Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-11-10
16:50:03 Uggla gibi thanks for adding your name to the roster ! I hope we will be more than 2.
16:50:11 Uggla yep
16:50:40 Uggla sean-k-mooney, I will to the update in launchpad asap.
16:50:49 sean-k-mooney i just did it for this one
16:50:56 Uggla sean-k-mooney 👍
16:51:00 Uggla thc
16:51:01 sean-k-mooney but feel free to correct anyting if needed
16:51:04 Uggla *thx
16:51:35 Uggla are we done for today ?
16:51:54 sean-k-mooney yep, nothing form me anyway
16:52:02 Uggla Then, thanks everyone
16:52:08 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-11-10-16.02.log.html
16:52:08 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-11-10-16.02.txt
16:52:08 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-11-10-16.02.html
16:52:08 opendevmeet Meeting ended Mon Nov 10 16:52:08 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:52:08 Uggla #endmeeting
16:54:31 elodilles thanks o/
17:02:19 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova-specs master: libvirt: Use built-in firmware auto-selection for UEFI firmware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/966584
18:09:49 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: move nova-alt-config to debian-13 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966479
18:10:26 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: move nova-alt-config to debian-13 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966479
18:13:10 sean-k-mooney mikal: ... libvirt.libvirtError: unsupported configuration: spice graphics are not supported with this QEMU
18:13:25 sean-k-mooney mikal: i need to check if i just need to install an addtional package
18:13:43 sean-k-mooney but just spotted that when trying tup update the nova job to debian 13
18:13:50 sean-k-mooney its still supproted in sid
18:14:01 sean-k-mooney so my guess is its just not installed by default
18:17:31 sean-k-mooney mikal: qemu-system-modules-spice
18:17:34 sean-k-mooney https://packages.debian.org/trixie/i386/qemu-system-modules-spice
18:17:41 sean-k-mooney ya so its an optional addtional package
18:19:03 sean-k-mooney ill fix that in devstack when runing on debian its a recommended depenency in treixe but we intentiolly dont install those
18:19:05 sean-k-mooney https://packages.debian.org/trixie/qemu-system-x86
19:33:06 haleyb not sure if anyone has cycles to look at a new bug i just filed, but cross-nova-functional job is blocking the requirements repo CI - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2131032
19:34:22 sean-k-mooney haleyb: that looks unrelated to bumping os-ken
19:34:48 haleyb sean-k-mooney: yes, that is just a trigger that is running that job, other changes have same failure
19:35:17 sean-k-mooney https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=cross-nova-functional&project=openstack/requirements
19:35:27 sean-k-mooney so its failing on other change to the requiremetn repo too
19:35:35 haleyb yup
19:37:09 sean-k-mooney im running the funcitonal test locally with master quickly to ssse if i see the same
19:37:36 haleyb anything since october 31 is broken, which lines-up with the change i cited, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963036
19:38:37 sean-k-mooney so you think tis related to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963036/5/nova/tests/functional/libvirt/test_pci_in_placement.py
19:38:39 haleyb sean-k-mooney: anyway, thanks for looking and running tests
19:38:44 sean-k-mooney the other change is identical
19:39:00 sean-k-mooney oh
19:39:01 haleyb sean-k-mooney: well that is the line that is failing
19:39:07 sean-k-mooney ok i think i know what happening
19:39:48 sean-k-mooney this uses a new config option added as a bug fix
19:39:56 sean-k-mooney but i dont knwo if that is released
19:40:22 sean-k-mooney or rather if that release does exsit is it allowed by UC
19:40:51 sean-k-mooney its enabling https://github.com/openstack/placement/commit/5b73b980d0f022de2855480f57c9d5f04a7a4712
19:41:29 sean-k-mooney ya https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/962776
19:41:33 sean-k-mooney is only on master
19:42:34 haleyb ah, that seems to be it. does that cross-nova job need to require the placement project? just thinking of fixes
19:42:57 sean-k-mooney so nova does https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/job/nova-tox-functional-py312
19:43:06 sean-k-mooney because we use the placement fixture form master
19:43:19 sean-k-mooney but that means we can nit issues like this
