972302
15:08:02 stephenfin gmaan: Looks like gtema found a bug in the keypair JSON schema spec, if you've time to take a look https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986660
15:18:11 melwitt bauzas: hey do you think you might be able to take a look at the bottom 3 patches for vtpm prep? it's a follow up and two small things that got split out during code review. dansmith has reviewed them https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978836 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983504 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983505
15:18:56 gmaan stephenfin: done, saw from gerrit email
15:18:57 bauzas melwitt: not sure I'll have time, but I'll try
15:19:10 stephenfin gmaan++ ty 🙏
15:20:19 melwitt bauzas: ack thanks
15:21:05 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use native IntOpt for tx_queue_size and rx_queue_size https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969014
15:32:27 gmaan melwitt: stephenfin sean-k-mooney gibi bauzas dansmith Uggla, As we were not able to discuss the 'standardization of service-to-service communication' topic in PTG, I am proposing it in gerrit, please check when you have time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986590
15:32:48 gmaan I am not in hurry to merge it but would like to get a kind of team agreement on it
15:33:49 sean-k-mooney gmaan: ack. to soften my stand a bit. it may be ok to use the service_user section as a fall back ot create teh user token for requst made by nova on behalvf of a user. but it idally shoudl not be the only way
15:33:58 gmaan sean-k-mooney: I think it is aligned what you were suggesting but I am adding a fallback to service_user which you objected to use for service calling
15:34:17 gmaan sean-k-mooney: yeah
15:34:25 sean-k-mooney the reason im brinign that up is we know that cern and other have one nova that talks to neutron in 3 regions
15:34:52 sean-k-mooney so we can assume that all service a given compute host talks to are in the same region or use the same CA for tls ectra
15:35:24 sean-k-mooney so each service nova talsk to shoudl ahve its onw cofnig section with the common keystone auth optiosn in it
15:35:25 gmaan sean-k-mooney: and i ack your concern for devstack bug for mess up on configuring service users which I will take up as a separate things to solve, I can work on that when get time
15:35:35 sean-k-mooney and then and only then fallback to service_user
15:37:03 bauzas do people know that we have upstream bug triage discussion at the moment ?
15:37:12 bauzas I don't see Uggla telling about it
15:37:18 bauzas https://meet.google.com/fdz-phux-cnc
15:37:38 opendevreview Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: ironic: Abort build on fatal image validation errors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986674
15:37:40 sean-k-mooney gmaan: by the way i mentioned this in the agentic coding irc channle. its entirly ok for proejct or teams to do one of ptg style meetign that are open for everyoen to join if they need high bandwith com like the midcycle. ill review your proposal when i have time but if we need oen we can poll the list for a time that works an do liek a 1 hour one off on this topic
15:38:15 sean-k-mooney bauzas: oh ok vagely i can join in a mainly liste mode
15:38:15 gmaan ++
15:38:24 sean-k-mooney im doint somethign else in parallel
15:38:29 gmaan let's see how feedback goes in gerrit and accordingly we can decide
15:38:55 gmaan ' agentic coding irc channle' can you link name, I can join it
15:40:23 sean-k-mooney #openstack-agentic-workflows
15:40:31 sean-k-mooney we need to get that added to ease drop
15:40:46 sean-k-mooney but that will happen once the tc vote happens on the governace repo
15:50:28 gmaan thanks
15:51:09 gmaan sean-k-mooney: Uggla bauzas as we spoke in bug triage meeting,. this is functional test for live migration cleanup things https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986477
16:11:06 cardoe So for cyborg+nova, nova is still making a KVM VM for example and attaching the accelerator to the VM?
