Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-11-21
14:39:48 sean-k-mooney well teh only contoveral part is we try not to use _ like that in parmater names
14:39:56 sean-k-mooney let me check tha actual code
14:40:03 jkulik sure. thanks
14:40:51 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/cmd/manage.py#L2790-L2792
14:40:56 sean-k-mooney so it is uesing an underscore
14:41:13 jkulik yes.
14:41:18 sean-k-mooney i woudl personlly prefer to supprot both but we coudl do that in a follow up i guess
14:42:00 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose openapi spec for Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/958869
14:42:03 sean-k-mooney the i guess we are inconsitent
14:42:15 sean-k-mooney we use '--until-complete' but also --max_rows
14:42:39 sean-k-mooney we shoudl proably normalise al of these to the gnu convention of only using hyphens in a sperate patch
14:42:55 jkulik I agree. do we need a bug to remember this?
14:43:06 sean-k-mooney it would not hurt
14:43:11 jkulik I'll create one
14:45:18 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Repropose remove-os-volumes_boot-api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/958865
14:48:33 jkulik https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2132130 hope the description fits the discussion
15:05:40 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make RBD Tpool usage conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956089
15:05:41 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make guestfs' Tpool usage optional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965821
15:05:41 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make libvirt Tpool proxying conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956090
15:05:42 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove tpool_execute as it is unused https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966552
15:05:42 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make image upload tpool usage conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966505
15:05:43 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [test]Further categorization of disabled unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956092
15:05:43 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix ProviderTree copying with threading Lock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956091
15:05:44 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Do not fork compute workers in native threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965466
15:05:45 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt event handling without eventlet https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965949
15:05:45 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Compute manager to use thread pools selectively https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966016
15:05:47 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Run nova-compute in native threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965467
15:23:32 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: docs: Corrects a typo on a placement audit command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922850
18:14:46 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Clean up flavors tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958746
18:14:46 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: db: Move regex helpers to utils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958745
18:14:47 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add ability to filter flavors by name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958748
18:14:47 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Simplify API version check for flavor description https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958747
18:14:48 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Restrict additional query string arguments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958750
18:14:48 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Remove dead fields from flavors response https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958749
18:14:49 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add runtime check for query additionalProperties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958856
18:14:49 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Fix typo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958855
18:14:50 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Add missing test coverage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958857
18:19:40 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add runtime check for general additionalProperties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958858
19:46:09 opendevreview Phillip Toohill proposed openstack/nova-specs master: WIP: Improve image caching behavior https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/968065
20:07:46 opendevreview Phillip Toohill proposed openstack/nova-specs master: WIP: Improve image caching behavior https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/968065
20:25:25 JayF If some folks could make time to review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967941 -- it represents a very straightforward fix to a nasty bug for users of the Ironic virt driver. Thanks o/
22:18:30 nicolairuckel Did anyone have this error before? https://paste.opendev.org/show/b1ZNcgc3WxTDchUGR0Yg/
22:19:30 JayF nicolairuckel: ensure your dependency versions, specifically oslo.service, match the version required in requirements.txt and upper-constraints.txt for the version you're using.
22:20:25 nicolairuckel Let me check where to do this in DevStack
22:21:33 nicolairuckel I was assuming that would work automatically.
22:25:56 nicolairuckel thanks, that helped!
22:28:26 JayF good luck; fwiw I don't think this channel is usually used for support; you might wanna email openstack-discuss@ next time instead :)
22:29:23 nicolairuckel I thought it makes sense because I thought it was a Nova problem.
22:31:47 JayF Well and I helped you with it :) Just letting you know that may not always be the case, async via mailing list is often more successful. YMMV :)
22:39:45 nicolairuckel Got it! Thanks. :)
#openstack-nova - 2025-11-22
06:10:56 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LibvirtLiveMigrateData https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952628
06:10:56 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021
06:10:57 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483
06:10:57 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: bump service version and require it for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962051
06:10:58 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629
06:10:58 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
06:10:59 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052
06:10:59 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975
06:11:00 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add documentation and reno for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962889
06:11:01 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477
08:49:43 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LibvirtLiveMigrateData https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952628
08:49:43 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021
08:49:44 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483
08:49:44 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: bump service version and require it for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962051
08:49:45 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629
08:49:45 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
08:49:46 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975
08:49:47 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add documentation and reno for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962889
08:49:47 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052
08:49:49 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477
12:45:24 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021
12:45:25 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: bump service version and require it for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962051
12:45:25 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LibvirtLiveMigrateData https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952628
12:45:26 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
12:45:26 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483
12:45:27 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975
12:45:27 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629
12:45:28 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052
12:45:29 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477
12:45:29 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add documentation and reno for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962889
22:10:18 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LibvirtLiveMigrateData https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952628
22:10:18 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021
22:10:19 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483
22:10:19 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: bump service version and require it for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962051
22:10:20 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629
22:10:20 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
22:10:21 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052
22:10:21 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975
22:10:22 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add documentation and reno for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962889
22:10:23 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477
#openstack-nova - 2025-11-24
08:07:03 LarsErikP sorry for nagging, but is there any progress on merging this? /o\ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/916409
08:11:15 opendevreview Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Support boot_index for multiple block devices https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963665
10:23:57 nelljerram LarsErikP: I'm not an expert at all in the area, but I took a look and there is an unresolved comment, which looks to me reasonable and like it should be addressed; but there has been no response from the author since April. You might need to upload your own version, with the comment addressed, in order to make progress on this.
10:43:40 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: [ironic] Ensure unprovision happens for new states https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967941
11:18:54 LarsErikP nelljerram: hmm.. Maybe let sean-k-mooney and tobias-urdin chip in here. I know the discussed something here last time I asked about it :P Sadly I'm not enough of a developer to fix the unresolved comment (if that's really what needed)
11:20:28 LarsErikP and even if the original author is MIA; this is still a (large) issue imho, so it should really be fixed by someone else if need be /o\
11:22:46 sean-k-mooney so dan made a seoft request for th epatch to follow our normal regesstion process by creating a functional repoducer in addtion to the unit tests
11:23:20 sean-k-mooney i tought abvout that orginlaly but i decided not to request one. its been a while so i dont recall why
11:24:03 sean-k-mooney dan left it open to other cores if they agreed a funcitonal test was retuire to move forward or just a nice to have
11:24:57 sean-k-mooney no one has actully responded ot dan on there request and its clear they feel the testing is not enough as is to proceed which is why they are not will to upgrade to +2

Earlier   Later