19:43:35 haleyb cross-nova-functional doesn't do that
19:43:35 sean-k-mooney the correct fix woudl likely be to release placment with the bug fix
19:43:44 sean-k-mooney i can check but i woudl suspect not
19:44:11 sean-k-mooney am not it does nto look liek it does
19:44:12 haleyb https://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/src/branch/master/.zuul.d/cross-jobs.yaml#L170
19:44:13 sean-k-mooney https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/job/cross-nova-functional
19:44:43 sean-k-mooney ya so either we could rbing it in line with nova but then we woudl loose the test coverage for this
19:44:59 sean-k-mooney or we can leave it as is and do a release of placement
19:45:04 sean-k-mooney Uggla: ^
19:45:09 sean-k-mooney gibi: ^
19:45:42 sean-k-mooney haleyb: its late for them so they proably wont see that until tomorow, you coudl propsoe addign placement to the requried project in the requiremet repo as a test
19:46:06 haleyb i'm assuming there isn't a chicken/egg here, i.e. can that nova-cross job succeed on a patch updating placement requirement
19:46:14 sean-k-mooney that proably ok as the short term fix and it might become the long term one
19:46:58 sean-k-mooney ya there kind of is
19:46:59 haleyb i can propose a patch and rebase the os-ken change
19:47:40 sean-k-mooney in this case we proably shoudl not have merge the nova change until after plascement was released
19:47:54 sean-k-mooney so we might want to revert that or do the release to resolve it
19:49:41 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963036 is purlly a testing patch so reverting and reapplying it would not impafct anything but let see what gibi thinks in the morning
19:51:32 haleyb sean-k-mooney: that seems to be the original patch, i'm proposing something in the requirements repo as well
19:52:16 sean-k-mooney yep im just saying we may end up doing a revert of that isntead
19:52:27 sean-k-mooney so i htink the cross job is actully doign the right thing
19:52:31 sean-k-mooney and the bug is in nova
19:52:46 sean-k-mooney our functional test shoudl not fail with the released version of placement
19:52:57 sean-k-mooney haleyb: its failign for me locally as well
19:53:14 sean-k-mooney its only passign in ci beasue that is usign master
19:54:07 sean-k-mooney so the correct fix i think is to revert the nova patch and either update it ot degrade gracfully if the option is not aviable or wait to merge it until we have released a new version fo placement
19:54:40 sean-k-mooney ill push a patch quickly to catch the NoSuchGroupError error quickly
19:57:47 haleyb sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks, i pushed more of a test patch in requirements, but will -W it, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/966630
20:03:39 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: allow funtional test to run with released placment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966631
20:03:56 sean-k-mooney haleyb: i think ^ would fix it properly
20:04:44 sean-k-mooney im testing that locally now
20:05:22 haleyb sean-k-mooney: thanks, if that works guess you can add a Closes-bug there
20:05:44 sean-k-mooney yep is there one fileed
20:06:00 haleyb https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2131032
20:06:36 sean-k-mooney ah right you linked that before
20:07:11 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: allow funtional test to run with released placment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966631
20:07:26 haleyb i tried to be thorough :)
20:08:04 sean-k-mooney as this is a test only change it jsut runs the tox jobs so it will be pretty quick to report back
20:08:35 sean-k-mooney well quick for nova :)
20:10:51 haleyb yeah, the one i proposed to requirements is already 30% done, can propose one that just relies on your change later as a second test
20:15:46 sean-k-mooney functional: OK (639.38=setup[32.16]+cmd[605.77,1.46] seconds)
20:16:21 sean-k-mooney cool so that worked im going go go eat but melwitt dansmith if your about could you take a look at ^ to ublock the requiremetns gate
20:17:08 sean-k-mooney or gmaan ^
20:24:24 gmaan checking
20:31:27 gmaan sean-k-mooney: haleyb did we test it in requirement repo? i mean anything else not failing in nova cross job in requirement gate?
20:34:17 haleyb gmaan: i was going to update my test patch to depend on it, just waiting for results from my original change, but all the failures seem to have the same backtrace

Earlier   Later