| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-05 | |||
| 19:19:47 | nicolairuckel | dansmith: Like this? | |
| 19:27:54 | melwitt | nicolairuckel: the stack is good but on the last backport afaict there was a manual merge conflict resolution needed and those are to be referenced in the commit message of the backport i.e. https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#conflicts I will mention this on the review | |
| 19:36:51 | nicolairuckel | interesting, I didn't merge anything manually there | |
| 19:37:33 | nicolairuckel | I wonder if its because of some of my Git settings. | |
| 19:39:17 | melwitt | yeah I noticed after I replied to you I see that the merge conflict content is included in your backport which it shouldn't be. so I wonder what kind of thing could have caused that to happen automatically? I have not experienced something like that before | |
| 19:42:25 | nicolairuckel | me neither | |
| 19:42:39 | nicolairuckel | I need to experiment a bit with that tomorrow | |
| 19:42:48 | nicolairuckel | but for now I want to just fix the patch :D | |
| 19:42:56 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Preserve vTPM state between power off and power on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978908 | |
| 19:43:56 | melwitt | sure. please do look into it later :) | |
| 19:44:06 | nicolairuckel | Thank you for looking into the patch | |
| 19:44:29 | nicolairuckel | I'll be busy with dinner now but I'll check later again. | |
| 20:43:24 | opendevreview | Zhan Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Allow Operators to Launch VMs on Disabled Hosts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/979049 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-06 | |||
| 00:58:20 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add nova-vtpm job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978841 | |
| 01:06:02 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add nova-vtpm job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978841 | |
| 01:14:30 | melwitt | looks like some new gate failure might be brewing "AttributeError: 'Parsed' object has no attribute 'config_format'" https://paste.opendev.org/show/bS87fFXvqOKODTRMllg4/ seen in https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-py313 and https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-docs&skip=0 | |
| 01:15:19 | melwitt | oh yeah wow. everything red https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstack-tox-pep8&skip=0 | |
| 02:36:55 | haleyb | and i thought it was just a transient failure :( | |
| 03:06:08 | haleyb | https://github.com/tox-dev/tox/issues/3866 - just filed | |
| 08:12:37 | nicolairuckel | Are there any known problems in the CI with cinder at the moment? https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/620bd5237b564976b4307c6f0c105d67 | |
| 08:12:52 | nicolairuckel | I want to make sure I didn't break anything before restarting the CI job. | |
| 09:14:51 | opendevreview | Ilia Baikov proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Pre-load flavor and system_metadata in init_host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979126 | |
| 09:15:52 | opendevreview | Ilia Baikov proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Pre-load flavor and system_metadata in init_host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977037 | |
| 09:47:10 | opendevreview | Ilia Baikov proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Pre-load flavor and system_metadata in init_host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977037 | |
| 09:52:38 | opendevreview | Ilia Baikov proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Pre-load flavor and system_metadata in init_host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977037 | |
| 09:53:22 | opendevreview | Ilia Baikov proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Pre-load flavor and system_metadata in init_host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977037 | |
| 10:32:53 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: refactor memory encryption trait logic for extensibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967971 | |
| 10:32:53 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: stop using _get_mem_encryption_config() for SEV checks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967970 | |
| 10:32:54 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: refactor _guest_configure_mem_encryption() for extensibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967973 | |
| 10:32:54 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: make RP creation independent of specific encryption models https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967972 | |
| 10:32:55 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: introduce a check between mem_encryption and locked_memory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971300 | |
| 10:32:55 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: adjust requirement checks for mem_encryption guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967974 | |
| 11:59:45 | nicolairuckel | oh, now even more jobs are failing | |
| 15:16:33 | stephenfin | Uggla: Did you just update https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-os-volumes-boot-api? If so (a) your date is wrong and (b) it's all merged | |
| 15:16:58 | stephenfin | Uggla: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958864 | |
| 15:17:11 | stephenfin | I lost the topic during a rebase, clearly | |
| 15:18:19 | Uggla | stephenfin, yet updating the status. I have just realized I copy/paste a wrong comment. | |
| 15:24:14 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Move Gazpacho implemented specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/979283 | |
| 15:29:08 | nicolairuckel | frickler: Thanks for triggering another recheck. One of the tox jobs is still failing though: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/59c9b161b7334605a7ced566038547d2 Or do you think that may be because of my changes? | |
| 15:42:27 | stephenfin | nicolairuckel: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/2TF4CXQUCP4Y24PAKZQGM2D5BONL5Z34/ | |
| 15:58:03 | frickler | ah, why can't all openstack-tox-* jobs inherit from openstack-tox? *sigh* (I know why they don't, but that makes this pinning task tedious) | |
| 16:08:35 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Update min support for Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979301 | |
| 16:28:00 | cardoe | Uggla: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/471815 is the spec that I've been trying to land with the implementation. I was told previously it was too late for 2026.1. This is the one that's had an implementation since 2024.x | |
| 16:28:14 | cardoe | sean-k-mooney: ^ that's the one we've talked about as well | |
| 16:34:50 | Uggla | cardoe, sorry but unless if I'm wrong this spec was not reproposed for 2026.1 and yes it is too late now. | |
| 16:35:31 | dansmith | Uggla: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/471815/11 | |
| 16:36:09 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: oh the metadta one | |
| 16:36:26 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: ya im still supprotive of actully geting that upstream | |
| 16:36:29 | dansmith | or maybe you mean wasn't tracked as such somewhere? I know @cardoe has been consistently harping on it so I don't think we can claim it was not proposed :) | |
