Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-08-21
14:29:54 zigo elodilles: I did this one for Antelope: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/958207 though there's no unmaintained/zed branch, how can I do it then?
14:46:16 opendevreview Merged openstack/placement master: sqlalchemy: Use built-in declarative https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/953759
14:54:59 elodilles zigo: thanks for the nova backports, i've found some nits in it, otherwise looks good! see my comments!
14:55:58 elodilles zigo: as watcher is only open for backports till antelope, we cannot test it and post it on zed (and older branches), so antilope is fine there
14:59:51 elodilles zigo: i'll review the watcher patch as well, thanks for that, too!
15:00:52 zigo Fixed according to your suggestions.
15:15:19 elodilles zigo: thanks! though i think you forgot to git push it o:)
15:17:27 elodilles zigo: on the other hand i see that tempest jobs are failing as we use pinned tempest (branchless repository) there, so we probably have to exclude some tests in .zuul.yaml to make the tempest based jobs functional on unmaintained/2023.1
15:25:08 priteau sean-k-mooney: Hello. Could you please review these backports like you did for 2025.1? Thanks! https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/945098 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/945099
15:25:21 priteau Same request for elodilles :)
15:27:38 sean-k-mooney elodilles: there are exactly 3 that will fail
15:28:40 sean-k-mooney elodilles: so you would need to update the regex or backprot and release a new tempest verion to support the unmainted versions
15:28:53 sean-k-mooney elodilles: i think modifying the regex is proably mroe correct
15:31:38 elodilles priteau: ACK, will review in a minute
15:32:50 elodilles sean-k-mooney: backport on tempest is not possible, so yes, the regex is the way-forward i think (see my comment: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958200/2#message-f75c8b173bbd03f257e96a5291b4db82f9b3d4c8 )
15:34:16 sean-k-mooney the proble is that cinder and other project likely also have those tests runnning
15:34:27 sean-k-mooney so the regex change will impact far more then nova
15:46:36 elodilles sean-k-mooney: oh i see :S then probably we have to set the exclude regex in job definition directly, so that will fix more jobs in multiple repositories, though i guess we won't fix everything in one single place :/
16:01:29 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Separate volume, snapshot and volume attachments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952347
16:01:29 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Address issues with images APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956102
16:01:30 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Only apply "soft" additionalProperties validation to requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952936
16:01:30 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Use valid UUIDs for cinder resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952935
16:01:31 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for snapshots APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952349
16:01:31 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for volumes APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952348
16:01:32 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for floating IP APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952972
16:01:32 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for volume attachments APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952350
16:01:33 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for security group APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952973
16:01:34 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server usage audit log APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953209
16:01:34 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for services APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953196
16:01:36 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for simple tenant usage APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956096
16:01:36 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for tenant network APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956088
16:01:38 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for quota class sets API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956140
16:01:38 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for limits API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956139
16:01:40 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for migrations API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956142
16:01:40 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for quota sets API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956141
16:01:42 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server tags API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956144
16:01:42 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server migrations API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956143
16:01:44 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Simplify servers views (1/3) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956231
16:01:44 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server metadata APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956145
16:01:46 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Simplify servers views (3/3) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956233
16:01:46 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Simplify servers views (2/3) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956232
16:01:48 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (2/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956236
16:01:48 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (1/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956234
16:01:50 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (4/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956238
16:01:50 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (3/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956237
16:01:52 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (6/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956240
16:01:52 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for servers APIs (5/6) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956239
16:01:54 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: tests: Invert validation check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956241
16:01:54 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server shares APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956266
16:02:28 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: gmaan: I'd appreciate reviews on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/952347 when you can get to it. That's been the cause of a few rebases now, due to the number of lines it touches (it's just code shuffling but git doesn't know that)
16:03:21 stephenfin and from sean-k-mooney on the one below it (gmaan is already +2 there)
16:18:31 gmaan stephenfin: +2
16:18:38 stephenfin ty
16:21:22 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: api: Fix validators for hw:cpu_max_* extra specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957739
16:21:54 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.2: api: Fix validators for hw:cpu_max_* extra specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957744
16:22:25 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova stable/2024.1: api: Fix validators for hw:cpu_max_* extra specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957745
16:24:15 opendevreview Max proposed openstack/nova master: performance: reduce calls to libvirt / add caching https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922855
17:24:09 opendevreview Masahito Muroi proposed openstack/nova master: Add image_response_extra_properties config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/958230
17:30:00 masahito hi, nova team. We have already used the image properties fields to see our own custom image properties which not listed in the image meta object. if nova keeps showing the properties, it's super helpful. please review the patch if it's not a wrong direction.
