| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-10-08 | |||
| 06:13:49 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477 | |
| 06:20:22 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771 | |
| 06:20:22 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021 | |
| 06:20:23 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975 | |
| 06:20:23 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629 | |
| 06:20:24 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add documentation and reno for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962889 | |
| 06:20:24 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052 | |
| 06:20:25 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477 | |
| 06:46:24 | opendevreview | Nicolai Ruckel proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve UEFI NVRAM variable store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959682 | |
| 06:47:41 | opendevreview | Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: Fix 'nova-manage image_property set' command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963348 | |
| 07:14:11 | jlejeune | hello all, can someone may have time to check my change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963156 please ? | |
| 07:51:29 | bauzas | jlejeune: looking | |
| 07:55:37 | jlejeune | bauzas: thanks, it's the first step to help me to reproduce the bug#2085135 | |
| 07:56:10 | bauzas | jlejeune: ack, I don't have a context, so this is related to a bug ? | |
| 07:57:01 | jlejeune | yes, that one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2085135 | |
| 08:00:04 | jlejeune | like explained in my commit message, I noticed that in tests, we don't update the mapped field of compute nodes after creating their mapping object, and I think we should, like it's done here: https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/commit/cc742602bcdeff185ff120452e4f301398f6aa7b/nova/objects/host_mapping.py#L209 | |
| 08:13:19 | jlejeune | bauzas: I've replied to your comments | |
| 08:16:37 | bauzas | cool will look | |
| 08:19:12 | bauzas | jlejeune: ah right, thanks, you were right about the fact we need to call twice the ServiceFixture but could you please add the bug report in the commit msg ? | |
| 08:33:08 | opendevreview | Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Update start_service() function in test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963156 | |
| 08:34:23 | jlejeune | bauzas: done | |
| 08:34:40 | bauzas | jlejeune: thanks, will do another round | |
| 08:37:20 | bauzas | jlejeune: I'm just looking now at what lookups for context nested cell cache | |
| 08:42:32 | jlejeune | thanks bauzas ! | |
| 09:15:38 | jlejeune | bauzas: do I need to ask for more reviews from another core devs ? | |
| 09:17:20 | bauzas | hopefully no :) | |
| 09:17:37 | bauzas | I have more time for this cycle upstream \o/ | |
| 09:35:13 | jlejeune | bauzas: ok, cool :) | |
| 10:28:10 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add a regression test for ImagePropsWeigher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963357 | |
| 10:28:11 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Fix fill_metadata usage for the ImagePropertiesWeigher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963358 | |
| 10:57:02 | opendevreview | Pavlo Shchelokovskyy proposed openstack/nova master: Return Conflict from attach_interface when no PCI slots https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963363 | |
| 10:57:43 | sean-k-mooney | jlejeune: on i remeber this bug report, so ok you making the test setup work more like reality with the cell db update and adjusting the two test that fail as a sidefect. | |
| 11:21:03 | jlejeune | sean-k-mooney: exactly, thanks for your votes | |
| 11:21:29 | jlejeune | I'm going to push my new regression test when that first change will be merged | |
| 11:35:31 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Update start_service() function in test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963156 | |
| 11:45:41 | opendevreview | Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#2085135 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963368 | |
| 11:48:27 | jlejeune | bauzas: sean-k-mooney: here it is ^ | |
| 11:53:45 | sean-k-mooney | can you rebase the fix change on top of the repoducer. regression test shoudl idealy be in the regression folder in a file named test_bug_#######.py | |
| 11:59:47 | opendevreview | Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Reset the mapped field of nodes at service deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933022 | |
| 12:00:40 | jlejeune | done for the rebase | |
| 12:02:52 | sean-k-mooney | that does not seem to be rebased on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963368 | |
| 12:03:13 | sean-k-mooney | so i was expectign to see that with the rebase it would fial in ci | |
| 12:03:40 | sean-k-mooney | until you later update it to modify the regression test to nolonger assert that the excption is raised | |
| 12:07:37 | jlejeune | for me it made more sense to put it in test_host_mapping module but I can move it in a dedicated module if you insist | |
| 12:09:29 | gibi | bauzas: can you look back to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/947260 I promise it is very simple | |
| 12:10:25 | bauzas | gibi: thanks for the reminder | |
| 12:10:26 | bauzas | did it | |
| 12:12:48 | gibi | thanks | |
| 12:19:08 | opendevreview | Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#2085135 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963368 | |
| 12:20:27 | opendevreview | Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Adds regression test for bug LP#2085135 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/963368 | |
| 12:25:07 | opendevreview | Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Reset the mapped field of nodes at service deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933022 | |
| 12:29:14 | opendevreview | Julien Le Jeune proposed openstack/nova master: Reset the mapped field of nodes at service deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/933022 | |
