| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-11-22 | |||
| 22:10:20 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771 | |
| 22:10:21 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052 | |
| 22:10:21 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975 | |
| 22:10:22 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add documentation and reno for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962889 | |
| 22:10:23 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-11-24 | |||
| 08:07:03 | LarsErikP | sorry for nagging, but is there any progress on merging this? /o\ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/916409 | |
| 08:11:15 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Support boot_index for multiple block devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963665 | |
| 10:23:57 | nelljerram | LarsErikP: I'm not an expert at all in the area, but I took a look and there is an unresolved comment, which looks to me reasonable and like it should be addressed; but there has been no response from the author since April. You might need to upload your own version, with the comment addressed, in order to make progress on this. | |
| 10:43:40 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: [ironic] Ensure unprovision happens for new states https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967941 | |
| 11:18:54 | LarsErikP | nelljerram: hmm.. Maybe let sean-k-mooney and tobias-urdin chip in here. I know the discussed something here last time I asked about it :P Sadly I'm not enough of a developer to fix the unresolved comment (if that's really what needed) | |
| 11:20:28 | LarsErikP | and even if the original author is MIA; this is still a (large) issue imho, so it should really be fixed by someone else if need be /o\ | |
| 11:22:46 | sean-k-mooney | so dan made a seoft request for th epatch to follow our normal regesstion process by creating a functional repoducer in addtion to the unit tests | |
| 11:23:20 | sean-k-mooney | i tought abvout that orginlaly but i decided not to request one. its been a while so i dont recall why | |
| 11:24:03 | sean-k-mooney | dan left it open to other cores if they agreed a funcitonal test was retuire to move forward or just a nice to have | |
| 11:24:57 | sean-k-mooney | no one has actully responded ot dan on there request and its clear they feel the testing is not enough as is to proceed which is why they are not will to upgrade to +2 | |
| 11:25:57 | sean-k-mooney | so the best way to move it forward would be to add the extra testign that was reuqested by dan. the althernitive is to find another core to reveiw it | |
| 11:28:27 | LarsErikP | uhm ok. So.. how do we go about progressing with that? :P I'm really keen on this getting fixed, but sadly not able or comfortable to help much with the coding.. | |
| 11:45:33 | sean-k-mooney | sorry was making coffee, im surpriesd ragat has not updated it but i guess they have just been busy | |
| 11:47:27 | sean-k-mooney | i guess the best way forward is to create repoducer as a sperate patch and or see if someone can pick this up by addign it to the irc meeting later today | |
| 12:49:09 | LarsErikP | If you could discuss it in a meeting, that would probably be useful? =) | |
| 12:49:17 | LarsErikP | sirry, was afk too. Got servers in the mail :P | |
| 13:41:40 | dmsimard[m] | sean-k-mooney, bauzas: hi btw, still unpiling the summit backlog but I don't think I ever thanked you for helping discussing through our proposal so thanks, even if the outcome didn't turn out the way we hoped, it was worthwile to talk about it :p | |
| 13:43:55 | sean-k-mooney | dmsimard[m]: sorry still tryign to rememebr names and topics which one was that specificly? there were a lot of topics at the ptg? numa? | |
| 13:44:41 | dmsimard[m] | dynamic overcommit/scheduling with monitoring/prometheus | |
| 13:45:53 | sean-k-mooney | oh o/ ill try and remember you nic | |
| 13:46:32 | sean-k-mooney | so ya that was interesting. i think we could impove teh ux there by actully makign that plugping a stevador entry point and possibley help you with creatign a new repo | |
| 13:46:43 | sean-k-mooney | to host operator filters/weigher | |
| 14:09:52 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement stable/2025.2: Reproduce GET a_c slowness bug/2126751 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/964219 | |
| 14:09:54 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement stable/2025.2: Prune a_c search space by invalid prefixes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/964220 | |
| 15:10:08 | Uggla | Nova meeting in ~50mn | |
| 15:10:37 | gibi | Uggla: I will be on another meeting during the nova meeting today. I have no news to raise for the eventlet topic | |
| 15:11:12 | Uggla | ok gibi, thanks letting me know. | |
| 15:20:14 | opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: [ironic] Ensure unprovision happens for new states https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968208 | |
| 15:22:37 | dmsimard[m] | sean-k-mooney: philosophically speaking, it's true that the scheduler is already pluggable with the ability for out of tree filters/weighers so it's fine I guess, I understand that perspective and can even agree with it | |
