| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2025-10-01 | |||
| 20:51:02 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483 | |
| 20:51:02 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LibvirtLiveMigrateData https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952628 | |
| 20:51:03 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021 | |
| 20:51:03 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: bump service version and require it for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962051 | |
| 20:51:04 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771 | |
| 20:51:05 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975 | |
| 20:51:05 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629 | |
| 20:51:07 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477 | |
| 20:51:07 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052 | |
| 23:51:20 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2025-10-02 | |||
| 07:15:21 | jlejeune1 | hello, now that 2025.2 is out, I would like to have new reviews for my backports please: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug-2044235%22 :) | |
| 09:43:24 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Reproduce GET a_c slowness https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/962596 | |
| 09:43:25 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Prune search space with invalid prefixes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/962776 | |
| 09:43:25 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/placement master: Remove excessive logging from GET a_c https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/962775 | |
| 09:45:05 | gibi | dansmith: sean-k-mooney: ^^ this helps if we keep max_allocation_candidates <= 1000 . I will test it in devstack next. I know that it is uggly and I have intention to clean it up as much as possible | |
| 09:45:33 | gibi | I just need proof first that it helps my customer as well | |
| 09:46:17 | sean-k-mooney[m] | cool ill take a look | |
| 09:46:54 | sean-k-mooney[m] | ugly and works reliably is better then broken at least in the short to medium term | |
| 09:49:03 | sean-k-mooney[m] | without buying in to any of the graphql hype i do wonder if there are larger refactors we may want to look at eventually. i know there was an experimetn to see if more could be done in sql in the past bt i dont know if that ever landed | |
| 09:52:51 | sean-k-mooney[m] | gibi: one comment can you keep the assisted-By in the commit message only. i really dont think that belongs in commetnt or doc strings | |
| 09:56:44 | sean-k-mooney[m] | gibi also that is not that ugly you just created your own product generatior, when you said ugly i was expectign somthing much more hack ish although im not a huge fan of the while true. i need to step away breifly but ill read it propler when i get back | |
| 10:02:37 | stephenfin | gibi: sean-k-mooney[m]: Can you review this test-only change? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951744 | |
| 10:03:31 | stephenfin | I'm trying to remove keystoneclient from keystonemiddleware, and lajoskatona is trying to remove python-neutronclient, so this will (hopefully) break at some point | |
| 10:54:28 | sean-k-mooney | ack that makes sense to me | |
| 11:05:17 | gibi | sean-k-mooney[m]: I agree. I will move the assisted by tag to the commit message | |
| 11:06:06 | gibi | stephenfin: +2+A | |
| 11:06:16 | stephenfin | ty | |
| 11:31:43 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: sambork: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962478/2 see comment in line i think we are leakying that executor between test runs | |
| 11:32:12 | sean-k-mooney | im happy to proceed with teh first 2 nova-conductor native threading patchs for what its worth but the third i think has a bug | |
| 11:49:22 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: lets procede with the first two for now while Kamil checks the refactor. dansmith could you review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962478 ? | |
| 12:07:51 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: tests: Replace keystoneclient with keystoneauth1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/951744 | |
| 12:16:15 | zigo | stephenfin: Thanks for taking over https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/962487 ! | |
| 12:16:19 | zigo | Much appreciated. | |
| 12:16:42 | stephenfin | nw, actually need to approve that | |
| 13:40:28 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Switch nova-conductor to use ThreadPoolExecutor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957088 | |
| 14:03:24 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/placement master: Remove remaining basepython https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/962804 | |
| 14:04:26 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-traits master: Drop basepython https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/962805 | |
| 14:04:49 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-resource-classes master: Drop basepython https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/962806 | |
| 14:05:29 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-resource-classes master: Drop basepython https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/962806 | |
| 14:05:45 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-traits master: Drop basepython https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/962805 | |
| 14:10:45 | tkajinam | anyone care to merge these trivial changes ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/947488 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/932878 | |
| 14:17:08 | sean-k-mooney | done | |
| 14:17:22 | sean-k-mooney | well for the last 2 | |
| 14:17:27 | gibi | done | |
| 14:17:34 | gibi | ahh | |
| 14:17:38 | tkajinam | thanks both ! | |
| 14:17:44 | gibi | :) | |
| 14:18:14 | sean-k-mooney | the basepython thing we can do | |
| 14:18:22 | sean-k-mooney | but it also will nto break anything if we never do it | |
| 14:18:44 | sean-k-mooney | so ill look at it eventually but i need to go rebase things | |
| 14:18:55 | sean-k-mooney | so ill try to remember to loop back | |
| 14:24:21 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-resource-classes master: Drop unnecessary 'x' bit from doc config file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/932878 | |
| 14:31:56 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-resource-classes master: Replace UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-resource-classes/+/947488 | |
| 15:50:25 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-traits master: Drop basepython https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/962805 | |
