Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-01-21
14:59:15 stephenfin gmaan: I think I've responsed to all your questions and fixed the things I needed to fix on the above ^
15:31:38 gibi Im delayed from the eventlet sync
15:42:14 bauzas gibi: I can't join but I'll look at the doc
15:42:29 sean-k-mooney gibi: stephenfin: can you make some time to review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/973149 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/971231 the initall neturon patch has merged the rest will depend on thse mergign and a release of os-vif all the patches are tested end ot end by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/972820
15:54:47 gmaan stephenfin: ack
15:58:18 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Run mypy from tox https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/973975
16:02:21 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: typing: "Import" objects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/973976
16:08:56 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add TAP device pre-creation support for OVS/OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/971231
16:12:41 sean-k-mooney the link to the nova status etherpad is missing in the topic
16:12:58 sean-k-mooney was it remvoed intentionally?
16:13:06 sean-k-mooney it should be https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-status
16:13:19 sean-k-mooney instead of pointing at the ptg link
16:26:07 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: typing: Replace objects from typing with literals https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/973977
17:03:06 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for migrations API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956142
17:03:06 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for quota sets API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956141
17:03:07 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server tags API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956144
17:03:07 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server migrations API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956143
17:03:08 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Simplify servers views (1/3) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956231
17:03:08 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server metadata APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956145
17:03:09 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Simplify servers views (3/3) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956233
17:03:09 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Simplify servers views (2/3) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956232
17:03:10 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (1/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956234
17:03:11 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (3/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956237
17:03:11 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (2/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956236
17:03:13 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (5/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956239
17:03:13 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (4/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956238
17:03:15 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server shares APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956266
17:03:15 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (6/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956240
17:03:17 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Invert validation check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956241
17:03:38 stephenfin gmaan: Sorry, fixed that missing delete_query dict /o\
17:40:07 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Bump hacking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/973978
17:53:51 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: typing: Add hints to nova.cmd, nova.conf, nova.console https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/705657
17:53:52 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: typing: Add hints to remaining top-level modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/705658
17:53:53 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: typing: Correct import issues https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974221
17:53:53 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: typing: Add hints to nova.virt, nova.virt.libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974220
17:53:54 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: mypy: Enable incremental checks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974222
18:37:30 gmaan stephenfin: thanks, network field still seems odd to me. I think we can keep that as commented field and client can handle it for older version if that needs to be supported.
18:52:32 sean-k-mooney gmaan: i was kind of indiffernt on that which is why i didnt comment either way in the review so im happy to follow your lead on taht
18:52:54 sean-k-mooney we have kept schemas for other removed or deprecated things so im fine with keeping it or not
18:53:18 sean-k-mooney gmaan: what i woudl suggest is if we remove it do it in a followup in the end of the series
18:53:46 sean-k-mooney well unless stephen is rebasign them again anyway for somethign else
18:54:07 gmaan sean-k-mooney: yeah, sure I am ok in followup. did not want to rebase all things
18:54:43 gmaan I think I commented about ok as followup but maybe in other change
21:58:00 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: blueprint: iothreads-for-instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939254
#openstack-nova - 2026-01-22
04:01:30 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor service user authentication https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974267
05:04:53 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor service user authentication https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974267
07:53:40 jkulik melwitt: if you find some time, we'd appreciate a review on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/699176 ("Faults from cell DB missing in GET /servers/detail")
07:56:16 opendevreview Esra Ozkan proposed openstack/nova master: Fix Concurrent VM Live Migrate - Volume Backup Error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/973750
09:22:42 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: refactor memory encryption trait logic for extensiblity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967971
09:22:42 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: stop using _get_mem_encryption_config() for SEV checks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967970
09:22:43 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: refactor _guest_configure_mem_encryption() for extensibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967973
09:22:43 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: make RP creation independent of specific encryption models https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967972
09:22:44 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: introduce a check between mem_encryption and locked_memory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971300
09:22:44 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: adjust requirement checks for mem_encryption guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967974
09:24:21 RomanHros[m] Hello guys, I have the following problem.... (full message at <https://matrix.org/oftc/media/v1/media/download/ARKuyhvh_dMCVP_iifQ_N7pqYUCJHPZCCUZ85LfdunjJgzP7Ip4KsQrfsaTxfiLYItD4jSD9QFMw_X2sz8kxdQ1CecLR3rwQAG1hdHJpeC5vcmcvR3dDTXJQcUt1dXhKQ3hGSVJpcUZXb0hL>)
09:45:39 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Run nova-compute in native threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965467
09:45:39 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt event handling without eventlet https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965949
09:45:40 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Prevent leaking RPC poller thread between tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974299
09:45:40 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: DNM:Test with oslo.vmware + compute eventlet removal patches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/973468
11:40:23 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021
11:40:24 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: prepare to bump service version for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962051
11:40:24 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LibvirtLiveMigrateData https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952628
11:40:25 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
11:40:25 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483
11:40:26 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975
11:40:26 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629
11:40:27 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477
11:40:27 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052
12:35:02 opendevreview Masanori Kuroha proposed openstack/nova master: Copy applied provider config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948304
14:26:58 LarsErikP hello! I've asked this before, but I would really love to have nova >= 31.1.0 in UCA. especially to get this fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2098496
14:27:13 LarsErikP who do we talk to in order to get that going?
