Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-09-19
07:07:25 gibi jlejeune: on it
07:08:07 jlejeune thanks :)
07:11:26 gibi jlejeune: maybe its me but I only see the regression test being backported there. do you have the actual fix backported on top of that as well?
07:12:55 jlejeune yes but I haven't yet create the changes, doing
07:14:44 gibi OK. I'm +2 on the regression test backports. Feel free to ping me when the fix backports are up.
07:14:57 jlejeune perfect
07:36:11 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Adds regression test for bug LP#2044235 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961601
07:36:12 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961774
07:40:47 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961775
07:41:55 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: nova-conductor puts instance in error state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961778
07:42:57 jlejeune gibi: here there are ^
07:47:33 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Reproduce bug/2115905 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960241
08:02:55 gibi jlejeune: thanks
08:06:16 gibi jlejeune: one small suggestion, you can put all these to the same gerrit topic that was used for the original bugfix so it is easy to see the list of backports in a single query
08:30:53 jlejeune gibi: indeed, can I add a topic after having created the change ?
08:33:30 gibi jlejeune: yes on the web UI you can add it by hand
08:40:04 jlejeune nice, done :)
08:46:44 gibi jlejeune: thanks
08:47:11 gibi elodilles: there is a simple clean backport series from jlejeune in https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug-2044235%22 if you have time :)
08:48:05 elodilles gibi: ACK, will add it to my TODO :]
08:48:12 gibi elodilles: thanks!
08:50:34 gibi Uggla: (and others) I kept monitoring the nova-tox-py312-threading job to see if we have unexplained failures. I found three cases where this job failed but the eventlet based unit test job does not. I filed a bug and I will patch the ignore list to not run these two test cases until I have time to go back to burning down that ignore list https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2125185
08:51:23 gibi If anybody sees a nova-tox-py312-threading run that fails while the normal unit test job passes then please let me know
08:53:39 Uggla gibi, ok I think we could share this in our next meeting and follow up on it if you wish.
08:57:24 gibi sure I will try to remember of it in the next meeting j)
08:57:25 gibi :)
09:00:16 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [nova-tox-py312-threading]Ignore failing tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961781
09:00:33 gibi Uggla: ^^ this is the immediate fix
09:00:51 Uggla 👍
09:00:52 gibi bauzas: sean-k-mooney: ^^ if you are around this fix a small gate instability
09:31:47 bauzas gibi: looking (sorry was on meeting)
09:32:27 bauzas gibi: thanks for continuing looking at our CI <3
09:33:08 gibi yeah I feel like I introduced a voting job so I responsible keeping that job in good health :)
11:22:37 sean-k-mooney gibi: done
11:23:26 sean-k-mooney gibi: sorry was not around in my morning today
12:03:13 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks, and no worries :)
12:15:47 gibi heads up I saw multiple multinode job failing due to the fact that the subnode nova-compute cannot connet to rabbit.
12:16:34 gibi maybe it is intermitten infra issue but if you also see it happening on your patches then it might worth to report to infra
12:17:31 frickler gibi: infra is watching you already ;) do you have an example I could look at?
12:19:42 sean-k-mooney gibi: the last tim ethat happend it was a build where the nodes came form 2 diffent providers
12:20:01 sean-k-mooney so it woudl be good to check if all nodes came form the same provider in that failed job run
12:20:54 gibi frickler: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/488552424c654e2e8a4d8c5cb82f02a0/logs
12:21:12 gibi frickler: and thanks for keeping an eye on it (on me?!)