| 15:55:17 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Run nova-conductor in native threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958575 | |
| 16:18:33 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: after some desperate reading in n-client, neutron and nova I think the exotic exceptions like IpAddressGenerationFailureClient & ExternalIpAddressExhaustedClient and all similar ones are not really used anymore | |
| 16:18:51 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962604/1/nova/network/neutron.py#b3099 | |
| 16:20:14 | lajoskatona | as I see the method allocate_floating_ip is only called from nova/api/openstack/compute/floating_ips.py which is if I understand well is the deprecated FIP API in Nova which calls to Neutron (https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/#floating-ips-os-floating-ips-deprecated ) | |
| 16:20:53 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: am I thinking the right way or I am totally lost in how these API exceptions work? | |
| 16:22:57 | lajoskatona | I checked on the Neutron side and for IpAddressGenerationFailureClient for example that catches the Neutron ipam http "exception" https://opendev.org/openstack/neutron/src/branch/master/neutron/ipam/exceptions.py#L62 | |
| 16:25:22 | lajoskatona | I am not sure how that is done to tell the truth, but anyway the Neutron ipam IpAddressGenerationFailure 's base is Conflict so I can check the inside of the SDK ConflictException to check for msg "No more IP addresses available for subnet..." | |
| 16:27:14 | sean-k-mooney | lajoskatona: ack reading back | |
| 16:28:05 | lajoskatona | so summary (I think) 1.) part of these exception consumer methods are for deprecated Nova APIs (/os-floating-ips) 2.) it seems that as Neutron packs the msg of the http rsp with definite msg (like "No more IP addresses available for subnet....") I can catch these messages and raise different nova exceptions back based on the message | |
| 16:28:41 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: thanks, it is a summary for myself also to not forget it for tomorrow :-) | |
| 16:28:57 | sean-k-mooney | lajoskatona: i belive you are correct that is is realted to the porxy apis | |
| 16:29:10 | sean-k-mooney | nova does not to my knowlage allcoate floating ips internally | |
| 16:29:22 | sean-k-mooney | so i cant think of any other reasonable usage of those methods | |
| 16:30:01 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: ack, so the possibility that I break something important is lower :-) | |
| 16:30:15 | lajoskatona | that is always good news .... | |
| 16:32:21 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:33:06 | sean-k-mooney | the other thing to consier is while the error code is part of the api contract the exact details of the error message isnt nessisarly part of it | |
| 16:33:40 | sean-k-mooney | so if we anted to make these proxy apis bevhve a little more like neturon wew could but if we can do the convertion without a visible impact that is stil probly better | |
| 17:06:28 | noonedeadpunk | hey folks! I've spotted that there's a spec regarding iothreads for virto-blk lying here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/951636 | |
| 17:06:43 | noonedeadpunk | which should be placed to 2026.1 I guess | |
| 17:06:51 | noonedeadpunk | But I have a different, but related question | |
| 17:07:33 | noonedeadpunk | I've spotted there's also an scsi blueprint without spec: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-add-support-for-virtio-scsi-multiqueue | |
| 17:09:19 | noonedeadpunk | it seems that these 2 should not be conflicting with each other and I assume both can be implemented? | |
| 17:11:14 | noonedeadpunk | as if I'm not mistaken, that Windows virtio-blk driver is always a single queue, so the way to get any disk performance on windows would be to have scsi and multiqueue there | |
| 17:16:15 | noonedeadpunk | jsut trying to validate if I'm sane and can proceed to working on spec :) | |
| 17:16:27 | noonedeadpunk | (or it could be specless one) | |
| 17:17:39 | dansmith | noonedeadpunk: we have at least three things that are all related, so probably best to have a PTG discussion on it | |
| 17:18:02 | dansmith | domain iothreads, device iothread pinning, and any of these queue things are probably related enough to combine into a single conversation | |
| 17:18:05 | noonedeadpunk | also ports multique I guess? | |
| 17:18:16 | noonedeadpunk | yeah | |
| 17:18:20 | noonedeadpunk | fair enough | |
| 19:47:20 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477 | |
| 20:10:26 | sean-k-mooney | noonedeadpunk: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/953940 i sthe related one that we created to try and scope down the propsoal to make some progres in 2025.2 but that also got hit by spec freeze | |
| 20:11:31 | sean-k-mooney | noonedeadpunk: im hoping that Masahito will pick up the prosal again this cycle if they have time | |
| 20:12:59 | sean-k-mooney | this was the other thing they were interested in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/938823 | |
| 20:14:04 | sean-k-mooney | so there multiple iothreds, mapping disk queues to iothread and filterign service by netwrok id | |
| 20:14:14 | sean-k-mooney | i dont know which is there priority | |
| 20:15:56 | sean-k-mooney | noonedeadpunk: im just siging off for today but i assuem you want to progress the live migration concurncy feture as well in 2026.1 | |
| 20:16:12 | sean-k-mooney | i know there was some code up for that but i lost track for where that review was | |
| 20:16:44 | sean-k-mooney | noonedeadpunk: this was your spec for that https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/955783 | |
| 20:17:01 | sean-k-mooney | but i also belive there was a specless blueprint approved indepently? | |
| 20:18:19 | sean-k-mooney | this was your bluepint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-parallel-migrate but https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-migrate-parallel | |
| 20:18:29 | sean-k-mooney | was appoved then deferd | |
| 20:20:03 | sean-k-mooney | noonedeadpunk: so we currently have two competing propsoals for this one form you and another form Fabian Wiesel | |
| 20:22:58 | sean-k-mooney | noonedeadpunk: given they have revierd and +1 your versiohn i assume yours is the one that we inteded ot proceed with but we shoudl abandon one fo them and if decied if its goign to be specless or requrie a spec | |
| 20:24:41 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: fyi ^ do you have any prefernce on which of the two blueprint we use and if we want to proceed specless or not | |