| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-01-05 | |||
| 16:37:43 | Uggla | Thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening and see you next week. | |
| 16:37:48 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-01-05-16.03.log.html | |
| 16:37:48 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-01-05-16.03.txt | |
| 16:37:48 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-01-05-16.03.html | |
| 16:37:48 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Mon Jan 5 16:37:48 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:37:48 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 16:37:53 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:38:05 | tkajinam | thank you :-) | |
| 16:38:40 | r-taketn | Thank you! | |
| 16:38:46 | Uggla | you are welcome. | |
| 19:41:23 | JayF | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969321 is still waiting review; minor improvement to the Ironci driver. Already has one +2 from 2025 :D | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-01-06 | |||
| 04:58:01 | ykarel | gmaan, Uggla apart from 2025.2 those centos9-stream job should be working(we running those in neutron periodic and are green), for 2025.2 we dropped those jobs as described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2126033 | |
| 05:09:56 | ykarel | ok all those jobs failing https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-centos9-stream-fips&job_name=tempest-integrated-compute-centos-9-stream&skip=0 with same issue as they running with non default python i.e PYTHON3_VERSION=3.11 , and that requires couple of fixes https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2109591%22 | |
| 05:10:36 | ykarel | i think instead of that should be fine to just create a job variant for stable/unmaintained to run with Default python3_version | |
| 05:36:07 | ykarel | pushed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/972257 | |
| 06:39:12 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Replace removed os-vif-ovs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972102 | |
| 09:25:37 | tkajinam | any chance to get second +2 for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968942 ? I see a few more people are hitting the problem in recent Ubuntu. | |
| 09:29:33 | grami[m] | I second this, it should also be back ported to 2025.1 | |
| 09:49:54 | bauzas | tkajinam: sent to the gate | |
| 09:50:10 | bauzas | tkajinam: I'll try to review your blueprint series this week btw; | |
| 09:57:00 | tkajinam | bauzas, thank you ! | |
| 11:07:27 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961896 | |
| 11:07:44 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Update the Testing document https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/966504 | |
| 12:01:14 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Skip unsupported firmware types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968942 | |
| 12:10:31 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: libvirt: Skip unsupported firmware types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972276 | |
| 12:23:28 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add basic xml generation for firmware auto selection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969085 | |
| 12:23:28 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Extend functional test coverage of UEFI boot guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969263 | |
| 12:23:29 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add capability to load ssm feature from existing xml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969131 | |
| 12:23:29 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add capability to load loader and nvram from xml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969086 | |
| 12:23:30 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use firmware auto-selection by libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969132 | |
| 13:02:41 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Update the Testing document https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/966504 | |
| 14:15:24 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Replace remaining reference to policy.json https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970648 | |
| 14:28:00 | opendevreview | Bodo Petermann proposed openstack/os-vif master: Fixed bridge name when per_port_bridge is used https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/966410 | |
| 14:31:41 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| 14:36:59 | opendevreview | Bodo Petermann proposed openstack/os-vif master: Fixed bridge name when per_port_bridge is used https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/966410 | |
| 14:38:28 | womax | fix was favored over using the existing placeholder (another fix that was proposed in the mails) ? | |
| 14:38:28 | womax | Hi nova, I recently stumbled on this commit: https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/commit/9046f0fff4be424eda25401a3f9b8752964de775 that replace '.' with '-' at server creation as it created some problems while updating from old version as some integration used the metadata api to retrieve hostname that is now different. I read the thread in the mailing list and I understand that we were relying on UB, but I was still curious as to why this | |
| 14:42:04 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Drop redundant N371 check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972302 | |
| 17:04:49 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| 17:07:48 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928022 | |
| 17:07:49 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron extensions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962270 | |
| 17:07:49 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron subnets https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962190 | |
| 17:07:50 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron Ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969298 | |
| 17:07:50 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron floating IPs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962604 | |
| 20:55:11 | nicolairuckel | I changed the commit message of my patch and now the tests are failing. Curiously, now the tests seem to fail locally too. Are they pulling any external dependencies in the background? I do have a new OS so that could also be the culprit. | |
| 21:02:47 | gmaan | nicolairuckel: I think you are talking about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 ? | |
| 21:04:52 | gmaan | upstream CI sometime (ort many times) fails for other bug or unstable tests, i can see test_resize_volume_backed_server_confirm test failing for ssh timeout in your change. The failure is not related to your change and you can re-trigger testing using recheck | |
| 22:40:12 | nicolairuckel | gmaan: yeah, I was talking about that one. I thought that maybe the tests changed and I need to rebase and now I have a local test failure too. I guess it's better to fix it now anyway. | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-01-07 | |||
| 00:59:20 | nicolairuckel | I can't figure out how to restart the tests. Do I need a Zuul account for that? | |
| 01:08:39 | clarkb | nicolairuckel: no, there are two methods. One is the push a new patchset, but the other is more appropriate in this case: you leave a comment that starts with "recheck" and can optionally leave a reason why to retrigger jobs against a change without updating it | |