12:22:02 frickler sean-k-mooney: yes, that was one of my ideas, but both from sjc3 in the above case
12:22:11 sean-k-mooney https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/488552424c654e2e8a4d8c5cb82f02a0/log/zuul-info/inventory.yaml
12:22:19 sean-k-mooney they are both form raxflex
12:22:40 sean-k-mooney https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/488552424c654e2e8a4d8c5cb82f02a0/log/zuul-info/inventory.yaml#320
12:22:44 sean-k-mooney so it not that htis time
12:22:53 gibi https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7055bb2bfcb84b6388f67ad3181f8043 this was the another case I hit today
12:24:49 sean-k-mooney frickler: the two node might be in diffent subnets
12:25:15 sean-k-mooney im not sure what the cider is but once is sueing 10.0.16.132 and the other is 10.0.17.239 for the private ip
12:26:23 sean-k-mooney 255.255.240.0
12:26:36 sean-k-mooney ok so they are in a /20 so in the same subnet
12:27:04 sean-k-mooney so there shoudl nto eb any firewalling between the nodes then
12:28:00 sean-k-mooney well assumign they are in the same secuiryt group and we allow access from member of the same secuirty group but i dont think secuirty groups are likely to be the issue here
12:28:07 sean-k-mooney if it was it woudl affect all jobs on that provider
12:28:53 frickler there should not be two ethernet interfaces. we same some changes recently that could cause this. let's move to #opendev
12:29:28 sean-k-mooney ack, ya i notcied there are 2 interface and 2 diffent private ips
12:29:36 sean-k-mooney ack on swaping
12:35:32 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Centralize cooperative yield https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/950991
12:35:33 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [hacking] N374 do not use time.sleep(0) to yield https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/950992
12:40:48 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make RBD Tpool usage conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956089
12:40:48 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Make libvirt Tpool proxying conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956090
12:40:49 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix ProviderTree copying with threading Lock https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956091
12:40:49 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [test]Further categorization of disabled unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956092
12:40:50 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [vncproxy]Handle ssl.wrap_socket removal in py312 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955915
12:40:50 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Warn on long task wait time for executor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952666
12:59:33 bauzas gibi: frickler: I probably have another related failure https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/2ba0b6a8665e4c66883119ca7c602f6a
13:01:14 gibi FYI, next week I want to get back to the normal eventlet sync meeting schedule. I updated the doc with the current status and things that can be reviewed already https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vCOmD7kxmRFk9IG8WbVhyqKlCpOPDZFJgkUSwYdQHbM/edit?tab=t.0
13:07:10 bauzas gibi: cool, I guess that procedurally, we just need another blueprint for the Gazpacho release to be accepted
13:14:19 gibi uhh ohh yeah
13:14:26 gibi I promised to do that
13:14:37 gibi let me remember if I did it already :)
13:15:01 gibi ohh hey I did it https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/eventlet-removal-gazpacho
13:15:46 gibi as acceptance I'm not affraid of asking for it on the next meeting
13:18:32 bauzas cool :)
13:19:09 bauzas lawyer czar, lemme be it :)
13:19:26 bauzas I'm French, I'm naturally leaning towards this role
13:22:42 gibi meeting agend has been amended, French lawsuite suit successfully avoided :)j
13:26:18 bauzas heh
14:17:22 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Add admin context when filling metadata on ImagePropsWeigher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961673
14:21:39 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Regression test for ImagePropsWeigher due to missing context https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961803
14:21:40 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Add admin context when filling metadata on ImagePropsWeigher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961804
14:26:00 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Regression test for ImagePropsWeigher due to missing context https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961805
14:26:01 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Add admin context when filling metadata on ImagePropsWeigher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961806
16:07:04 elodilles gibi jlejeune : the bug fix has landed AFTER stable/2025.2 was cut, so it needs to be cherry picked to stable/2025.2 first :S https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug-2044235
16:09:14 elodilles and note that as long as we are before the Final RC deadline, it should be merged to stable/2025.2 only if this bug is release critical :/
17:49:28 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.1: libvirt: Disable VMCoreInfo device for SEV-encrypted instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/959914
#openstack-nova - 2025-09-21
13:50:38 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: Update contributor guide for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961896
#openstack-nova - 2025-09-22
06:42:11 jlejeune elodilles: hello, I'm just seeing your message from last friday about https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug-2044235%22, so what I have to do as my bug is not critical ? do I have to cherry-pikc anyway on stable/2025.2 ?
07:17:09 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Regression test for ImagePropsWeigher due to missing context https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961803
07:33:53 tkajinam jlejeune, if you aim to backport this to stable branches then you have to cherry-pick these to 2025.2 first (and also update the existing backports to update commit ids mentioned in chery-pciked ... line)
07:34:12 tkajinam cores may decide whether it should/shouldn't be merged during the current rc phase
07:46:12 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928022
08:21:54 jlejeune tkajinam: ok, thanks, I will do it
10:17:40 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Run nova-conductor in native threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958575
10:46:26 opendevreview Ian Watson proposed openstack/nova master: Implementing get_num_instances for ironic virt driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/955685
10:55:11 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: Use SDK for Neutron networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928022
11:00:03 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Add admin context when filling metadata on ImagePropsWeigher https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961804
12:07:31 opendevreview Julien LE JEUNE proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Adds regression test for bug LP#2044235 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/961948

Earlier   Later