| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-20 | |||
| 14:39:00 | sean-k-mooney | but as a new feature it woudl have to be opt in i think for a release or two before we consider if it can be the default | |
| 14:39:48 | sean-k-mooney | by the way currently when you use this feature we only use it for 2 things | |
| 14:40:05 | sean-k-mooney | the hw_vif_model and hw_disk_bus defaults | |
| 14:40:42 | sean-k-mooney | if we were to use libosinfo there are many other thing it could express an opion on but we have moved toward usign libvirts defaults instead | |
| 14:40:49 | sean-k-mooney | our our own in code | |
| 14:41:24 | sean-k-mooney | we are not tellign libosinfo about the machine type we are suign for example or the architecure | |
| 14:41:44 | sean-k-mooney | so today it can provide sub optimal or invalide recomendation in some cases | |
| 14:42:20 | sean-k-mooney | the feature was never really updated after it was initally created so its somethign i discuage peopel from using | |
| 14:43:54 | sean-k-mooney | the last change was https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/6be668e51992df53a4d871bea70bc738a9beacb8 to workaround a breakign change in libosinfo so i just see this as tech debt today | |
| 15:01:15 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: do you have time for a question about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979999 ? | |
| 15:03:22 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: tl;dr wasn't able to find any difference between the code and the fixtures, so I can't see any leak | |
| 15:14:58 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: ack im not sure where the change in behvior is either. but i kown we were not ablt to propperly repoduce it in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/914712 when we tried. we coudl only repoduce it in devstack | |
| 15:15:38 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: I looked that we were providing the limits in the Selection object | |
| 15:15:47 | bauzas | that's why it works | |
| 15:16:08 | sean-k-mooney | right but i dont thnk we have that on the compute node right | |
| 15:16:34 | sean-k-mooney | only in the schduler so i asuem it was drop in the rpc? | |
| 15:18:01 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/manager.py#L2505 | |
| 15:18:20 | sean-k-mooney | build_and_run_instance accpate the limits object but im not sure if we pass it | |
| 15:18:25 | sean-k-mooney | and what it contains | |
| 15:18:26 | bauzas | we pass the limits | |
| 15:18:30 | bauzas | by it | |
| 15:19:02 | bauzas | of course, if we no longer have alternates, then we call back to the conductor and then we miss the limits | |
| 15:19:22 | bauzas | also, limits are not persisted so when you resize, you don't look at the network metadata | |
| 15:19:39 | sean-k-mooney | well yes because they can change on resize | |
| 15:20:00 | bauzas | so yeah, we should get the network metadata by the claim, but as I said, I can't reproduce the issue | |
| 15:20:01 | sean-k-mooney | they shoudl not be persited they shoudl be calcuatled on each create/resize/rebuild | |
| 15:20:05 | bauzas | correct | |
| 15:22:49 | sean-k-mooney | i can see if i can make some time to try and look into it next week im currently tryitn to wrap up some cybrog stuff for rc2 so i proably cant dig into it indetail today | |
| 15:23:13 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: are you currently blocked or do you have enfor info to try workign on the fix? | |
| 15:23:39 | bauzas | I'll work on the fix | |
| 15:25:48 | sean-k-mooney | ack my best advice right now is try adding some LOG.debug statement like artom did https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/914712 | |
| 15:25:58 | sean-k-mooney | or even take over that patch | |
| 15:26:29 | sean-k-mooney | and see if you can repoduce in devstack | |
| 15:26:48 | sean-k-mooney | we can hopefully use that info to fix the funtional tests or repoduce in a unit test later | |
| 17:33:13 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Fix keypairs lost during cross-cell resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/981558 | |
| 17:33:13 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug #2108974: keypairs lost during cross-cell resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/981557 | |
| 20:42:22 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug #2144660: NUMA cell sorting bug for non-PCI VMs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978885 | |
| 20:57:39 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Fix NUMA cell sorting for non-PCI VMs with pack strategy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978954 | |
| 21:52:24 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: FUP Add HW_PCI_LIVE_MIGRATABLE trait to PCI resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977310 | |
| 21:52:37 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Tidy up pci self.flags() calls in SR-IOV functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978479 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-22 | |||
| 00:54:44 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Update master for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980406 | |
