| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-04-13 | |||
| 11:08:15 | lajoskatona | Uggla: from user perspective this will mean (most visible at least) that after creating the subnet the server list output will add the extra IP for the given VM. | |
| 11:09:39 | lajoskatona | Uggla: This is a bulk POST from Neutron side, but as I am not familiar with the depths of Nova would be good to check this from a Nova perspective also before I overload some network cache mechanism :-) | |
| 11:20:04 | sean-k-mooney | lajoskatona: i didnt think prot recived ip on subnets automaticlly | |
| 11:20:35 | sean-k-mooney | lajoskatona:my understandignis if you add a subnet to a network that has existing prot if you want to an an ip formthat subnet to the port you have to do it manualy | |
| 11:20:54 | sean-k-mooney | so the server output shoudl not change without addign an addtional fixed ip | |
| 11:21:47 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: good point, I have to double check that | |
| 11:21:48 | sean-k-mooney | so the act of adding a subnet to a netowkr shoudl not require a network-vif-changed event | |
| 11:22:30 | sean-k-mooney | lajoskatona: if you auto added ip to prot by addign a subnet that owuld be a breaking api chagne from my perspective as hostiroclly you did that when you exaused ipis and eneded more | |
| 11:22:51 | sean-k-mooney | so you would not want to auto acllcate ips form the new subnet to exisitng ports | |
| 11:24:25 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: I played only with sending out the network-changed event | |
| 11:24:45 | sean-k-mooney | sorry network change is what i ment | |
| 11:25:19 | sean-k-mooney | the only plasce wehre we cache/use the subnet info is for the metadat api | |
| 11:25:29 | sean-k-mooney | but even so adding a subnet to a network | |
| 11:25:41 | sean-k-mooney | shoudl not chagne the subnets assocatred with a port | |
| 11:25:48 | sean-k-mooney | that is determien based on its fixed ips | |
| 11:27:06 | sean-k-mooney | so i think its only correct to send a network-chagned event ot nova if you added a fixed ip form the new subnet to a port but not for the creation of the subnet itself | |
| 11:30:20 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: ack, I check it, if that can be catched and managed from Neutron side and if that is something to work or just document it somewhere. | |
| 11:30:45 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: did it work ever? Perhaps when nova-network was the networking? | |
| 11:33:27 | opendevreview | Koya Watanabe proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose newly instance metadata/tag protection feature https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/977339 | |
| 11:41:54 | sean-k-mooney | lajoskatona: did what ever work? | |
| 11:42:07 | sean-k-mooney | adding a subnet to a network is not ment to add it to exisitng ports | |
| 11:42:35 | sean-k-mooney | so i dont think that ever "worked" if that is what you mean | |
| 11:42:49 | sean-k-mooney | btu that would be a breakign api change to add now | |
| 11:43:20 | sean-k-mooney | nova-networks only ever supproted 1 subnet per tenant and it was not really exposed as a first class thing | |
| 11:43:32 | sean-k-mooney | at least not in the way that neturon does | |
| 11:43:57 | sean-k-mooney | auto addign subnet ip to prost woudl also likely break l3 routed netowrk for what its worth | |
| 11:44:46 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [py313-threading]Reenable the last vmware unit test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984369 | |
| 11:44:48 | sean-k-mooney | given you cant assume a subnet is routable to all host in that case | |
| 11:45:31 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [py313-threading]Reenable the last vmware unit test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984369 | |
| 11:56:16 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix oslo_svc_fixture.SleepFixture usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984373 | |
| 12:46:03 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, we have this bug (more a RFE). https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2060916 do you know the status, Do we we have a spec less blue print for it ? | |
| 13:01:38 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: support shared tenant placement aggregates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984383 | |
| 13:02:40 | opendevreview | Philipp Dreesens proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for bidirectional RPC liveness handshake https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/984384 | |
| 13:16:58 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: so the nova part of this | |
| 13:17:19 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: is that nova should adopt the use fo the new more secure way fo enablet tursted_vf | |
| 13:18:16 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney something to discuss at the PTF ? | |
| 13:18:18 | sean-k-mooney | having an admin modify binding porfile was a security risk espically fi you used custom policy to allow endusers | |
| 13:18:20 | Uggla | *PTG | |
| 13:18:33 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: this came out of a prior ptg dicussion forfm a year or two ago | |
| 13:18:42 | sean-k-mooney | i asked neutron to develop this | |
| 13:19:02 | sean-k-mooney | so i woudl prefer to handle this as a wishlist bug or at most a specless blueprint ideally | |
| 13:19:34 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: basicly this just requires use to check 1 addtional localtion with a fallback tothe old way | |
| 13:19:48 | Uggla | yes I'd like a SLBP too, and closing this bug. | |
| 13:20:25 | sean-k-mooney | ack then lets create the blueprint firest then mark ti closed after with a link to the blueprint | |
| 13:21:02 | Uggla | ok do you want me to open the BP ? | |