16:13:55 sean-k-mooney cardoe: yes
16:14:16 sean-k-mooney cardoe: nova is entrily respocneble for the vm defintion and lifecyle management
16:14:23 cardoe okay cool. I wish the docs actually said that plainly on the intro page. :D
16:14:37 sean-k-mooney cardoe: cyborg just dose the inventory of the accelerator adn tells nova here is the pci adress
16:15:15 sean-k-mooney in the future cybrog may to other thing such as cleanign the device it manages for example
16:15:22 sean-k-mooney not firmware flashing
16:15:34 sean-k-mooney but secure rease of nvme ssds
16:15:43 sean-k-mooney that sort of thing
16:16:38 sean-k-mooney eventually its is hoped that cyborg woudl be able to mange other devices beyond pci like usb or cxl or block devices
16:16:52 sean-k-mooney nova woudl still need to eb able to add those to a vm
16:17:14 sean-k-mooney but that woudl be the limit of what nova woudl need to do and cybrog woudl do the enurmation and prepreation fo the device as requreid
16:17:42 sean-k-mooney at least that is the current split of responsiblitys, who knwo what ti will actully become
16:26:08 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for NUMA live migration overcommit bug https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986693
17:23:24 melwitt aw man, microversion 2.98 (server show image props) in openstackclient and openstacksdk have still not happened 😭 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/940799 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/940798
17:53:38 sean-k-mooney i also have a ptch for server backup i need ot respin at some point
17:53:53 sean-k-mooney melwitt: server backup works exactly once
17:53:58 sean-k-mooney which is what we test
17:55:04 sean-k-mooney melwitt: stephenfin is gone for today but if we think those are ready to go we shoudl refresh them and ask stephen to then take a look
17:55:12 melwitt hah, awesome
17:55:46 melwitt yeah that would be good. I would usually assume there is something wrong with the proposed patches and that's why they've not been reviewed and merged yet
17:56:01 melwitt so if we can find out what that is, I or you or whoever can update them
17:57:46 sean-k-mooney yep we have +2 right there but not +w bug stpehn as both so if we can get them into a state we think is good to go we cna then ask stephn to take a look
17:58:45 melwitt oh I didn't even notice that it had been +2 in the past
18:49:40 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Stop asking bug report to upstream https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933381
19:16:04 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Drop workaround for old keystoneauth https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927669
19:16:21 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Fix typo in Caracal prelude https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/915036
19:31:21 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove old warning log about UEFI support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908563
20:24:48 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Delete duplicate unit test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984607
20:25:03 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: TPM: fixup for bump service version documentation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978836
20:25:27 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove unused gabbi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978006
22:57:33 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use native IntOpt for tx_queue_size and rx_queue_size https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969014
#openstack-nova - 2026-04-30
01:39:18 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: TPM: handle key manager Forbidden errors consistently https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983504
04:35:07 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: TPM: clean up orphaned libvirt secret on guest creation failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983505
08:27:55 opendevreview chenker proposed openstack/nova master: add risc-v https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986752
08:34:07 opendevreview chenker proposed openstack/nova master: Add compatibility for nova with RISC-V architecture. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986752
08:44:03 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Change nova-alt-configurations job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983179
09:00:10 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug #2150616: KeyError in _rollback_volume_bdms https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986754
12:10:33 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Fix invalid jsonschema for keypair list response https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986660
12:56:16 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-vif master: Remove url tags from README https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/976271
15:47:18 dansmith gibi: I'm not sure if my point is getting across in the spec reviews.. I'm not really blocking on anything I just feel like we're taking an already very confusing syntax and blowing it up, which I think is unfortunate
16:01:00 gibi dansmith: yeah I agree that the config syntax is complicated. I like your idea of listing addresses to define the group. I just went one step further and wanted to do that in a separate group_spec option not directly in the already complicated device_spec optikn
16:01:05 gibi *option
16:01:45 gibi I think we are not *ready* with the spec so your comment alone is not blocking anything
16:02:20 gibi I think we are exploring the possible configurations to express a group right now
16:02:31 gibi so no hard feeling at all
16:03:16 gibi (if I come accross as angry in my comment then sorry it wasn't the intention, today I got angry on a totally unrealted thing but I guess some then leaked into my spec comment)
16:05:37 dansmith oh no, no leakage that I noticed I'm just trying to make sure it's clear that "I don't like this but I don't really know what the best plan is"
16:05:55 dansmith and it's really just about the actual [pci] syntax part
16:06:11 gibi OK cool then

Earlier   Later