Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-01-05
16:16:57 Uggla ^- is outdated, I'll try to update it and launchpad ASAP.
16:17:16 Uggla #topic OpenAPI
16:17:24 Uggla #link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned
16:17:32 Uggla #info still 20 remaining atm. (-3)
16:18:05 gmaan this is still in my still but did get time on that due to priority on eventlet series
16:18:10 Uggla #topic Stable Branches
16:18:38 elodilles thanks o/
16:18:57 elodilles just like Uggla mentioned: this is my 1st day after PTO, too, so i might missed something... but anyway, i'm not aware of any stable gate issue
16:19:33 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:19:45 elodilles and that's all from me for now
16:19:58 Uggla Thx elodilles
16:21:20 Uggla Skipping 2 next points because gibi and fwiesel are still on PTO.
16:21:31 Uggla #topic Open discussion
16:21:37 Uggla (r-taketn) Review request for the SEV/SEV-ES refactoring codes
16:21:45 Uggla #link: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/generalize-sev-code
16:22:08 r-taketn Thanks.
16:23:15 r-taketn I hae uploaded some SEV/SEV-ES refactoring code for generalizing to add other memory encryption architecture,
16:23:47 r-taketn Could you please review these code and give some feedbacks?
16:27:37 Uggla r-taketn yes I will be able to look at it.
16:27:59 Uggla It will be great if tkajinam could review them too.
16:28:32 tkajinam I think I completed my first round of review but will recheck these
16:29:04 Uggla tkajinam sorry I did not checked. That cool if you already reviewed it.
16:29:28 r-taketn Uggla, tkajinami: Thank you. Some feedbacks would be helpful for me.
16:31:18 r-taketn Uggla: Thanks. That’s all from me.
16:31:33 Uggla good thx r-taketn.
16:31:43 Uggla Anything else you would like to discuss ?
16:33:57 Uggla seems not.
16:34:03 Uggla moving on
16:34:09 Uggla #topic Bug scrubbing
16:34:15 Uggla #info up to 200
16:34:23 Uggla #link: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:35:09 Uggla Tbh I'm not ready to run something about it today, so I would rather defer it to next week.
16:35:24 Uggla Unless someone wants to share something.
16:37:21 Uggla Seems not, so time to close.
16:37:43 Uggla Thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening and see you next week.
16:37:48 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-01-05-16.03.log.html
16:37:48 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-01-05-16.03.txt
16:37:48 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-01-05-16.03.html
16:37:48 opendevmeet Meeting ended Mon Jan 5 16:37:48 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:37:48 Uggla #endmeeting
16:37:53 elodilles thanks o/
16:38:05 tkajinam thank you :-)
16:38:40 r-taketn Thank you!
16:38:46 Uggla you are welcome.
19:41:23 JayF https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969321 is still waiting review; minor improvement to the Ironci driver. Already has one +2 from 2025 :D
#openstack-nova - 2026-01-06
04:58:01 ykarel gmaan, Uggla apart from 2025.2 those centos9-stream job should be working(we running those in neutron periodic and are green), for 2025.2 we dropped those jobs as described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2126033
05:09:56 ykarel ok all those jobs failing https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-centos9-stream-fips&job_name=tempest-integrated-compute-centos-9-stream&skip=0 with same issue as they running with non default python i.e PYTHON3_VERSION=3.11 , and that requires couple of fixes https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2109591%22
05:10:36 ykarel i think instead of that should be fine to just create a job variant for stable/unmaintained to run with Default python3_version
05:36:07 ykarel pushed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/972257
06:39:12 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Replace removed os-vif-ovs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972102
09:25:37 tkajinam any chance to get second +2 for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968942 ? I see a few more people are hitting the problem in recent Ubuntu.
09:29:33 grami[m] I second this, it should also be back ported to 2025.1
09:49:54 bauzas tkajinam: sent to the gate
09:50:10 bauzas tkajinam: I'll try to review your blueprint series this week btw;
09:57:00 tkajinam bauzas, thank you !
