Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-09-23
16:53:50 gibi looking at my company calendar, wednesday is out if during the winter the meeting moves to 17:00 CET
16:53:56 bauzas I guess we need to discuss that again next week
16:54:26 bauzas Uggla: maybe you should start writing an email thread, just explaining your problems
16:54:30 gibi monday might work company wise
16:54:42 bauzas and then we'll try to find a solution cooperatively :)
16:54:42 Uggla not with daylight
16:54:52 Uggla for monday
16:55:52 Uggla bauzas sure.
16:57:38 gibi I'm dropping. Sorry.
16:57:42 Uggla Ok lets stop
16:58:01 Uggla at least I manage to remove the Friday option.
16:59:46 Uggla ok time to close. Thanks everyone.
16:59:51 elodilles (and note that daylight saving time switching is on different dates for example for US and EU folks)
16:59:52 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-23-16.01.log.html
16:59:52 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-23-16.01.html
16:59:52 Uggla #endmeeting
16:59:52 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-09-23-16.01.txt
16:59:52 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Sep 23 16:59:52 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
17:01:12 elodilles hence, unfortunately sticking to UTC is probably the most straightforward :/
17:01:29 elodilles in my opinion
17:22:55 Uggla elodilles with all our internal meetings + daylight + reasonable time (not too late), I'm struggling to find a single day that works. :(
17:24:54 Uggla What I know is Tuesday is the worst, so we need to change.
21:11:51 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `user` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942502
21:11:51 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941795
21:11:52 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add vtpm_secret_(uuid|value) to LibvirtLiveMigrateData https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952628
21:11:52 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `host` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/941483
21:11:53 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support instances with `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942021
21:11:53 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: bump service version and require it for live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962051
21:11:54 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: support live migration of `deployment` secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925771
21:11:55 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: add late check for supported TPM secret security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956975
21:11:55 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: TPM: test live migration between hosts with different security https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952629
21:11:57 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM vtpm tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477
21:11:57 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: WIP Opt-in to new TPM secret security via resize https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962052
21:55:15 clarkb zigo: is that with python3.13 too?
21:55:21 zigo Yeah.
21:55:22 clarkb exciting
21:55:36 zigo Well, I got Epoxy on official Debian under 3.13, and it works ...
21:56:12 zigo Release day is when? Tomorrow?
#openstack-nova - 2025-09-24
07:37:34 Uggla zigo release of F should be next week.
07:38:01 gibi zigo: nice!
07:39:07 Uggla zigo yep thx for the testing, that's cool !
07:43:53 lajoskatona Uggla: Hi, just would like to highlight that the first green patch for migrating from neutronclient to SDK is ready: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928022 , I plan to migrate the remaining calls (like subnets, ports, sec_groups....) also (I hope I will have time for it)
07:45:21 Uggla lajoskatona cool good news
09:30:49 gokhan__ hello folks, is there a way to rescue openstack windows instance ?
09:32:18 gokhan__ What values should I set for the hw_rescue_device and hw_rescue_bus image properties for Windows instances in OpenStack?
10:22:06 jssfr gokhan__, that probably depends on what image you want to use for rescuing?
10:22:28 jssfr if it's a windows image, I'd suggest to try a sata CDROM as bus (I think virtio still needs specific drivers on windows, so I'd stay away from that)
10:27:12 elodilles Uggla: I'm about to check and generate last-minute RCs where needed, and I see that nova has a merged bug fix on stable/2025.2 already. do you consider that bug release critical? should I generate an RC2 for that? (the bug fix is: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961804 )
10:45:51 gokhan__ jssfr, I am using windows server 2019 qcow2 image and I want to give this image also as rescue disk image.
10:51:37 jssfr gokhan__, then I'd go for hw_rescue_device=cdrom and hw_rescue_bus= ... hm, sata is not an option, then I'd first try scsi and if that doesn't work usb.
10:52:22 gokhan__ hw_rescue_device
10:52:22 gokhan__ sata didn't work jssfr
10:52:22 gokhan__ hw_rescue_bus
10:52:22 gokhan__ cdrom
10:54:07 jssfr gokhan__, yeah, I just noticed sata is not an option. try scsi and if that doesn't work, try usb.
11:00:31 gokhan__ jssfr, ok I will try with different options. may be if hw_rescue_device=cdrom we need to use .iso image.