14:29:28 dansmith someone at canonical I imagine, but not here
14:31:57 LarsErikP right.. hmm
15:15:32 haleyb LarsErikP: so you're asking about Epoxy? it's going EOL in April so doubtful to get a point release before that imo. we would typically do an SRU for a single change, but i haven't seen that one reported by a customer
15:17:50 LarsErikP I've tried reach out to jamespage over on #ubuntu-server at least. We have just upgraded from Caracal to Epoxy, and encountered this...
15:18:13 haleyb LarsErikP: james no longer works at canonical...
15:18:17 LarsErikP oh...
15:18:34 LarsErikP he was listed here :P https://documentation.ubuntu.com/project/SRU/reference/exception-OpenStack-Updates/
15:19:02 LarsErikP I guess, don't trust stuff you read on the internet
15:19:41 haleyb i think only two of the people in that list still work here
15:19:50 LarsErikP who? (A)
15:20:32 haleyb well, i don't know who icey is to start
15:21:55 LarsErikP james is the only one of them, that's actually present on #ubuntu-server right now :P
15:24:41 haleyb right, and corey is at mozilla
15:25:06 haleyb like i said, for epoxy there won't be much desire
16:36:32 melwitt jkulik: thanks for the reminder, I will try to look soon
18:33:42 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928022
20:07:09 Zhan[m] while checking the live migration related stuff, I noticed that there are some features/params that are available on libvirt but not yet available in nova (e.g., additional auto converge params, compressions, etc.). I see recently that the parallel connection feature was added in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955784, so I'm thinking about just adding all features that are available on libvirt to nova. do we have plans
20:07:10 Zhan[m] regarding this, or if not then maybe I can pick this up? thanks :D
20:28:04 dansmith just because it's in libvirt doesn't necessarily mean it should be in nova, and also, we won't generally add things that are in versions of libvirt that are not yet in an enterprise distro
20:28:31 dansmith best thing would be to identify important missing and relevant things and write a small spec explaining how they would be configured and what benefit they bring
20:45:30 Zhan[m] make sense. in terms of the versions, I'm assuming I should check https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/reference/libvirt-distro-support-matrix.html?
21:11:09 dansmith sure, but those are old, so best to look in the code to see what current master is currently targeting (which may be currently still set to the previous release)
21:25:23 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Prevent leaking RPC poller thread between tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/974299
21:26:23 gmaan melwitt: commented on vtpm 'deployment' security change ( 942021), am i missing something on testing the no-vtpm to/from vtpm resize ? they should be supported right?
21:29:30 melwitt gmaan: cool thanks, I will look. basically all resizes are supported _except_ resizes that would need a change in secret ownership. 'deployment' secret owner is the nova service user, 'host' and 'user' secret owner is the normal user
21:31:21 melwitt gmaan: there is a patch at the end of the series which enables resize from TPM 'deployment' => TPM 'host' or 'user' and TPM 'host' or 'user' => TPM 'deployment'. it's just initially not supported bc it is a lot of code and I suspect will be the most difficult part to review
21:35:32 gmaan melwitt: I think that is ok but the test I pointed in review is asserting that the no-vtpm <-> 'deployement' is unsupported unless i missed to understand the tetst
21:39:10 melwitt gmaan: ok I think the confusion is the difference between "instance has no TPM" and "instance has a TPM but secret_security=None bc the user didn't specify one"
21:39:52 melwitt gmaan: if the instance has a TPM and the user did not specify a secret security type (i.e. secret_security=None) then they get the default policy of 'user'

Earlier   Later