Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-02-02
16:47:01 tkajinam for example volume id is not needed for ephemeral volumes
16:47:29 Uggla tkajinam ++
16:47:51 Uggla erlon, something else ?
16:47:51 erlon yeah, I also believe that the current operations should be okay, since it is mostly a point in time operation. As long as the operator have a way to update the VMs they should be fine.
16:47:54 erlon ok
16:47:58 erlon thats all from me
16:47:58 gibi sounds sane
16:48:09 Uggla thanks erlon
16:48:28 Uggla I guess lajoskatona wanted to share someting ?
16:48:39 lajoskatona Uggla: thanks, I have :-)
16:49:07 lajoskatona o/
16:49:28 lajoskatona I started to work on the migration away from neutronclient calls to SDK ones, and I have few patches up for review:
16:49:34 lajoskatona https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22sdk_for_neutron%22
16:49:59 lajoskatona The last one for ports is red currently, I have to revisit it when I will have time
16:50:57 lajoskatona I tried to do small patches, each one covers one neutron API element, like networks or subnets
16:51:44 lajoskatona and it would be really helpful if I have feedback if the overall direction is good or any suggestion in review
16:51:55 gibi i will try to start reviewing them
16:52:31 Uggla me too.
16:52:42 lajoskatona thanks. I believe teh logic under remained the same, I just changed from what SDK returns instead of the dicts returned by neutronclient
16:53:27 gibi can we put a recurring topic about this on the agenda?
16:53:33 lajoskatona the other "big" difference are the exceptions as Neutronclient has some real exotic ones, and I tried to cover those with exceptions from SDK
16:53:39 gibi (just to help me remember)
16:54:02 Uggla gibi sure.
16:54:03 lajoskatona that can work, we do the same in Neutron meeting for this topic when I have more for review
16:54:16 gibi Uggla: thanks
16:54:38 lajoskatona thanks for the time
16:54:39 Uggla lajoskatona did you checked what was done for manila regarding sdk ?
16:55:14 lajoskatona yes, I checked in the past but not deeply
16:55:31 MaxLamprecht[m] o/ Uggla I have also one additional topic
16:56:09 Uggla MaxLamprecht[m] do you think you can cover it in 5mn ?
16:56:11 lajoskatona that's it from me for SDK
16:56:19 Uggla thanks lajoskatona
16:56:23 MaxLamprecht[m] sure
16:56:34 Uggla ok MaxLamprecht[m], so please go ahead
16:56:39 MaxLamprecht[m] I am working on resolving some inconsistencies between bdms/cinder-attachments that are happening regulary in our environment.
16:56:48 MaxLamprecht[m] I have these MRs incl. regression tests. Would be great to get review :) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972045 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974832 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/934984
16:58:21 Uggla MaxLamprecht[m], I have put them on the review list.
16:58:54 MaxLamprecht[m] I am currently investigating every single cause of these "out of sync" states in our env and try to fix the root causes. Maybe I will come up with more MRs in the next weeks/months.
16:58:54 Uggla it looks like you have reproducer so it is cool
16:58:56 MaxLamprecht[m] thanks
16:59:40 Uggla MaxLamprecht[m] something else to add ?
16:59:54 MaxLamprecht[m] nop thats everything :) thx
17:00:23 Uggla good thanks. It is time to close because we are at the top of the hour.
17:01:01 Uggla Thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening and see you next week.
17:01:09 gibi thanks
17:01:09 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-02-02-16.01.log.html
17:01:09 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-02-02-16.01.txt
17:01:09 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-02-02-16.01.html
17:01:09 opendevmeet Meeting ended Mon Feb 2 17:01:09 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
17:01:09 Uggla #endmeeting
17:01:15 lajoskatona Bye, o/
17:01:39 bauzas thanks
17:02:04 elodilles thanks o/
17:05:52 elodilles Uggla: :S i hope she gets well soon
17:16:39 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove tpm support detection for libvirt < 8.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952308
17:17:01 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Drop redundant chown of tpm data directory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962446
17:33:38 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM test volume snapshot NFS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956282
17:36:19 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Init virt driver before use https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975165
17:38:35 gmaan gibi: on graceful shutdown, this is ready . I have abandon the DB, object change for the new topic field https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975242
17:38:38 gmaan bauzas: ^^
17:41:44 gibi gmaan: ack, I will circle back
17:41:49 gmaan thanks
18:09:04 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet from libvirt/test_driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970070
18:09:04 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet from CacheConcurrencyTestCase https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970069
18:09:05 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Speed up RetryDecorator in unit test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975443
18:09:05 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet from libvirt/volume/test_mount https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970071
18:12:10 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Speed up RetryDecorator in unit test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975443
18:19:42 gibi gmaan: the first graceful patch looks good to me I just have a question about RPC minor version / service version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975242/4#message-96014581a53a1bfc9a6dbc419832eb7dd61dac46
18:21:38 gmaan gibi: yes, I am planning to bump that when new RPC server/new topic will be in use in compute service
18:22:10 gmaan because that is the time, we need to handle the old vs new compute via versioning or fallback etc
18:23:56 gibi gmaan: OK make sense
18:24:03 gibi I just wanted to be sure we will do it
18:24:09 gibi my +2 stands :)
18:24:16 gmaan yeah, thanks
18:52:51 gmaan gibi: checked the STOPPED events change, its looks nice now. I left one comment about calculating the remaining_delay while it wait for shutdown condition https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974445/comment/597be334_afaa6a5f/
19:26:09 gibi gmaan: thanks you have a good point. I will fix it tomorrow
19:28:02 sean-k-mooney gibi: would you mind adding https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975171/1 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/973149 to your review list for tomorrow
19:30:38 gibi sean-k-mooney: done :)
19:31:24 gibi I mean the first one is done
19:31:53 gibi the second will need my fresh brain tomorrow
19:33:49 sean-k-mooney thanks :)
19:38:14 dansmith gibi: can I have you for a sec?
19:38:20 dansmith fresh brain probably not required
19:51:30 gmaan gibi: ack
19:53:17 dansmith nevermind I think
20:07:49 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add regression test to repoduce bug 2139351 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975171
#openstack-nova - 2026-02-03
01:26:53 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: testing: Run functional tests under [testenv:cover] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975346
01:26:54 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: unified limits: Fix openstacksdk usage for endpoint discovery https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975106
01:36:40 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: prepare to bump service version for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962051
01:36:41 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
01:36:41 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483
01:36:42 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975
01:36:42 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629
01:36:43 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477
01:36:43 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052
03:35:09 melwitt I have noticed nova-next has been failing a lot on the master branch today https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-next&project=openstack%2Fnova&branch=master&skip=0
03:37:34 melwitt 'scsi-block.physical_block_size' not found"
03:37:34 melwitt error like this "Failed to start libvirt guest: libvirt.libvirtError: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor: 2026-01-30T20:30:26.821021Z qemu-system-x86_64: -device {"driver":"scsi-block","bus":"scsi0.0","channel":0,"scsi-id":0,"lun":0,"share-rw":true,"drive":"libvirt-1-format","id":"ua-409f3368-f41a-4915-aa22-29dff53bf25b","bootindex":1,"logical_block_size":512,"physical_block_size":512}: Property
08:51:36 gibi dansmith: sorry I was away
09:05:27 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Reproduce bug/2130881 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/975166

Earlier   Later