| 01:08:53 | clarkb | for example "recheck test failed due to reason X that is not related to this change" | |
| 02:00:47 | nicolairuckel | ah, I see | |
| 02:01:06 | nicolairuckel | I didn't realize that it's triggered by comments | |
| 02:01:10 | nicolairuckel | then I'll do that once I can confirm that it works on my machine | |
| 02:10:30 | gmaan | nicolairuckel: this guide can give you details about how to handle test failure and key things to c heck before doing recheck https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 06:51:54 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: stop using _get_mem_encryption_config() for SEV checks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967970 | |
| 06:51:55 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: make RP creation independent of specific encryption models https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967972 | |
| 06:51:55 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: refactor memory encryption trait logic for extensiblity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967971 | |
| 06:51:56 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: adjust requirement checks for mem_encryption guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967974 | |
| 06:51:56 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: refactor _guest_configure_mem_encryption() for extensibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967973 | |
| 06:51:57 | opendevreview | Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: introduce a check between mem_encryption and locked_memory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971300 | |
| 08:43:54 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron Ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969298 | |
| 10:19:08 | opendevreview | Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/nova master: Fixed 500 response error for concurrent API requests. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/896320 | |
| 10:19:12 | opendevreview | Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/nova master: Fixed 500 response error for concurrent API requests. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/896320 | |
| 23:17:03 | opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/nova master: return error about external network to the user on build failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972601 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-01-08 | |||
| 06:10:37 | opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: allow discover host to be enabled in multiple schedulers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972638 | |
| 06:21:54 | auniyal | elodilles o/ do we need to do any extra step to add zuul and run CI in patches now ? | |
| 08:45:39 | elodilles | auniyal: hi o/ how do you mean? :-o | |
| 09:41:10 | auniyal | earlier zuul used to get added automatically I think, and we used to get CI status link but today, I have add zuul manually this time- but eventually it started CI and commented at end | |
| 09:41:48 | auniyal | frickler shared the CI status link with me, all good now | |
| 09:47:34 | frickler | note that you do not need to add zuul as a reviewer, it will pick up changes automatically based on the config in .zuul.d/ or .zuul.yaml | |
| 09:52:54 | auniyal | yeah, but it used to be faster | |
| 09:53:17 | auniyal | but thanks for letting me know | |
| 10:20:54 | frickler | would anyone be interested in looking at this zuul config error on stable branches? "Job os-vif-ovs not defined" https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/config-errors?project=openstack%2Fnova&skip=0 | |
| 10:28:56 | elodilles | frickler: here is the patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972102 | |
| 10:29:03 | elodilles | on master | |
| 10:29:24 | elodilles | i guess this can be backported | |
| 11:09:14 | frickler | elodilles: oh, wow, seems the job was dropped in xena and nova didn't notice until now. and now the xena-eol cleanup triggered this. well, better late than never. usually I'm hesitating about backporting such job changes, but in this case it seems warranted, the other option would be to just drop the job that never ran on those stable branches. your choice | |
| 12:22:54 | elodilles | frickler: hah, indeed. it was only an experimental job. anyway i think then i'll cherry pick it now to old branches, so that it remains the option... | |
| 12:26:34 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Replace removed os-vif-ovs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972663 | |
| 12:27:27 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Replace removed os-vif-ovs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972664 | |
| 12:28:31 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Replace removed os-vif-ovs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972665 | |
| 14:17:15 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/placement master: Fix compatibility with gabbi 4.x https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/972708 | |
| 14:18:37 | stephenfin | gmaan: melwitt: Could you take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/972708 when you're about. It's needed to unstick https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/972462 (which is needed to unstick a further bump that'll address a CVE) | |
| 14:18:49 | stephenfin | I'd ask gibi too but he doesn't seem to be around | |
| 14:47:20 | opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/nova master: return error about external network to the user on build failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972601 | |
| 16:23:06 | opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/os-vif master: DNM: gate health test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/972739 | |
| 16:54:24 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/2024.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/965497 | |
| 17:01:05 | gmaan | stephenfin: lgtm, +W | |
| 17:05:49 | stephenfin | tyh | |
| 17:05:50 | stephenfin | *ty | |
| 17:50:56 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Use cchardet>=2.2.0a2 for placement-perfload job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/937423 | |
| 19:19:32 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Fix compatibility with gabbi 4.x https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/972708 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-01-09 | |||
| 02:14:56 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Add Python 3.13 functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/970058 | |
| 13:06:37 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Use standard FPGA resource class https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/953580 | |
| 15:15:55 | opendevreview | Bodo Petermann proposed openstack/os-vif master: Fixed bridge name when per_port_bridge is used https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/966410 | |
| 15:16:28 | opendevreview | Masanori Kuroha proposed openstack/nova master: Copy applied provider config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948304 | |
| 16:11:09 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: trivial: Use functools.wraps https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971450 | |
| 16:38:33 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Ensure device alias is present https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971452 | |
| 20:52:34 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement stable/2025.1: Remove excessive logging from GET a_c https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963383 | |