11:07:27 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961896
11:07:44 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Update the Testing document https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/966504
12:01:14 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Skip unsupported firmware types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968942
12:10:31 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: libvirt: Skip unsupported firmware types https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972276
12:23:28 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add basic xml generation for firmware auto selection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969085
12:23:28 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Extend functional test coverage of UEFI boot guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969263
12:23:29 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add capability to load ssm feature from existing xml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969131
12:23:29 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add capability to load loader and nvram from xml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969086
12:23:30 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use firmware auto-selection by libvirt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969132
13:02:41 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Update the Testing document https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/966504
14:15:24 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Replace remaining reference to policy.json https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970648
14:28:00 opendevreview Bodo Petermann proposed openstack/os-vif master: Fixed bridge name when per_port_bridge is used https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/966410
14:31:41 opendevreview Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682
14:36:59 opendevreview Bodo Petermann proposed openstack/os-vif master: Fixed bridge name when per_port_bridge is used https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/966410
14:38:28 womax fix was favored over using the existing placeholder (another fix that was proposed in the mails) ?
14:38:28 womax Hi nova, I recently stumbled on this commit: https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/commit/9046f0fff4be424eda25401a3f9b8752964de775 that replace '.' with '-' at server creation as it created some problems while updating from old version as some integration used the metadata api to retrieve hostname that is now different. I read the thread in the mailing list and I understand that we were relying on UB, but I was still curious as to why this
14:42:04 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Drop redundant N371 check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972302
17:04:49 opendevreview Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682
17:07:48 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928022
17:07:49 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron extensions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962270
17:07:49 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron subnets https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962190
17:07:50 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron Ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969298
17:07:50 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron floating IPs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962604
20:55:11 nicolairuckel I changed the commit message of my patch and now the tests are failing. Curiously, now the tests seem to fail locally too. Are they pulling any external dependencies in the background? I do have a new OS so that could also be the culprit.
21:02:47 gmaan nicolairuckel: I think you are talking about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 ?
21:04:52 gmaan upstream CI sometime (ort many times) fails for other bug or unstable tests, i can see test_resize_volume_backed_server_confirm test failing for ssh timeout in your change. The failure is not related to your change and you can re-trigger testing using recheck
22:40:12 nicolairuckel gmaan: yeah, I was talking about that one. I thought that maybe the tests changed and I need to rebase and now I have a local test failure too. I guess it's better to fix it now anyway.
#openstack-nova - 2026-01-07
00:59:20 nicolairuckel I can't figure out how to restart the tests. Do I need a Zuul account for that?
01:08:39 clarkb nicolairuckel: no, there are two methods. One is the push a new patchset, but the other is more appropriate in this case: you leave a comment that starts with "recheck" and can optionally leave a reason why to retrigger jobs against a change without updating it
01:08:53 clarkb for example "recheck test failed due to reason X that is not related to this change"
02:00:47 nicolairuckel ah, I see
02:01:06 nicolairuckel I didn't realize that it's triggered by comments
02:01:10 nicolairuckel then I'll do that once I can confirm that it works on my machine
02:10:30 gmaan nicolairuckel: this guide can give you details about how to handle test failure and key things to c heck before doing recheck https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures
06:51:54 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: stop using _get_mem_encryption_config() for SEV checks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967970
06:51:55 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: make RP creation independent of specific encryption models https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967972
06:51:55 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: refactor memory encryption trait logic for extensiblity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967971
06:51:56 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: adjust requirement checks for mem_encryption guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967974
06:51:56 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: refactor _guest_configure_mem_encryption() for extensibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967973
06:51:57 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: introduce a check between mem_encryption and locked_memory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971300
08:43:54 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron Ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969298
10:19:08 opendevreview Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/nova master: Fixed 500 response error for concurrent API requests. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/896320
10:19:12 opendevreview Tobias Urdin proposed openstack/nova master: Fixed 500 response error for concurrent API requests. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/896320
23:17:03 opendevreview Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/nova master: return error about external network to the user on build failure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972601
#openstack-nova - 2026-01-08
06:10:37 opendevreview Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: allow discover host to be enabled in multiple schedulers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972638

Earlier   Later