| 15:23:16 | dmsimard[m] | the topic then centered around something like "there's a couple operators that have this use case, we have something interesting for it, now what do we do?" | |
| 15:29:09 | sean-k-mooney | dmsimard[m]: right os the schduler is one of the only offical plug point that still existin in nova | |
| 15:30:39 | sean-k-mooney | dmsimard[m]:i agree your usecase is interesting the thign that makes it hard is we have a rule (for scaling reaosne) that the weighers and filter cannot do api calls and shoudl avoid db operations although the base weither and filters do allow them to do bulk opertions on all host rather then weigher per host | |
| 15:31:02 | sean-k-mooney | so there are some opetrunities to optimize the impact of you were to call prometheus while schdulign | |
| 15:31:33 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/weights.py#L100-L120 | |
| 15:31:56 | sean-k-mooney | for example allwos you to weigh all candiate hots at once rtather hten relying on the defautl per host approch | |
| 15:32:30 | sean-k-mooney | same for filters https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/filters.py#L36-L45 | |
| 16:00:05 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:05 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:05 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Mon Nov 24 16:00:05 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Uggla. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:05 | Uggla | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:15 | Uggla | Hello everyone | |
| 16:00:40 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:00:45 | Luzi | o/ | |
| 16:01:36 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:01:44 | kgube | o/ | |
| 16:03:15 | Uggla | Let's start | |
| 16:03:22 | Uggla | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:38 | Uggla | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:03:45 | Uggla | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:03:53 | Uggla | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:04:01 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:04:10 | Uggla | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:04:12 | bauzas | o/ (but on another meeting) | |
| 16:04:18 | Uggla | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:04:29 | Uggla | #info Please try to provide a meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:04:42 | Uggla | I have not seen anything special with the gate. | |
| 16:07:23 | Uggla | Skipping next topic as gmaan seems no available | |
| 16:07:29 | Uggla | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:07:35 | Uggla | #link https://releases.openstack.org/gazpacho/schedule.html | |
| 16:07:41 | Uggla | #info First spec review day is tomorrow | |
| 16:07:48 | Uggla | #info PTG etherpad for 2026.1 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-ptg | |
| 16:08:31 | Uggla | oops sory spec review day is on Thursday | |
| 16:09:41 | Uggla | btw tkajinam, I'll review your spec, as this is on my todo list for our sprint. | |
| 16:10:01 | Uggla | But if I'm not wrong gibi already reviewed it too. | |
| 16:10:38 | tkajinam | Uggla, thanks ! and yeah gibi already reviewed it and I addressed his comments :-) | |
| 16:10:50 | tkajinam | so am waiting for second +2 :-) | |
| 16:10:53 | Uggla | 👍 | |
| 16:11:12 | Uggla | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:11:19 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.1-status | |
| 16:11:26 | Uggla | #topic OpenAPI | |
| 16:11:32 | Uggla | #link: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22openapi%22+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+-status:merged+-status:abandoned | |
| 16:11:39 | Uggla | #info still 23 remaining atm. (-5) | |
| 16:12:04 | Uggla | It progressed compared to last week. 👍 | |
| 16:12:21 | Uggla | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:12:33 | elodilles | thanks | |
| 16:12:35 | elodilles | so | |
| 16:12:43 | elodilles | #info stable/2024.2 branch seem to be broken, due to test_schedule_to_all_nodes test case fails on nova-grenade-multinode | |
| 16:13:49 | elodilles | i haven't investigated it yet in depth | |
| 16:14:28 | elodilles | so if the error seems familiar to anyone, then please let us know | |
| 16:14:56 | elodilles | some more detail is here: | |
| 16:15:00 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:15:08 | elodilles | line 19 | |
| 16:15:20 | elodilles | otherwise | |
| 16:15:23 | elodilles | #info not aware of any issue on stable/2025.* branches | |
| 16:15:57 | elodilles | though i have the feeling that stable/2025.1 has the same issue with slurp grenade job :/ | |
| 16:16:04 | elodilles | but haven't tested it yet | |
| 16:16:39 | elodilles | and that's all from me | |
| 16:17:08 | Uggla | thanks elodilles | |
| 16:18:02 | Uggla | there are few cores today, I'm pretty sure someone knows about this issue. | |
| 16:18:45 | Uggla | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:18:58 | Uggla | I'm not sure fwiesel is around. | |
| 16:19:23 | Uggla | seems not so moving on. | |
| 16:20:02 | Uggla | I know gibi is part of another meeting and not available, so skipping eventlet removal topic. | |
| 16:20:17 | Uggla | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:20:35 | Uggla | (Uggla) 8th December 2025 meeting will be probably cancelled. | |