| 13:21:08 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: orginally this was a bug prly becuase we might want to backport it to the rlease where neturon added the feature | |
| 13:21:38 | Uggla | oh I guess we can note that in the BP | |
| 13:21:39 | sean-k-mooney | if you have time that woudl be great if not i cna trhy and loop back to it | |
| 13:22:00 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: the backporting is really jsut a nice to have | |
| 13:22:09 | sean-k-mooney | if we fix it on master i would be happy with that | |
| 13:22:09 | Uggla | I'm gonna open it, I will ping you for a "review". | |
| 13:22:17 | Uggla | ack | |
| 13:22:59 | opendevreview | Koya Watanabe proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose newly instance metadata/tag protection feature https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/977339 | |
| 13:23:13 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: im not sure fi you saw my message form last week about the cybrog cross project session | |
| 13:23:36 | sean-k-mooney | would 13:00 utc tuesday work for you in the cybrog room | |
| 13:23:59 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, yep I saw it this morning. I propose to discuss during the upstream meeting. | |
| 13:24:13 | Uggla | is 1h ok for you ? | |
| 13:24:13 | sean-k-mooney | ack that works too | |
| 13:24:18 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 13:24:30 | sean-k-mooney | we might be able to do less time but it shoudl not take more | |
| 13:24:51 | sean-k-mooney | my plan was to then use the next hour in the cyborg room to wrap up the cyborg ptg | |
| 13:25:05 | sean-k-mooney | so we can take any feedback back and resolve it | |
| 13:25:39 | sean-k-mooney | ill be able to join the nova seession then after that wraps up at least on tuesday | |
| 13:26:54 | phildree[m] | Hi Nova team! I’ve proposed a new spec for improving compute node healthchecks: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/984384 | |
| 13:26:55 | phildree[m] | This is my first time working on OpenStack/Nova, so I’d love any feedback or corrections on the approach. Thanks for the help in advance! | |
| 13:27:17 | Uggla | I have just seen the TC meetings shrink to 16h and 17h. | |
| 13:29:53 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: support shared tenant placement aggregates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984383 | |
| 13:32:07 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: support shared tenant placement aggregates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984383 | |
| 14:24:26 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: support shared tenant placement aggregates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984383 | |
| 14:29:51 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: support shared tenant placement aggregates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984383 | |
| 14:34:27 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: support shared tenant placement aggregates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984383 | |
| 14:37:03 | opendevreview | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: scheduler: support shared tenant placement aggregates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984383 | |
| 15:02:48 | bauzas | Uggla: I just noticed that the nova sessions are 1 hour later than usual PTGs (2pm-6pm UTC). Was it intutional ? | |
| 15:16:17 | Uggla | bauzas, I have just booked the room before my PTO. So the slots are not well defined. Please do not take them into account yet. | |
| 15:17:06 | bauzas | Uggla: ack, can you then check with sean-k-mooney about the exact timings because he mentioned they scheduled their Watcher sessions based on our own timings | |
| 15:17:40 | Uggla | bauzas, yes we will discuss that at the upstream meeting. Then I will refine the agenda/tools | |
| 15:17:48 | bauzas | cool | |
| 15:18:08 | sean-k-mooney | i have tried to agragne the cybrog and watcher sessions to minimise overlap with nova and the tc sessions | |
| 15:18:49 | sean-k-mooney | basiclly im trying to maxiumis the tiemi can attend the nova session based on how they were orginaly planned | |
| 15:19:14 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Replace eventlet with threading in novncproxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/976089 | |
| 15:19:45 | sean-k-mooney | my intent is if there is not a tc cyborg or watcher seession at the tiem of a nova session ill try and be in the nova sessions | |
| 15:20:50 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Enable native threading mode for console proxy services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/976089 | |
| 15:21:46 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Enable threading mode for proxy services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/976089 | |
| 15:40:48 | Uggla | Nova upstream meeting in ~20mn | |
| 15:42:57 | opendevreview | Michel Nederlof proposed openstack/nova master: Add RBD XML update functionality for migration process https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974032 | |
| 16:02:24 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:02:24 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:02:24 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Mon Apr 13 16:02:24 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Uggla. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:02:24 | Uggla | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:02:33 | Uggla | Hello everyone | |
| 16:02:34 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:02:45 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:02:54 | bauzas | o/ but tired | |
| 16:03:04 | phildree[m] | o/ | |
| 16:03:24 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:03:28 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:03:32 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:04:17 | Uggla | Let's start | |
| 16:04:28 | Uggla | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:04:36 | Uggla | #info No Critical bug | |