11:46:10 gokhan__ jssfr, with windows 2019 server image iso hw_rescue_device=cdrom and hw_rescue_bus=scsi worked. I can see console. But when I try to repair instance it didn't worked. it can't show disks. it says no disk to repair
12:01:40 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add a spec for 2026.1 for libvirt launching Arm CCA instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/960777
12:05:47 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add a spec for 2026.1 for libvirt launching Arm CCA instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/960777
12:12:55 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add a spec for 2026.1 for libvirt launching Arm CCA instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/960777
12:18:34 ykarel_ uptime
13:03:28 gibi Copy conference info
13:03:28 gibi content_copy
13:03:28 gibi fyi eventlet sync in ~90 minutes meet.google.com/bcy-uqoz-hje
13:03:28 gibi 
13:03:40 gibi baad copy past buffer, baaad :)
13:03:53 gibi but the link is correct
13:38:44 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [hacking] N374 do not use time.sleep(0) to yield https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/950992
13:39:32 gibi stephenfin: thanks. Good catch of my sloppy conflict resolution on ^^. I fixed it up
14:12:14 bauzas gibi: can't join the eventlet meeting unfortunately :(
14:12:19 gibi bauzas: no worries
14:12:42 gibi the doc has some links and text about where we are if you later want to take a look
14:17:30 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron subnets https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/962190
14:17:30 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928022
14:19:22 dansmith I've not made much progress on my thing in the last week due to other distractions
14:22:18 gibi same here. but I want to get back to the rally stuff this week finally
14:26:13 gibi btw, for me devstack in 24.04 in a VM generates strangely high io load recently. So high that it affects the normla use of the host. I'm not seem to able to pinpoint the source in the VM. I rolled back libvirt and qemu to pre sept 16 version in sid and that seems to help at least to get it back to unnoticed if I don't measure it. Maybe it is also related of my use of iommu and IGB for SRIOV...
14:28:03 gibi so that is anoher reason I did not progress with rally :)
14:42:23 tkajinam Can we merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/935121 ? (post unmaintained transition change, kept for some time)
14:42:58 gibi tkajinam: done
14:43:11 tkajinam gibi, thx !
14:54:24 opendevreview Merged openstack/osc-placement master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/2023.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/935121
14:56:54 atmark hello, is nova host-evacuate-live concurrent or serial?
15:07:15 tkajinam atmark, API calls by cli would be done in serial but the operation is asynchronous so actual migration may be run concurrently.
15:07:48 tkajinam atmark, note that the max_concurrent_live_migrations option controls how a single nova-compute can run live migration concurrently so by default it processes multiple live migration requests one by one
15:07:52 tkajinam unless you tune it
15:18:05 opendevreview Jonas Schäfer proposed openstack/nova master: Preserve vTPM state between power off and power on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955657
15:37:39 melwitt bauzas, dansmith: for your awareness, the spec re-proposal for vtpm live migration is available for review at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/961564 and the updated patch series is at https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/vtpm-live-migration%22+is:open
15:37:55 bauzas ack, will try to review it shortly
15:38:17 melwitt ty
15:38:52 dansmith melwitt: I know, I've had the notification marked in my client to follow up, I just keep ... not
15:38:57 dansmith sorry
15:39:57 melwitt dansmith: sure np
15:44:58 melwitt it when they are back
15:44:58 melwitt for tempest testing I have https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/955969 proposed and I will be adding a test to it for the resize-opt-in. I have also been trying to get vtpm to work with regular tempest but have been unsuccessful. I have got all the setup in place but the guest crashes in qemu and I can't find why. they work fine in whitebox obvs but regular tempest no. I will probably ask sean-k-mooney about
15:47:57 dansmith by "regular tempest" do you mean in an upstream job?
15:50:09 melwitt yes
15:50:30 melwitt the unsuccess is here at the top of the series https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477
15:51:17 melwitt it gets tpm enabled in the capabilities and everything and the guest xml properly gets the tpm device in it but the guest just crashes when it tries to start, example: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/35be637426de4f7db36e56d76c554964/log/compute1/logs/libvirt/libvirt/qemu/instance-00000003_log.txt
15:52:08 melwitt the regular tempest patch is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/957475 and what I linked above is the nova patch that depends-on it to see if it could work

Earlier   Later