| 12:29:18 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Inline _consolidate_allocation_requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963052 | |
| 12:29:18 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Prune a_c search space by invalid prefixes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/962776 | |
| 12:29:19 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Release notes for bug/2126751 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963275 | |
| 12:52:25 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Inline _consolidate_allocation_requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963052 | |
| 12:52:25 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Prune a_c search space by invalid prefixes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/962776 | |
| 12:52:26 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Release notes for bug/2126751 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963275 | |
| 12:55:11 | gibi | dansmith: I fixed the comments and replied to you questions | |
| 12:56:52 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Release notes for bug/2126751 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963275 | |
| 13:03:58 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement stable/2025.2: Remove excessive logging from GET a_c https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963382 | |
| 13:04:38 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement stable/2025.1: Remove excessive logging from GET a_c https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963383 | |
| 13:05:07 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement stable/2024.2: Remove excessive logging from GET a_c https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963384 | |
| 13:26:48 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Prune a_c search space by invalid prefixes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/962776 | |
| 13:26:49 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Release notes for bug/2126751 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963275 | |
| 13:26:49 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Inline _consolidate_allocation_requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963052 | |
| 13:41:54 | dansmith | gibi: replied | |
| 13:52:10 | bauzas | dansmith: not sure you saw it, but I eventually found the solution so please review that series : https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2125935%22 | |
| 13:53:06 | bauzas | btw. I lol'd when I saw BTTF2 and BTTF1 (the best movies <3) | |
| 13:53:21 | bauzas | s/BTTF2/BTTF3 | |
| 13:56:08 | dansmith | there is more BTTF trivia sprinkled (by me) through our tests, FYI... but yep, will look in a bit | |
| 13:59:54 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 14:10:06 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Prune a_c search space by invalid prefixes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/962776 | |
| 14:10:07 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Release notes for bug/2126751 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963275 | |
| 14:10:07 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Inline _consolidate_allocation_requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/963052 | |
| 14:10:38 | gibi | dansmith: thanks. I think everything is fixed now ^^ | |
| 14:25:24 | dansmith | gibi: just one more nit.. just ooooooone more | |
| 14:25:29 | dansmith | (not really) | |
| 14:26:34 | gibi | :) | |
| 14:26:38 | gibi | thanks | |
| 14:28:06 | dansmith | gibi: so the inlining patch.. is that really a big benefit? | |
| 14:29:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Remove nova.service.process_launcher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/947260 | |
| 14:30:16 | gibi | yep it can half runtime or bigger configs like for for a compute with 21 devs and a flavor with 21 devs requested | |
| 14:30:22 | gibi | s/or/for/ | |
| 14:30:36 | dansmith | but why? just overhead for the function call? | |
| 14:30:51 | dansmith | (few minutes late to the eventlet call, fyi) | |
| 14:31:16 | gibi | it is not just inlining the call it is avoiding recalculation of things by re-using intermediate data and relying on the fact that the logic behind the call is cumulative | |
| 14:33:30 | dansmith | okay, would we get most of the benefit by just making a better function instead of having to inline? I haven't looked at it in detail yet, so.. | |
| 15:16:58 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: dansmith i belive this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/679385 was related to that work but its not the optimistation i was refering too | |
| 15:18:42 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: https://blog.leafe.com/graph-database-follow-up/ this describes one of the experiment | |
| 15:20:11 | sean-k-mooney | oh it was tetsuro that was workign on this | |
| 15:20:41 | sean-k-mooney | ya i remeber taliksing about graphql as well i belvie this was all arount th time of the second vancouver summit | |
| 15:23:57 | gibi | I remember the room where Ed showed his trials but I cannot associate a city to the room :) | |
| 15:28:44 | sean-k-mooney | it may have been the second denver one also | |
| 15:28:53 | sean-k-mooney | it was one of the last in person ones | |
| 15:32:06 | sean-k-mooney | but ya the preor post had some imperssin ve early showing https://blog.leafe.com/placement-graph-examples/ honestly whyile i do think adopting a graph based db on teh backend might ultimpalty make sense. moving an existing cloud and supproting the full api of placemetn with its special cases liek memerof ectra woudl be non trivail to do | |
| 15:33:23 | sean-k-mooney | neo4j is perhapse even more popular today the it was back then with the riase of llms and rag | |
| 15:33:33 | sean-k-mooney | but java is less so | |
| 16:15:01 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-resource-classes master: Drop basepython https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/962806 | |
| 17:11:12 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Remove remaining basepython https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/962804 | |