18:26:38 melwitt sean-k-mooney: do you know if host domain capabilities like TPM are ever expected to be available in CI? I tried to create some regular tempest TPM tests and it failed bc there was tpm=no in host domain caps
18:27:24 sean-k-mooney you mean upstream
18:27:26 sean-k-mooney it shoudl work
18:27:36 sean-k-mooney vtpm does not depend on havign a tpm on the host
18:27:47 sean-k-mooney youjust need ot have the swtpm package isntalled
18:28:19 sean-k-mooney and ubuntu 24.04 is new enoguht to meet all our requiremetns
18:28:26 sean-k-mooney melwitt: do you have an exampel failure
18:28:46 melwitt uhm yeah, sec
18:29:42 melwitt sean-k-mooney: this, just trying to run only the nova-live-migration job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/957477
18:29:46 melwitt ok I must need some additional setup or such
18:33:28 sean-k-mooney is https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#libvirt.swtpm_enabled set to true
18:34:32 sean-k-mooney ok it is https://fdc1d05a9a337a8993b4-089607d394060d72ce519e30966a0033.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/openstack/4eb4b144eadc47b2848afc0e4ac315c8/controller/logs/etc/nova/nova-cpu_conf.txt
18:34:34 melwitt yes but I don't have the swtpm_user and swtpm_group set, not sure if that matters
18:34:45 sean-k-mooney it shouldnt by default
18:34:45 melwitt I noticed in whitebox it sets those
18:34:56 sean-k-mooney hum is it passign there?
18:35:06 sean-k-mooney the default should work
18:36:05 sean-k-mooney i dont see the swtpm package installed
18:36:09 sean-k-mooney https://fdc1d05a9a337a8993b4-089607d394060d72ce519e30966a0033.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/openstack/4eb4b144eadc47b2848afc0e4ac315c8/controller/logs/dpkg-l.txt
18:36:26 sean-k-mooney i wonder if its a suggested or recomemned package
18:36:37 melwitt yeah when you said that earlier I was thinking I need to add something to install it probablah
18:36:55 sean-k-mooney 25-08-16 18:29:02.173 | alsa-ucm-conf alsa-topology-conf libxml2-utils swtpm swtpm-tools mdevctl
18:37:01 sean-k-mooney so it in recommended
18:37:45 melwitt I shall try it. thanks
18:37:59 sean-k-mooney https://paste.opendev.org/show/bcoAzqGjo8UbLR3JWy1i/
18:38:35 melwitt right next to our friend mdevctl
18:39:22 sean-k-mooney https://github.com/openstack/devstack/blob/master/lib/nova_plugins/functions-libvirt#L72
18:39:26 sean-k-mooney you can add it there
18:39:53 sean-k-mooney proably with mdevctl while yoru at it for good messure
18:40:44 melwitt cool thanks :)
18:41:42 sean-k-mooney i woudl sepcficly add `swtpm swtpm-tools mdevctl`
18:42:05 sean-k-mooney i think the names are the same for centos too but i woudl just do it for ubuntu for now
18:42:31 sean-k-mooney if you submit a patch feel free to add me and ill take a look on monday
18:43:04 sean-k-mooney https://repology.org/project/swtpm/versions
18:43:12 sean-k-mooney swtpm is the same for waht its worth
18:43:23 sean-k-mooney im just not sure about the tools package
18:43:47 sean-k-mooney https://repology.org/project/mdevctl/versions
18:44:06 sean-k-mooney mdevctl also has the same name everywhere we care about
18:45:32 sean-k-mooney https://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=swtpm-tools
18:45:41 sean-k-mooney swtpm-tools looks portable too
18:46:04 sean-k-mooney so you could add all 3 in both branches and just see if the devstack josb pass

Earlier   Later