| 16:37:03 | Uggla | cardoe, but I see this is a proposal for 2026.2 and I'll try to take care of it to land in 2026.2. | |
| 16:37:25 | sean-k-mooney | it was propsoed for the last few cycles | |
| 16:37:44 | sean-k-mooney | it just dint get reviewed beofre spec freeze | |
| 16:37:52 | cardoe | I'll do whatever you folks need from me. I'm happy to review other patches. I'm happy to attend team meetings. I'm happy to make whatever changes. | |
| 16:38:49 | sean-k-mooney | there is also a fully implemation of the feature that has been up for the last 2 cycles https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941227 | |
| 16:39:30 | sean-k-mooney | i have lost context on the detials but i belive its complete | |
| 16:39:54 | cardoe | It is. I'll rebase it once the spec is approved. I'm running it locally. | |
| 16:39:58 | sean-k-mooney | or at leat a comple poc | |
| 16:40:01 | cardoe | There's also tempest tests for it. | |
| 16:40:14 | Uggla | dansmith, I mean it was in Launchpad as a BP. But missed the entry in release/approved directory. And it was not reviewed before SF as sean-k-mooney mentioned. | |
| 16:40:51 | dansmith | Uggla: it _was_ in the 2026.1 directory in PS11 (link above) | |
| 16:41:22 | sean-k-mooney | and in 2025.2 poir to that | |
| 16:41:23 | dansmith | not arguing that it wasn't reviewed in time, that's obviously correct, I just want to point out that it was definitely in the proper directory/state | |
| 16:41:25 | dansmith | yes | |
| 16:44:16 | Uggla | my bad the file is not there because not approved. Sorry. It's getting late here. :) | |
| 17:04:00 | nicolairuckel | stephenfin: thanks! | |
| 20:31:35 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient stable/2026.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/978649 | |
| 20:31:37 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient stable/2026.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/978650 | |
| 20:51:30 | opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/nova master: feat: add get_vnic_type() to ComputeDriver and set for Ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979354 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-07 | |||
| 06:17:56 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: return error about external network to the user on build failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972601 | |
| 13:54:45 | opendevreview | ChungRyeol Lee proposed openstack/nova master: Fix inconsistent description of volume attachment id in Nova API docs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979378 | |
| 21:00:26 | opendevreview | Ilia Baikov proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Pre-load flavor and system_metadata in init_host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/977037 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-08 | |||
| 10:40:58 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Use native interface to implement own is_admin check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979428 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-09 | |||
| 03:22:20 | opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/nova master: feat: add get_vnic_type() to ComputeDriver and set for Ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979354 | |
| 07:55:33 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: introduce a check between mem_encryption and locked_memory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971300 | |
| 07:55:33 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: adjust requirement checks for mem_encryption guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967974 | |
| 08:12:17 | masahito | hello nova team. Please review the lock API 500 error bug fix if you have time. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946223 | |
| 08:37:56 | nicolairuckel | Are there any updates on https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/2TF4CXQUCP4Y24PAKZQGM2D5BONL5Z34/ | |
| 08:44:32 | nicolairuckel | I wasn't able to find any bug report on that on launchpad yet. | |
| 08:44:53 | nicolairuckel | There's a good chance I'm looking in the wrong place though. | |
| 11:02:17 | r-taketn | gibi: bauzas: Could you please take another look at sev refcator series(https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/generalize-sev-code%22)? I’ve updated the code and comments based on the feedbacks from gibi last week. | |
| 11:17:45 | elodilles | Uggla: hi o/ is the cycle highlights patch ready for merge? or do you want to update it before the merge? | |
| 12:36:55 | opendevreview | Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Intel TDX confidential VM support for libvirt driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/979608 | |
| 12:49:09 | opendevreview | Anton Iacobaeus proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Intel TDX support in libvirt driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/979608 | |
| 13:16:55 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/placement stable/2024.2: [CI][stable-only] Workaround for missing pkg_resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/979642 | |
| 13:21:47 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/placement stable/2025.2: DNM: CI health test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/979644 | |
| 13:24:29 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.2: DNM: CI health test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/979646 | |
| 13:27:51 | cardoe | Do I need a spec for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/979354 to be able to be considered? | |
| 13:32:30 | dansmith | cardoe: as it affects all the drivers and sort of alters the compute manager behavior, it might be a good idea.. like to explain if/how another driver might ever use that and what the other options are | |
| 13:32:54 | dansmith | like, AFAIK, other drivers support _multiple_ VNIC types so a driver method that returns only one might be kinda fundamentally not useful for others (IDK) | |
| 13:33:27 | dansmith | also, this seems like less of a "feat"ure and more like a bug fix | |
| 13:33:55 | dansmith | so you could try arguing it with a bug, although I'll have the same questions | |
| 13:38:49 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: one of my consuer is nova and ironci should never modify the vnic type | |
| 13:39:02 | sean-k-mooney | the existing bevhiaor in ironic is violating that | |
| 13:39:51 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: this touches on the fact taht ironic is techinly not ment to be modifying the port bindig for nova ironic isntances but is for legacy reaons | |
| 13:40:41 | sean-k-mooney | we have again for legacy reason restited proviing a way for nova ot create port with a vnic type other then normal | |
| 13:41:11 | sean-k-mooney | forcing the pre creation of port for dpdk, sriov or ironic networing | |
| 13:42:29 | sean-k-mooney | i had suggested allowing the vnic type to be specified when you provide a network in the past and that was rejected or haveing nova determin it so i think this really woudl need a spec to get agreement | |
| 13:42:59 | dansmith | ^ | |
| 13:43:06 | sean-k-mooney | cardoe: we never blocked --nework form being used with irionic flavors partly due to the upgrade impact but its also techinally incorrect to use that today | |
| 13:43:26 | sean-k-mooney | it only works becuase ironic "fixes" it eventhough it not really ment to modify the neutron ports | |