| 13:26:10 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] POC: NUMA-aware vSwitch enforcement on compute claim https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/981684 | |
| 13:26:16 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2145135 you were right about the current dependce on the limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979999 is a valid repoducer but only becuase part of the orginal spec was not properly impmented. | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-23 | |||
| 12:51:24 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Move py312-threading to py313 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980458 | |
| 14:22:20 | nicolairuckel | Do I understand it correctly, that this is done? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vtpm-live-migration | |
| 14:22:52 | nicolairuckel | And all patches from here that are merged should belong to the implementation? https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/vtpm-live-migration%22 | |
| 14:26:01 | dansmith | yes, and "should" | |
| 14:36:00 | nicolairuckel | thanks :) | |
| 14:55:21 | Uggla | melwitt, gmaan, please can you review again https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/981085 it should not take long. | |
| 15:06:28 | Uggla | Upstream meeting in ~1h. | |
| 15:21:12 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Fix Flamingo version in qemu matrix. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/981085 | |
| 16:00:31 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:31 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:31 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Mon Mar 23 16:00:31 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Uggla. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:31 | Uggla | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:35 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:00:40 | Uggla | Hello everyone | |
| 16:01:47 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:01:47 | nicolairuckel | o/ | |
| 16:02:30 | lajoskatona | o/ | |
| 16:03:35 | Uggla | Let's start | |
| 16:03:45 | Uggla | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:51 | Uggla | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:04:19 | bauzas | o/ | |
| 16:04:24 | Uggla | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:25 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:04:43 | Uggla | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:04:54 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:05:01 | Uggla | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:05:06 | Uggla | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:05:12 | Uggla | #info Please try to provide a meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:05:37 | Uggla | TBH I have not looked at the status pages. Anything wrong with the gate ? | |
| 16:06:46 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:07:27 | Uggla | seems not so moving on | |
| 16:07:46 | Uggla | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:07:54 | Uggla | #link https://releases.openstack.org/gazpacho/schedule.html | |
| 16:08:05 | Uggla | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:08:17 | Uggla | #info PTG etherpad for 2026.2 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg | |
| 16:08:24 | Uggla | #info This is a "work in progress document", but you can enter you topics at the bottom of the document | |
| 16:08:42 | Uggla | I have seen gibi already entered something about eventlet, so thanks | |
| 16:09:36 | Uggla | #info This week is final RCs, release should happen next week. | |
| 16:10:23 | Uggla | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:10:31 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-status | |
| 16:10:55 | Uggla | I will open the new doc for 2026.2 this week. | |
| 16:12:03 | Uggla | There is 979301: Update min support for Hibiscus | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979301 pending waiting for grenade update. | |
| 16:12:30 | Uggla | Then we should be completely ok for 2026.1 | |
| 16:13:26 | Uggla | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:13:43 | elodilles | thanks | |
| 16:13:47 | elodilles | #info nova stable gates should be OK | |
| 16:13:56 | elodilles | #info placement and osc-placement have blocked stable gates, fixes need stable cores review (see: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:pin-setuptools-81-docs and https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:pin-setuptools-81-via-virtualenv-pkg-resources) | |
| 16:14:04 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:14:13 | elodilles | and that's all from me about stable | |
| 16:14:43 | Uggla | thanks elodilles, that looks in a good shape. | |
| 16:14:57 | Uggla | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:15:05 | Uggla | fwiesel anything for us ? | |
| 16:15:12 | fwiesel | no updates from my side | |
| 16:15:19 | Uggla | ok thx | |
| 16:15:32 | Uggla | #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal | |
| 16:15:41 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:15:44 | gibi | two things | |